>>2085
>why integrate?
m8 if you're working with a continuous object and not just a one-dimensional stick you have no choice but to integrate
>>2084
>>The force acting on the cross-sectional area is equal to the integral of the stress on the cross-sectional area (Picture 2)
>I don't understand how they got to that. Can anyone explain?
That's the definition of stress; stress is a tensor whose three components represent stretching and torsional forces in a continuum per unit of surface, in all three directions. Therefore, if you pick a cross-section, to get a force acting on it, all you need to do is integrate that component of the stress tensor along entire cross-section.