a3d3f7 No.9873[Last 50 Posts]
well /polpol/ its officially happening, i am sure you've heard about it, this is going to be another media shitstorm and no doubt innocent white people will suffer as a result.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/08/us/south-carolina-officer-is-charged-with-murder-in-black-mans-death.html?_r=0i dont see him being convicted of murder, nigger grabbed for the taser.
also, anyone else think the video looks fake? i mean, i doubt that this is an orchestrated event, but the person filming is so nonchalant, and just so happens to turn on camera at the exact time to catch the nig running but not early enough to film the struggle.
also the cops seem so indifferent to his presence.
idk, probably not a false flag, but it crossed my mind.
4b5476 No.9881
It would be great if whites collectively said who gives a fuck, then went on to give the argument that despite wildly popular belief, black lives usually don't matter.
a3d3f7 No.9882
looks like the nig managed to shoot the taser, this pic looks like the taser coils and prongs attached to the officer.
9eb4e7 No.9884
>>9873> The shooting unfolded after Officer Slager stopped the driver of a Mercedes-Benz with a broken taillight, according to police reports. Mr. Scott ran awayHe didn't do nuffin. Of course, everybody would run the fuck away because a broken taillight.
Also here something you won't hear in future reports:
> Mr. Scott had been arrested about 10 times, mostly for failing to pay child support or show up for court hearings, according to The Post and Courier newspaper of Charleston. He was arrested in 1987 on an assault and battery charge and convicted in 1991 of possession of a bludgeon, the newspaper reported. a3d3f7 No.9886
>>9881if the defense successfully shows that the nig shot the taser, or even managed to apprehend the taser, hes going to be acquitted.
you can expect a major chimpout as a result.
a8a2a6 No.9902
>>9882Someone needs to really analyse this closely because even without freeze-framing it, an object obviously dropped and at the beginning of the tape there seemed to be some type of struggle going on. (Of course if there hand't been a struggle why would the cameraman be walking over like that?)
At the beginning of the tape you can see two objects on the ground. One right near the victim's feet (maybe a rock), the other skidded a bit in back of the police officer.
Later in the tape you can see the police officer picking something up off the ground where those objects had been dropped.
A lawyer left him because of the "struggle over a tazer" claim. But it looks like there might have been a "struggle over a tazer". The policeman may have not known that the tazer dropped and thought the victim had it.
a8a2a6 No.9903
>>9902I mean: a lawyer who had put forth the "struggle over a tazer" claim left him after the video surfaced but the video may make the claim appear possible.
6f16fd No.9904
>>9903>>9902heres webm that seems to show pretty conclusively cop was shot by the taser
a8a2a6 No.9906
>>9904The reason I'm hesitant about that is that the cop would have claimed that. The lawyer would have said that right?
6f16fd No.9907
>>9906theres no trial or press release from cops people yet as far as i know
a8a2a6 No.9908
>>9905Did the cord get entangled in his legs when he ran away and then break off from the tazer?
How does this work?
a8a2a6 No.9909
From the video it looks like the guy running away might have been shuffling a bit to unentangle himself, or he was just getting started running. Tree kinda blocks it.
a8a2a6 No.9910
Ok, now I can absolutely see something on the ground being dragged by the victim as he runs in back of the tree. If you look closely you can see it.
9e9ddc No.9911
>>9873"The officer then runs back toward where the initial scuffle occurred and picks something up off the ground. Moments later, he drops an object near Mr. Scott’s body, the video shows."
This worries me. The cop may have tried to plant evidence. An honest cop would never 'move' evidence unless it had the chance to be damaged or destroyed before forensics could show up. If a civilian moved evidence at the scene of a crime he/she'd end up in jail for tampering with evidence and it seems likely that the piglet will end up worse.
a8a2a6 No.9913
>>9911The problem with this account is that the wires can be seen while the cop is firing his gun. Why are wires attached to the cop when he is firing his gun?
a8a2a6 No.9916
After reading the article it looks more like the cop did do it.
3f5f39 No.9919
>>9916yeah i dont think we're debating whether or not the cop shot him bro
a8a2a6 No.9920
It is slager who claimed to have fired the taser.
a8a2a6 No.9921
>>9919I mean without justification.
9e9ddc No.9922
>>9913Still, tampering with evidence is a crime and it won't be overlooked since it was caught on tape.
