/satanic/ - The Hole in the Wall

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Anonymous 09/30/15 (Wed) 10:34:54 No.202 [Reply]

Can someone link me the originl copy of sad satan game?

Anonymous 10/08/15 (Thu) 23:08:26 No.203

>curious about the name

>look it up

>mildly watch a few minutes of a part 1- 4 video aeries

>video is extremely slow

>gameplay looks crappy and choppy

>read that it has torture sounds and original version has cp

>nope.jpg

Anonymous 10/16/15 (Fri) 06:12:33 No.207

>>202

The curious puzzle of sad satan:

On one aspect, sounds like an edge-tier move to try to promote an upcoming engine/game, as the youtuber publisher has a history of botching "surprising discoveries" - movies that were obviously tampered with.

On the other hand, the muddling up of the video suggests several possibilities, some of which include:

1) the original video contained information not wanted

2) the anonymous 4channer was going for lols, especially when individuals continued to crash no matter what they did.

3) the anonymous 4channer intended to send a message alongside the actual content.

4) the anonymous 4channer was actually the youtuber

5) the youtuber and the 4channer are working together

Discoveries alongside the video suggested, on one side, a consciousness-raising video demonstrating corrupt connectivities and the sadisms of hushed-up jobs.

The other side provides circumstantial evidence supplementing the claim that the youtuber, Obscure Horror Corner, created additional hype in order to stimulate interest in his game/youtube channel.

I am of the position that it is entirely possible there is a more complex and deeper story behind its collaboration and propagation, especially given its propagation vis a vis a controlled channel, but, as to its validity, I wouldn't know. It is certainly a thought-provoking puzzle.

https://www.reddit.com/r/sadsatan/comments/3cslpz/if_youre_new_to_this_subreddit_please_read_this/

https://www.reddit.com/r/sadsatan/comments/3ch9sq/guys_theres_so_much_proof_that_obscure_horror/

Linked Boards of Interest Anonymous 02/08/15 (Sun) 03:48:07 No.6 [Reply]

As the topic suggests, so shall the substance be composed.

>>>/satanworship/
a board designed as a platform for sectarian phraseology, (in)formal ritualizing, ceremonial cyber marking, and general prayer.

Anonymous 02/08/15 (Sun) 07:04:39 No.7

Here is a board focusing upon Spiritual Satanism. It has resources with available information from a spiritual angle and other commentary.
>>>/satan/

Here is another Spiritual Satanism board.
>>>/satanism/

Post last edited at 03/02/15 (Mon) 20:49:17

Anonymous 02/27/15 (Fri) 16:00:59 No.9

If you sincerely want more traffic on this and lhp-related topics, then there should be but one board.

A marginalized group indeed, so many boards for the (almost) same topic spreads the potential community too thin, especially when the board is still just a babby.

There can be a spiritual thread. There can be a theistic thread. There can be a JOS thread. There can be threads on rituals and what you're currently listening to all in the same board.

Later, when traffic demands specialized boards, do so. But now is not the time.

I applaud your efforts. This is just my first impression and my 2cents.

Hail Satan!

Anonymous 03/02/15 (Mon) 22:10:17 No.16

>>9
Greetings. Thank you for visiting the Satanic Lounge. I hope your experience was pleasant or, at the least, thought-provoking. After all, such are things this boards seeks.

I must express my disagreement that a solitary consolidation is the solution or even an answer to our existence as decentralized and marginalized characters within this elaborate fantasy woven around ourselves.

As characters of freedom, of liberation from the bonds and restrictions within society and existence, we must pursue the idea that spreading variances of perspectives in specialized angles is a worthy pursuit. Having a virtual chamber for dedicated ritual worship, having a platform open for questioning specific orientations, having a board for openly neutral yet primarily for theological, theoretical, philosophical, psychological and sociological debates of all perspectives and simultaneously maintained by a Satanic angle, having anonymity and open allowance for tor commentary, are all important aspects that I think should be considered.

Certainly, the idea that we could be spread thin is always a worrying possibility, but such are the conditions of modern society. We Satanists are naturally inclined towards subversive and independent angles.

