[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/sci/ - Science and Mathematics

Spending thousands of dollars on useless labs since 2014.

Catalog

The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
A message from @CodeMonkeyZ, 2ch lead developer: "How Hiroyuki Nishimura will sell 4chan data"
Advertise on this site
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Oh, hey. We're actually having old posts pruned now.

File: 1428809707029-0.png (199.42 KB, 953x633, 953:633, scihelp.png)

File: 1428809707029-1.png (216.63 KB, 947x541, 947:541, scihelp2.png)

 No.2084

Okay /sci/, please help a first year engineering student understand stress and strain in beams. We're covering Euler-Bernoulli beam theory, and they (the lecturers) have stated that curvature is the rate of change of the slope of a beam in deformation. That I understand. I understand how curvature can be related to the radius of a circle, given that we assume the deformation to be in that shape (i.e.: a minimal deformation).

We arrive at
Stress = Modulus X Strain = Modulus X Curvature X Distance from the neutral axis
(Picture 1)

Then this comes up:
>The force acting on the cross-sectional area is equal to the integral of the stress on the cross-sectional area (Picture 2)
I don't understand how they got to that. Can anyone explain?

 No.2085

>>2084
Specifically, why integrate?

 No.3132

>>2085

Because you're summing the stresses along the y axis.


 No.3133

>>3132

Wow, I just noticed how old this thread is.


 No.3144

>>2085

>why integrate?

m8 if you're working with a continuous object and not just a one-dimensional stick you have no choice but to integrate

>>2084

>>The force acting on the cross-sectional area is equal to the integral of the stress on the cross-sectional area (Picture 2)

>I don't understand how they got to that. Can anyone explain?

That's the definition of stress; stress is a tensor whose three components represent stretching and torsional forces in a continuum per unit of surface, in all three directions. Therefore, if you pick a cross-section, to get a force acting on it, all you need to do is integrate that component of the stress tensor along entire cross-section.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]