073a41 No.9926
>>9911It's clear in the video he drops the object only to pick it up again moments later and put it on his belt at 2:10. So it's probably the taser
>>9905 cf4f38 No.9927
Does this mean what I think it means?
4f868f No.9931
>>9904Seen the full clip several times
Never noticed that before
Disappointed with MSM for not even mentioning this
a8a2a6 No.9934
>>9931The cop claimed to have shot the taser. Though it looks like the taser was shot at the cop.
The police report said he tried to shoot the victim with a taser first.
Some tasers can fire multiple times but why not mention that the victim shot the taser? Why would the cop leave that out?
073a41 No.9937
>>9934Perhaps they both had tasers?
a8a2a6 No.9949
>>9937Cop claimed that he thought victim had taken the taser. (which is possible).
According to nyt the policeman said "Shots fired and the subject is down. He took my Taser".
If you look on the tape he talks to his radio right while he is walking to the body. So this is probably what that is referring to.
Then according to the nyt he eventually went back and got the tazer and brought it over.
So maybe he really thought that the guy had the taser but found no taser at the body and panicked and then planted it.
If the cop was shot by the taser I'm sure he would have mentioned it. Maybe the wires got tangled around him somehow after he shot the victim but there doesn't seem to be any reason to believe he was shot and every reason to believe he wasn't.
a8a2a6 No.9951
>>9949By possible I mean possible that he thought that.
a8a2a6 No.9955
Perhaps another possibility is that the wires were all over the place and he brought the taser to the body because the wires were still tangled in his legs? I don't know anything about tasers so meh.
073a41 No.9957
>>9949Seems like the cop indeed thought the guy had the taser, went back to pick it up, dropped it when he started talking to his partner.
He didn't 'plant' evidence though, he picked up the taser again at 2:10
4f868f No.9959
1) Cop has nig by arm and is reaching for Tazer™
a8a2a6 No.9962
>>9957Well, he could have put it there and realized it was on video and had second thoughts.
4f868f No.9963
2) Nig used escape, cop still has Tazer™
4f868f No.9964
3) Black object lands on ground behind copper, possibly Tazer™, how does it manage to get behind him?
4f868f No.9965
4) Now cop goes for pistola
4f868f No.9967
5) Finally the Tazer™ wire can be seen.
Unless the Strong Independent Black Man was holding the Tazer™ to begin with, I don't see him grabbing it. How does the Tazer™ get beind the cop? Someone explain the events to me.
a8a2a6 No.10023
>>9967One explaination is that the victim never had it. That the policeman threw the taser in back of him and the wire got caught over his right shoulder. The policeman would have done that to have it in a safe spot so he could quickly get rid of it in order to have his hand free to grab the pistol.
a8a2a6 No.10024
>>10023Or maybe it got caught on something attached to his uniform towards the top.
a8a2a6 No.10025
>>10024Actually it would be tangled most likely around his arm.
80383b No.10065
>>9886>you can expect a major chimpout as a result.Oh god please let it happen
e1e64b No.10076
I just think its sad that the average person isn't aware they're being manipulated. Cops have always had a poor reputation for being heavy handed but it's only lately that the media been hyping the racial story ad nausea.
80383b No.10078
>>9967What is that shit on the ground between the two? The video never shows what happened up to that moment. Was he coming at him with a rock or something?
235f42 No.10082
>>10076Yeah that's really the issue, this debatable and frankly confusing scenario is going to by hyped up by media racebaiting and liberal self-hatred, and the chance of figuring out what really went on and maybe having a legitimate legal investigation is going to be minor at best.
fc41fa No.10083
cop was already arrested, so, unlikely.
You need another Garner, where the cop kills a subdued black person and the police chief rightfully rules it as natural causes.
98c12a No.10089
>>9886they chimp out in south carolina you are going to end up with more than one dead nigger
80383b No.10094
>>10025Police dept. saying that the black dude was hit with a taser.
322e0e No.10099
>>9884>possession of a bludgeonWhat, did this happen in Bongistan?
80383b No.10101
>>10099It was likely an aggravating addition to an underlying crime like assault or robbery.
490f1a No.10142
Even if there was a struggle over a Taser, would a cop be legally justified in shooting an unarmed man running away from him?
064cee No.10145
>>10142This.
