No.5743[Last 50 Posts]
Old thread:
>>1945A place to bitch about furries, shitpost about Raz, and never clarify your complaints so nothing ever gets fixed.
Or a thread for /d/ group/parcel discussion and suggestions, if you wanna actually do something useful instead. Your choice, as always.
Current skybox theme suggestions:Some combination of batthouse/onsen, locker/dressing rooms, bathrooms and gloryholes.
If I missed/forgot anything, or if you've got new ideas, post 'em up.
/d/onghouse redecoration status:Aborted, due to the very compelling argument that the house shouldn't be trying to be more interesting than its occupants, when pixelfucking is the goal. Best to keep it low-key and neutral, because the environment is just the canvas, and you guys are the (sticky white) paint.
I've still got a few tweaks to make. Those sliding gate doors on the bedrooms with the wheelchair access signs are ridiculous, and I still need to do the teleport doors. Does anyone have any suggestions for good-quality mesh doors that fit the general neutral-beige-wood visual theme? I plan to kill two birds with one stone here.
Apologies to any birds triggered by that. No.5753
>>5743Would it be possible to put up a sign that says Welcome at the front door?
I find the /d/onghouse to be very cozy and welcoming and I think that would complete the deal.
No.5754
>>5743ban Oratario. Autist runs around in ugly avatars, annoys people fucking and doesn't lewd.
No.5755
>>5754Why is autism so accepted in there? It physically hurts to hear him and others go on and on about inane shit.
No.5757
>>5754>ugly avatarsNot bannable, fortunately for some of us.
>doesn't lewdAlso not bannable so long as he doesn't disrupt others.
>annoys people fuckingThat, however, is shitty and not cool, if it's true. Get some chat logs, screenshots, or whatever else to myself or one of the other officers. It would be irresponsible for us to take action based on anonymous posts in the thread, for obvious reasons, but if there's something genuinely disruptive going on and someone gives us something to work with in-world, we'll do our best to solve whatever problems arise.
Seriously, talk to someone in-world about it, because that shit ain't kosher, and it's the thing I most concern myself with in terms of /d/onghouse administration. First and foremost, it needs to be a decent place to hang out and pixelfuck.
>>5755This is SL. You kinda signed up for it.
Besides, I've heard just as bad in every other group I've spent any time around in SL, from /vg/ (in all its various incarnations in the past 2ish years) to shitty pubbie groups of all sorts. And most 4chan groups in other games, come to think of it. MMOs are particularly bad for it.
No.5764
heres an idea a bookshelf filled with /d/ lewd shenanaigan's logs. Bored and no one to lewd? want to know how someone you are curious to fuck rps? pop open a notecard of one of there sessions and have fun.
It goes without saying that there needs to be consent by both/everyone involved before it gets put into the bookshelf
No.5765
>>5764Huh, that's actually a pretty neat idea. Could even put a couple general theme tags on them, like "F/futa, anal" and such, like you see on Usenet porn fiction archives etc.
I'll have to get some feedback from someone who isn't shit at scripting (i.e. not me), but I'm pretty sure I even have a decent-quality mesh bookshelf somewhere in the horrid abyss that is my inventory.
No.5766
>>5765I have a couple of bookshelves/sets if you want one. as for scripting it, just a simple multiple choice item giver dialog script will work just fine--Pretty much every "Library" I've seen uses it
No.5768
>>5766Sure, throw me whatever you've got, it's good to have options. We can probably sort the base of this out within a few days, but soliciting logs from the community to populate it will take a bit longer.
No.5769
>>5754how is it that he's banned from /vg/ and not here? i've never even seen him lewd with anyone whenever i'm around, unless lewd now includes spouting autistic garbage at anyone within 50 meters of him.
maybe we can convince sovot and company to unban him so he goes back to them? No.5770
>>5769hes 50/50 in robot or maybe griffy avatars but i havent seen him do anything bad. why was he banned from /vg/?
No.5773
>>5770>hasn't done anything bad>fucking in room>ora walks up>tell him to go away>refuses>derender his ugly primshit>starts breathing into the microphone like an autistAnd this is why I no longer go to the donghouse, it's become the garbage pile of the /vg/ group
No.5776
>>5773
>Have a bad experience with a single autist>Garbage pile, never going again! No.5777
>>5769it worked with alex
No.5782
>>5777Alex does lewd things regularly and often though.
