[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/sci/ - Science and Mathematics

Nerdflix and shill.

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Oh, hey. We're actually having old posts pruned now.

File: 1447372425948.jpg (110.43 KB, 263x400, 263:400, Superman_Heat_Vision[1].jpg)

 No.3446

The explanation for Superman's heat vision has always been that it was concentrated and focused x-ray vision.

Ignoring how X-rays don't work even remotely like Superman's sight, would it even be physically possible to focus intense x-rays to the point they can melt steel?

 No.3447


 No.3449

>>3447

Thanks.


 No.3780

>>3446

Also, it wouldn't be nearly as localized as you'd think.

Most things are relatively transparent to x-rays. Take concrete, for instance. Depending on wavelength, the "penetration depth" (the depth at which half the x-rays are absorbed ) is 4-60mm (or higher, but then you've moved up into gamma rays). For comparison, take the penetration depth to be 1cm for simplicity. Now look at a light bulb. Now move twice as far away from it and look at it again. That change in light intensity is the equivalent of a 2cm chunk of concrete for x-rays.

You try to, say, weld an I-beam and a significant chunk of the x-rays would just go right through into whatever is behind it.

Not to mention the amount of x-ray scattering that would happen.


 No.3804

>>3446

are you asking if x-rays can melt steel beams?


 No.3807

"Testing stuff"


 No.3808

:^)


 No.3809

>:(




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]