It's clearly an execution.
e11ba2 No.10148
>>10145Executions are premeditated. This was nothing more than a nigger on the wrong end of a cop's muscle memory.
8bd7e4 No.10152
>>10151
divide and conquer what? whats and niggers? you're a deluded retard if you think the average nigger is compatible with or useful to our cause.
8bd7e4 No.10153
cbc65f No.10155
>>10152No, but senseless hate and bashing on a naturally inferior race doesn't help us either.
Don't be so blinded by your neighborhood pest problems that you can't put out the house fire.
8bd7e4 No.10157
>>10155where is the senseless hate ITT?
5fd7a3 No.10158
>>9873Time to stock up on razor blades
cbc65f No.10160
>>10157Not in this thread, but a lot of old/pol/ would continuously be distracted by laughing at the chimpouts and dindus. Yeah they're disgusting and dangerous and all, but they're not the only issue.
If you spend all day laughing at chimpouts on the internet you might miss the seriously sinister shit, like Jade Helm and such.
cbc65f No.10161
>>10160I should add that I'm not saying we shouldn't have a thread about this, just a word of warning not to let us be overrun by racebaiting. It's a slow killer of boards.
8bd7e4 No.10162
>>10160true, but i dont think laughing at niggers and discussing serious events are mutually exclusive.
also this is /polpol/ and this thread has been pretty objective so far.
80383b No.10169
>>10142Case centers on subjective belief of the cop. If he thought the guy was regrouping and had a hidden gun or something, there would still be justification for shooting the suspect.
f82773 No.10171
>>10152>>10152You're ignoring that the average nigger is not what is possible for the black groups. Most people are trash and have been made completely retarded compared to what is possible for people.
They've been manipulated by the same people who are manipulating you with the same kind of racial division propaganda but aimed towards different groups.
Fighting them is a waste of time/energy and is not going to fix anything. Another enemy will come along as it always has.
cbc65f No.10173
>>10162I know. I'm just being
reactionary.
I've seen too many boards fall to shitposting and meme circlejerks. I approach everything with caution now.
8c09b9 No.10185
Anyone siding with the cop right now is an idiot. He outright shoots the guy several times in the back while he's running away.
There is no controversy here. It's not Michael Brown or little Tray Tray. The cop is clearly in the wrong.
8c09b9 No.10190
>>9884Explain how any of this justifies the shooting.
80383b No.10192
>>10185>Anyone siding with the cop right now is an idiot.All the facts aren't even in yet. You're basing this off a shaky video that shows a fraction of the altercation you shitty troll.
80383b No.10193
>>10190Explain how OJ was set free.
8c09b9 No.10194
>>10192The video clearly shows the cop shooting a man who was running away from him. Unless South Carolina allows a police officer to stop a fleeing suspect with lethal force, he's in the wrong.
>>10193Shitty justice system which exonerates the rich.
57adb1 No.10195
Cop looses when he goes back off screen presumably picking up tazer and then dropping it on perpetrator. He might beat murder rap but still loses on planting evidence
490f1a No.10197
>>10169Okay, thanks. That would seem to be a real stretch here, tbh.
I'll wait for more evidence to come in, but I tend to think this anon has it right
>>10185 242832 No.10198
>>10194But why was he running away from the cop? Probably the cop was a dumbass but that doesn't mean that the dindu din do nuffin.
8c09b9 No.10200
>>10198That's irrelevant.
>Unless South Carolina allows a police officer to stop a fleeing suspect with lethal force, he's in the wrong. 80383b No.10201
>>10200Except that's wrong.
8c09b9 No.10204
>>10201Okay, how? Explain how, unless South Carolina allows an officer to stop a fleeing suspect with lethal force, he would be in the right to use lethal force against a fleeing suspect, which he clearly did. Though I'm certain the law allows it if the officer has reasons to believe the suspect is armed and planning to harm or kill someone, this video shows the cop has no reason to believe such a thing.
80383b No.10205
>>10194>The video clearly shows the cop shooting a man who was running away from him. No one is arguing whether the officer shot him, that should be obvious even to you. The question is whether it was justifiable, and a conviction will not center on this video alone without the cop's side of the story about the facts leading up to what is contained in the video.
80383b No.10207
>>10204A law as you describe wouldn't matter. It would be unconstitutional. It's wrong as I stated here
>>10169Burden is now on whether it was justified self-defense.
