File: 1439759928191.jpg (334.15 KB, 1240x739, 1240:739, b7cc1028459667.55c129c9842….jpg)
9ec4ce No.687
I feel that having a consistent design style throughout the project will go a long way in making it appear more legitimate. This includes logos and images as well as text layout/page design, especially if we go with >>39 and compile the material into an offline webpage.
I have a fair amount of graphic design experience and such, but what sort of style do we think would be appropriate?
posting some design examples i've found interesting
9ec4ce No.688
File: 1439760198149.jpg (318.53 KB, 1200x1385, 240:277, 8e683c8b6a126cb34b98881a2d….jpg)
9ec4ce No.690
File: 1439760416692.jpg (259.17 KB, 1240x827, 1240:827, b406a0fcae285b773aed1998d8….jpg)
8e4abf No.705
This is what I made in html/css 3, just something that doesn't look too agressive or overwhelming with lots of room for change.
Anything is possible so let's see what we can do with it
Code (2 htmlpages and 3 css stylesheets and some images for now) for V1.2:
https://mega.nz/#!tJpnyR6a!bToURhRdeGgLpP9Vagj3yeBv2pTmRtvIIb0Qe_QAfaA
(I am going to upload it to github probably or something else that isn't owned by the kikes. so we can all work on it while being able to make backups)
a739a1 No.708
>>705
I really like this style.
8e4abf No.711
Made a github account and made this (public) repository, anythting I should know before I submit my current code? (V1.2 of this >>705)
>>708
thx mate
01454f No.714
>>711
Make sure to save back ups (of course) and keep the actual content to a minimum because as I'm sure you know or have been told it's been infiltrated by SJW modes who might outright delete your project or kick you out once they look at the content.
>>705
I know It's early on but It would be cool from a design perspective if we could do something like >>687 with a transparent foreground and upload custom backgrounds for each subject. The color scheme on >>687 is cool too, light grays with red highlights on a deep blue background is very easy on the eyes.
If we were discussing WWII for example and used pic related as the background with a blueish filter with text over laid it would be very cool. Bonus if we could put a button to bring it to the foreground that would slowly fade from the bluish filter to original color. Or maybe if we had a collage of different pictures on a universal background like a world map or a large logo like in >>599 with the 3 swords it would be very slick.
9ec4ce No.722
File: 1439776151568.jpg (841.15 KB, 1240x5641, 1240:5641, 9efca35a0baaf3f710ffe8acc4….jpg)
9ec4ce No.737
This is basically napkin doodle level right now, but I started working on designs a bit.
8e4abf No.741
>>737
Looks great. We can surely mix it with>>714.
My impression from your design is that its contents will look serious. I'm going to see what it gives when I mix it up with the html i made already, my be the dark background will look great with the red picture (see >>705)
or something like that.
5987c3 No.742
I like the streamlined look of this. Clean, clear and easy to read. Normies can then easiy flip through pages and we can re-do some of our redpill images to make them easier to understand.
9ec4ce No.743
Fucked with it a bit more, blending the background as >>714 suggested - though something other than uncle dolf may be a better intro page choice eventually :^)
9ec4ce No.744
>>741
yeah, my intent at this stage is just trying to figure out a good design style, and from there creating mockups/templates/style guide for web development and infographics etc
a739a1 No.751
>>722
Holy shit they look perfect for this
29b65e No.753
>>737
Inspired of your designs if tweaked my design to this already, how do we proceed? what could we change?
Sharp corners look better than the round corners in retrospect, en yet don't look too agressive imo. colors also updated and I put the logo on the bottom of the page.
(may be we make the logo invisible untill hovered over the button when going to the first section? or the logo in the button itself when hovering over?)
29b65e No.754
>>753
also updated the text according to the changes I suggested before
9ec4ce No.756
>>753
Going to sleep shortly, but the red gradient feels very 2006 corporate intranet page to me at the moment. Bold/sharp use of color fits the message much better imo
29b65e No.763
>>756
allright, didn't look at it that way.
I will think of something in the meantime that doesn't look outdated lel
29b65e No.764
>>763
first thing that comes to mind is Mirror's Edge-style art (red simple sharp shapes seperated by white lines in them)
May be I'll make something in the corner(s) like that?