No.5789
Any tips on getting some action in the /d/onghouse?
I find that everyone's really stuck up and picky compared to people in other lewd sims. Odd atmosphere.
It is a nice place though, great to chill at, at least.
No.5790
>>5789I don't mean it as an insult, most of you are really cool, just hard to impress.
No.5791
No.5793
>>5776>ora>driocku>shinoda No.5794
>>5782i mean you never see alex at /d/ now that he's unbanned from stern
No.5795
>>5794because /d/ a shit and alex' house even looks better
No.5796
>>5793But shinoda is kawai
No.5797
>>5793Log it, make an official complaint to someone, problems get solved. Can't go off vague anonymous posts, like I said before.
I already gave Shinoda shit when people were complaining about an incident a few weeks ago. If there's more, see above. If it's just you being overly sensitive, grow a pair and say something to him.
>>5794He was banned from /d/ ages ago.
>>5795Mmm, salt.
No.5798
>>5797lol, how could that slut possibly be too weird for /d/
No.5799
>>5798Not too weird, too shit-stirring. He had been warned repeatedly for starting shit with people for no reason, and kept doing it, so for the sake of not running everyone off I had to ban him.
No.5800
>>5798They got banned for back talking a mod when they got told to stop doing something.
No.5801
>>5800must've been pretty fucking intense given the sort that still roam there, how did he actually manage to get someone that chapped
No.5803
>>5801According to the ban list:
>ice.karsin : Banned for starting shit. Banned harder for whining about it in the thread for weeks on end.It was kind of sad to watch.
No.5804
>>5801banned for making fun of tumblr babies who immediately got triggered
No.5806
>>5804On a scale of 1 to mad, how mad are you?
No.5808
>>5803going to be even more fun to watch when one of the /vg/ mods gets fed up with him and bans him again
No.5813
>>5810I wish I knew how to work with animations.
I'd make so many naga accessible ones.
I don't even have a naga No.5816
>>5789Ask Alex or Ssen, guaranteed victory.
No.5952
What are some nice free/cheap clothes for femboys?
No.5953
>>5952if you're running Kemono, then check out Krankhaus. Their stuff is great, usually flat-chested, and like L$25 a piece.
No.5965
>>5810that was a fun night
No.5977
New to SL, how do I join this autims?
No.5985
>idler at /d/
No.5990
>>5769He was banned because Genki and Rahf hated him
No.6032
The adventurers are refreshed from a good nights rest to face another day of fucking each other senseless
No.6033
>>6032Dammit why do I never get invited for fun.
No.6037
How do you get back to the /d/onghouse?
I left it and I'm not sure how to get back
No.6041
>>6037Mate...
http://maps.secondlife.com/secondlife/Gale%20Winds/56/224/2002Make sure when you are at the /d/onghouse to go to world and set landmark to here.
No.6083
Figured we should have one. So i added a landmark giver to the thread-link box, which i also updated to link to this thread (someone IM me when we get a new one) and also made it send the link privately to the clicker's local chat from anywhere instead of whispering locally. also hopefully less memory usage without the script crashing
No.6294
How about an exhibitionism themed area? Like, it's a room set up to look like a shopping plaza or a park, has fuckable objects like vending machines, lamp poles, benches, water fountains, and maybe a bush or two. Then it could have like, a button to determine if the room is night or day (or use the wind light settings, no clue), and to get more of an exhibitionism feel, some "onlookers", aka 1 li 2d cutouts of people, possibly /d/-goers, looking shocked/aroused/disapproving
No.6295
>>6294A small box full of glory holes when.
No.6296
>>6295>>6294I second both of these. the exhibitionism area could be a fun group building project but it shouldnt be something big, more like a themed skybox.
No.6298
>>6294Something like this?
I guess I probably should've stated beforehand that my entire architectural/landscape design vocabulary consists solely of "dystopia" and "art deco". So it's probably shit, but hopefully it inspires someone else to counter-propose something better.
No.6299
>>6294>>6298Also yes it'd be easy to do crowd silhouettes, for like 0.5 LI on the interior of a mesh cube. Maybe even subtly animated.
No.6339
>>6298Looks like one of the old /slg/ builds
No.6348
>>6339Yeah, I know the one. I half-remembered it while I was working on that.