8c09b9 No.10209
>>10205
>The question is whether it was justifiable>Unless South Carolina allows a police officer to stop a fleeing suspect with lethal force, he's in the wrong. 8c09b9 No.10210
>>10207Then the cop would have to have a fucking good excuse to think the guy was running away to go get a gun and come back to shoot him.
8c09b9 No.10214
Not me, copy pasting it from somewhere else:
Source: I'm an ex-cop
I worked in Texas so the laws may be slightly different but in general there's very few times you can shoot someone whose just running away. If the suspect was running and you could articulate that by escaping he would constitute a real, deadly threat to the public then you can use lethal force. So, think, terrorist bomber running away or a serial killer. An example given in my training was a husband who you knew had access to a gun in his truck, had made threats to kill his wife and was currently running towards said truck and about to be able to get away from you (and thus potentially kill his wife). As you can imagine these scenarios are few and far between and the one in this video (baring an additional facts) doesn't seem near enough to justify the shoot.
322e0e No.10220
A few points:
This traitor pig has just undermined the facts that Trayvon and Mike Brown were guilty pieces of shit. The narrative will be "this time we got the cracker on tape, if only Trayvon and Mike Brown had been recorded". The truth doesn't matter. Look at how the story is sold, "recent similar shootings".
If he is convicted, then ZimZam and the dude who shot Brown are convicted by proxy in the minds of SJWs, niggers and the media.
If he is not convicted, then it "proves" that Trayvon and Gentle Giant were innocent victims too. Meanwhile, it has become acceptable to shoot fleeing suspects in the back.
This piece of shit cop has just made the world worse for everyone, and for that I hope he goes to jail and gets raped by a pack of niggers.
19273e No.10222
>>10220This. This situation in of itself isnt spectacular, or new, or anything else, but what the media is going to do with it means they can now bring back the circus of Trayvon and all the other dindus.
Get ready for another chimpout.
0db7f5 No.10223
>>10207>A law as you describe wouldn't matter. It would be unconstitutional.Lawfag in the place, no, and there already is an "obligation" (that would have to be checked with state law and cops duty; nevertheless, if it isn't an obligation, it sure is a right) to use proportionate force to prevent excessive harm that is predictable, imminent and targeted at an identifiable group from occurring. Even citizens have that right.
>>10214Seems to sum it up pretty much, except in Canada it still wouldn't be allowed, you need to make sure there is literally no other option to prevent the damage, and our judges wouldn't allow you to get away with it especially if there was a media buzz around the story. But I know your judges are more conservative than ours, so I guess that situation could happen for you guys.
88dff5 No.10231
I'm tired of all this shit white cop/black victim shit, man. Just so tired.
00855f No.10232
>>10231Sorry to say anon but It won't stop for a while.
People want to get their 'justice' their payback,
compensation, relief, return on their investment.
What investment you may ask?
Why, the investment of white guilt, this downward-spiral
will only stop when there's mass movements against it
or when they win.
57adb1 No.10237
>>10232Its the left wing consolidating the black vote for next years elections 74% of blacks vote democrat so they need a very polar political issue to get them to the polls
eaacfb No.10238
>>10210There was a passenger in the vehicle who could have been armed
b8a981 No.10239
>>9904It's a taser, you can see the wires.
0ae371 No.10246
>>10190Don't run away from a cop like that unless you're ready to die.
eaacfb No.10248
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner>If an officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a threat of serious bodily harm either to fellow officers or to others, it is not constitutionally unreasonable to prevent escape by using deadly force. 00855f No.10253
>>10237Honestly it's sad that they have to do this so often to keep
Black voters caring about any 'issues' no matter how
meager the importance is, it's like how some of the
Republican party have started appealing to Latino
voters because they know no one is really taking actions to change immigration seriously as long as the Democrats take hold of the majority immigrant voters
86c0d7 No.10265
>>9884Not a USfag, would the prior records possibly mean he would do time for something like a taillight? Would explain his freaking out and running at least.
There is certainly a tazer there, I can't tell for sure if cop or black dude use it though.
>man Dodger doesn't age well. 57adb1 No.10269
>>10253To appeal to latinos all you have to do is speak spanish they might gravitate more to the Dems over immigration but a pol that understands the language and culture can sway them
6e0fd7 No.10282
>>10142Brings to mind the Vietnam vet shooting a cop.
