[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/realnews/ - REAL NEWS

Real News Without Shills or Trolls

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next update (Jan 4 2016)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1444848400086.jpg (8.63 KB, 300x201, 100:67, BLM_land_grabbers.jpg)

 No.702

A Northern Texas rancher says property that’s been in his family for over half a century is now suddenly being targeted for confiscation by the Bureau of Land Management.

Ken Aderholt runs cattle on his roughly 1,250 acres in Harrold, Texas, along the Red River, which forms the border between the Lone Star State and Oklahoma.

Aderholt’s family has had a deed to the land since 1941, and he had hoped to pass the property and the family business on to his sons.

“They come down here a lot and play,” Aderholt told KAUZ News Channel 6. “They help with the cattle and help building fences. They are very interested in hanging round here and helping me out.”

But according to the Bureau of Land Management, the same federal government agency that confronted Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy in 2014, some of that land belongs to the feds, and they want the Aderholts off it.

Furthermore, the BLM claims the deed that proves Aderholt’s ownership of the land, given to his parents by the State of Texas, is worthless.

“The BLM is saying we should have never had a deed to it. That Texas should have never produced that deed,” Aderholt said.

The rancher concedes the BLM is entitled to land “along the gradient boundary,” according to KAUZ, which Aderholt says is dependent on “the way the water washes and cuts into different properties.”

But the BLM argues the real boundary lies a half mile inland from the river, which cuts into 600 acres of Aderholt’s land.

KAUZ reports the BLM’s efforts could leave Aderholt and his family homeless, as his “house is located inside the 600 acres the BLM wants to claim.”

Despite never bothering him for the last 70 years, the feds aren’t offering Aderholt an explanation for what they plan to do with the land.

“They could own it, they could turn it to the public, they could condemn it, they could sell it back to me,” Aderholt says.

“It is a land grab,” Aderholt insists. “As far as I am concerned, this is private property.”

https://archive.is/IUqkM

http://www.infowars.com/texas-rancher-prepares-to-fight-back-against-blm-land-grab

 No.709

>>708

>There was no seizure of land that belonged to Cliven Bundy

The thugs at the BLM would have took his land if he didn't have a strong ass militia protecting him. He refused to pay a huge fine, that alone could be used as an excuse to seize his property which I bet was true intent of the BLM.

The BLM has been known to kick many people off their property before for completely asinine reasons. Whether Bundy would have gotten kicked off his property or not, we really don't know for sure.

>who is a criminal who, if anything, has been dealt with too leniently

Bullshit. Bundy refused to pay a huge fucking fine he didn't deserve in the first place. Some people would call that extortion! He didn't disobey any laws or regulations intentionally. So what his cattle crossed federal land? It's not like one rancher can keep track of all his cattle 100% of the time!

>Infowars just copied the local news article

Good! At least they'll force it to stay up and keep it publicly available in the future for a reference.

>I smell BS, as with 99% of the garbage on this board.

How about you stop trolling me on this news board and get the fuck off it then? Go back to /n/ and stay there with the rest of all the yuppy dead-head liberals. I've been too busy prepping to reply the last few days (offline and on the lay low), but from now on this is my last response to trolls such as yourself: if don't like me or content I post here, then take the advice of the moderator! You are not being forced to come here, you can ignore this board if you like.


 No.987

Multiple ranchers, a sheriff and several Texas counties are suing the federal government for unconstitutionally attempting to seize thousands of acres of private property along the Red River.

Claiming the US Bureau of Land Management is violating citizens’ Fourth and Fifth Amendments and “infringing upon the sovereignty of local county governments,” a lawsuit filed in US District Court by nine private landowners, including one county sheriff, in addition to Wichita, Clay, and Wilbarger counties, seeks to end the dispute with the feds once and for all.

The lawsuit claims the federal government’s “ownership of property is limited to bottom-half of the sandy riverbed outside of Texas.

“Nonetheless, the BLM asserts that its boundary extends well past the riverbed into Texas and, in some instances, more than a mile outside of its lawful territory.”

Plaintiff and rancher Ken Aderholt spoke out last month about the federal takeover threatening nearly half of his family’s land and home.

Despite Aderholt possessing a deed to 1,250 acres of property in Harrold, Texas since 1941, the BLM recently deemed the title worthless, asserting ownership of some 600 acres.

“The BLM is saying we should have never had a deed to it. That Texas should have never produced that deed,” Aderholt told KAUZ.

“It is a land grab,” Aderholt insists. “As far as I am concerned, this is private property.”

https://archive.is/fKgcb

http://www.infowars.com/texas-ranchers-counties-sue-feds-over-blm-land-grab/


 No.988

>>713

I would advise you go back to /leftypol/ where you belong with all of your other delusional despot friends and stop trolling. You can't handle real news.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]