>>33The israelites were essentially whining "but daaaaad, all the OTHER COOL NATIONS have one!! Why can't I have one too?", that is, having a king.
With a king comes prestige, but also meant that they were following an earthly ruler rather than just God.
Nobody can serve two masters, and when the ruler turns from God, and people turn to the ruler, things go downhill.
There is not a dichotomy between monarchy and anarchy, this passage isn't in favour of the latter, and expresses the earthliness (and thus possibility of failure) of the former.
>>340> Christianity isn't a governmental, economical, or political system. It's not of this world.True, true. There are social teachings derived from the Bible- "Share with others, be generous and have a giving heart" or "be charitable". The trap is deriving from these a system that supports them -someone saying "WELL THAT'S SOCIALISM, WE GOTTA SOCIALISM IF WE'RE CHRISTIAN, IF YOU DON'T SOCIALISM YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG. SUPPORT SOCIALISM, VOTE SOCIALIST.". This pulls the focus away from Christianity, and then the front falls off.
> The underlying message in almost every lesson in the OT is that when you don't maintain your faith in God and try to find the answers in worldly things, you lose your way and risk peril.Exactly- we've all got to watch ourselves - it's all to easy to fall into the trap of putting a system,ideology etc in front of God, faith and the bible. It should always follow in tow. Otherwise, we run the risk of fettering our faith to a system/ideology, and soon start using Christianity as just a tool to justify said ideology.
PS: Please correct and critique my TL;DR comment as necessary, I'd hate to have said or implied something wrong.