>>953He will be doubtlessly referring to the studies which had finally decoupled affective and cognitive empathy.
The psychopathic Jew Cohen had them suppressed later, out of insane jealousy that his agenda was being devalidated.
I doubt doubt we score low EQ's on Cohen's Jewish-style empathy scale, because none of that is measuring European-style empathy; Jews need to train themselves into estimating feelins through their thouhts, Europeans don't need to, their emotional attunement is fine. This is how I rationalize the connection between the affective-conitive EQ bifurcation and race, except Cohen's EQ only measures the
latter part of that bifurcation, as I've repeatedly mentioned before.
One can, instead of viewing it as a dichotomy, have two options: changing the quadratic rubric so that empathy is scaled congnitively-to-affectively
RATHER THAN BEING ONE MORASS, or as I had discussed with another autistic acquaintance of mine at college,
seeing where the overlap in neuromasculinity and neurofemininity exist, which is more likely where we'll find our answer.
It seems fitting to me that Aspergers in particular (forget the rest of the spectrum for a moment) is a case of neural bigenderism; there are an inconsistent array of traits, some which can be easily classified as extreme neurofeminine, some which can easily be classified as extreme neuromasculine, with no clear continuuation where moderates as such exist in the symptomology. An example of that is permanent memory
is not a neuromasculine trait, yet it is attributed to Aspergers. Hypothetically it'd make more sense than scapegoating masculinity.