/board

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 05:55:46 No.68

/board

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 06:09:29 No.69

File: 1411884569582.jpg (41.07 KB, 266x400, 133:200, image.jpg)

Catholics

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 06:29:35 No.72

>>68
>absolutely bananas
gets me every time
>>69
how is catholicism edgy?

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 06:48:22 No.76

>>72
>MUH CRUSADES
>MUH INQUISITION
>MUH 1500 YEARS OF SYSTEMATIC RAPE AND CULTURAL OPRESSION
Pretty much everything about the mackerel snappers is edgy. They pretend to drink blood, and eat flesh. They celebrate torturing their god.

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 07:19:15 No.80

>>68
>agnosticism in heresy tier
>atheism in bottom tier

I'd just like to interject for a moment. Everybody is either theistic or atheistic, and either gnostic or agnostic. Theism vs Atheism is merely a matter of whether YOU "believe" in a higher power. This includes deism, and any assortment of non-yahweh gods. Gnosticism vs Agnosticism is essentially "I know that [theism/atheism] is true". Very few people, even among those who wear the "Atheist" tag, actually assert that they're gnostic atheists. Therefore, every Atheist that doesn't claim to have complete and total knowledge about the fact that there is no god, is actually an agnostic. It's just a less confrontational way of letting somebody know that you're an atheist, or in the process of losing your faith.

Anonymous 09/28/14 (Sun) 07:24:42 No.81

>>80
Belief in a God is something that an individual either possesses, or doesn't possess. If there is a benevolent God, he wouldn't demand that his subjects believe that he exists under pain of eternal damnation. Imagine a kid with an ant farm. Should he condemn the ants to an eternity of hellfire for the simple act of not believing in him, if he acts in ways that don't definitively reveal himself? No, that's childish as shit. The concept of needing to believe in order to be saved is one of the most central lies in Abrahamic religion, and it was used to increase the power wielded by those in positions of power within the church, rather than any actual divine inspiration. If there is a god that is worthy of worship, then said god wouldn't act like a petulant child on the topic of non-believers.

Anonymous 09/29/14 (Mon) 05:04:46 No.106

File: 1411967086819.jpg (4.83 KB, 200x253, 200:253, leoxiii.jpg)

>>76
>Implying Europe would have resisted Islamic rape and cultural oppression without the unifying force of the Church.
>Implying the Church didn't encourage cultural and political localism and subsidiarity, principles that Islam has no notion of.
>Implying the Inquisition wasn't a political necessity in post-Reconquista Spain.

Anonymous 09/29/14 (Mon) 06:39:09 No.109

Who created this thing, it is very incorrect. It is nicely done but very inaccurate.

Anonymous 09/30/14 (Tue) 05:10:03 No.111

File: 1412053803333.jpg (79.89 KB, 595x394, 595:394, 1391450928374.jpg)