9ec4ce No.765
>>764
yeah, mirror's edge edge has very good design for this sort of thing
8e4abf No.773
Made some backgrounds in PS in jewdows, I'll see later how they fit into the html.
Inspired on the Mirror's Edge style
1/2
8e4abf No.791
How these backgrounds look with the html (v1.4)
1/2
9ec4ce No.797
Mockup update: I changed up the typeface, but I'm not settled on this yet. Vectorized a logo from the other thread and added it as in >>791.
I also did a different page menu design on the left, but I'm not sure which i prefer yet.
8e4abf No.798
>>797
Your colors support better the idea of our RedSticks, also i think content will fit yours better.
Especially the bottom, looks better imo
9ec4ce No.802
>>798
>tfw cant remember how to css/html at all
oh lord
9ec4ce No.806
9ec4ce No.807
>>806
oh kek rip that tripcode
01454f No.814
>>797
Looks good. I wouldn't change anything other than adjusting the darkness a tad.
Should we start to decide on a good image to use for the background of the into? Perhaps the Oath of the Horatii?
a739a1 No.828
>>797
This is the style we should use for all the documents. Or at least most.
9ec4ce No.829
8e4abf No.830
File: 1439898287586.png (1.22 MB, 1903x1627, 1903:1627, Greetings._-_2015-08-18_13….png)
I'll have time this afternoon, but here's the current coded version based on Adrijan's mockup (I continued from the css from the red-white design)
I'll add the menu and other things later.
Also i'll make a page for content of Section I, the intro will be a little different from the actual content (like not needing a menu)
8e4abf No.831
>>830
also hovering over the bottom menu gives this line:
8e4abf No.833
File: 1439899278082.png (2.11 MB, 1903x1687, 1903:1687, Greetings._-_2015-08-18_14….png)
1cea4f No.845
>>833
Great job. I like the layout a lot!
f2f5fe No.847
>>814
>>827
It looks really slick, but I don't know. Normies could look at it and see the "lel hitler salute", and thus drop it. I really really like it, though.
1cea4f No.854
>>847
It's the Oath of the Horatio. One of the most famous paintings of all time.
It's fine
1cea4f No.855
>>854
Horatii**
Goddamn autocorrect
f2f5fe No.863
>>862
Oops. Meant to post this as a new thread.
9ec4ce No.871
For anyone else working with image/design elements, here is the current color scheme.
9ec4ce No.873
File: 1439971703425.jpg (1.82 MB, 3263x1435, 3263:1435, redstickcomp [Recovered].jpg)
Here's a few more layout mockups, but this is a ways ahead of the site building still.
As soon as we start figuring out what sort of images and infographics we want to include I'll start work on reformatting those, since that will probably be the bulk of the design workload for this.
5987c3 No.874
>>833
Can I make the suggestion that the font be a bit bigger?
bad eyesight
9ec4ce No.875
>>874
yes
Typeface/size is placeholder in that image, it's being updated to be the same as the mockups now
How readable are they to you?
5987c3 No.876
>>875
I have to squint due to the soft pixelation of what I'm assuming is photoshop.This may be due to my astigmatism, but it makes things already a wee bit blurry, so any sort of softening on text is basically hellish to me.
I also would love a serif font but I know sans serif always looks cleaner, but its technically harder to read.
Might only need one font size larger, maybe 2.
9ec4ce No.877
>>876
The blurriness is from image editing, yeah. Browser text rendering will also look quite a bit different.
I'm not certain on sans vs serif yet, trying to keep it looking clean while also being comfortable to read large volumes of text. If it stays sans I'll probably increase text size slightly and also use slightly darker backgrounds.
8e4abf No.880
>>874
sure, I'll experiment with it now a little.
Although people ith bad eyesight can just zoom in (when looking at the webste not an image here)
8e4abf No.881
>>874
btw is this readable?
a4313f No.882
>>881
thats absolutely perfect
f2f5fe No.887
>>881
Remember to change the symbol to the final design.
>>850
8e4abf No.892
>>887
Will be updated by tomorrow-evening ( 20-26 hours) along with with other small updates.
