/reddit/ - plebbit

Really, /pol/tards bing surprised they get B& for posting racist shit? It'd be better if you didnt have names liks "Something_Offensive and "88" in your name and modded "niggers" or w/e reddits.

>>189
this x infinity. yall niggas are stupid as shit.

also the mod in the op doesn't mod /r/news anymore because apparently he banned too many racists and got mods above him salty. kek

Op if you want to make people understand your point of view you can't go on strong like that.

I don't agree with your ideals (given that you're actually a white nationalist) but you should introduce the concept of useful stereotyping/useful presumptions rather than make the (incorrect/unproven) idea that non-caucasians are violent and criminal by nature. If you want to have this narrative you should promote the idea that their situation/culture makes them the way they are instead.

I don't think your view is logically sustainable because it's based on false assumptions of correlation. So you're unlikely to convince people of something without being a sensationalist news asshole.

Now presuming you're right and somehow non-Caucasians are violent beasts then you should still promote the idea of useful/effective stereotyping because your truth will become evident eventually.

While you're just posting facts and letting people explain it away with their own reasons you will only invest them in having their own explanations be right. If you made the claim that african american culture with gangs and such being bad you'd get a lot more support and reddit being the crowd they are they're more likely to agree.

I find the concept of white nationalists disgusting because the movement is openly promoting violence and has 99% of the time very little philosophical base for their arguments. On top of that it's nationalism. Among the most dangerous ideals to hold in the world.

>>190
How the fuck is that racist you idiot.

BipolarBear is a known Zionist shill.

a bunch of faggots being faggots, op included

>>173
>white nationalist
And you want people to think you aren't racist? Top fucking kek

>>173
>2012
>/r/politics is in full progressive-circlejerk mode because "muh mittens"
>shit about all sorts of things the "ebil republicans" are doing is the entire makeup of the news
>there's almost nothing bad about obama
>calling the board out on this results in the regulars frantically searching for something that does criticize him
>get buried when you point out the criticisms are of him not being progressive enough
>wondering why i'm still here
>see thread about how "ebil republicans are infringing on voters" because florida is imposing voter ID laws
>ask the circlejerk in the comments section why this is bad
>get condescending responses from one guy about how it's inconvenient
>detail the process to getting different forms of state-issued ID and reply with it not being hard at all
>as all the "le upboats" that he's getting lengthens his e-peen, his comments towards me get more hostile and start to include name calling
>rebuke the "muh inconvenience" shit he's parroting by bringing up the fact you need ID to buy alcohol, cigarettes, guns, mature movies and video games, as well as drive, open bank accounts, or do a lot of things in the US
>he gets mad with this, everyone reading my horrifying affront to their hugbox buries my response
>he claims i'm trying to help the republicans cheat by denying votes
>i claim he's trying to help the democrats cheat by getting votes from illegal aliens to count
>banned from /r/politics for being racist five minutes later
>get up next morning and see all the submissions/comments i've made on the account are all down by ~50 points each
>realize the hugbox hivemind decided that my digital ego needed to be hit hard for having a different opinion
>quit going to plebbit after that

and nothing of value was lost

BipolarBear is a fucking cuck faggot.

>>266
He got doxxed hardcore awhile back, he's a known Zionist shill.

>>173
Disgusting horseshit. Not that I agree with you about your views on race, but that's plain oppression of free speech.

Reddit must burn.

>>182
Probably because you did that faggy comma thing , ya know?

>website bans racism
>you post racism and get banned

Could've figured that out by reading the sidebar.

>be an obvious /pol/ retard
>expect serious replies

>get called for your shitty post history
>lol they mad xD

no im not redditor or sjw, the only reason im here is because i tried if 8chad has a reddit board

>>189

I'm confused, how are those stats "racist"?

They're just a statistical representation of reality, following your logic, the conclusion is that reality itself is "racist."



> adjective
>Showing or feeling discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or believing that a particular race is superior to another: we are investigating complaints about racist abuse at the club

>discrimination
>prejudice

The statistics include hispanics, whites, even native americans.

They also do not directly condemn any one race for their behavior/criminal data. I really would like you to enlighten me anon.

>>198

>don't agree with your ideals (given that you're actually a white nationalist)

I've been waiting for a well thought out counter argument for his ideals, if you could provide one it'd be much appreciated, but don't wanna impose you to.

>false assumptions of correlation
>somehow non-Caucasians are violent beasts

Like I said in my initial reply to another anon, all OP did was provide legitimate, unbiased statistics, the explanation I'd really like you to give that is more relevant is how you came to that conclusion from that data. Are you saying that if you look at the data of reality in our country the ONLY conclusion is that non-caucasians are violent beasts? What if the stats are skewed? What if all people of african descent in America are brainwashed commit crime by white institutions? You can come to many conclusions that are all over the spectrum of right and left wing but why is it that you choose to assume?

>>244

If someone automatically correlates white nationalism with "racism" then they are not making a logical decision for many different reasons. I do not call the Japanese Nationalists racist for their ideals, one because I avoid using meaningless words, and two because I've researched their ideals and non of them really speak negatively about any race

.>>272

Yet another anon that I must ask of this, can you please provide a reasonable explanation as to why these statistics are "racist" in any way.

>derailing successfully a thread
>getting an obvious /pol/ack
>getting b&
good job, op