Dude is all goofy and dancing and shit, runs off to his car door then turns around with a M1 carbine and goes full "VIETCONG FUCKING EVERYWHERE" on the cop.
Just because someone moves or runs away from you doesn't mean you're out of the woods.
6e0fd7 No.10283
>>10148This too is a possibility. And it doesn't just happen to niggers alone.
eaacfb No.10288
>>10265>Would explain his freaking out and running at leastBrother owed back child support.
e99890 No.10291
>>10282He had an AR not a m1 carbine.
6e0fd7 No.10294
>>10291No he didn't. He had an M1 carbine. You can see the rifle clearly, you can count the shots, you can see the mag.
6e0fd7 No.10324
>>10307More like the screams of false authority.
I hate the death of a husband and father-to-be as much as the next guy, but this is one of those clear examples where the Stanford experiment meets a combat-hardened warrior. 9999 people move back in line when you yell at them because they're afraid of abuse, and then you meet that last one that has seen more human suffering that you could ever imagine.
Let's not fool ourselves into thinking that this officer was thorough, mature or tactful; it was just another one of those young power trippers happening to run into the wrong person who doesn't comply just because you yell the same thing in their face over and over.
And don't forget that the cop shot first. Hit the vet in the stomach.
dd98bb No.10349
>>10324Oh shit he shot first? Don't feel so bad now. If he was a decent cop he would have unloaded center mass till the vet was dead. If he was a good cop it probably wouldn't have happened at all.
e46752 No.10401
>>10222>Get ready for another chimpout.Are they wrong to?
We all know if this video didn't exist, the cop and his two buddies would have had a narrative nobody would question. The cops planted evidence after using lethal force like it was NOTHING. They would have just lied to the public, on the witness stand, etc; painted the victim as the aggressor, just to cover their own murder.
Who is to say this isn't the norm, and cops aren't doing this shit all the time and have been for the last 100 years? We would never know. And the only reason we know NOW is that everybody has an iPhone.
Maybe this is just how cops always are, and have always been. Just murdering people like it was nothing, and lying about it. I would say if anything gives the blacks a right to chimpout, it's this realization.
e6beef No.10441
>>10401Thanks for the speculation.
2940ce No.10564
>>10441I mean, I agree with the messages therein, but what the hell video was THAT?
sensible chuckle/10
19273e No.10565
060976 No.10576
>The guy either grabs the Officer's taser and manages to hit him, or fails and runs away
>Either way, the Officer isn't fazed by it
>The guy runs away from the Officer, getting at least 12 feet away from him
>Instead of realizing that this guy didn't pose a serious threat without a weapon and immediately going in pursuit, the Officer decides instead to shoot an unarmed guy in the back 8 times
>8 fucking times, not 3, not 4, 8 fucking times. As if years of training in the police academy didn't give him enough knowledge on how to incapacitate a person who is running in a straight line by, oh I don't know, shooting him in the leg instead?
>Casually strolls on over to the body
>"PUT YOUR HANDS BEHIND YOUR BACK!", he says to the person he just shot 8 times
>Handcuffs him. Because you gotta make sure that person you just shot 8 times in the back won't get up and run, or reach for a non-existent weapon
>People will defend this
40a183 No.10577
>>10576>>10576>oh I don't know, shooting him in the leg instead?i dont totally disagree with your overall stance but this is reddit tier stupidity. they're trained to shoot to kill.
060976 No.10582
>>10577>they're trained to shoot to killAnd my point was that he didn't have a reason to shoot in the first place.
40a183 No.10586
>>10582so dont weaken your point by spouting reddit tier aphorisms about shooting perps in the leg
e83f76 No.10591
>>10576>8 fucking times, not 3, not 4, 8 fucking timesYou're being a bit disingenuous here. You're acting as if shooting him 3 or 4 times would be magically acceptable, but the fact that it was 8 times is arbitrarily unacceptable.
It's not like the extra bullets made him extra dead. You shoot to kill, whether it takes 1 or 10 bullets.
073a41 No.10614
>>10576>don't cuff him! It's not like it's standard procedure and pavement apes aren't have a precedent of feigning only to shoot you when you are lax>shoot him in the leg!>into_the_trash_it_goes.jpgLook, this isn't even to defend the cop but you making libtard/plebbbit arguments is disgusting to read.
