[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/r9trip/ - The Complete Robot

More androids than an Asimov novel

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
A message from @CodeMonkeyZ, 2ch lead developer: "How Hiroyuki Nishimura will sell 4chan data"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 4 per post.

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.949

Lolcows in order of intelligence thread anyone?

Video embedded is semi-related; that's David Chac, my former partner of ~2 years until March '14. (I don't know if Moss is aware that I'm gay yet.)

Fuck /cow/'s talk of Nick's intelligence. They don't know how to interpret the test. It's clear Nick's general intelligence is deficient compared to his ability to bullshit. This is evidenced in his inability to rationalize his own paedophillia! He's a 109 per his Raven score, not a 129 nor even a 147 (his verbal score), plain and simple. At least I could rationalize my racism.



Debating skill is general intelligence skill. I don't care if verbal meanderances make one more slick, forging impression of cogency. If an argument lacks substance, it has holes; Nick has too many holes in his ramblings of paedophillicism to even entertain with seriousness.



Both my informal Raven test and my proctored IQ both rank me as above average in general intelligence (fluid intelligence skill is the most g-loaded subset of any test). The latter ranks me as of average verbal skill. I'm not as slick as I thought, but it isn't unlivable, and I certainly won't beckon to humiliation when I likely have more raw intelligence than Jason Scott, even if I'm not verbally slick. I value my hypermale profile, and laugh at the Nicks ands Jasons of this world.

I can understand information far beyond my ability to comprehend it verbally on its face (right-brain dominance), which sounds paradoxical, but this is common among autists. Let me explain further: general intelligence in autists, as it is in Mongolians, in Amerinds, and any other VS-dominant profile group, is used as a substitute, a surrogate, for deficient verbal skill, and is only of the many compensation mechanisms employed by them.

In the case of Mongoloids, the verbal deficiency isn't that great vis-a-vis Whites (96 vs. 100), which is why most of them try to, and successfully, speak English well. Still, you can tell from its mechanical asyndeton, that they were using different processes to learn language, that lie closer to the Asperger side of the neural spectrum.

Anti-psychotics were a nightmare for me. All they do is rob you of your right-brain and force you to live in a temporal, feminine realm. Psychiatrists prescribe them to autists out of a desire to retard them, because it's amusing. RSDuke, who I know is the Legion Faggotymous 'neurochemistry major' poster from writing style, makes no secret that he is a sociopath in one of his threads, which is why he wants to matriculate up psychiatric profession and inflict harm upon autists.

I think Chris-chan is demonstrable example of VS>V (visuospatial>verbal). It's no secret where I regard his intelligence to be. He is average in both subsets, but high- and low- for each of the afformentioned, respectively. Videogames, his only 'good' class being trig, and a visually-dominant thinking style (even if dyscalculia fucks up his presentation of that) are all evidence of this. Then you have his ability to comprehend and use language. Speaks for itself. It's not completely abysmal, he has a concrete understanding of basic grammar, but it falls over on itself when he tries to play fast and loose. I can relate with this.

 No.950

(cont.)


Why is his writing bad? VS-dominants learn to systematize language differently, especially lexicographical language. They don't really learn to 'write', so much as they learn to mimic lexicographs by visual rote. Hence contributing to a word salad appearance. This is due to the combination of a visuospatial thinking style with poor verbal skill. Koreans had simplified their alphabet, in my opinion, so as to spend less time wasted on this. The Chinese hadn't done so well with simplified Chinese, though most, if I recall, only use 1,500 basic characters, with the rest aided by autocompletion software when needed.

It's possible that Chris-chan has more raw intelligence than Nick Bate (a 109, not a 129 or a 147 as his fake subsets determine, do not forget), which is why the latter is, in my eyes, a bigger lolcow.

