>>114436
Ok Lovecraft.
Many religions do provide that safety, and many if not most Christians are not genuine but merely seek that relief.
However, myself and many others base our belief in real interaction. Those who seek God will hear his voice, probably not literally, but things with relevance happen that many would say are mere coincidences, someone once said however they sure do notice a huge amount of these coincidences.
Then there are other interactions, actual, undeniable miracles; the supernatural happening right before you. I have witnessed some myself, yet ironically the thing that initially gave me belief was the demonic, both in what I research (how ingrained it is in society and governments) and subsequently in supernatural things happening afterwards (things not able to be labelled as mere hallucinations or coincidence).
God calls many, but chooses few.
Seek and listen, discern, choose him!
It cannot be expected that most people will hear him, find him or properly invest in doing so, the bible explicitly says multiple times this won't happen.
>>114539
I'm glad someone brought up science. Too many people have this inner conflict of believing in science but not trying to understand how this can fit in with their spirituality.
Bible says our souls will testify against us on judgement day, perhaps this could help clarify how souls fit in with our minds.
Our being, mind, is indeed the sum of the brains mechanics, and our soul might be an observer, not really being in control but simply observing, whilst our bodies are generally engineered whether in biology or in life's happenings towards a certain function of God's desire. Our body enables us to interact with creation both physically but also in thoughtfulness.
God must surely take into account things that happen to our brain when judging us.
I respect a desire for evidence, and there is evidence for God to be found, however it is unique to each individual and purposefully intended to not be something you can measure and prove to the whole world the same way you can prove oxygen.
There are many forces at work in creation that God allows, most people are led astray, but I believe in a time fast approaching were spiritual forcing will be most provable.
>>114544
Well if depends on the precise definition. They obviously chose to do whatever they did throughout their lives. Free will perhaps is a bad choice of language, in the absence of better wording.
It might be better to say once they ate the fruit, their decisions now involved an extra level of thought; their free will once being merely a means of decision making, now had huge consequences on how they thought, felt, how it affected others and their relationship with God.
The concept of free will was probably largely irrelevant before eating the fruit, there was nothing restricting their will; they didn't have to consider good and evil.
Keep in mind God had seen this would happen, allowed it, prepared for it and shaped the rest of creation's existence around it. The point being it was a part of God's plan for humans to lose innocence and gain an extra level of thinking/free will.