>>114380
Come on now why so angry? I should have posted sources, my apologies for seeming trollish or foolish.
It's easy to keep the attitude of negativity in an online forum full of, well, us.
>Eating meat doesn't raise test, there's never been any evidence of this
I am slightly off, testosterone may not be the cause but high meat diets give more muscle, which happened to me. And there is in fact evidence of test increasing with meat, it's conflicted between studies.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1435181 (higher test on high meat diet than veg)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19678968 (more muscle gained from meat diet than veg with equal protein intake)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10584048 (meat diet led to greater non-fat weight gains during exercise)
Going from 0.5cm hair length to a chest full of inch and a half hair seems unlikely to be a placebo, especially as I didn't hear about potential raises of test until long after this all happened. Maybe it wasn't from the diet. I did eat very poorly before this, so maybe I just never had the proper nutrition.
>it should be obvious you can't get nearly enough micro nutrients from meats
>make it sound as if all nutrients a body needs can be found in meat
>little of what we need is in meat (and whatever is in meet can also be found in veggies, legumes and fruits)
It's beautifully ironic really, it's 90% opposite of that
http://www.diagnosisdiet.com/food/vegetables/
This site is wonderful in explaining things, do give it a good read.
We can keep in mind that diet and biology is understood differently with each era, what we're told is good for us changes frequently, new discoveries are made yet not always get the spotlight, it can take a long time for the truth to become excepted.
People can consider the motives of what is presented to us, given we are a society that runs off of profits.