/pone/ - My Little Pony

They're all terrible people making a terrible show

Oh great another one.

Literally who this faggot?

Well, people have called him Peter JEW before.

Not surprised at all, we have seen a lot of show stuff voicing similar opinions.

Is he a voice actor in the show?

>>224099

Is he a jew?

>>224101

>Is he a voice actor in the show?

Yes, he's Big Mac.

>Is he a jew?

I don't know but I've seen people refer to him like that, maybe it's just a joke because of his name.

>>224100

Stuff or staff?

>>224087

Meh, the only bad part is that equality is nonsense, we just should have equal opportunities.

>>224105

staff

>>224094

>Feminism = politically correct sexism and ignorance of the equal pay act of 1963.

Did Peter New completely forgot about S5 premiere that portrays an egalitarian dictatorship?

He's not just some SJW, he's an embarrassment at this point.

>>224101

No he's not, but for the past years he changed from pretty cool guy to …This.

The spiral of social justice brainwashing worked well on him..

>>224087

More delusionally optimistic leftist posturing and fandom jerking. Comes with the territory at this point.

On a side note, I've always hated how Big Mac was reduced to a meme character so early on. If it's not the one-word answer it's him liking dolls or some shit Le brony shoutout XXXDD

>>224087

>>224094

Doomer knows exactly how to trigger tumblrinas. I love it, it's like two words collide.

One's a hardcore defender of freedom, the other one's a VA who believe everyone thinks like him.

>"according to Your views and Your morals"

>>224133

Still insane that only a furfag stands up and goes call on Peter New's bullshit about the community. And not a true brony or fan, or nor/mlp/eople doing it instead.. Havent heard a single line from them on Twitter about that pile of shit he wrote.

>>224093

he's the voice of big mac (I had to look it up)

>>224140

>>224136

This. That's what I find more cringeworthly than Peter News's bullshit alone, it's that because he's a VA he's untouchable.

That's the problem in society as a whole.

>>224140

> the better part of 4chan left to this place after moot pulled of the cuckening.

Yet even here we are less likely now to engage in confrontation then we were at this point one year ago. Is it time to bring the fire back, channel the God Emporer, and start debating over red pills like vid related?

>>224142

>Yet even here we are less likely now to engage in confrontation then we were at this point one year ago.

Because it's ultimately useless. Armchair activism at its finest. Most of us realized what an utter waste of time it was and went back to chatting about ponies and laughing at drama.

What are we gonna do? Spam his twitter with "Redpill" videos?

>>224147

The most fun I've had with that was with Big Jim on Twitter, and that was a lucky accident.

Someone needs to take another photo of him pissing :^)

>Peter New confirmed SJW

>Canadian VA

>MLP:FiM

Almost all the voice actors are confirmed SJWs. Do you see why we need HUAC?

And yet, these Canadian RDDBs are allowed into the country for conventions.

Fuck Peter New.

>>224094

>feminism = equality

The most obvious lie. Feminism is a misandrist hate movement.

>>224255

if you actually read what he posted, deeper in the convo he explains that he meant it in a society where men have the upper hand - which they do, mostly

all he probably meant was probably that a good balance is needed, someone else scolded him for not being exactly clear right from the start

the complete context might be useful

>>224263

It's all here, really. DarkDoomer pointed out why Peter New's blog was biased, that it was his opinions, but he insisted that they should be guidelines for the fandom, which none of us will agree.

>>224248

Well, darn tootin' ain't that the cat's meow!

>>224269

Except your response was the first mention of his blog i found. Assuming http://www.peternew.net/2016/02/29/heres-why-brony/ is the post in question; a link to this one would've made it a lot more understandable for them faggots who don't keep up to date with the creators' tumblrs.

>>224274

Well; one way to look at it; either he he'll get oppression olympics points for being oppressed read:argued with by them evil white cis male 4chan account holders; or he gets sj ponies for converting an evil white cis male population to sjw principles.

>>224243

Speaking of which. Which MLP VA will be Raped by a Muslim refugee first? It can't be Tara strong. I doubt she can truly be raped. She clearly wants to be gang bang by fans

>>224136

Yep, one furfag. then a few came later but /mlp/ remained essentially silent.