May the Dark Lord illuminate your path.

Shadow Walker 03/03/15 (Tue) 03:00:11 No.18

>>>/randomthoughts/
This is a board where anonymity and op privacy is encouraged. All members can make a thread exclusive or open. This is in the interest of maintaining the board as a debate/blog repository for whatever might be on your mind.

Anonymous 09/20/15 (Sun) 21:46:06 No.200

>>>/arcane/

A flexible, open board dedicated towards the magic community, providing esoteric material and sociopolitical discourse.

>>>/magick/

A board dedicated towards magical discussion, manipulation and observation without mandating standards upon discourse.

File: 1441214467980.png (38.24 KB, 255x178, 255:178, 1423493449383.jpg.png)

Anonymous 09/02/15 (Wed) 17:21:07 No.197 [Reply]

>>>/baphomet/

File: 1428277970659.jpg (76.81 KB, 640x512, 5:4, image.jpg)

Questions Anonymous 04/05/15 (Sun) 23:52:50 No.83 [Reply]

I'm curious,what is satanism?do you believe in Jesus? And what of God?do you believe he's a tyrant?what do you think lucifers motives were for rebelling?(I'm not Christian though I was raised catholic)

6 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 04/14/15 (Tue) 20:07:18 No.132

>>102
Very interesting information and an even more interesting point of view, thank you.

By the way, is a site like sacred-texts a good resource for information about religions, old knowledge? Or is it more like the very bold statements in for ex. the JoS site, stating that old knowledge is "corupted"/"erased"?

Or should I look into more recent book releases?

Anonymous 04/15/15 (Wed) 01:48:37 No.133

>>132
JoS Satanist here and I browse sacred-texts a lot. The thing with corrupted information is, you really have to know the intention and meaning of the original text, otherwise, you're not going to understand shit.

For example right now I'm reading the Rig Veda. Thanks to Christianity and the RHP, it's corrupted beyond anything we know. Understanding that Sanatana Dharma or Eternal Law was originally about advancing the soul and raising the serpent(kundalini) we have to read texts like these from a satanic perspective.

>TLDR nothing we read about ancienct religion or true spirituality is going to be free of christian dross, try to sift it out as much as possible. Don't take anything at face value. Study and read as much as you can, then compare and contrast.

Anonymous 04/16/15 (Thu) 03:23:22 No.156

>>132
There is power which dominates over society, existing within symbols of its own, surrounding ourselves with mirages and staged personality complexes, infusing itself within psychosocial discourse. This suggests that there does exist old knowledge, utilized to constrain society within aesthetic puppetry, mobilized in degrees to suppress collective potential.

I think sites and research centers, such as sacred-texts, hold useful data and information, ideas from which you can draw conclusions and interesting studies. I do not think that true knowledge is ultimately unattainable. However, it is my belief that absolute truthful knowledge exists within a mirage of its own, a representation of truth that makes sense to us given other conditions of governing knowledge- e.g. the notions of moral justification, our conceptions of linguistic structure, the dominating social themes within our culture, etc.

I would suggest that any modern book can be dived into and research will produce beneficial information. To what purpose it exists and sustains itself ultimately decides its wide-spread utility. I do think that historical interests have restrained knowledge before, see: Library of Alexandria. Its tale is a strange tale indeed, with many alternating stories and approaches to its destruction. This suggests that it was used as a pinnacle of information and was controlled by dominating powers in order to create a presentable dilemma- centralize all "world knowledge" within one locality, and then spread stories of its eventual attacking and systemic burning while preserving the desired narrative. To me, this theoretical scenario doesn't differ too much from the systemic reconditioning undergone vis a vis the Council of Nicea, and other manipulating paradigms, such as Mao's structural engineering. Society tends to reconstruct truth using standardizations upheld by dominating institutions. In many ways, our Internet is our Library of Alexandria.

