[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / girltalk / hikki / maka / scifi / strek / sw / wooo ]

/roze/ - Randytaylor69

Catalog

Winner of the 19th Attention-Hungry Games
/scifi/ - We won because we paid Yawn fifty bucks.

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 4 per post.


Work in progress, be back soon!

File: 9ff652397f26d5f⋯.jpg (230.98 KB, 1200x817, 1200:817, howdy partner.jpg)

 No.4043[Reply]

Board restoration underway! Don't lose hope!

23 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4915

>>4912

fixed,thanks admin!




File: 9ff652397f26d5f⋯.jpg (230.98 KB, 1200x817, 1200:817, howdy partner.jpg)

 No.4052[Reply]

Welcome to /roze/, Rose's Other Den

(You know, the one not under her bedcover)

/roze/ is a board based around the existence and accomplishments of internet personality and Youtube/chan celebrity Rosemary Gotto A.K.A. "randytaylor69" or "Roze". /roze/ was created to be a healthy and safe board for Rose and her followers with a clean history. Here, freedom of speech and freedom of expression is allowed. Rosebuds (fans of Rose) are permitted to discuss any subject and OC/fanart is encouraged.

Board Log: https://8ch.net/log.php?board=roze

Board Settings: https://8ch.net/settings.php?board=roze

Board Banners: https://banners.8ch.net/list/roze

Why choose /roze/ over other Roseposting boards?: https://8ch.net/roze/why.html

Board Guidelines:

1.] No doxing

2.] No spamming or thread derailing

3.] Spoiler any porn/gore

"I don't understand… why? What's the attraction?"

Click the links below or lurk.

If you still don't understand, perhaps you weren't meant to.

Official Youtube accounts:

https://www.youtube.com/user/randytaylor69

https://www.youtube.com/user/roseplaysgames

Rose archives:

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Post last edited at


File: 2e265ec4f53a85e⋯.jpg (89.05 KB, 450x338, 225:169, tumblr_mcmw3oqX211qzkqhi.jpg)

 No.5231[Reply]

One of the anons here said quite a few times that Rose is an attention whore. I wish! Imagine if she was, we'd have hundreds if not thousands of videos, shitton of pictures, probably regular Q&A's and other stuff too. How can she be an attention whore when she run the moment she got too much attention on her? When even back when she was active she could go months without uploading? When for years now she rejects easy money she could've made on youtube from horny, lonely beta males? Imagine how tempting that is, or at least should be, for a girl that dreads growing up and having a regular job. She could sit in her bedroom, make some random videos and play video games, at least until her looks are gone. And funny thing is it would actually save her from stalkers, as they'd be drowned out by hundreds of normal fans, and would probably lose interest quickly if she was no longer this forbidden fruit with every new video and pic something to fight for and treasure. I can't decide if evacuating from the web was a smart or dumb move on her part.

I think I'm cursed, IRL my oneitis is the same, barely any presence on the web, doesn't use social media, nothing. Normally that's a great gf material, right? But when you're desperate it's really a cruel joke that you fall for THAT girl, when all her friends upload dozens of pictures and basically document their daily life for all to see, meanwhile you go months or even years without a new photo to fap to

24 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5268

>>5267

>literally his every post is pure seething rage full of insults towards anyone who disagrees with him

>doesn't like my tone and demeanor

seek professional help

Also you're free to keep your oh so secret information within your oh so special secret club/inner circle, on this oh so serious matter of some girl from the internet, but stop using it as an argument then. You can't bring up some "facts" as an argument and then go "no, I can't tell you guys, it's a secret, but it's true, I swear!" when questioned further.


 No.5272

>>5260

are you the friend of her father guy?


 No.5273

>>5272

nope.

>>5268

Look at your post lmao, desperate attempt but you aren't getting a thing out of me and i haven't said anything of the "i swear!" kind, it's of no interest to me what you do or don't believe… learn to read, never said anything about secret anything either just that because you're a full blown cunt shite i'm not sharing anything specifically with YOU. Plenty of others already know what i know, just not you.


 No.5276

/popcorn

I like you guys.


 No.5282

I'm curious to know how any of you would actually react if you ever saw her irl.




File: 5278cbac1054bc8⋯.jpg (49.61 KB, 1280x720, 16:9, yarmulke.jpg)

 No.4999[Reply]

Is it just me, or does Rose's skull look abnormal/unusual?

47 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5277

>>5274

you say this but take away the female aspect and rose is exactly the same, no charisma and le quirky annoying farce, lots of ppl around here are like it, fucking annoying whimsical fucks.


