[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/realnews/ - REAL NEWS

Real News Without Shills or Trolls

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1443207574258.png (661.61 KB, 1022x569, 1022:569, UN_Agenda_Censorship.png)

 No.556

The United Nations has a radical, dangerous vision for the future of the Web.

Under U.S. law — the law that, not coincidentally, governs most of the world’s largest online platforms — intermediaries such as Twitter and Facebook generally can’t be held responsible for what people do on them. But the United Nations proposes both that social networks proactively police every profile and post, and that government agencies only “license” those who agree to do so.

But the United Nations goes on to propose radical, 'proactive policy changes' for both governments and social networks, effectively projecting a whole new vision for how the Internet could work.

At one point toward the end of the paper, the U.N. panel concludes that “political and governmental bodies need to use their licensing prerogative” to 'better protect human and women’s rights' (yah right!), only granting licenses to “those Telecoms and search engines” that “supervise content and its dissemination.”

In other words, the United Nations believes that online platforms should be (a) generally responsible for the actions of their users and (b) specifically responsible for making sure those people aren’t harassers.

Regardless of whether you think those are worthwhile ends, the implications are huge: It’s an attempt to transform the Web from a libertarian free-for-all to some kind of enforced social commons.

https://archive.is/W7iTG

 No.557

Censorship Resistant Software

(Full Updated Archives | ZIPPED | 15.7GB)

https://mega.co.nz/#F!kJw0jZZb!qDpY2xGsWjsgbEv8toWAQQ

Censorship Resistant Software.tar.gz | 14.66GB

https://mega.co.nz/#!gdI03CDK!YnLiP4cUdLPa__62TG5LwEP1zoAEndvOyBxD1eLlWIE

These updated archives include loads more software and tools to counter online censorship than the recent archives released in December of 2014! The Alpha release contained around ~6GB total - this new Beta release contains around ~16GB total! This release contains tools used by Russian and Chinese people to counter censorship (DPI) as well. It also contains a brand new archive with three separate Operating Systems used by people around the world to access the internet during times of crisis!


 No.562

The United Nations has disgraced itself immeasurably over the past month or so.

In case you missed the following stories, I suggest catching up now:

The UN’s “Sustainable Development Agenda” is Basically a Giant Corporatist Fraud: https://archive.is/CbjY8

Not a Joke – Saudi Arabia Chosen to Head UN Human Rights Panel (fixed): >>509

Fresh off the scene from those two epic embarrassments, the UN now wants to tell governments of the world how to censor the internet. I wish I was kidding.

https://archive.is/Rn2hy

http://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2015/09/25/the-un-releases-plan-to-push-for-worldwide-internet-censorship/

Post last edited at

 No.690

With the latest call from China for an Internet "code of conduct" to be enforced by the "international community" we see the final phase of of an agenda meant to curtail free speech and control what is said, who says it and who sees it on the world wide web. For Americans, these "international norms" would directly nullify their constitutional right of free speech.

"It is highly necessary and pressing for the international community to jointly bring about an international code of conduct on cyberspace at an early date," said Wang Qun, director-general of the Arms Control Department of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, in comments to the U.N. General Assembly.

Wang's comments were reported by China's main state-owned press outlet, the Xinhua News Agency.

"China, for its part, will continue to commit itself to establishing a peaceful, secure, open and cooperative cyberspace and pushing for an early international code of conduct acceptable to all," Wang added.

For anybody that still has any doubt that Americans have been sold down the river and this was the agenda the whole time, we can pinpoint specific events that have brought us to the brink of having our Internet freedom of speech completely stifled.

Look back to a Newsweek article from March 2015, titled "Obama Wants a Global Community to Run the Internet, but It Could End Up in the Hands of China. Or Putin."

But they acknowledge that such a vision is yet to be fleshed out. A process to define a new approach to Internet governance was launched at a March conference in Singapore. Another gathering will be hosted in late April by Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff in São Paolo. There, organizers hope, global "stakeholders" will form a body capable of taking over the functions currently performed by the U.S. government. There will be other conferences, including one next September in Turkey, whose prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, just tried to muzzle Twitter in his country.

Pessimists note that international conferences often end in disagreement and rancor. Just look at what has happened to international talks on environmental issues, where for decades governments and activists have failed to agree on meaningful measures to combat climate change. Instead of a meeting of the minds, the pessimists fear, powerful undemocratic governments will muscle in and stifle the freedoms now enjoyed by Web users.

More from the Washington Times from May 2014:

In advance of a meeting in 2012 to consider changes to the ITU’s international communications regulations, Russia’s Vladimir Putin explicitly stated that he wanted to achieve “international control of the Internet using the monitoring and supervisory capability” of the United Nations.

What’s more, several countries did not hide their intent to adopt as official policy government censorship of Internet communications. A proposal floated by Russia, China, Saudi Arabia and Iran — countries not known for respecting free speech — declared that ITU member states should be allowed to restrict communications “used for the purpose of interfering in the internal affairs or undermining the sovereignty, national security, territorial integrity, and public safety of other states; or to divulge information of a sensitive nature.”

Read more here:

https://archive.is/FqiVq

http://allnewspipeline.com/Internet_Code_Of_Conduct.php




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]