>>133
>nothing we read about ancienct religion or true spirituality is going to be free of christian dross, try to sift it out as much as possible. Don't take anything at face value.
I agree with you to a degree, but disagree with you to another. I think Christianity, largely composed of pPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Anonymous 04/25/15 (Sat) 09:23:21 No.158

im a hard polytheist

i believe most gods are real, but creation stories are just stories to enforce belief in a particular god/pantheon

i believe that gods are just a form of life that science has not yet reached the sophistication to prove

i believe that deities with specific "jobs" are not literally holding those duties. individual interpretation is needed to determine the meaning of each gods association

i believe that the abrahamic god is merely a stronger god or "fathergod" to the angels, yhwh is a tyrannical space kike encouraging humans (as the dominant species in the area) to starve other deities of influence in meatspace, and "satan" had enough of the shit and got slandered to hell (get it?)

Anonymous 08/24/15 (Mon) 03:05:13 No.191

>>83

To me, Satanism is the purifying process of attuning yourself to daemon and the deeper energy that surrounds us.

I'm a mix between panentheism and polytheism. There are many daemon, whose powers and influence expand past space and time. Our current reality is only one part of the entire spectrum of daemonic existence, and their ways go far beyond our simple human traditions.

Jesus was nothing more than a flashy salesman. Tech was low, so everything was hearsay. He got popular as the church grew. The church needs that money-making story of a trinity tribunal waging war against an ever-present temptation.

Lucifer is just one name given to those daemon whose sight and wisdom expands past our flimsy reason.

My "god" is a trans-reality sort of super-daemon, made up of many different trans-universal daemon. We are expressions of these daemonic energies mixing together, capable of reaching into the Abyss.

File: 1434748632057.png (5.31 KB, 465x296, 465:296, National_Socialist_Black_M….png)

Satanic Interviews Anonymous 06/19/15 (Fri) 21:17:12 No.174 [Reply]

A collection of interviews regarding Satanism

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvRP_jCJoXQ

Anonymous 08/18/15 (Tue) 04:33:17 No.188

That video is a very solid composition of aesthetic/ symbolic Satanism.

I find it a shame that some advocates of symbolic Satanism often call upon Christianity so strongly. I understand historical and contemporary animosity and I realize that iconoclastic activity requires necessary blasphemy, but such centralization boarders upon purposely clinging to opposing theology. Personally speaking, I find it just as necessary, and equally as important, to blaspheme against power-structures of archaic signals as it is to blaspheme against power-structures of modern signals.

It is enjoyable how often symbolic Satanists refer towards the power of naturalism, the disposition of the alpha human, the natural-born Satanist. Satanism is not a religion tuned for the every-man; it is a religion of elitist self-empowerment and requires intentional alienation of illusive properties. It recognizes that humanity contains both untermensch and ubermensch, conformists consumed with commodity and individuals determined to control the handles of their own life.

Anonymous 08/24/15 (Mon) 02:38:50 No.190

Once, I called myself atheist, but there's no denying the energy I feel during rituals, and the answers which daemon reveal to me.

Why not /rel/? Anonymous 08/17/15 (Mon) 16:30:45 No.186 [Reply]

Why use a board dedicated to a particular religious orientation when you can use the general religion board?

>>>/rel/

Anonymous 08/18/15 (Tue) 04:55:17 No.189

File: 1439873717371.jpg (77.96 KB, 500x383, 500:383, 55226207.jpg)

One thing creates hesitation- a general religion board classifying an upright pentacle as "Satanism". I also enjoy having a multitude of a/religious selections, as a limited amount boxes difference into relative formations.

In any case, although >>>/satanic/ is positioned in favor of Satanism, its doors are open towards any (anti-)spirituality. It is recognized that difference is the drive of existence; the apex of survival lies in adapting to the plurality of the Force of nature. Therefore, all are welcomed to examine, explore, question and dive into the damned, the alienated, the blasphemed, the hidden and unknown things living in the Shadow around us.

As a universally open platform, >>>/satanic/ deliberately provides a "hole in the wall", an area of theological and a/spiritual contemplation that offers all individuals further analyzations and experimentations provided within its own spiritual prayer/ritual chamber >>>/satanworship/.

