/r9trip/ - The Complete Robot

>>1646
> in a completely desecratory way as to only symbolize my failure.
Where did you get this out of the traditional birthday celebrations? It's just a celebration of age that literally everyone participates in because everybody grows old and has birthdays.

You ought to just explain the feelings to your mother. Perhaps if you were committed you'd be able to get some more help, and you could also discuss the possibility of being Schizotypal and other things to people that will listen and know how to help. I also hate those Schizophrenia videos. When I was in AP Psychology, I was deep into conspiracies and paranoia and I was terrified that I could perhaps have Schizophrenia because my teacher's "word salad" example was a guy discussing that he felt like he was being watched by the feds in a way similar to the stuff I was reading online. Those videos are scaremongering, man.

>>1649
In a traditional birthday celebration, the ceberatant is typically a normalfag with the path of resistance on the easiest mode possible allowing him the swiftest and most scenic route to success. I'm not a traditionally middle-class upbrought normalfag with psychologically sane parents who properly cared about his well-being, they were parasites who bred children merely for their own ends (tax credit and child benefit among other things) and this reflects itself in the unrelenting psychological and verbal abuse which had been so instrumental in demotivating my self-esteem to the degree where I'd regarded myself so worthless that it was inevitable that I'd slip into sanity in order to escape this notion (yes yes go on your little feminist rant about how 'refrigerator mother' theory for mental illness is 'misogynist'), though it is inevitably unavoidable as a conclusion just from my very surroundings.

I'd been committed three times last year, and the only thing they were interested in was scapegoating all of my foibles on Aspergers (because it's really that horrible and heartless of a condition guys, it's not because of our third-tier toilet B'nai-B'ritish-communist education which hasn't taught us to distinguish somebody cold from somebody distant, or that neither of those things in any case are autism! –erm, no the former is not misandrist propaganda!). If they're uninterested in properly interepreting my symptoms, I'm uninterested in their dilettantish posturing of 'expertise'.

I used to think my mirror was bugged by the trolls on Tinychan in order to give themselves a live feed of my life so that the PVCC – in reality a trolling crew run by a stupid autistic tranny from the Midlands, but in my mind a Jewish, Mossad conspiracy who had ties to Cohen and Jason Scott – could not only profit off the proceeds, but conjure up their counter-arguments to my exposé of their conspiracy (which were all completely incogent and incoherent gibberish, btw) in addition, to which I imagined they were so retarded to me in comparison (grandiosity) that they needed 'battlefront intelligence' to supplement their negroidic ingenuity deficit.

Besides, the only treatment is anti-psychotics and you should know what happened the last time, as I told you.

>>1655
celebretant*

Here's another of my favourite schizophrenia videos:

Here's part 2 of the aforementioned video:

>>1659
It's correct only from the psychotropically-intoxicated, cognitive-behavioural-therapeutically-modified, psychiatric-dictatorship worldview of liberal-totalitarianism, which wants to moderate all hues of emotion so that nothing bares significance anymore, placing you in a state of permanent denialism ala Que Sera Sera.

I've studied the pharmacology of anti-psychotics and something occurred to me in the logic of how this treatment was supposed to work. If anti-psychotics inhibit dopamine's uptake (antagonizes it) by dopamine receptors in neurons, then that must imply there is a dopamine excess. Dopamine should be measurable right? Oh, wait, you're telling me the entire basis for you determining whether I'm mentally ill is a symptomal checklist? Oh gee…

So you see, therein lies my philosophical and scientific contention with the use of drugs when the right instrument for its analysis isn't even available to us (an intra-spinal-fluid measure of dopamine levels available in the brain).

When you combine that with the fact that it has a track record worse than placebo and a side-effects profile to match, you wonder whether it's just the accumulation of side-effects to fight with more "medication" that is the end goal of the psychiatrist: to get you on a merry-go-round of polypharmia.

>>1680
They follow a logic alien to you because the psychiatry that's portrayed by mainstream Jewsmedia isn't the psychiatry that developed and gradually warped itself over the course of history. To say it was "trial and error" that brought nearly all its discoveries – and not just the one odd invention here or there as with other fields – would understate the degree of dumb luck involved in modern psychopharmaceutical's founding.

The point stands which you haven't disproven: psychiatry's not a science and certainly not even 'medicine' where it's application as an art is concerned. That would imply it had real methods of medicinal analysis beyond a superficial checklist, and that any degree of genuinely profound or nuanced interpretation is involved in reaching conclusions even based on such a checklist. Psychiatry was frequently regarded the science 'medical professionals' who weren't cut out for real medicine had been consigned to in their inability to get accepted into proper programmes.

All medicines have side effects; psychiatric medicines don't even compete with placebo controls.

The end goal of psychiatry which can be logically deduced from the inefficacy of medicines is that the very objective they wish to reach is to make you suffer from as many side-effects as possible, giving them ample opportunity to diagnose more fake disorders. It's a vicious circle.

I won't bother. I've frankly had a better experience even with natural medicine (and I'm not even talking about illicit herbs).

This is Bob.

He uses language in such a loose way that it reminds me of me during my worst at 2012-14.

>>1686
>an average of 195 at bowling
an average.. damn that's good. if i fluked i'd still max out before 160.

>>1703
I've not visited in days but before you'd set me off on one, I had a response which I've just remembered.

http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method

>It is an answer to the question: is there a way to tell whether a concept or theory is science, as opposed to some other kind of knowledge or belief?

Protip: psychiatry fails this test. There's no way to tell its constituent hypotheses apart from fiction. Now feel free to ban me 54m50n, I'm ready to retch just thinking about this spinster.