That's the problem, we're not active enough to get the socjus rekt.

>>224293

Sure thing Peter

>>224286

tara is cucking her husband, so odds are, she will fuck any mudskin she finds.

>>224293

bieng a cock sucking faggot normal? becuase in my shit country it isnt

>>224286

that's why yes means yes laws are invented; it is rape unless you have preferably explicitly written consent for every way single contact and need to proof she wasn't under the influence of substances/alcohol/a bad mood while doing it.

>>224310

You are blind or retarded. I never said anything about equal representation those are all your words.

Guess it shows that you are actually happy that /pol/ influence exists. I am not and I start to hate this place.

I will probably actually leave and go to ponychan or something… this is shit. No clop threads, no new stories, all you do is pretend you know politics and repeat catchphrases, words like "autism" and "cuck" without knowing what they even mean.You are probably all 12 years old and feel so important.

And I don't care that you don't care.

>>224319

How was it?

inb4 you're the guy that snapped the picture of his dong

>>224320

>feminism = equality

Both of those words are so loaded that what exactly it is that he means is not clear. He could just be talking about the Elizabeth Cady Stanton brand of feminism and basic rights.

>>224286

It would be even more hilariously redpilling if it were Michelle Creber and Claire Corlett being raped by a Mudslime rapefugee.

#fuckCanada

#bringbackHUAC2016

>>224584

And then Faust would post herself jacking off to it

>>224587

The horror.

>>224587

hold that thought. On another note…

>yfw Blackgryph0n becomes a Muslim to fuck both of them since it's so halal in Canada.

>>224087

>"My answer was some rambling effort to say that Bronies can change the world. I think that it is a necessary step in the cause of equality for men to embrace the feminine; necessary for men to proudly love in the world. I saw Bronies as a step towards an end to hatred and violence and fear. I felt like LGBTQ rights, feminism, non-violence, and social justice were all positively influenced by the very existence of Bronies, and that there was no reason for that not to continue."

Men proudly loved before the idea cropped up that they had to be more feminine. They also cried and expressed themselves whenever they felt like it, but they just did it like men, not like women. Men should only be "embracing the feminine" in the sense that they embrace women with love and compassion. Anything else is either a joke or should be kept in private, not paraded as a pride symbol or a political statement. You might as well host a pride parade for masturbation and lobby for designated jerking streets.

Look at violent movies like Lethal Weapon or Die Hard to see men expressing emotion without having to pay lip service to the feminine. In the former, Mel Gibson's character cries like a bitch, but it's over something truly painful. In Die Hard it's Bruce Willis' character choking back the tears when he confesses to his friend over radio how he fucked up with his wife and will probably never see her again.

>>224944

So basically men have to express emotion only in the way you approve?

Sorry but I dare to call that a shitty opinion. How about letting everyone express feelings in their own way and avoid people that do so in a way that annoys you, eh?

>>224944

Your mistake is that you are buying into the idea that gendurrs are real. The key to cutting through the identitarians' bullshit is to recognize the plain fact that reality is composed entirely of matter and energy moving through time. All the imaginary shit like gender is just a bunch of expressions that are ultimately rooted in material reality.

>>224950

Well you can't expect your random anon to grasp all this, can you.

But teaching people not giving that much shit when others don't act according to their own codex of "correct behaviour" would be nice.

Still, as long as you rage in your own home, with your sameminded friends or something, all's good. But when people lynch other people for not following what's "normal", then something is really messed up.

>>224947

What I approve of isn't the point. The point is men shouldn't be expected to be like women, or vice versa. If you happen to be a feminine guy, fine. I'm not your dad. You can go suck dicks and cry until your eyeliner melts off. But men are different from women. It doesn't mean they're emotionless, and it doesn't mean they need to meet the approval of people like Peter New or other SJWs who want to change what it is to be human by doing away with "toxic masculinity". That's beta bullshit.

>>224950

That's bullshit too, though. You can't just ignore biology and the sexes, because we are literally wired differently. Males and females actually exist, regardless of what term you want to use. The term gender is pseudoscientific garbage anyways.

>>224953

You talk about physiology and noone is trying to say you don't have a benis if you happen to have one.