I don't even think Robert Wayne Stiles is as stupid as people make out. He again has English grammar issues but it's mostly superficial (punctuation mastery is not a hypermale trait). His ability to speak is solid. Whether he is a VS>V, I can't be sure, because I'm not even sure if he has Asperger's; from all indications, sociopathy better fits the bill, which is a V>VS condition (I remember RSDuke once boasted of his verbal comprehension skill of 124 in an Army-mandated IQ test; can we be sure the rest of his scores are as high?). His interests aren't excessively spergy, and all recent sperginess I can easily attribute to the antipsychotics he is on, which actually worsen (in his case, the appearance of) autism in the long term. Robert might be a low-average overall.

I wouldn't place him lower than a 90. He's impetuous and never thinks; that's plenty of IQ-90s, not necessarily indicative of extreme retardation. The average person has no motivation to think. They are in the intellectual mode of consumption only, as are nearly all sub-100s and most 100-110s, with few exceptions (the VS-dominants).

Jace, the TGWTG spergs, Pixyteri, and others, all strike me as average. Jace's determination never to learn anything might actually be throttling his innate potential. His writing isn't terrible! In anywhere it is weak, it's mostly due to superficial, functional errors.

Sammy is by far the least intelligent lolcow. I can't tell if this is genetic (he seems to have some facility with technology, indicating reasonable general intelligence) or the result of anti-psychotic abuse. I remember reading his political views. He certainly has his mind in the right place, despite its inchoate development. He is exemplary of Asperger social conservative values. This leads me to think that whatever his overall intellectual profile, his logical and general reasoning skills far exceed his verbal perspicacity.

Before people chime 'he is parasitic, hikki NEET', the liberals are to blame for that, encouraging the idea in employers that Aspergers sufferers belong to welfare dependency, so that the Jasons, who control the economy, never hire them.

I'm done. I wasted class and part of a lunchtime writing this. Thankfully lecturer left me alone; she assumed I was doing work/taking notes.

 No.954

>>949
>(I don't know if Moss is aware that I'm gay yet.)

I'm aware that you're gay. I didn't realise that you'd actually partnered with Chac though, I thought your relation with Chac was strictly as friends with common interests.

Now that I've clarified that, I'll read the rest of the thread.

 No.955

>>949
Ok, so following on.
I didn't actually know Chac was gay though. Also, good thing you've seen the light as far as his true nature.
Just so you know, I'm still a bit lost on the whole background story, in that I don't know enough about Chac, Nick, Jason, RSDuke, Robert etc. Honestly, I don't really concern myself with lolcows and am only interested in them insofar as your rapport with any of them has led to a better understanding of psychology as per the thread you started for your twitter.

>Debating skill is general intelligence skill. I don't care if verbal meanderances make one more slick, forging impression of cogency. If an argument lacks substance, it has holes

Yeah, excellent point.

As for meds, never been on antipsychotics myself, just Citalopram for chronic depression/GAD. Didn't work.
"Didn't work is an understatement".
My problems dated back to 2008, I started smoking cannabis in 2010 although not regularly.
By the end of 2013 I'd re-entered education and began attending college. Cannabis use became more frequent and helped me cope just fine. Then August last year came and I had to get off it in preparation for moving and transferring college, went a month or so without nothing, got on citalopram and… well yeah, just look at my thread from the sunday/monday I cut myself the fuck up and ended up in A&E.

 No.956

>>955
*"Didn't work" is an understatement.

 No.957

>>955
*without anything

fuck I'm getting worse with my grammar.

 No.961

>>955
Chac's a number of barely-coherent things. Last, he identified as pansexual genderfluid. :/

I don't even think he was truly gay. He wanted me as a surrogate for his inability to get a woman I'm sure. The feelings were purely unilateral; I gave, but with nothing returned.

I will make introductory thread on them all later, for background information.

I don't know if I told you about my suicide attempt in January 2014. It was becoming clear that neither David nor anyone for that matter was there for me in the world. Also I was driven by psychosis-fuelled gender dysphoric "feelings" I've had since the age of 13 but refused to acknowlede I was actually just suffering an agravated depressive-hypomanic episode to simply go and off myself in the forest, to my failure of course.