It's not an especially great suggestion, since it renders so much of the area useless, and I have no idea where we'd position sex furniture aside from benches and a fountain (I'm sure there's a sex fountain). But it's the only one I've got at the moment.
No.6365
>>6348need a place for vollyball because nothing is better than subtly homosexual volleyball montage
No.6369
>>6365>subtly homosexual >subtlyYou're on SL, son.
No.6370
No.6448
>>6298That's a pretty good rough idea, but a more realistic look would be better imo. Silhouetted cutouts can stay, it could work. When I get the time I'll try drawing something up
No.6472
>>6448More realistic how so? If you mean the texture of the background, I wasn't planning on using that one anyway, it was just something I lazily grabbed off Google to fill the space.
If you mean something else though, lemme know. I definitely need suggestions before doing this, since exhibitionism, while it is nice, isn't my area of fetish expertise.
No.6585
>>6472Hard to describe exactly what I mean by realistic, I guess the proper word would be like, attention to detail? Like say crosswalk poles, fire hydrants or even vending machines by the buildings. Somethibg to make the place look used/somewhere people travel daily.
No.6623
Pretty dolls.
Doll cases are the best thing in /d/onghouse.
No.6625
>>66233 couches full of people can't be wrong!
No.6649
Why is Erk allowed to put up gay furry porn on the walls
Why is Erk allowed
No.6650
No.6651
>>6649idk but he seems to treat it like boneyard 3.0 or something.
leaving shit everywhere like its some kind of god damn sandbox. although in general the place has been invaded by a bunch of pubbies lately
No.6652
>>66511v1 me, no poseballs
No.6653
>>6649>>6651Talk to an officer to get it cleaned up?
No.6654
No.6655
>>6654>cruxesThis explains everything.
No.6656
>>6654I'm not a furry and the whole thing kinda confuses me, so, riddle me this, because I'm having some trouble with it. Furries on SL are generally a fairly tight-knit, or at least interconnected, community. So if there's someone like this, who is so obviously a toxic element in the community, why hasn't he been collectively shamed out? Other tight-knit communities do that. In my experience, even communities that are, themselves, deeply toxic, demonstrate a general willingness to exclude people who cross a certain threshold of acceptability.
No.6658
>>6656Furries on SL all fall into different niches based on a variety of factors. Generally these separate niches despise one another, but will band together against perceived external threats.
No.6661
>>6656Oh he's been shunned in plenty of places. Frequently gets made fun of so he crawls back to hugboxes with similar autists
No.6662
>>6661He's pretty awful.
He interprets indifference as friendly affection.
No.6671
>>6654>>6662Obviously nothing will be done via anonymous posts in a thread though. Talk to an officer, and bring proof if possible.
No.6674
>>6671proof is all over the donghouse, what do you want?
No.6678
>>6674Which part of "talk to an officer" confused you?
No.6684
No.6685
No.6688
No.6689
>>6688As much as Erk is a weirdo, that's some highschool drama tier shit.
No.6690
>>6688I voted no.
Sure, he's weird but I don't mind him.
No.6693
>>6689This.
You either talk to an officer in-world, or you take your giggling highschool girl bullshit and you fuck right off. If you ain't got the balls for shit, then don't be starting shit.
No.6719
No.6741
>>6649Why isn't gay allowed? Seems kind of odd to allow very specific types of furry porn when a decent amount of the people who visit there are fags.
No.6742
>>6741furry isn't /d/. The straight furporn posters should be taken off too. In fact all porn posters should. They are just trashy
(oh wait just like /d/) and ruin any resemblance of a decent looking hangout.
No.6743
>>6742That's a pretty understandable way of looking at it, and although I disagree, I certainly see where you're coming from with that logic.
That said, it just seems weird that people would be upset about a couple of gay pictures far off in the corner while there's a giant portrait of Zilkas fucking some weird thing in the butt that nobody cares about. It's hypocritical to complain about some but not all, just because it's not suited to your taste in a place with a wide variety of people of different orientations. (This obviously isn't directed at you, specifically - More of a general statement.)
No.6745
>>6742>trashy (oh wait just like /d/)I enjoy a bit of trashiness. It's fun and silly, and keeps me from taking myself too seriously, which is a very real danger that I see a lot of on SL.
