[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/sci/ - Science and Mathematics

Nerdflix and shill.

Catalog

See 8chan's new software in development (discuss) (help out)
Infinity Next Beta period has started, click here for info or go directly to beta.8ch.net
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Oh, hey. We're actually having old posts pruned now.

File: 1447117559327.jpg (110.73 KB, 540x699, 180:233, The Jamesinator.jpg)

 No.3435

I've always wanted to read up on the social sciences (specifically psychology and sociology and their biological aspects) and get a better understanding of how the mind works/societies evolve and function. The problem is that the social sciences tend to be fuzzier and less precise, and are hotly debated and can be construed to meet some ideology. How do I approach these subjects as empirically and bias-free as is possible?

I love William James philosophically-speaking, but his The Principles of Psychology is more than one hundred years old so it's obviously not exactly ideal to start there, I would presuppose.

I come from (what you would call) a conservative perspective and so as far as sociology is concerned, I've really only ventured into Anthony M. Ludovici's works which are aristocratic and Nietzchean in orientation. I also consider myself a naturalist and a physicalist so any kind of explanation that rests on concepts of transcendent forces or souls or something will almost definitely not sway me, but I am open to any suggestions.

But yes, overall, how do I approach these subjects fairly? Thanks in advance to anyone who has any ideas.

 No.3441

>>3435

I'd read some cognitive science and game theory first, so you know what "hard science" basis you have to compare the material you read to.

But honestly, I'm on the same boat as you.


 No.3509

shameless bump


 No.3510

I doubt you can fairly approach these. Mainly because sometimes its subjective. Its not math. Its not empirical. You should read what you enjoy and work your way up from there. Even if ita debatable, its really interesting .




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]