File: 1426210920668.png (3.39 KB, 149x222, 149:222, 8792375908342759023.png)

The Art of Sigilization Anonymous 03/13/15 (Fri) 01:42:00 No.39 [Reply]

I have a few sigils with me. One of them, I carry inside my wallet. Another one, I have stored with my supplies. Another one lays upon my ritual table. There was once a time that I constantly used my runes, tarot and did sigil work. Those times are no longer continual, they have been minimized for some time.

There has been a lot of adjustments lately, and my reading pursuits have taken me back onto Grant Morrison, Spare, Peter Carroll. I used to do some studying on chaosmatrix.org, but they've shut down. Luckily, I found an excellent archive of it.

As such, enjoy the link. Any thoughts on sigilization?

http://web.archive.org/web/20140223052314/http://www.chaosmatrix.org/library/chaos_all.php

6 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 03/17/15 (Tue) 20:10:52 No.57

File: 1426623052491.pdf (2.35 MB, 01 Illtlgy(1).pdf)

Here is the illuminatus trilogy:

Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 17:39:02 No.66

>>39
Do you think chaos magic is satanic?

Anonymous 04/08/15 (Wed) 14:46:05 No.96

>>66

No, I don't. I believe that Chaos Magic is outside of any religion. It is a sacrilegious set of principles, kept up by practical and undermining psychological anarchy.

Anonymous 07/27/15 (Mon) 19:25:25 No.178

File: 1438025125464.pdf (486.98 KB, Condensed Chaos.pdf)

Through magic, will and possibility, freedom can be wholly examined.

Anonymous 08/17/15 (Mon) 18:30:36 No.187

File: 1439836236647.pdf (4.52 MB, Principia Discordia (Wholl….pdf)

Principia Discordia Revised and Reconstituted Wholly 1st Edition, a wondrous book of surface contradictions and creative expositions.

File: 1432104369293.jpg (617.35 KB, 1024x1024, 1:1, 1430714986045-1.jpg)

This CSS is amazing! Anonymous 05/20/15 (Wed) 06:46:09 No.164 [Reply]

Hello, /satanic/. I just wanted to let you know that I'm the new board owner of >>>/kind/, and I'd appreciate it if you'd take the time to drop in and say hello. It's not really devoted to the discussion of topics pertaining to religion/philosophy, but I think kindness is or should be a virtue valued by all, irrespective of our world views!

Anonymous 05/24/15 (Sun) 20:09:44 No.165

File: 1432498184963.jpg (413.45 KB, 590x674, 295:337, 1b-.jpg)

Kindness is an interesting concept. At what point do the notions of apathy/empathy justify social participation? To allow too much kindness within ensures an easily modified platform, while complete apathy equally creates an externally modifiable social platform. A person who is too kind can be easily taken advantage over, while a person who has total apathy can be easily manipulated against via implementations of rumors and false histories to present social structures.

This world around us is composed of so much artificiality, where the multitude of existing personas reflect the commodification and systemic redesigning by commercialized representations of power and sophistication. Humanity undergoes a constant social breeding of a supposed perfection, but these compositions are simply stimulated cultural effigies. 1000 years ago, what's decent for you and I was radically different from any number of given civilizations.

I do not believe in isolating kindness but I am usually cold and indifferent to many of the people whom I meet. I value kindness as an extremely important psychological resource and its expenditures are equally as valued.

That being said, the board is a thought-provoking one.

Anonymous 06/04/15 (Thu) 04:50:10 No.167

I am of the mind that kindness, like so many other "virtues" espoused by western culture, can only be weakness.

Oxford defines "kindness" as "the quality of being friendly, generous, and considerate"

If one is deserving of an action that is friendly, generous, or considerate, then the concept of kindness is not needed; performing such an act falls under the category of justice.

If one is undeserving, then the act of kindness is a show of weakness and mush-mindedness.

Anonymous 08/04/15 (Tue) 20:01:54 No.182

I see kindness as a utility, a personal good to be expressed as I please.