 No.5278

>>5277

pierre pls, at least blue rose was more than that


 No.5279

>>5278

>>5278

>pierre pls, at least blue rose was more than that

nah, best rose was william bottin rose, i wish i could of met her back then.


 No.5280

>>5279

>best rose was william bottin rose

and you based this statement on these few pics we have from then?


 No.5281

>>5280

what a silly question.




File: 1aaf640df82a2d4⋯.png (734.98 KB, 1328x633, 1328:633, green magic puff puff.PNG)

 No.5269[Reply]

Take a look at these hands

They're passing in between us

 No.5270

File: 019dbf6baf8a144⋯.jpg (7.82 KB, 175x250, 7:10, 1401470427104s.jpg)

>>5269

just a short deviation, i have a question

https://warosu.org/g/thread/42201809

This photo is real?

and why the fuck was ignored and closed these thread?


 No.5271

File: 5a10418a797581a⋯.jpg (57.63 KB, 387x551, 387:551, 1400932771826.jpg)

>>5270

how new are you?

this photo was around for some time now




File: c04de83986c8b8b⋯.png (21.99 KB, 539x216, 539:216, neet.png)

 No.5145[Reply]

Everyday is a 2/3am finish for rose, she truly is /ourgirl/ the archetype neetess. Thank god she did that physics degree to help her maximize her fps shooting trajectory potential.

46 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5244

>>5243

I fail to agree with you on this one. CIrcular reasoning becomes devoid of meaning. I'm not a huge Nietzsche reader, and mostly find him boring and somewhat childish. However, the point of the eternal recurrence is amongst other things, that without direction there is no meaning. SInce reproduction is circular it isn't meaningful. It is pure repetition. Say, anything that has meaning either has to have meaning in itself, or meaning for something else. In this case to reproduce is held as the meaning. But if that is the meaning (argued from any rational stand point and not what you feel your body and mind screams at you), it must be asked why is it the meaning? The answer is obvious, so the children you produced can reproduce! The regress should now be obvious. You are by any piece of reasoning in this direction gonna lack a final place holder argument that grounds the concept of meaning and crystalizes the inferential chain backwards. It's empty here and now reasoning, and it is poor reasoning.

To assume that the physical purpose is to reproduce is generally fallacious. More concretely it's a subspecimen of the naturalistic fallacy. There are certainly non-religious sentiments that are able to derive more fundamental units of meaning, which only require reproduction as a necesary condition for such a value function to take place at all. Again you're arguing from biological reductionism, which is in my opinion not really an option. To a large extent it implies nominalism and determinism. If you find such defensible, then by all means. But it's simply not the case. A large varity of reductio ad absurdum can be found of this issue if it has any interest to you.

Also, the notion of transcending biology is not as far fetched as it seemed 20 tears ago. I'm not sure how I feel about iterated embryo selection but the thought is at least interesting.

At points sexuality seems more spiteful than anything. I'm relatively grossed out with being sexual. Not as much because sex is gross, but for the mere reason that it makes me feel like pavlovs dog. There's always this orgasm laying behind, waiting. A lil treat to keep you going. It's radically fucking nausiating. KIds I'd sort of like though.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.5245

>>5244

perhaps "purpose" is a better word than "meaning" when it comes to reproduction. We have biological purpose, it can be argued that meaning can't be biological, it's something abstract we create ourselves on top of such biological foundations like reproduction and survival.

So yes, having a child doesn't change anything about the emtiness of life, search for meaning. It's a biological drive. And it gives us biological rewards rather than philosophical. Still, it's a fact that giving birth and having a child will release massive amounts of chemicals in a womans brain to make her feel love and happiness. The strenght of those is reduced btw the more sexual partners a woman has, with each new male she let's in her she receives less and less love hormones (kinda like the more you fap to porn the less pleasure you feel and have to seek more extreme stimulation) making her less able to love one partner AND her children, making her worse and worse wife and mother. Convervatives are damn right about virginity and sexual restraint on women.

Normally a healthy, sane woman who mates with a healthy, strong male and gives him offspring will be happy, fulfilled. That may not be a meaning of life, but it's still fulfilling our body's programming, which gives us rewards - good feelings.