But as far as psychology and personality goes, it only affects you to some degree via hormones and such. But we are not "wired differently", society standarts for example have bigger impact on gender roles than type of your genitals or this "wiring" you mention.

>>224957

I'll add one quick example.

If you were a Viking ruler, you are probably not expected to feel the feels and over time through conditioning you will grow rather emotionally distant.

On the other hand, in Japan some centuries ago, a man from high society was expected to do the opposite, to be emotional and empathetic. To write poetry, paint, take long strolls through the park and think about the flowers and such.

You see? There is no "male prototype" that is hardwired to behave in a given way. That's nonsense. And what is mostly thought of as feminine in modern western civilisations contains many traits that could be very useful and desirable in a good man's personality.

But the society stigmatises these traits. Think of it as a pool of skills for your character - now third of the skills are going to be banned because reasons. Isn't that stupid? Why not let everyone pick from the entire skillpool.

It's definitely not about men becoming 50% female. It's about stop worrying about being feminine or masculine, just be yourself and fuck the haters.

>>224967

Apart from "men have a penis women a vagina", it is.

Like I said, different societies, different roles for the genders. How could genders be such a flexible thing if they were not a social construct in the first place?

>>224958

The problem is that while the concept of gender is largely abstract, it is not entirely so.

There are differences between male and female biochemistry that affects behaviour to a large degree. Just look at the effects on anger control injecting testosterone can produce and many of the female hormones have similarly big effects on your psychology, hence the emotional instability during menstruation.

It may be possible to compensate and overcome these effects with experience and practice, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.

You do have a point about the specifics of how gender is perceived is largely dependent on your personal experience and as such is based largely on the culture you grew up with. And while it may be an abstract concept that doesn't exist past your own perception of it, it is also part of the collective idea of what a gender is, since it, as any form of communication, is used to communicate to others who understand it based on their experiences. However the basis for any kind of communication is shared understanding of abstract concepts. Its the entire basis for human language. When you break with social conventions you break from the shared concepts and thus cannot expect others to understand your new abstract ideas about what your gender is from your perspective. Others will always perceive the world from their own perspective and experiences. That means if you want to be seen as masculine or feminine by others, changing the way you perceive the gender may be the start, but you can't just ignore the shared cultural notions of the people around you in doing so, or they will not understand you and will instead try to fit what you are doing into their own understanding. This is what SJW's think of as attacking and offensive. They see transphobia when a guy in a club has been picked up a chick in a club and then finds out she has a dick when he brings her home and rejects her. Not necessarily because the guy can't stand the thought of guys who want to wear dresses, but because he was expecting to be sleeping with a girl he finds attractive and instead gets a guy.

So moderate that "Don't worry about being feminine or masculine" shit with a bit of consideration for how others will see the situation. Especially if you want them to show consideration. Empathy is a two way street and if you fuck with others peoples expectations and ideas of what is normal, you can't always expect them to be positive about it.

Remember, just because much of what you see as a gender is an abstract concept with no physical substance, so is colour, but the only reason you know what "blue" is, is because you share the same abstract idea about which frequencies of the visual spectrum of EM radiation are "blue". The world you see is not the physical world. What you see is a stream of data from your eyes interpreted by by your mind to form a series of abstract concepts pulled from your memory to give you an idea about your surroundings.

>>224969

Well I mostly agree.

And I will never try and steal the right to be offended, displeased or disgusted by my actions from anyone else. Everyone should have a right to disagree.

What I would want the world to learn though, is that actual violence - physical or psychological - is a terrible way to deal with something that doesn't fit your ideas about the world.

Like when people feel so endangered by a teenager who isn't sure about his/her identity that they go and bully that person up to the point he breaks down and commits suicide.

And even worse is when people try to burn down your house, and you, and your wife, and your kids, only because you have a different color of skin or any other property that you have been born with and cannot really change at all, even if you wanted to.

What the hell is that. Such people basically throw away what makes us human and become a herd of stupid animals. I will not say "kill the killer", but I cannot really feel much compassion for these half-humans. They need to be controlled and their actions limited until they prove at least a basic level of tolerance. Not sure how to do that without falling into the slippery slope of a totalitarian regime - only this time under the hand of SJWs - but something has to be done.