1 gram diphenhydramine and a bottle of alcohol sent me meandering around the woods for 7 days until I was discovered by an off-duty police officer. I had a profound psychotic experience throuhout that entire period which scared the shit out of me; Jason, who I thought was named 'Cioran Murphy' at the time, was one of the people I saw and to wit, he told me, he could 'only advise me', with reference to where to find the red beacon where the Jews were meant to assassinate me. This is also what the 'woman who had stolen my reflection' referred to as well. A man who looked a lot like one of my old psychiatrists had stood in front of her asking if this was '[my] future?'

I'm a nutter, I know. But I voluntarily try to vanquish such thoughts daily. There is an ideological struggle for my neurogender (and thus neuro-race, effectively) and its destruction at their hands, I must stay with resillient valliance in my devotion of loyalty to this struggle.

That's more than David ever did, who is now miscegenating with neurofemme genes.

 No.962

I find it funny that while some would call me a lolcow, when I don't respond to their bullshit they get mad. So far it's only been places like /cow/ that does this. ED has moved on. No one else seems to care that I have a small penis (even though this isn't true) and thus all I am is an anime sperg.

 No.966

>>961
>I will make introductory thread on them all later
that would be appreciated.

Also, try not to go off the rails. In the current social climate, you have a lot of cards to play. Mixed race, gay, with (what the gynocentric liberals deem to be) a learning disability.

We know none of this means anything, because a truth is a truth no matter who articulates it. But brownie points to the liberals they are nonetheless, and whilst they may call you out as self-hating and merely projecting a low self-esteem,
1) The more of us try and talk sense the less water this argument will hold.
2) We merely need to make a habit of pointing out that we became this way having been immersed in their culture, ergo if our ideas are flawed, such flaws would have their root in their culture to start with. This is a logical fallacy and the only way to make sense of it is simply to deem that at its core, their ideology is indeed incorrect.

Needless to say, I don't have many people to talk about such subjects that interest me. That's changing now, predominantly through talking with other people on the autistic spectrum.

Before that, it was reduced to socialising with a (more moderate and non-violent) white nationalist.
He's switched on enough to begin to grasp the ideas I introduce him to, but he still hasn't got to the point where he sees the value in reading a lot more into it himself, independently.
Now's a pretty good time since his long term girlfriend walked out on him because of a rough spot as far as job security goes. It's amazing, isn't it? You'd think after so many years, if she truly felt anything for him, she would have stuck by him, but no. She felt for him, yes, but she couldn't override that sense of realising he wasn't the valuable long term prospect she thought he was. And just like that, it was over…

I articulate my ideas best in discussion. Talking to people such as yourself really helps. The more I converse, the more I find myself able to grasp concepts, complex ideas, it's exciting. One day I hope to solidify a methodology for the expression of such ideas covering all aspects of society. Start up a fringe political party, write up an extensive manifesto, just in principle. People might never recognise such a contribution in this day and age, but to be able to offer up a different view on the world, a fresh take on how to tackle the problems we face, and put it out there… that'd be worth it IMO.

 No.1009

>>966
>In the current social climate…

Ahahaha no. All the Jasons do is try to deny lending any credibility to your identities. When they really want to rail against autistics, and just about everyone hates them as much as Jason does, they'll keep deconstructing and deconstructing and deconstructing your identity until you're nothing but a tabula rasa robot in their eyes.

So it means even less in the context where these cards were ever to be employed. They don't want it to mean anything, so why should I let it determine my participation in the liberal zeitgeist?

Cultural essentialism is the culture in which raw, autistic logic has been delegitimated. You are partially correct, but you are not contextualizing it in terms of what I call the neurosexkrieg. (I had an essay written up about it, but I'm probably never going to post it on my blog). Relativism is the natural mens rea of neurotypical intellectual terrorism. It allows them to strip context and meaning inherent to words, and extrapolate it outwith the sentence's semantic space, so as to delegitimate it. You're not allowed to think in such a culture; thought is relegated to the exo-spatial 'professors' who are the only ones allowed to give meaning and context. As such, neurotypicals depend on the 'given' from their tribal masters, just like their African ancestors, a process much alien to our Eurasian ways.

