[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/poverty/ - Poverty & Thrift

lifestyles of the poor and thrifty

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
A message from @CodeMonkeyZ, 2ch lead developer: "How Hiroyuki Nishimura will sell 4chan data"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


[ Board Confederacy Project / Povertymod's Link List ]


File: 1418142403261.jpg (127.01 KB, 3320x2152, 415:269, anarcho_syndicalist_flag_b….jpg)

 No.277

So I saw this board was dead.

If anyone comes back to it, what do you think would help the poor more, government assistance, union action or partial ownership in their workplace?

 No.279

Bunkers

 No.280

Kinda depends on the unique situations of each area. I would say government assistance is a decent option. Unions and partial ownership may also help but I'd want to know more details about how. Personally I think income inequality is a major contributor to problems in society, this ted talk covers a bit of what I see in that: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWpMr82jnf8

–basically what the guy says is whether you reach a reduction in the wealth gap via taxes, via aid programs, via whatever, a closing of the gap is what helps.

 No.282

p.s. did you claim the board?

 No.283

File: 1418257222106.jpg (52.67 KB, 598x598, 1:1, walmart vs winco.jpg)

>>280
I would say that employee-ownership is a more effective means of combating poverty. State programs merely subsidize poverty, collectivization of the means of production allows the people to overcome it.

How exactly one would do that depends on your ideology. Mutualists support creating cooperative networks within a capitalist economy with the goal of eventually overcoming and replacing it. Others support taking it by force or by union action.

>>282
How exactly do you claim the board?

 No.313

I don't know about replacing the capitalist economy but I agree with >>283
about employee owned enterprises. Less money goes to the executives and more goes to the workers.

I also think that the United States should allow 10 people to collect all their unemployment checks in a year if they promise to create a worker owned business. Or we could get rid of our current inefficient and bureaucratic welfare system and get a universal basic income. Not a living wage, but just a simple ubi of 5 thousand dollars or so.

 No.361

>>277
Living wage. Plain and simple.

A benefit is just the government subsidising the wages of the corporations.

What would happen if we had no benefit and no minimum wage? Poor people would have no way to survive. What happens when you have an entire underclass that can't purchase anything? The vendors stop getting their money, for one, in turn making less profit. Furthermore, they begin to turn to crime and steal to survive.

Cutting all those protections and watching the fallout is a nasty way to come to the same conclusion: a living wage.

 No.366

>>283
Aren't the Rothschilds the wealthiest family?

 No.446

>>366
The Rothschilds? If this were 19th century Europe, then yes.

 No.448

Community action and a worker run means of production.

Mainly community action though, I think that is key.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]