Look at how people react to muslim population, a lot of people is actually ready to kill them, for real. Victims of paranoia for sure, but still - they need to be taught some level of selfcontrol or be somehow contained.

Once again, this is all a slippery slope, I am well aware. But if everyone sits and watches how will things resolve themselves, innocent people will die in the meantime.

>>224957

>>224958

>>224968

>>224973

>we are not "wired differently"

>Why not let everyone pick from the entire skillpool.

>It's about stop worrying about being feminine or masculine

>Apart from "men have a penis women a vagina", it is.

>How could genders be such a flexible thing if they were not a social construct in the first place?

>only because you have a different color of skin

I bet you unironically want women to be allowed into the military and fire service.

What next? That women has the same average IQ as men?

That those batshit insane sjw/feminists on tumblr only exist on the internet and not in the media or government?

Race is only skin deep?

Hah very funny posts!

Now go back to tumblr.

>Look at how people react to muslim population, a lot of people is actually ready to kill them, for real.

I know! Those evil cis whitey scum wanting to kill innocent muslims who dindu nuffin wrong.

You seriously need to stop watching the kike media.

https://3.bp.blogspot.com/_4ify7vDXrDs/S-WDH4AQlDI/AAAAAAAAFw0/Zs8C5h8ZW88/s640/male_female_bell_curve_.png

>>224953

>You can't just ignore biology and the sexes, because we are literally wired differently.

That is not gender as it is being used here. Biology is material and therefore real.

>>224952

>Well you can't expect your random anon to grasp all this, can you.

It is really not all that complicated. That which exists physically is real. That which does not is imaginary.

>>224957

>society standarts for example

…are also imaginary, by the way. Imaginary things can affect people but only in so far as they are reacted to as if they were real.

>>224967

>gender

>a fundamental law of nature

Fucking lol

>>224969

>And while it may be an abstract concept that doesn't exist past your own perception of it, it is also part of the collective idea of what a gender is, since it, as any form of communication, is used to communicate to others who understand it based on their experiences.

That is precisely the philosophical basis of postmodernism. They use the same Kantian/Nietzschean reasoning and hypothesize the same identity-based power structures that the nazis use. It is hilarious that the two hate one another when they think so much alike.

>Victims of paranoia for sure, but still - they need to be taught some level of selfcontrol or be somehow contained.

They do not need to be contained or controlled. People will act as they will, and unfortunately many will act according to the demands of their imaginary constructs instead their own real world needs. The best thing that can be done is to tell folks how to find the real sources of their problems.

>>224975

in how many languages can you count to ten Anon?

>>224977

Guys, I think he's actually serious about this whole shtick

>>224991

Just to make it clear: I was referring to the poster, not the image. That was just a joke.

>>224991

eins,zwei,polizei,drei,vier,grenadier,fünf,sechts,alte hex,sieben acht,gute nacht

>>224996

>tumblr

Says the guy declaring that his gender is real.

>>225050

>There are no feminine or masculine skills; there are things that either men or women are naturally good at

Almost. There are things that men tend to be better at than women and vice versa. That, however, is not the sole basis for the abstract concept of gender. Hell, it is not even the primary basis. Economic reality is, at least as it pertains to men and women.

As for the various snowflake genders, their only cause is a that a bunch of faggots feel like shit and want to have some identity that allows them to pretend that they are brave foot soldiers in a righteous struggle against tyranny. They can not be proud of their own accomplishments, so they join an oppressed group in their minds that they imagine has done something of worth. It is the same thing that nationalists do.

>>225050

>some people are good at one thing over another

>same can be said about the sexes

so first you point out each person is unique, then you put them all into two perfectly defined bags - really? come on

>>225103

I don't see how they're mutually exclusive. Did you not see the firefighter video at >>224976

>>225131

because the first one is correct, the other is not

When you calculate the average, then yes - women and men will have different properties.

But in reality, average is nonsense, you always have to take it case by case. By your logic, every man is ready to be a bodybuilder warrior suited for dying on the battlefield. And every woman is an excellent mother and cook.