Society teaches humanity "civilized" living, taking away from them true individual action. In our modesty, we forget about the wilderness and embrace Man and Woman as they are packaged.

I think of kindness as a tool, a device that we use, a physical and psychological module towards affecting desirous change.

Anonymous 08/16/15 (Sun) 03:38:07 No.185

I myself use kindness as a situational tool of opportunity to gain a physiological upper hand.

File: 1429733903056.jpg (10.81 KB, 299x249, 299:249, 2spooky4me.jpg)

Spooky Stories Anonymous 04/22/15 (Wed) 20:18:22 No.157 [Reply]

Any experiences with demons or other spirits?

Anonymous 04/28/15 (Tue) 17:20:32 No.159

>>157

When i was a kid, I woke up in the middle of the night. To my right was a black and shady dog. It's eyes were glowing, but not brightly. They were grey lights upon a fuzzy and shadowy face.

I froze as I stared at the dog. My upper body started raising into the air, as i struggled to even breathe. Fear gripped my heart, I cried out to nothing, "help!"

The next moment, a silent roar shook me. The dog leaped over me and disappeared into the wall. Instantly, my body relaxed and I fell back asleep.

Anonymous 08/08/15 (Sat) 19:32:39 No.184

File: 1439062359919.png (166.51 KB, 528x526, 264:263, otherGODs.png)

>Looking for old PC games at the local Video Game shop.

>Ask shop keeper about the blank/Japanese text floppy disk.

>Says I can have it for free.

>Weird shit starts happening as soon as I put it into my floppy drive.

>Game crashing.

>Sudden deaths.

>Hyper-realistic face zoom.

>Ben drowned.

>There was no floppy.

>I'm a ghost.

File: 1423363797364.jpg (66.82 KB, 256x468, 64:117, 1z34x84z34234zxdf4.jpg)

In the name of- Anonymous 02/08/15 (Sun) 02:49:57 No.5 [Reply]

We Satanists are a marginalized group. Our kind are often disparaged, ostracized, and heavily propagandized against by associates and strangers alike. The media is infused with nonsense pertaining towards seekers of darkness. Legends often paint the narrative of normalized justice as a condition not capable of occurring by the antics or strategies of those who stray too far from the mainstream. Games reflect this, as do movies, and folklore is often no different. As such, the concept of the Satanist is subaltern.

In relation to this systemic isolation, the concept of the Satanist is not solely regulated to just the agent. The Satanist, as a regular recipient of disinformation and historical/present propagandizing, exists in the same nature as other exiled, previously persecuted, presently demonized orientations. Thus, the spectacle of the Satanist is one also shared by the bastardized, the outcast, the alienated.

This lounge represents but a small marking upon the matrix which exists around us: it is a statement, a phrase uttered into the cybersphere, stepped into and occupied but for a moment by curious explorers. The marginalized have a home here; the disciple and guide both find a union in their shared lust for the shadow.

Anonymous SAGE! 05/09/15 (Sat) 20:38:28 No.163

Thought for the day:

What does it mean to become marginalized?

Anonymous 07/01/15 (Wed) 23:30:40 No.176

The subaltern must continually refresh the cycles of resistance or else become assimilated within the stratum of populist consciousness.

Anonymous 08/04/15 (Tue) 19:18:46 No.181

>>163

I think marginalizing is mostly a public action that occurs when people are least involved with some one else. This could be psychically, physically, emotionally.

>the spectacle of the Satanist is one also shared by the bastardized, the outcast, the alienated

I'm not certain what you mean by this. What does spectacle mean in this context?

Books Anonymous 03/08/15 (Sun) 02:18:34 No.23 [Reply]

I love to read. What books do/are you reading?

I'm currently starting upon Camus, The Rebel.

3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

Anonymous 04/01/15 (Wed) 16:36:34 No.81

>>23
Erik Davis, Calling Cthulhu

Anonymous 08/04/15 (Tue) 18:39:19 No.180

File: 1438713560024-0.pdf (2.03 MB, uncut_ strangerstrangeland.pdf)

File: 1438713560027-1.pdf (1.38 MB, strangers in a strange lan….pdf)

Stranger in a strange land, by Robert Heinlein. Here are both versions, uncut and cut. Heinlein preferred the original.

