>>146
>not sure if idiot or paid
The question I was answering was a hypothetical rhetorical question
>>If her company wasn't shilling on 4chan how would she have known?
To which I gave a sincere honest answer.
The question itself isn't invalid, and every fact that she is involved into the company is thoroughly documented, but the question itself is pushing the narrative that is already established by doing reverse logic that in of itself isn't valid.
For instance, lets take a scenario where she has no connections to all of this and she was framed. Now lets take question as "If her company wasn't shilling on 4chan how would she have known?" for serious. In this scenario it could have been completely plausible for a friend/relative/troll to come by and notify her of the story.
Do you see the logic behind the rhetorical question now? Its flawed because it works backwards into the conclusion that was already established.
Sorry if I sperged, just wanted to clarify.