And that video is just manipulative shit. She obviously didn't know how to do it right and any fireman could be bad at his job. Saying that a fireman should be paid more by default than a firewoman finished the job at proving how misguided the author is.

>>225140

Average is average. It doesn't mean outliers don't exist. You can't throw out a bell curve because there are men who are physically weaker at women, or better at acrobatics and ballet than women.

Don't like that video? Okay, here's another one. I'll bet you I can find a similar article or video regarding women in the military.

>>225141

Listen, the problem is noone is willing to say - let's pay the "fireperson" according to his responsibilities and duties. We have to stop making a difference between genders like that.

Are you doing your job? Great, you will get paid the full amount. You are not? Sorry, you are fired. End of story. But right now, many areas make huge generalisations and that's the problem.

Also bell curve doesn't mean 99% of people are like that and 1% are the "outliers". Stop relying on such crude concepts and decide stuff person by person, the only fair way there is.

A lot of people (and great majority on 8chan apparently) think this way :

black person - nigger thief

arab - terrorist and rapist

jew - hoards money

woman - weak crybaby

trump - a sane and viable candidate

Crazy. Like if closemindness concentrated in this place.

>>225131

He is talking about how the level of variation in terms of individuals is greater than the variation between individuals of different sexes. An athletic man is better at athletic activity than a similarly athletic woman, but that athletic woman is better at athletic activity than a basement dwelling man just as that basement dwelling man is a better athlete than a basement dwelling woman.

Jobs that require extreme athletic ability must be done by men, because only men can do them. The thing is that those jobs are highly uncommon. In fact, most jobs require very little athletic ability.

The point is that the difference between the sexes concerning the execution of most occupations is so little as to be a useless metric for determining who should do the job. Biology is a factor, but it is not usually an extraordinarily significant one. It is just one quality of a given individual.

Of considerably more importance is economic necessity. A family unit that can function with only one source of waged labor will usually do so. It may not do so if there is a significant economic advantage to having two sources of wages and they have sufficient time. More often, having a second source of wages is not a choice but rather an economic necessity due to the fact that wages are so low that one wage is insufficient to support a family. These scenarios also greatly determine the division of unpaid domestic labor. Domestic labor is also necessary, but it requires time that is not in great abundance in families that have more than one source of wages.

So, should your woman earn wages? Neither of you really has a choice unless you happen to make so much money that your family wants for little. If you are one of the rare few who do, then bully, but having more may still be desirable, particularly if you do not waste your resources and time on economically useless children.

>>225148

Yes, nigger, children are economically useless until they become not children at which point they get jobs. To the family living in a fully industrialized society, children are an economic drain and ultimately never benefit the parents. That is why families in industrialized societies are significantly smaller than families in pre-industrialized societies where children serve an economic function.

>>225150

Without children, you will never have future workers and consumers, but that's not to say that if you don't have the resources or intention to raise them, better not to have them.

>>225154

That is great for a society that needs workers for the future, but it does nothing for the individuals who are expected to raise them. If you want people in a given society to raise children then they need some personally beneficial reason to do so, some economic incentive like individuals in pre-industrial societies have.

>>225154

Rejuvenation therapies and age reversion will be available in modern countries before 2100. Soon there really won't be so many kids as now. We will all be able to work indefinitely so only those who die in accidents will need to be replaced.

>>225158

Having children is part of healthy growth, not just for societies or economies, but for the people expected to raise them. The people that choose to have them in the first place. It's part of being human. If and when you have children, they are not just your little workers-to-be. They are your babies.

>>225165

See above. Not having children isn't a good thing, and being able to extend your life doesn't mean those people will choose to not have them as a result. People's mortality rates went from, what, 20s and 30s from medieval times to the 90s and 100s in recent times, and I think the only reason people are having less kids is because they either don't want them, or they think they can't afford them. Having children is simply human, and a part of growing up.

>>225174

Right now I feel I owe only a trip to the sperm bank

>>225174

Right now, it's also part of "being human" to die of old age. People generally accept that notion even though it's completely false, dying is not natural, we just haven't overcome it yet.

Being human is such a vague and fluctuating term, noone can predict what will it mean in 100 years.