We should really work together on some writings, and if we can get your WN to participate in some small way (even if so much as for the distribution) then that would be fantastic. Do you have a Skype?

 No.1010

>>1009
Fuck I love this Pyongyangesque slur I've coinced, 'neurotypical intellectual terrorism.'

It saddens me that Aspergia isn't a real thing. Had we a central news agency, we could issue edicts on the depravity of neurotypicals in the West all the time.

 No.1015

>>1014
i don't know if you use a throwaway or an account with all your actual details.
i have both, but i practically don't use the latter at all.

 No.1017

>>1014
Added.

 No.1018

>>1016
numlock + alt + 0173
t­ripfag

 No.1048

>>961
Could you make a more detailed thread focusing on your psychotic experience, please?
What I've read so far is fascinating.

 No.1059

>>1048
My memory of it isn't the best.

I tell you what though, I'll focus on trying to dredge up what details I can remember over the course of tonight. I'll write it up on the computer I have which isn't connected to the internet (that I normally use for essays and stuff, as a means of providing non-distraction) and transfer it onto either 1. the computer that is connected, or 2. a computer at school or at the library, depending on what time of day it is that I get around to it (I'm not always at home).

It's strange, because autism and psychosis are meant to be dichotomical opposites, and yet, we see plenty who suffer both, myself included. Cohen doesn't know shit! Lol.

 No.1347

>>950

It's hard to tell how intelligence is constrained by maladaptive behaviours caused by nurture.

The fact is that /cow/ has typically veered between mockery of chris-chan & pity based upon a supposedly wretched upbringing. The assumption being that his parents were ill-placed, due to ideology & socio-economic stratum, to properly raise an autistic male.

As for Robert & Jace they clearly haven't been able or expected to engage with adult responsibilities. They are living in a delayed adolescence. Jace's fantasies about military valor and Stiles' fantasies about fame via photography seem like similar wish fulfillment.

 No.1387

>>1347
I'm sure more liberally permissive parents would've absolutely destroyed any potential of Chris-chan's. That to me just seems like Jason Scott-fuelled neocon-baiting against the 'White cis-patriarchy'. The fact of the matter being, Bob was simply trying to raise his son no different to how any other dad from the greater generation would. That isn't a crime, that was an attempt to get Chris-chan to engage in a wake-up call and adopt some semblance of good values. That somebody as dysfunctional as David Chac responded to his dad's wake-up call, tells me that something more severe than even autism is going on in Chris-chan's mind, maybe some kind of autoinfantile regression.

I can't say that I disagree with your observations on Robert and Jace, but Jace strikes me as exaggerating his maladies for entertainment value among his audience.

 No.1410

>>1387
I agree. Chris' parents did the best the could.

Now, Peter Coffin is the mercurial lolcow that defies any explanation. He single-handedly reinvigorated a moribund /cow/ through the sheer verve, range and persistence of his fantasies.

I still don't know what the actual scenario concerning his 'wife' is. There's no metric for this pissant behaviour.

 No.1425

>>1410
Assuming the history checks out (and this is one rare instance that I'd trust psychicfish over /cow/; /cow/ simply demonstrated in their ousting of psychicfish that there's no honour amongst theives) then Peter can still be accused of fishing for the equivalent of a gratis mail-order bride when he was clearly out-leagued by everyone woman for his infinitely pussyish feminist-bot shit.

I think they eventually found that this Ashley was not even maritally related to him, but some random tumblr bitch who had been enlisted to his aid. I wouldn't be too clear on the details of that; Peter bores me enough not to be of hugely sufficient interest to follow him.

 No.1426

>>1425
>everyone woman

every local woman*

Sorry, tiredness. I've been studying, both real coursework and my raciology obsession.


[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]