>>105
>somehow ethno-nationalistic socialism is a contradiction
I hope you realize that socialism is just an economic system… Although Hitler himself said that the idea of socialism, if it is to succeed, will live more in the hearts of the people than in the economy. What he was basically promoting was charity and saying voluntary love and compassion for your kinsmen is more important than being forced to pay higher taxes for things like nationalized healthcare (although Nazi Germany did in fact have this).
Also, Hitler was in fact a socialist. During the Nazi regime:
>healthcare, amongst a few other things, was nationalized, for the benefit of all Germans
>a progressive income tax was establish, I believe the richest class payed like 25% of their total income in taxes, and the lowest class payed around 4.7%.
>Nazi Germany was the first country in the world to demand companies to provide cafeteria and recreational areas for their workers, they also demanded measures to be taken towards safety at the work place, for the workers benefit
>shut down companies not paying their workers fair wages
>was the first country in the world to establish the standard of only having a 40 hour work week (although this was obviously increased as WW2 progressed for obvious reasons, although this happened in all nations)
>Hitler constantly preached about removing the barriers between the classes, uniting all Germans instead under the banner of their country rather than by social class
>the Nazi regime heavily focused on elevating the working class to a respectable and fair state, both aspects they had been deprived of in the past (like in all nations). Hitler said something along the lines of "Instead of trying to make every one equal like the communists, we've instead simply given justice to people who haven't had it in the past."
Hitler was a bad ass. His accomplishments, teachings, ideology, and moral fiber far exceed that of any of your lying, hypocritical, communist, brutes of leaders that ever lived, that you admire so dearly.
You probably call him a capitalist though because he heavily supported private property and free enterprise. Well guess what buddy, not all of us have a fetish for being completely dominated by our government, and free enterprise has given us countless brilliant inventions in the past and continues to today.
This is why fascism is better than communism. Fascist economics says:
>"If what you're doing benefits the nation, and you treat your workers fairly, go right on ahead, we're fully with you".
Communist economics says:
>"Our dictator says that you're benefiting off of your company. This is unacceptable. The only person allowed to benefit from anything in this country is our leader, everyone else must be a peasant. Oh, but you're totally "liberated" though. But we're totally socialist though. What's that? You don't like it in this country anymore? Well, too bad, because you're here forever. We don't let you leave. Oh, but it so terrible in all of those western nations! So bad that even though their governments let them leave most don't! Oh, the horror!, err-, I mean, oh, the horror, my comrade! Anyway, I promise you, one day, the workers truly WILL lead the nation, and we won't have any need for the tyrannical dictator! This promise is absolutely NOTHING like the promise of a utopia afterlife made by Christianity that we condone so severely. Also, even though a communist revolution has never taken place in a capitalistic nation, indeed, they've all been feudal nations, this is still totally an anti-capitalistic movement. Now get back to work. No breaks, and if we hear any complaining, you're getting executed!"
Sorry to say it mate, but you're just an edgy moron.