Even if we colonise another planet or two in time and overpopulation won't be an issue, I firmly believe people will keep lowering their desire to have children. A lot of them already postpone having them until the biological clock starts ticking - what if it doesn't start at all?

>>225180

>Right now, it's also part of "being human" to die of old age. People generally accept that notion even though it's completely false, dying is not natural, we just haven't overcome it yet.

It's reality, anon, just like the sexes. Even if you overcome death by old age, there's still death by any other means.

>A lot of them already postpone having them until the biological clock starts ticking - what if it doesn't start at all?

Good question. While we're at it, what if we eliminate the need for sleep? That'd have a major impact on the progress of society if people could work and stay awake 24/7.

>>225182

I believe that Androids will be more our children than our "real" children. We don't produce any new lifeforms right now - sentient androids will be our first.

>>225187

I specifically said "to die of old age is also part of being human right now" - I do realise that some form of death may be inevitable. Even that's far from a given though.

And getting rid of the need for sleep would be an amazing thing - I already experimented with ampakines, that boost your neural pathways and keep you awake for up to three days without any damage, need to sleep 18 hours afterwards or hangovers when you finally go to sleep.

It was awesome, being awake for 50 hours, focused, working and having fun, smiling for yourself when you looked at the clock and realised the rest of the world is wasting so much time at that moment… dunno how long we will have to wait for massive usage though. Hopefully we're talking just a few decades.

>>225189

>And getting rid of the need for sleep would be an amazing thing - I already experimented with ampakines, that boost your neural pathways and keep you awake for up to three days without any damage, need to sleep 18 hours afterwards or hangovers when you finally go to sleep.

Yeah, I wonder what the long-term effects are for that substance, and whether or not they can be engineered into human genes safely.

The point I wanted to make was that it's an unrealistic goal that is bound to have harmful ramifications even if you do pull it off, somehow. I don't think you're taking into account all the costs that go into sleeping less, and not allowing your body to repair itself.

>I believe that Androids will be more our children than our "real" children. We don't produce any new lifeforms right now - sentient androids will be our first.

But if you're not willing to have natural-born children, why would you want to raise an android? To work for you? To be your slave, or your companion?

>>225191

No studies showed any bad influence whatsoever. And the drug family has been known for quite some time, just like with all drugs - safety and caution make them come to our shelves extremely slowly.

All you can really say is "I personally doubt it", then again, people doubted like every single scientific breakthrough ever. So… feel free to be sceptical, luckily it won't hinder the progress in any way because scientists are working hard and ignore the neighsayers.

>>225195

>No studies showed any bad influence whatsoever.

None whatsoever, huh?

>Few side effects have been determined, but an ampakine called farampator (CX-691) has side effects including headache, somnolence, nausea, and impaired episodic memory.

>Episodic memory is the memory of autobiographical events (times, places, associated emotions, and other contextual who, what, when, where, why knowledge) that can be explicitly stated. It is the collection of past personal experiences that occurred at a particular time and place. For example, if one remembers the party on his or her 6th birthday, this is an episodic memory. They allow an individual to figuratively travel back in time to remember the event that took place at that particular time and place.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ampakine

http://www.nature.com/npp/journal/v32/n6/pdf/1301257a.pdf

The study above was double-blind and placebo-controlled, consisting of 8 male and 8 female subjects at the mean age of 66.

Here's an article discussing the harmful indications of using these kinds of cognitive enhancement drugs:

>Cognitive enhancement is perhaps one of the most intriguing and controversial topics in neuroscience today. Currently, the main classes of drugs used as potential cognitive enhancers include psychostimulants (methylphenidate (MPH), amphetamine), but wakefulness-promoting agents (modafinil) and glutamate activators (ampakine) are also frequently used. Pharmacologically, substances that enhance the components of the memory/learning circuits—dopamine, glutamate (neuronal excitation), and/or norepinephrine—stand to improve brain function in healthy individuals beyond their baseline functioning. In particular, non-medical use of prescription stimulants such as MPH and illicit use of psychostimulants for cognitive enhancement have seen a recent rise among teens and young adults in schools and college campuses. However, this enhancement likely comes with a neuronal, as well as ethical, cost. Altering glutamate function via the use of psychostimulants may impair behavioral flexibility, leading to the development and/or potentiation of addictive behaviors.