Anonymous SAGE! 10/10/15 (Sat) 20:54:13 No.204

File: 1444510454156.pdf (136.99 KB, Carroll_Peter_J_-_Liber_Ka….pdf)

Liber Kaos, by Peter J. Carroll

Anonymous SAGE! 10/27/15 (Tue) 08:05:25 No.214

File: 1445933125160.pdf (114.93 KB, wbtw01.pdf)

>>204

Walking Between Worlds, by Phil Hine. Shamanism has always been alluring and this book caught my attention.

Anonymous SAGE! 11/21/15 (Sat) 21:58:34 No.228

File: 1448143115355.pdf (10.16 KB, Sigils.pdf)

reading about sigils

File: 1433635371185.png (249.24 KB, 491x509, 491:509, ~~~The Banana.png)

YLYL The Movie 42069 BC. Anonymous 06/07/15 (Sun) 00:02:51 No.168 [Reply]

I have never actually won a single one of these threads. Everytime I see that comically anthropomorphized banana holding his peel in a suggestive manner, likening the peel to clothes and his peel-less nature to human nudity, I bust up laughing. This happens every time, no matter where I am, be it the house or the bus or in class. Sometimes I laugh just thinking about it. This is a dark memory but a few months back I had just gotten done with a fit of laughter caused by one of these hilarious threads. Suddenly my mom walks in and she's crying. I attempted to suppress the growing urge to laugh but it was getting more difficult. Face red, tears running down her aging face, mom grabs my shoulders and says "Your father's dead."

It was at that moment that I couldn't hold back anymore. I burst into a banana-induced fit of laughter, but the horrible news drew tears to my eyes. I laughed while I cried, tears streaming down my wide open grin, memories of daddy resurfacing and being melded and combined with the naked banana.

I lost two things that night.

What did you lose that night, anon?

File: 1428467279533.gif (2.64 MB, 264x240, 11:10, 155745470-313451155.gif)

Blood Rituals and Sacrifices and all of that shit Anonymous 04/08/15 (Wed) 04:27:59 No.93 [Reply]

So do Satanists actually believe in this stuff?

Pardon my newfaggotry, but does Satanism condone sacrificing animals?

Anonymous 04/10/15 (Fri) 16:14:17 No.103

Yes. Most people don't want to mention it, but the Dark Gods are very blood hungry.

Anonymous 04/12/15 (Sun) 00:42:23 No.116

Animals? Are babies next?

I satisfy myself with my own sweat and energy. If we are to reach Godhead, then I don't believe that killing is going to do it.

Anonymous 04/14/15 (Tue) 02:00:03 No.118

Overall, Satanism does not condone sacrificing. Some perspectives do, such as the Order of Nine Angels.

The way I view blood magic is as a transmissive fluid of focused spell-work. There is both life and death within blood, intrusive viruses and white cells, and it is only one aspect of magical facilitation. Blood magic is particularly powerful, as a versatile piercing object or as a willful self-mutilation. The shedding of the self by the self is an extremely powerful psychosocial motivator, brought on by embracing willful pain and the removal of fear in order to further desire, and its focusing power to spear-head spell-work is an aspect that I think requires delicate meditation and self-control.

Since Satanism is a religion of holistic liberation, one can argue that sacrificing animals within ritual-work can be undertaken vis a vis outdoors hunting, as opposed to specifically acquiring store-bought animals. However, since I do not bother with nor believe in the power of using unnecessary blood, I do not find it convincing that animal sacrifice contains strength which you cannot manifest nor conjure yourself.

Anonymous 04/14/15 (Tue) 19:52:49 No.131

>>118
I think that living organisms can be sacrificed, but it isn't essential. I think it shows extra dedication and trust, though.

File: 1428738122334.jpg (55.31 KB, 500x382, 250:191, 154534523512.jpg)

Left/Right-Hand path Anonymous 04/11/15 (Sat) 07:42:02 No.108 [Reply]

What attracts you to the left/right hand path?