8e4abf No.909
>>892
I made an example-topic to start with (random ideas, for design we should I think put pics instead of text related to the topic/section for the intro of the topic)
I also made an intro text that hasn't been corrected yet by others (or is apparently good enough, idk)
Updated logo
menu becomes bigger after each supsection (navigation between previous subtopics, without being able to go to the last part of the section in one go, aka implying to read it all, I suggest we put a password for each section? or after every page/subtopic?)
Also I'll need good backgrounds, can't find many good ones (example decaption in media, sth related to an event?)
8e4abf No.910
>>909
For the niggers here: The menu becomes bigger = every time a subsection is completed, that subsection gets added to the menu.
fb4822 No.911
>>909
Looking nice. For backgrounds, I would use classical or neoclassical artworks. I really liked the look of Oath of the Horatii on the first one.
a739a1 No.913
>>909
For the Redstick I wouldnt put any of the pictures we post on /pol/ however i would take the information in the pictures and compile it onto these types of pages. Is that what everyone is thinking? Cause if so then its a good idea.
c78ef6 No.914
Hey guys, for the web-guys is there some kind of Git repo? Because that would make collaboration a little bit easier.
8c86d3 No.915
>>914
Not yet, this is because we are like just two coding for now and it's not worth it to put it publicly online (You know, kikes, SJW and Trolls).
If there are more anons willing to collaborate actively already, just let me know and I'll share the code on Tox or Github if it's in our advantage.
I just kept it 'closed from public' for now bc there is not yet a reason to put it 'public' like if I would with a free Github account.
Add me:
3D00586DD0DB1C649FEC61AB0FDDCBA351412DCC29C4AC0BB9CF2337A9ABAF5F967D8B7FEBA7
(GMT +1, Eurozone for me)
9ec4ce No.931
Update:
I've been pretty busy recently, but I should have time for more work soon, though I'm still awful at actual web dev.
What other areas should I do design work on? For example, I'm thinking of working on citations/source page layout soon.
If anyone has specific ideas or design question, you can also contact me on tox:04D4C14830144C4A6D0D23FE24E13A84851C20F5CA8108F48E92C98BE374006781B05908F27A
0019b1 No.933
these backgrounds really need to be darkened or you cant read the text properly
7fc4e2 No.939
>>915
I would like to help. Any way I can contact you via email?
7fc4e2 No.942
We should have an interactive racial science laboratory that walks people through the undeniable differences between the races and the biological justification for the preservation of this diversity.
Please see link for info:
http://europasoberana.blogspot.com/2013/05/the-new-racial-classification-i.html
7fc4e2 No.943
7fc4e2 No.944
>>943
Practically the entire book is hundreds of citations of scientific papers citing differences in the races so there is no copyright on that.
e7e7b8 No.953
>>939
Yes sure, add me on tox:
3D00586DD0DB1C649FEC61AB0FDDCBA351412DCC29C4AC0BB9CF2337A9ABAF5F967D8B7FEBA7
I can also create an email but I have to find one that is anonymous.
Also I haven't been online in a while due to RL issues
e7e7b8 No.954
>>953 woops trips are wrong, may be these work
72eb27 No.1025
>>910
Is there a way to reset it so the next person starts again with the small menu?
>>913
Would it be worth making it so that the pictures don't show up in a reverse image search?
c2e407 No.1051
>>1025
That's a good point; we should rework almost all of the images so they don't show up in a reverse image search.
a4df85 No.1052
>>942
>>943
are you guys sure you want to throw a bunch of race stuff in there? i know the goal is to redpill people but race stuff too soon might make people want to discredit the whole thing
bc6361 No.1053
>>1052
the point of redpilling is pointing out facts that have been presented differently by the media/common knowledge.
Since there is an invasion goingon from other races into Europe we consider the 'race' topic crucial.
I personally do not hate other races, I do hate the jews that are guilty of usury, hypocricy and corruption in order to achieve whatever they have in mind for the future.
I do not hate africans or asians or whatever, but that does not mean I tolerate the downfall of the white man in the name of tolerance and liberalism. I do not necessarily dislike others, I dislike them coming on our territories whith the known consequences.
What are they going to discredit? that race does not exist? or that whites have built the best functioning societies today? that whites are racist by default? that immigrants to Europe are all just fleeing war? That it is a lie they bring monumental crime rates with them? That their morals go against European morals? that Europe was built on values of Christianity rather than revolution?