073a41 No.10618
>>10401>>10565The cop did not plant fucking evidence, he dropped his taser when talking to his partner and picked it up again not even a fucking minute later. It's not like cops are supposed to drop their guns every time they shoot a coon, they holster their weapons.
The video editing was biased as fuck. There was a slomo of the cop dropping the taser exclaiming "OMG PLANTING EVIDENCE HE DINDUNUFFIN" and casually doesn't focus on the cop picking up the "planted evidence" again. It isn't planted evidence if you don't leave it there.
c02daa No.10726
>>10349You should see how that vet operated with a gunshot wound.
4506bc No.10868
>>10220Correct. The thing that's so scary about this situation is that all the leftists have found their smoking gun, their "evidence" of an epidemic of white cops killing black men (even though statistics say otherwise). The cop definitely shouldn't have shot him and now he has potentially undone the position of authority non-SJWs had over the issue.
My guess is that the cop got tired of dealing with blacks and snapped in a fit of rage. Then he realized he murdered someone and knew he was fucked.
Interestingly enough, when I first read the NYTimes article about the shooting, they mentioned the officer could face the death penalty. I've seen countless articles on the NYT about how the death penalty is wrong, how it kills more minorities, how it has killed innocents, etc. Now all of the sudden it seems like they're almost implying that the death penalty is what this officer deserves. It seems like a "dog whistle" tactic; saying to whites "you're time is coming".
I just looked through the article and it seems like the death penalty reference was removed.
>>10401Chomping out is never justified.
490f1a No.10871
>>10564I think we're seeing a growing number of blacks who are so fucking disgusted with what their own culture has become. Tommy Sotomayor is one of the best examples, but you see other blacks like him in the Youtube comments agreeing with him.
>>10577>>10586>>10614In partial defense of him, that's not necessarily liberal ignorance. I have noticed that people in places where guns are rare
hint: Europe often don't have a clue about them, even if they are pretty sharp otherwise.
Their knowledge of guns revolves around things like spaghetti Westerns and Hong Kong cop movies.
>>10726The vet was not shot in the stomach immediately. The first shots from the cop missed.
3668b6 No.10874
>>10871>I have noticed that people in places where guns are rare hint: Europe Actually, guns are very common in most countries of Europe compared to the rest of the world, it's just that America has a lot of guns.
490f1a No.10875
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>10868>The cop definitely shouldn't have shot him and now he has potentially undone the position of authority non-SJWs had over the issue.The important thing is not to defend the cop
barring some insane evidence that comes to light which exonerates his actionsI think it would be good to get stuff like this out there, showing an innocent white guy killed by cops.
This is primarily an irresponsible cop issue, not a race one.
4506bc No.10966
>>10875It would be nice if the debate was framed around police irresponsibility and accountability, but the media will never push that. The powers that be definitely have an agenda with the police vs blacks narrative. I'm pretty sure more whites get killed by police every year, but the people who are the most vocal are the leftists and the black community (and the media gives them the most airtime).
Also, didn't the Alburquerque PD kill almost 100 people in a year? I remember there being an outcry about their PD but it never received the level of attention Ferguson did.
490f1a No.11014
>>10966You're completely right in terms of the media, my only point was to bring it up in online debates and discussion. Don't let the notion that blacks are uniquely singled out for police brutality go unchallenged.
>Also, didn't the Alburquerque PD kill almost 100 people in a year? I remember there being an outcry about their PD but it never received the level of attention Ferguson did.Yeah, they have one of the worst records in the United States, and the crime there is trivial compared to real hellholes like Detroit, where you'd be a lot more forgiving of officers being on edge.
http://krqe.com/2014/04/10/comparison-apd-shoots-kills-more-than-other-agencies/ 71ddf1 No.11022
>>10966>It would be nice if the debate was framed around police irresponsibility and accountability, but the media will never push thatIt's termed 'selective outrage' and its the media simply attempting to position the narrative in a certain way to evoke a particular response.
fc4912 No.11027
>>9881I've seen this everywhere, and one of the most common reactions is exactly that…and it's not just /pol/ shilling. People are ceasing to give a fuck.
64dbe0 No.11154
>>9904there's two things flying out as the officer pulls his gun. something behind and one at the victim's feet.
Another thought is that the officer tried to tase him and he just deflected it and ran. Scott is swinging away at something just as the video begins.
