Who was more significant to the early empire, Julius or Augustus?
I think Augustus was the one who actually founded the empire and Julius's true spiritual heir was Mark Antony. The reason Augustus founded the empire and it lasted so long was because he only ever accepted powers from the senate after defending it from the military dictator named Mark Antony, and it was only with a decent senate as well as a decent Caesar or Emperor that the Empire truly flourished.
Lets talk about der phoenicians, shall we?
Phoenicia were some of the original gold-smiths in the Mediterranean. They were all around hated by every society they came across for their under-handed tactics in trade (Compared to the more honest Greeks) and were accused of various things like child sacrifice by the Greeks, Romans and Hebrews.
After their homeland in the middle east was taken over by both Hebrews and Persians, they were basically cast out of their land and had to regroup in some other Mediterranean settlements, like Carthage.
Carthage was where they tried to get some power back from the West Mediterranean that they lost in the East, at which point Rome came around to fuck their baby-blood drinking assholes raw.
At this point everyone was so tired of their shit that the Roman Republic, which at that time had some Greek advisers already, decided it was time to burn their shit to the ground because of how fucking violent and shekel-bergy they were.
So the Mediteranian was a pretty decent place after that, no real major wars until the battle between Mark Antony and Augustus.
Saint Emperors
I know you're all for Pagan Rome, just let me list Emperors with an opinion of Saints or actually cannonised in Christianity, as this topic interests me:Activity & Voting
Friends, Romans, Patricians, hear me out. From time to time we find ourselves facing a crisis that threatens the whole of Rome. The degenerate inactivity of this board is just such a crisis, and with a weakened Rome, its recovery shall suffer.