I am utterly convinced the topic of races needs to be on it, yet we should be careful on how we select and present our factual evidence of course.
a4df85 No.1054
>>1053
>yet we should be careful on how we select and present our factual evidence
this is pretty much all i was worried about. it needs to be presented in a way that says race does exist and are different without implying that one race is superior which may be tough
what i meant by discredit was that theyll read the race part, get offended and write the whole thing off as racist propaganda even if it is true. people deny factual evidence because of feelings all the time
4d6e74 No.1059
>>1051
>Take various /pol/ infographics and re-make them into a format that fits into the style of the Red Stick, all with a consistent look. Whoever compiles the final product should put them on some temporary megaupload-type site, and delete it after a month or so (during which the rest of us make copies and prepare our pills). Then, after it's deleted, we begin to distribute them.
>Perhaps this board should also vanish? Leave it looking as if the sticks have come "out of nowhere", or that they were made by just one guy and some sort of "shady underground network". The inevitable bollocks in the media, if using terms like that, will only make more people curious about them.
4d6e74 No.1060
Wat, didn't mean to greentext. Post fucked up somehow.
8cbd72 No.1063
I remember there was a MEGA folder for levels of redpill, does anyone have that?
65a5a0 No.1067
>>687
>>915
I want to start working on this right away. How about this:
> We set up a git repo for the design only. We build a "framework", completely faceless. No keywords should be mentioned, all content is lorem ipsum, completely low-profile. I'd use github out of convinience but there are other, similar services and they might be more anonymous, or allow invites etc.
> The webfags work on it and can continually improve shit, while we also write a parser that translates markdown into our HTML structure, so everyone on the board can write a segment easily. (markdown is trivial, and even then there are grandma-tier WYSIWYG editors like https://stackedit.io/editor)
> We get started in bootstrap, build a first, functional version (or take the existing ones so far)
> Inevitably, some will have differing visions of the design, so instead of arguing and being counter-productive, we'll branch out and let multiple versions develop until deadline
> The board decides on deadline.
> All of the well-organized content that has been written up to this point (Via a similar method preferrably) is being run through our parser, we implement it.
> Possibly have to develop small features like animations or interactive elements of some sort here and there.
> QA, Cross-Browser and JS-Bug purging
> Done
f29ac0 No.1068
>>1067
Awesome, we are extremely few to work on this these days. All help is welcome.
We have 85% of the framework, some adjustments and simplifications needed but that's not the main target now.
I can share what I have as a framework, what we need now mostly is content. I keep lurking every day for links and content but it's a colossal work to put it in a text on my own.
What I suggest:
> New anons working on texts
> New anons looking up sources and credibility (may be the same anons as above), this must be as accurate as possible.
>Some can improve the framework, but I'm only sharing it if we have a few more, trustable anons (right now it's me, idk about others doing anything. Also the Board-owner is not responding to emails).
Writing code can be fixed by me, what we need is huge advancement in content and how to write for normies.
I have myself a fuckload of work IRL, but Im fully willing to finish this. Even if it takes years.
91bae0 No.1069
>>909
The picture is too bright, makes the text hard to read
9a1ed8 No.1071
>>1069
I've been playing with the backgrounds a litle indeed because of some parts being harder to read.
For now I temporarily gave up on backgrounds, just the grey fall-back atm.
I'll pick it up later again when I've progressed with the texts/conent/sources (or if others want to contribute, feel free to do so)
3548a6 No.1093
Hello. I'm the anon you linked to here from the /pol/ thread
I'm interesting in helping out, even if only a little bit here and there. The only thing I am any good for is writing, I feel, though I'd do what else I can were I asked.
Your graphic design is rather intriguing so far. The one on the /pol/ thread caught my eye within seconds and made me want to read.
d73289 No.1094
>>1093
That's great to hear, writings are what we need the most right now, anon
Right now the focus is on technques of deceptions of the media and the Beautiful Ones-experiment. May be give it a try to rite something (even if it's small shreds) about that?
Other global topics are needed too, so feel free to write something down that we can back up with facts (things that are proveable, not just ranting about feelingz or defeatism)
Glad to hear from you, any help is welcome!