/sci/ - Science and Mathematics

So then what if the reason we can't observe dark matter is because it technically doesn't exist yet? What if dark matter is merely the Schrodinger's Cat of matter, where it spontaneously conforms to matter's presence because it is observed?

Or better yet, what if Dark Matter is matter of another universe?

Consider now the multiverse theory. Where every possibility of every action and reaction immediately splits into an infinite number of successive universes based on each decision.

If matter only remains stable and 'matter' upon observation, what would it be when we do not observe it?

Does that mean that the absence of matter IS dark matter? But where would it go? If the multiverse theory is true, then it didn't go anywhere other than intended, and also formed in the corresponding universe where a counter-observation was made upon it.

(Example: See matter, it does one action, not another - where at the same time, it does the other action in another universe, where it is observed as such there.)

Now how does all this fit into the Bubbleverse theory?

Alright, take the two previous hypotheses, and combine them as such when reading the following section:

1. Time, affected solely by matter and its gravitational pull and mass, does not exist where matter does not.

2. Time is the reaction from the creation of infinite universes based on the observation of matter.

While time itself has no mass, it is affected by matter as if it had did; it orbits a mass, per se, due to its gravitational pull. This means that where there are concentrations of mass, time flows slowly, and is observable. So the more observed a universe is, the more universes it creates, and therefore the faster it moves through time because it grows more and more due to increasing observations and reactions of matter. Make no mistake, I mean this not contradictory: Because time isn't present without mass, in its absence we don't observe it because it doesn't exist. So when it does, the more it is observed the faster it moves through space while simultaneously being slower due to location of observation.

Example: I'm a galaxy 8 billion light years away, fifty times more massive than the Milky Way. For me, because of all of the reactions in my galaxy (Due purely according to the presence of more matter occupying space) time would seemingly flow slower for me, because I'm more massive. I'm able to attract more of it into my gravitational pull. Because of that, my effective life is shorter to the observer here in the Milky Way. (Ever heard the phrase the brightest flame burns the quickest?) In 8 billion light years it could take to reach us here on Earth, I could have galactic civilizations rise and fall countless times over, all in a fiftieth of the time that it would take here in the Milky Way.

Okay, but where's bubbleverse? Assume each galaxy, then, is a universe. An enormous congregation of mass and matter. Affected by time and energy. Where there is no time, no energy, there is no matter, and is therefore the 'edge' of the galaxy. In 3-dimensional space, this could resemble a bubble surrounding the galaxy. So each galaxy that drifts throughout space is moving down that pathway of the dimensional universe, propelled further by observation, resulting in time past. (Only relative to the matter affected.) When galaxies collide, everything we know breaks down because there are that many more possibilites that can occur in space/time. (Space/time here being the observable universe.) The physics that shape everything we know break down near such gigantic clusters of mass, such as black holes. (And just as a kicker, there's presumably one at the center of our galaxy!) And as I'm finishing that statement, I realize something else that bugs me. What if black holes, such massive concentrations of gravity that even light cannot escape, and not even directly observable, are the engines of space/time?

What if black holes are basically Random Number Generators for the universe that make basic observations of matter? (Or better yet, what if they're non-random? That's an exciting prospect.)

If mass exists near a black hole, it is naturally going to affect that mass and create reactions. This creates an abundance of time, so it backlogs and moves slowly.

If time slows in the mere presence of that much force, then surely everything in a huge radius around it would be under its effects, disappating the further it exists in space from the black hole. The black hole would concieveably be a bubble of gravity to trap matter and light like a magnet.

And it drifts throughout the observable universe because of its own energy. (Time.)

Tl;dr:

Crackpot theory:

Black Holes: They're RNG (Or potentially even non-random) observation engines for the universe, creating infinite universes based upon its gravitational force. Time is the direct consequence of this action, allowing us to observe matter in one state or another. Time, as such, does not exist where matter does not; so dark matter could potentially be the absence of time. Dark energy, the supposed force pushing the observable universe apart faster, could be contributed to clusters of time and creation of multiverses pushing the bubbles of time and mass through dark space - which would be matter that hasn't been observed yet. (Or has since reached a state of being unobserved, lending to a cyclical nature we see in the natural universe upon re-observation.) When these bubbles collide, our known physics break down because there are more observations than we can see from our observable standpoint in relative time. That much mass present warps time, like a black hole itself distorts it. More reactions occur in a relatively shorter amount of time, increasing the energy and time released, where that many more reactions can occur.

Really, I just want to know where I'm wrong. That can't be the next big thing to solving the universe, can it? What am I missing to this equation?