>Furthermore, dopamine and norepinephrine do not display linear effects; instead, their modulation of cognitive and neuronal function maps on an inverted-U curve. Healthy individuals run the risk of pushing themselves beyond optimal levels into hyperdopaminergic and hypernoradrenergic states, thus vitiating the very behaviors they are striving to improve. Finally, recent studies have begun to highlight potential damaging effects of stimulant exposure in healthy juveniles. This review explains how the main classes of cognitive enhancing drugs affect the learning and memory circuits, and highlights the potential risks and concerns in healthy individuals, particularly juveniles and adolescents. We emphasize the performance enhancement at the potential cost of brain plasticity that is associated with the neural ramifications of nootropic drugs in the healthy developing brain.

http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2014.00038/full

At best, the research on ampakines and similar psychostimulants can produce drugs for curing neurological diseases, like Alzheimers, while the performance-enhancement benefits are best used sparingly by otherwise healthy individuals.

>>225203

>Few side effects have been determined, but an ampakine called farampator

Nice fact bending you have there. Literally every drug has some possible side effects, plus that age is already a sign that this is pretty much completely irrelevant.

Trouble with episodic memory at 66, now that's the first time hearing of such thing!

And the rest… why did you even bother man, those are such crappy arguments against this I don't even know how to respond and if I even should.

First you point out it had side effects in the elderly takers, now you try to use juveniles as an argument.

The rest is all "maybe" and "could".

At best, you lost 15 minutes looking those up. Seriously, you see anything relevant in those excerpts? I would not dismiss a valid argument, but this is not anything near that.

Plus if we talk amphetamine then duh, of course that thing is harmful. It also creates sleep lags and everything, it's useless for regular use but I am well aware of that nor did I imply it's any good.

tl;dr

y u hate progress so much you scaredy cat

>>225206

edit:

by fact bending I mean that they found almost no side effects at all, but one single variant of the drug possibly produced a few minor side effects in people over 65 years

and you use it as a proof it's dangerous or harmful

>>225257

>Every single organism on the planet has some form of reproduction which it is hardwired to follow.

The funny thing about humans in particular is that they have this thing called "sapience" which allows them to act according to rational self-interest as opposed to thoughtlessly conforming to inherrited instincts.

>The rest of your argument is pure opinion.

No. Just no. If you think it is, then you either fail at reading comprehension or are patently stupid.

>I fear we may have allowed technology get to a point where we are unable to properly adapt to it. I hope I am wrong.

Holy shit, luddites still exist! "Stupid" it is.

>>225261

>The funny thing about humans in particular is that they have this thing called "sapience" which allows them to act according to rational self-interest as opposed to thoughtlessly conforming to inherrited instincts.

Many animals will not or will refuse to mate under stressful or un-natural circumstances. It is not something they prefer to do but the response from factors beyond their control.

See John B. Calhoun's behavioral sink experiment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink

Wolves refusing or unable to mate due to environmental stress:

http://www.backpacker.com/news-and-events/news/trail-news/the-death-of-yellowstone-s-druid-wolf-pack/

Wolf Alpha showing a large amount of sapience when dealing with rival pack members including the ability to show mercy and foresight:

http://www.salon.com/2015/07/04/the_perfect_wolf_twenty_one_was_a_legend_he_never_lost_a_fight_and_he_never_killed_a_vanquished_rival/

I've read more about 21 since I read that Week article about him several months ago. Even when he was a pup he was capable of showing empathy. When one of his siblings was sickly the others avoided him while he would stay by its side and and comfort it.

>reply is literally 'no u'

Yet, "Women who do not have children do not get their birth canals stretched out, which means that their husbands do not have to spend their lives throwing a hotdog down a hallway.", Is not an opinion? This is a clear misunderstanding that a woman's reproductive parts repair themselves after birth and that vaginas have shown to not loosen or hang due to childbirth.

>reply is literally 'no u stupid'

>Completely misses the part where I said "Overpopulation will certainly be a problem in 50 years time. The answer would not be to stop having children and die out, but advance further and adapt better(see space colonization)."

"Faggot" it is. Could you please go back to tumblr? Or at least kill yourself?

