>>789
>implying metamorphism requires partial-melting
I never said that. Cratonic materials undergo metamorphosis from sitting underground for a very long time, usually WITHOUT partial-melting or tectonism.
Contrast this to granite near mobile belts, which, compared to cratonic material, is more likely to be eroded and fragmented due to uplift exposure to the elements. It would just get eroded into sediment before it has a chance to undergo metamorphosis into gniess
>implying granite doesn't primarily form through fractionation and assimilation processes in arc/back-arc settings
See
>However, uplifting does create more vaccums for intrusion to occur, which simply does not occur in cratons
You're just paraphrasing my point
My point is that true granite rather than gniess will be under mobile belts, whereas gniess will more likely be in cratons. I don't see why you're trying to distort this