Anonymous 04/11/15 (Sat) 18:52:24 No.110

File: 1428778344003.png (753.5 KB, 819x574, 117:82, 567478956895691242-518.png)

I think the 'left'/'right' hand path dichotomy is a primarily arbitrary one, which further relies upon historical methods of discourse control. Helena Blavatsky echoes the sentiment of the dominating tendency to criticize its great other which, in her time, was the rejection of tradition and engagement within social behaviors discerned as unpopular and backwards. Hence, how once she left Tibet, she referred to tendencies to break apart from domination as "left", or as a Vamachara, a heterodox practice of expression. In other words, she broadly tossed a title onto all practices which deviated from orthodoxy in some way or another, and typically attributed anecdotal hysteria towards the same practitioners.

Personally, the pathways are really just dualist methods of perceiving magic and ritual. I think of them as tools, mere toys within your own path, to be utilized by the magician as it decides in its seeking of self-empowerment.

File: 1427079258545.jpg (33.74 KB, 462x350, 33:25, 236423452345.jpg)

Satanism or Satanisms Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 02:54:18 No.64 [Reply]

Since my youth, I have been a Satanist. For over 17 years, I have walked the path of Satanism. I recognize, and fully realize, that there exists a vast multitude of ideas upon purity.

Countless cultures have believed that a particular aspect of their society was the most truthful and pure of ideas. Wars have engulfed nations, tribes have slain each other, cities have fractured apart in civil engagements over "right" and "wrong". Entire sections of human history are dedicated to crusades of some sort, especially in the arena of 'truth'.

When speaking about Satanism, it is most appropriate to talk about Satanisms, as opposed to a specific form of Satanism. There are many variations of Satanism, which are defined in vastly differing conceptions of adherence. Some forms anthropomorphize Satan, some forms are strictly symbolic and psychosocial in extension, and still, some others experience Satan in the spiritual sphere. That Satan, a diabolical being of ingenuity and cleverness, would be specifically molded after a historical approach seems a contrary idea to the very history of Satan as a social and religious force of change. Satanism is reflected in the plurality and expression of individual praxis, evident within the many developments thereof.

All religions and pursuits grew from historical conflicts and social tendencies that defined the sharing of knowledge and perspectives accordingly. Throughout the entire existence of mankind, humanity has continually interacted with multitudes of ideas and perspectives. Many ideas held underwent radicalization and marginalization, while still others were publicly adored and heralded as supreme. That a religion, unique in experience, would be exactly adjusted towards a specific esoteric and eccentric paradigm, seems counter-intuitive to the very notion of individual praxis.

The individual is not an exactitude of history.

Anonymous 03/23/15 (Mon) 17:37:02 No.65

I never understood how anyone could claim their religion was the one truth.

Anonymous 04/08/15 (Wed) 04:43:06 No.94

Interesting.

So is Satanism all about the individual or are there customs and traditions and shit?

Anonymous 04/11/15 (Sat) 03:31:35 No.107

>>94

It really depends upon your angle, but such is the most important aspect of Satanism. Satanism is an extremely relative religious perspective, contingent upon resistance and empowerment, encircling a union of sorts between a dynamic force, energies, and/or eternal ones.

One can subscribe to certain traditions- that choice is yours, and yours alone. The very stratum of Satanism has the idea of opposition, of inherent celebration and examination of difference, within its composure. As such, Satanism proposes that the individual is free, that the individual alone decides upon the importance of tradition.

Magic, a tool emphasized by focus and power, requires modules for its exercise. By relying upon over-sophisticated methods of rituals or traditions, one entraps themselves within the ideology of the mechanic. They are no longer experiencing actualized liberation but a simulated falsity, a forceful gnosis reliant upon methods convoluted by interested parties of power.

Instead, Satanism advocates taking that which is beneficial and discarding with that which is not. It is a deeply pragmatic spiritual approach, an eclectic religious platform which praises the creative expression of personal interest.

Delete Post [ File] Password

Reason [Global]