>>225257

>Overpopulation will certainly be a problem in 50 years time.

You people have been saying that for decades.

>>225284

There's dystopian fiction about the entire world becoming unlivably populated at a fraction of what the current world population is. It's pretty funny.

Even China's peaking and will be dealing with an ageing crisis soon enough.

>>225261

I suggest you don't bother with him anymore, he chose to be stupid so let him enjoy that.

>>225275

>Yet, "Women who do not have children do not get their birth canals stretched out, which means that their husbands do not have to spend their lives throwing a hotdog down a hallway.", Is not an opinion?

Either you have never fucked a mother before, or you have never fucked anything else. A vag is never the same again after a kid goes through it.

>>225304

Check the ID faggot. You have the time.

>(24)

wew

>>225293

>>225284

The human population has done nothing but rise rapidly for the past 70 years. You hold the belief that there will be no negative consequences if this continues without significant technological advances.

>>225310

You know from experience, anon? The vagina does loosen up after childbirth but then heals and can be further tightened by kegel exercises and stitching it back up after birth. Some women have found its even tighter after said operation.

>>225412

Interesting perspective. I like it.

Sucks this thread isn't more active. I'd be interested to know what others think of what I wrote. Oh well, time will tell.

>>226282

>Norway

>socialist

>fucking CANADA

>one of the most hyper-capitalist places on earth

>socialist

Jesus Christ. Nobody has any idea what that word means, and it is such a simple concept.

Am I surprised Peter New went full SJW here? no.

What do people like Peter New and Lauren Faust have in common.

Answer: They're Canadian

A majority of Canadians are a bunch of commies, because they were raised to be, What I like to call RDDBs. Red Diaper Doper Babies.

Red diaper doper babies. Faust, New, Strong, and a majority of the Canadian voice talent, including young Creber and Corlett were raised in left-wing homes; that's the Red Diaper Baby. That's a well-known phrase.

But I added the other D, which is Doper.

If you take a Red Diaper Baby and add in marijuana, for a long-term period, then you wind up with a red diaper doper baby, which is an extremely noxious human being, who will gut a nation like Canada AND the US and not even realize they're doing it.

>>226294

>>226296

Holy shit, what is this?

>>226350

The holy prophet Francis E. Dec Esq.

>>226294

DUDE WEED LMAO BECAUSE IT'S 2016

Isn't, like, almost the entirety of the show staff Canadian? Most of them probably even voted for Cuckstain Trudeau.

>>226371

Some of them even might have encouraged they allow the Muslim rapefugees into the country. I'm suspecting Navy Pedophile Blackgryph0n will convert to Islam so he can fuck Michelle Creber since it's absolutely halal in that disgusting religion.

>nb4 get yo navy pedophile ass outta here.

The only right way to handle gender in the legislative is to pretend it doesn't exist (save for things that are directly related to it biologically, such as pregnancy). Have the government act as if genders don't exist and treat everyone the exact same way – no advantages for anyone. The moment the government starts caring about genders is the moment it starts, unknowingly, encouraging hate between sexes. When a man sees a woman get a job despite being as dumb as a bag of shit, just because of some retarded quotas, he'll feel cheated and disadvantaged, and will experience a surge of enmity towards those so unfairly favoured by the system. Similarly for women. The moment you start to point out at differences between people is the moment you start dividing them. For example:

Imagine a country that assigns positions depending on a person's eye colour – people with green eyes get government positions, people with brown go to the army, people with blue work in the hospitals… Before you know it, there will be great tension between groups of people with different eye-colour, especially between those high on the social ladder and those on the lowest rungs. The reason we don't have that in our society is not just because eye colour doesn't matter, but also because it is given no attention or importance. Nobody even thinks of segregating society that way and thus doesn't view himself as part of the team brown-eye. If same conditions are achieved for genders, there will no longer be any political tensions between the sexes.

>>226860

Isn't she jewish?

>>226860

I'm sorry, but I seem to be failing you. I have searched, but I cannot find any evidence on the internet. I will have to retract my accusation with my deepest apologies.

>>227375

>Women should be judged less harshly

da fuck is wrong with you?

>>227375

This.