It comes down to existance of a soul IMO. Without it there is no meaning, only biological purpose. We can't prove there is a soul, so coming back to my original point, the only thing we are 100% sure of is our programming. From my observation most people who fail to fulfill their programming and find a good mate to reproduce with try to justify it somehow, maybe seek that justification in philosophy, antisocial movements… but that's just to make you feel better. Literally 99% of depressed neckbeard betas would be normal and happy if they'd get a good woman to build a life with and motivate them to live and fight. Even the anti-women and misoginist movements are a result of unfulfilled desire for a woman, which leads to unbearable frustration. Hating the object of our desire is one way to deal with our pain.

Not reproducing makes Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


 No.5246

File: 403e3c34659dbaf⋯.jpg (63.08 KB, 480x608, 15:19, 33.jpg)


 No.5247

File: 3d5f8754785d67d⋯.jpg (130.14 KB, 583x900, 583:900, willy-v-wendy-o-williams.jpg)

omG the tl;dr in this thread is real. That only contributes to the "urban legend" that rosebuds are autists . Don't embarrass some of us. This board isn't worth your time arguing with whole paragraphs. Fuck off.


 No.5248

>>5244

I disagree with the reasoning. From an individual point of view, reproduction is not cyclical. It only becomes cyclical if you look at it from the point of view of the species, but then reproduction is the thing that makes anything (meaningful or not) possible.

>"To a large extent it implies nominalism and determinism. If you find such defensible, then by all means. But it's simply not the case."

I don't see the problem with these positions. I see no reason to believe that anything could happen without prior causes, or that concepts have an existence of their own outside of the simulation that we run in our brains. Maybe you could explain a little bit? What did I miss?




File: d2d746cfd07854e⋯.jpg (27.38 KB, 271x196, 271:196, unintendedcreepiness.jpg)

 No.5229[Reply]

Refer to my newest hipothesis:

Rosebuds are secrectly in love with n8 as she was under his influence most* of the time we know her. Some of you considered yourselves as 'redpilled' so I guess you do know how women works and can agree with that?

*Exact date when their relationship went real much-needed

 No.5230

>noonereadsit

Refer to >>4116 here. She was more lovable before she crunched herself into the mold of a girlfriend and employable person.




File: be17bdde4bf6731⋯.jpg (456.2 KB, 1200x600, 2:1, go to sleep.jpg)

 No.5121[Reply]

post your rare roses

6 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5141

not mine, this was done by some anon on r9k


 No.5142

File: 7365b3cd87b92ad⋯.jpg (162.48 KB, 969x824, 969:824, 1510884802475.jpg)

>>5141

image didn't post


 No.5204

>>5122

>h3h3

do you think ethan could make a video on the whole randytaylor69 phenomenon? I just imagined him making one of his videos and showing this board, the subreddit etc. terryifing


 No.5205

>>5204

god i hope not.


 No.5213

>>5205

pewdiepie did a vid with/on rose

I will email h3h3 and mr metokur. metokur would probably love "the roze community"




File: 23bfbd6a7b82a9b⋯.jpg (105.51 KB, 550x500, 11:10, 1365894886622.jpg)

 No.5144[Reply]

I LOVE ROSEMARY!

3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5206

>>5178

pidor rooster cyka blyat


 No.5207

>>5165

Romarin Lisa Loup Gotto*


 No.5208

Готто Роза Петровна


 No.5210

File: d1318589da0f34f⋯.jpg (45.55 KB, 604x604, 1:1, d13.jpg)

>>5165

רוזמרי ליסה וולף גוטו


 No.5211

>>5210

וואי, רוצה להיות חברים?




File: 28b1cfefbdccce9⋯.jpg (126.77 KB, 642x614, 321:307, rosesearchtrends.jpg)

 No.5146[Reply]

I took a break from my obsession but forgot that I'm here forever so now I'm back again. What have I missed since the Christmas videos? Like what happened in August 2017 that made Rose's popularity higher than its ever been? And it also looks like there was a pretty big spike in may/june this year too.

8 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5163

File: 0bb13731984588c⋯.png (9.87 KB, 479x331, 479:331, wsj_alexa.png)

>>5162

>

https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wsj.com

hot damn, they really never recovered from their shit fiasco back at the beginning of the year


 No.5164

File: 54ce954c9db2480⋯.jpg (45.34 KB, 450x360, 5:4, ROSE (3).jpg)

>>5162

How do people like you that lack basic sentence comprehension skills even manage to use a computer?

You just said exactly what I was referring to. When I said /pol/'s favorite youtuber, I was referring to the meme of pewdiepie trolling as a white supremacist/anti-semite.


