ddbe21 No.10997
ACTION
The Party Platform Thread Act
This action's purpose is to make it mandatory for all Parties to create threads that outline their platform.
1. All parties must have a an active P.P.T. at all times.
2. If a party does not have an active P.P.T., then said party's votes will be void until the time that they do.
3. If a party does not have a P.P.T. by election time, then their party will no longer be registered, and no longer eligible to hold seats.
Amendment
4. Independent Senators are to be treated the same as parties in regards to points 1, 2, and 3 of this law.
Amendment
5. Coalitions are to be treated the same as parties in regards to points 1, 2, and 3 of this law.
Post last edited at
ddbe21 No.10998
Yea, 35 seats.
d969bc No.11013
defcd0 No.11016
Yes, 31 seats
57d9cd No.11018
Yea, 35 seats. This should be common sense. **I wonder why Burk never made this a bill?''
d969bc No.11021
>>11018Should have made a law for supporting PhoneBloks/ProjectAra, Red(FullStackLanguage), Non-secure tripcode research and Telegram compression
76f318 No.11031
Sweet, that means I don't need mine anymore
Yes, 10 votes
a19804 No.11033
Yes, 30 votes.
9836ed No.11034
>>11031kek. Fucking technicalities. I'll have to amend the bill.
f19b49 No.11099
Kane trying to get in a last-minute potshot at me, I see.
No. Seven seats.
9cded1 No.11101
>>11099Just because you're too stubborn to follow basic board etiquette doesn't mean I'm taking a "pot shot" at you. This should have been a law to begin with.
7ab263 No.11103
Yes, 81 seats.
9cded1 No.11104
7ab263 No.11105
>>11103>>11104Whoops, screwed that up.
Yes, 18 seats.
9cded1 No.11110
>>11105Oh OK. That's better
f19b49 No.11118
>>11101Making a law directed almost entirely at me and me alone that stipulates my complete removal from the Senate because of my business practices is a level of disproportionate retribution that I seriously cannot see as anything other than an unadulterated potshot.
Anyway, we already talked about this in the IRC.
As long as this proposal is still active, I'm maintaining my vote against it.
ee386d No.11149
>>10997Yea, 9 seats. This simply makes sense; people have the right to know what their votes are going to.
bb5de6 No.11171
yea 10 seats
It's just logical.
c3fd8e No.11202
Agreed.
Yes, 17 votes.
2e2165 No.11300
Yes, 30 votes.
Everyone needs to state their party ideals.
57d9cd No.11318
ACTION PASSED
Votes yea: 200 (PF, HKLIP, ACP, ConservAnon, RxPx, KP, Marcus Aurelius, Caesar)
Votes nay: 7 (Xeno)
Action passed with a 96.6% majority.