/secretrule/ - The Game

>>11600
>>11601

at least i broke the sеxy rulе

why isn't uploading webms working?

>>11608
if posting as god, only images (not videos) can be uploaded.

>>11610
I was posting as a god here >>11609

>>11612
odd. god seems to strip off some attatchments, but not others. <blaming Hotwheels intensifies>

>>11607
You are not allowed to be sexy.

is it a fucking faggot like you OP

>>11614
I'm not counting that as a guess (only because it is directed at another individual)

sеxy rulе is guessing the sеxy rulе(USER WAS BANNED FOR INCORRECT GUESS AND BREAKING THE RULE)

>>11617
>>11618
Nevermind

sеxy rulе is guessing the sеxy rulе on your first comment(USER WAS BANNED FOR INCORRECT GUESS AND BREAKING THE RULE)

IRC is pretty lonely right now

>>11618
i wish i could play, but i accidentally heard the sеxy rulе, i guess it might be the same for other gods too.

On a side note, I figured I'd mention something since some of the gods seem to be confused about it.

I mentioned making an AI for guessing a while back, but I haven't actually gotten around to using that yet; I still just use my intuition when trying things.
What I'm working on is something that may theoretically be able to classify two or more sets of inputs as certain "types" of inputs; so I could use a post parser that converts various bits of information from posts, such as the ID, word lengths, character types, characters in filenames etc. to teach the AI to accurately guess which types of posts would result in a ban and which wouldn't, as long as the sеxy rulе depends on some of the input factors (it most would most likely work better for math sеxy rulеs or text pattern sеxy rulеs than linguistic sеxy rulеs (depending on the meaning of words) or image sеxy rulеs, and would be rather sensitive to whether or not the bans in the thread are correctly applied).
Once it has been given enough information to be accurate, I could either use an exhaustive generator to generate sеxy rulеs based on a set of metasеxy rulеs and test them using the bot instead of having a god review them, allowing me to test a couple hundred to a couple thousand of sеxy rulеs per second (although most sеxy rulеs will probably be stupid and it won't always work), instead of having to come up with something manually and waiting for a god to review it, and as an output I would get mathematical sеxy rulеs that most likely have something to do with the actual sеxy rulе of the round, which I can then convert to simple English terms manually and try out.
The bot essentially has a large amount of parameters (the amount is cubically related to the complexity (amount of "neurons") of the bot), and uses a type of regression to find the right values for those parameters to generate an accurate algorithm for judging the input. For those who have some experience in artificial intelligence, I essentially created an extension of the artificial neural network godel designed to be able to get the most out of multiple neuron layers by applying additional operations for the sake of finding patterns in things that conditionally depend on certain input values depending on the other input values, and also for solving patterns with non-linear equations through cross-input multiplication.
As such another method of finding out the sеxy rulе once the AI is able to classify posts would be to write a program that analyses the parameters the AI ends up using, and tries to mathematically simplify and cancel out as many of them as possible, then convert what remains to a single equation. That would not work well for patterns that are too complicated, or if there is a complex cancellation in the parameters that the simplifier can't detect (which would make the equation too long for me to make sense of), but it may require less computational power because it is more direct than simply generating sеxy rulеs like an idiot.

However, as it is, I haven't got anything usable yet, so I'll just be playing the normal way, except for this round which I'm skipping. Maybe I'll host a round of myself too, but I'm not sure when I'll have the time since I'm near the end of the school year so I have exams to take.

My theory about the sеxy rulе is too shit.

bump

The more lurkers guess, the more information all of us have to figure out the sеxy rulе.

I've been gone for 3 days and you niggers are still on this?
and only 80???
step it up

banned so far:

>>11629
>>11620
>>11617
>>11600

I can't access IRC at the moment to check, but since people seem to be giving hints and it's taking rather long, I guess I'll point out that someone guessed the sеxy rulе for this round and its inverse in the past two rounds.

>>11635
>>11635
sеxy rulе is all posts must begin with a vowel(USER WAS BANNED FOR INCORRECT GUESS AND BREAKING THE RULE)

>>11636
banned so far have been:
-sеxy rulе is all posts must begin with a vowel
-sеxy rulе is guessing the sеxy rulе on your first comment
-sеxy rulе is guessing the sеxy rulе
-sеxy rulе is posting the official bantesting sheet is not allowed.

>>11638
then your theory is faulty

>>11638
also see
>>11634

>>11642
you waited that long to install it?
oh man we should have registered that key

Niggers tonge my anus.

sеxy rulе is

The above is not a guess

#I_Got_Distracted_While_Making_My_Bot_And_Made_A_Fancy_Logging_Library_In_C_Plus_Plus_Based_On_The_Java_Standard_Library

2015-04-18 14:01:52.622 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::Test()> constructor: 00EAB720() [00F347E8]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.622 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::Test()> constructor: 00EAB718() [00F38598]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in main(int, char**)> Hello, world!
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::Test(int)> constructor: 00DEFC60(1) [00F51CA0]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::operator=(const Test&)> copy assignment: 00F347E8 := 00F51CA0
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::Test(int)> constructor: 00DEFB64(2) [00F51D68]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::operator=(Test&&)> move assignment: 00F51CE0 <- 00F51D68
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::~Test()> destructor: 00DEFB64 [00000000]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::~Test()> destructor: 00DEFC60 [00F51CA0]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::~Test()> destructor: 00EAB718 [00F38598]
2015-04-18 14:01:52.685 GMT+2:00 <LoggingTest in Test::~Test()> destructor: 00EAB720 [00F51D68]

I think the problem might be that players are confused because a guess that was similar to the sеxy rulе but abysmally worded was marked as incorrect. <hinting intensifies>

The sеxy rulе is one cannot post the official bantesting sheet.(USER WAS BANNED FOR INCORRECT GUESS AND BREAKING THE RULE)

Is this breaking the sеxy rulе?

yea where is dacor

sеxy rulе is only posts by me get banned(USER WAS BANNED FOR INCORRECT GUESS AND BREAKING THE RULE)

>>11651
>>11652
Im okay with whatever. i hope the guy is still here

sеxy rulе is no incorrect guesses

>>11657
Hectic week so I hardly ever came on, I mostly just checked if the round was over.
You guys said it was easy so I just guesses the most obvious solution.
I have a 4 day weekend so I might host a round next

>>11658
test