This is why I avoid cops like they carry the plague.
a59199 No.11189
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/apr/09/florida-police-shoot-mentally-ill-man-videoI really have trouble keeping all of these stories straight lately there's been such a spike in reported cop vs citizen killings. I feel like we had another "black schizo with broomstick" within the past year.
Why is the cop wearing a white mask/hood?
2b2233 No.11210
I think the aspect of this whole thing is that he freaked out because he didn't want to go back to jail for unpaid child support. I know Tyrones don't like to raise their kids and whatever, but you people have to realize some shit.
You can get slapped with child support and you have ZERO RECOURSE once you get it. If you lose your job and don't pay, you can lose your license. Now you can't drive to go find a job, so you can't pay your child support, they issue a warrant for your arrest, so now you're in jail. Different states keep you in for various amounts of time, but it doesn't matter because you can't get a job while you're in jail so you can't pay your child support. Now you're homeless because you can't find a job, so you can't pay your child support etc etc.
This story is an extreme but it's not unheard of.
Now you're in a never ending hamster wheel of poverty and incarceration, and if you're like 75% of men, SHE LEFT YOU and took your kids.
In Hilary's America, this is probably the future for us all. And they'll tell us it's our privilege.
254050 No.11215
>>9881After the Trayvon and Mike Brown debacle, I really just don't give a shit anymore. The media decided to cry wolf at the wrong times for their own interests and they can accept the grave they've dug as more and more whites throw up their hands and say "fuck this, I don't care"
a59199 No.11289
http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/local/Man-on-Stolen-Horse-Stunned-by-Sheriffs-Deputies-in-IE-299250951.html
>The man did not appear to move from his position lying on the ground for more than 45 minutes. He did not appear to receive medical attention while deputies stood around him during that time.
>The man, identified as Francis Jared Pusok, 30, of Apple Valley, was hospitalized with unknown injuries, authorities said.
>In the two minutes after the man was stunned with a Taser, it appeared deputies kicked him 17 times, punched him 37 times and struck him with batons four times. Thirteen blows appeared to be to the head. The allegedly stolen horse stood idly nearby. f9c7c8 No.11291
>>10248This is the relevant law for this case.
Whatever people are arguing about the nignog tasing the cop and all that, there was no probable cause to indicate that his ESCAPING would result in harm to the cop or anybody else.
US "fleeing felon" rules are decisive on the illegality of shooting that guy in the back in a situation like this.
a59199 No.11292
>>11289On that link if you follow through to the story they threw a random gallery in with a black guy as the first picture. So like halfway down the article there's a picture of a black guy even though he has nothing to do with the beating. Of course the average tard will scroll past and assume it's the person beaten (in front of a US flag too lol)
61394d No.11296
>>9927Blacks are so funny
258b93 No.11343
>>10874By our standard your guns are rare, also though the total number is fairly high their distribution in Europe is very narrow. In the US the ATF now claims that 80% of households have a gun and that is merely what is suspected. In rural America you won't find a house without a gun. The numbers they give out regarding our rates of ownership are very conservative, there are probably 400-900 million guns in the US not 300 million.
eaacfb No.11348
>>11291>grappling with a cop for a weapon>not a danger to the copThe presumption is that he would use the weapon on the cop first had he gotten it. Guy was then a felon and cop could use deadly force to restrain him from leaving. Did you read the case at all?
8978cb No.11480
Meh i dont really care, just another dead erectus.
thats good news for me
05d01b No.11482
This shit is going to keep repeating itself all the time, isn't it. It has become very uninteresting at this point. It's common occurrence. Niggers gonna nig.
f9c7c8 No.11484
>>11348Yo, dumbass, if he'd got shot while grappling with the cop, the cop would never have been arrested.
He get shot while obviously fleeing.
And why are you gonna assume that because its called a "fleeing felon law" that it means "open season on shooting felons"?
That's just a name.
The rule means what I just fucking said it means. Wrestling for that taser, even if that took place, would only mean the guy was maybe "unarmed and dangerous", it does NOT mean "there was probable cause to believe that his escape would have resulted in death or serious injury to the officer or others"
There are NO OTHER acceptable circumstances for shooting a fleeing, unarmed suspect under US law. Period.
You should try reading then case, THEN reading the relevant laws. Cuz y'know, that helps.
Even on a common sense level, have all these other cases taught you nothing? Cops don't charge their own with murder lightly.