 No.5166

>>5156

yes I even made a thread about it but apparently it's gone now, wtf


 No.5167

>>5156

yes I even made a thread about it but apparently it's gone now, wtf


 No.5168

>>5164

but he is an antisemite?

archive.is/sKiji




File: 4accfa001fc3c9e⋯.jpg (34 KB, 350x429, 350:429, Black_Widow_(Official_IW_C….jpg)

 No.4979[Reply]

do you think people at marvel are rosebuds

and took rose as inspiration for black widow's new concept art?

2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4985

File: b43cad849ca8bf8⋯.webm (74.65 KB, 320x198, 160:99, why_so_retard.webm)

>>4979

Doesn't even remotely look like her.


 No.4986

File: 48d3c80338ed887⋯.jpg (967.44 KB, 1980x3000, 33:50, plastic surgery.jpg)

>>4985

rose has those scarjo jowls going for her though


 No.4988

File: ac10115037ba801⋯.gif (5.79 KB, 300x100, 3:1, frame_00_delay-1s.gif)

>>4985

>scarlett johansson looking like rose

it's the other way around cunt


 No.5066

>>4979

If so, they sure as fuck missed that trademark concave celestial nose of hers.


 No.5148

>>4988

That's what I meant retard




File: 809f495c2c4b201⋯.png (590.16 KB, 750x490, 75:49, VeiB0WmgG_8.png)

 No.5037[Reply]

I need the size to buy a bra for my sex

doll.

26 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5114

>>5113

>>all weirdo stamp collecting hoarders and saddos sending her money and shit for simply existing

so there were more of them than just that guy from teawrecksgodzilla?


 No.5118

>>5114

Who knows, she was obviously sent other stuff ie books n shiet. There was plenty of the former though.


 No.5127

>>5113

some good that did you lot right? now your little community is dead, meanwhile i'm still here and so are a few of the others.

>You mean the perceived reality comprised of a self deception and failing of the frontal lobes to separate subjective desire from objective analysis to appease the ego.

use your fucking eyes.


 No.5128

>>5114

just ignore him.


 No.5129

>>5128

t. teawrecksgodzilla

>>5127

You fucking silly cunt lmao, it's not about quantity its about quality and we actually had a good couple years whilst you just supah lifah being a sad fuck in the background, what a fucking loser.

>>5127

>use your fucking eyes.

Use your fucking brain actually maybe that's a bad idea, enjoy your completely fabricated delusions.




 No.5046[Reply]

hoy guys i was looking at my old phone photos from some years ago and found this, is everything in this pic correct?

8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5086

>>5060

why is it illegal to dox on this board btw?


 No.5095

>>5086

reddit mod


 No.5096

>>5086

Whiteknights.


 No.5098


 No.5115

oh srry guys, didn't knew this shit was a dox glad u guys deleted, feel kinda bad that she was doxed




File: cadbd1c82c39192⋯.png (301.67 KB, 399x391, 399:391, phone.png)

 No.4962[Reply]

what phone is this?

5 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.4989

Does your bf bought your phone, Rose ?


 No.5105

File: 3d35bb3f3c5ebe2⋯.jpg (53.95 KB, 366x262, 183:131, 1990.jpg)

>>4989

Nathan, broke up with her two months ago, he wanted a family.


 No.5106

>>5105

How long are you going to keep claiming they broke up?


 No.5107

File: bf7a35e1acf8b06⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 66.8 KB, 460x438, 230:219, 1510353509502.jpg)

>>5106

why are you obsessed with me?


 No.5108

File: 596e5f0c3d9cc30⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 20.71 KB, 400x323, 400:323, 1496230949009.jpg)

>>5107

I should be asking you the same thing. But really what do you gain from spreading falsehoods and posting cryptic kids for the noobs?




File: 1f7d4e91af144df⋯.gif (264.88 KB, 400x300, 4:3, 1488391542794.gif)

 No.4670[Reply]

Does Rosie own any sex toys?

57 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.5018

>>4998

get you fucking normie


 No.5026

>>4998

>we must have kids at all costs

gtfo tradcuck


 No.5028

>>5004

antinatalism is retarded

>>5018

>normie

back to r9k faggot

>>5026

*tips fedora*


 No.5045

>>5028

nice non-arguments, why don't you go back to >>>/reddit/


 No.5100

>>5026

this




Delete Post [ ]
[]
Previous [1] [2] [3] [4]
| Catalog | Nerve Center | Cancer
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / aus / girltalk / hikki / maka / scifi / strek / sw / wooo ]