politics

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

File: 1440386147055.jpg (296.36 KB, 1200x987, 400:329, politics.jpg)

politics Anonymous 08/24/15 (Mon) 03:15:46 No.192

Question:

Is /satanic/ open to political convos? I enjoy metaphysics and religion, but I also think that Satanism supercedes any one focus.

Anonymous 08/28/15 (Fri) 20:21:29 No.193

File: 1440793289901.jpg (39.71 KB, 500x281, 500:281, tumblr_static_tumblr_stati….jpg)

>is /satanic open/ to political convos?

Yes. The board is open to any and all individuals concerned, interested or intrigued by esoteric subjects -spanning from religious to socioeconomic relations- and other fields composed of the examination, exploitation, manipulation or satiation of individual/other consciousness.

To clarify the subject a bit further, this board doesn't suppose an absolute stance upon what political form Satanism mandates nor is it now, and never shall be, closed off to any psychosocial analysis.

As Satanists, we are called to tear asunder weakness and restructure ourselves through the black flame. As such, the analyzation of power and its relevant paradigms is a necessary procession.

>Satanism supercedes any one focus

I absolutely agree with you. Satanism is neither simply a philosophy or composite of iconoclasticism; it is a holistic perspective continually refining intent and ironing conscious development.

Anonymous 08/29/15 (Sat) 14:03:59 No.194

One word: Libertarian

Anonymous 09/07/15 (Mon) 22:49:34 No.198

Personally, I think that Satanism is sorta apolitical. It's not really one philosophy or another. Satanism is really flexible. Then again, I can't agree with a satanist trying to tell others what to do. We are very counterculture.

Anonymous 09/11/15 (Fri) 01:56:22 No.199

>>194

I truly think that libertarian oriented philosophies best compliment individualist religions, such as discordian, demonological and other left-hand path paradigms. It seems counter-intuitive to suggest conformist ideologies, especially given that LHP practitioners are fundamentally iconoclastic.

>>198

I wouldn't suggest Satanism as apolitical, insofar as I would call it "initially politically formless". Although Satanism is strongly associated with individual praxis, there's nothing within Satanism that fully alienates communitarian ideologies, at least not immediately. Generally speaking, the left-hand path is construed as one involving a deliberate aversion against traditions and popular social normalities.

Anonymous 10/17/15 (Sat) 10:43:45 No.210

>>194

>>199

I personally think Satanism fits better with anarchism, particularly the variants influenced by Max Striner, since 'libertarianism' in the american sense requires compliance with the market and property related laws, which I find confining.

Anonymous 10/21/15 (Wed) 03:55:50 No.213

>>210

I used to focus a lot on Stirner.

Ten years ago, I came across him and he challenged my views so much to the extent that I became an epistemological solipsist. His views against ghosts and the reflections they play on the mind came to such a degree that I found it relevant to the very properties of conception itself. These days, I am a mixture of autopantheism and polytheism.

I believe that voluntary agreements between individuals and their manifestations are the cornerstone towards attaining the full potential of a cooperation. To the degree that markets exist, regulation appears to be a method of domination exercised by a ruling social order. Similarly, I am inclined towards agorist and truly free market exchanges.

I am a left-wing market anarcho-transhumanist. I am convinced that self perfection best arises through synthesized technologies of the occult and material sciences. In my opinion, this process is best materialized by an entirely informationally-open, psychosocially flexible and (a)spiritually multifaceted society.