That said, it may be worth getting some suggestions for non-furry stuff to replace ALL the furry art with (not just specifically the Erk-related stuff), if people can find things that are generally agreed upon as "really awesome". We may have a lot of furries, and shooing them out as members would be ridiculous (much like /vg/, we'd lose much of our membership if we did that), but it's true that furry isn't /d/ (per board rules), and there's more than enough non-furry /d/-relevant art out there to have plenty to choose from.
Just because the walls aren't festooned with snout-faces doesn't mean people can't bring their snout-faced avatars in, after all. I'm open to suggestions.
No.6746
>>6745>>6743If you put up any porn posters at all, at least ensure that they are something you could put up in a RL fetish club aswell. You know, something with a bit of quality and not generic fur/anime art with 0 effort put in.
I still vote on removing all porn pics from walls. If furry places like yiff alley lounge manage to look good I don't see why the donghouse should look like a brazilian sex sim.
No.6749
>>6746On one hand you could class the place up with some nicer, more elegant art that would suit the place better as a hangout.
On the other hand, I think the owners really want it to be a place where you can feel free to actually just pork, and keeping the atmosphere clean could deter that. Having trashy, lewd art on the wall helps people along in being trashy and lewd - And there's nothing wrong with that. It's just a matter of what you feel the place should be, a regular hangout or a sex-driven meetup locale.
No.6750
>>6746The southwest room has porn because I have no idea what to do with it, since there's no real point in having two separate hangout areas when the entire east side is that. My original intent was to have sort of an upscale art gallery feel (hence the girl-and-octopus painting in the center, which is decidedly more "fine art"-like than the rest), and RL fetish clubs were sort of my inspiration there, since you'll see similar weird-but-high-quality art. But I only have so many resources for "fine art"-looking /d/ stuff, and other people got to it before me. I generally defer to the preference of the masses, aiming for as large a cross-section of /d/'s membership as I can, so I figured if those paintings went up and I hadn't heard any complaints (until these recent posts), then there must not be anything wrong with them, and I must simply be the crazy one.
I also didn't want to resort to shunga, the only consistent source I could think of for /d/-relevant stuff (and that generally only tentacles, via octopi, though there are some demons and such too), both because it's not especially good (its artistic value is more historic than aesthetic, with some exceptions), and because it's a painfully weeaboo kind of thing to do.
In short, the best thing anyone could do right now to solve that is either:
1. Suggest more "fine art"-looking /d/-relevant art to replace the existing furry stuff, preferably stuff that looks like actual paintings, like the one in the middle room.
2. Suggest something useful to do with the southwest room so it's not just sitting empty. Caveat: Needs to not take up a zillion LI, since the main house is already pretty damn heavy.
>>6749I do see his point though, the specific art choices could at least stand some classing up, because "just some art of people fucking" is, in fact, BR sex club tier. I just figured that's what people wanted, and given I've been pretty hands-off thus far (it seems like the best policy, to not hover and meddle too much), I wanted to let the crowd decide its own preferences. But it's clear that may, in fact, not be the crowd's opinion on average, and people have just left it alone because it's not big enough to merit a complaint.
No.6751
>>6750I can agree with that. Tasteful lewd art would be the best thing you could do in my opinion, best of both worlds.
No.6754
No.6756
>>6750Why not remodel the hangout building to have one large central area instead of the way it's laid out now?
No.6762
>>675620m chat range, wouldn't work. Would have to use a new building entirely even if that wasn't a concern (since those central walls can't be removed and the floor of the central room is recessed anyway), and I'm kinda tired of wasting money on remodels of questionable usefulness.
No.6764
No.6765
>>6764I think it's good for there to be a few different areas for different people to have different conversations.
No.6767
>>6764Chat relays are the most retarded thing in existence. You end up with people seeing the same post repeatedly just because they're in range of multiple relays.
No.6768
>>6767The link posted doesn't send the same message twice even if you're in range of several relays.
No.6770
>>6768I like being able to hump a dick far enough away so people can watch if they want, but not have to listen, but those who want to listen can also get close enough to do so.
No.6850
>>6770Same here. But usually I'm doing RP as well, so I don't pay too much attention to chat those times.
No.6919
Vacation
As some of you may have noticed, I haven't been around much lately. Or, ideally, you haven't noticed at all, which means everything is running smoothly without my intervention. That would be awesome.
Between being busy IRL, and just generally being a bit bored of SL, I likely won't be on much for... well, who knows how long. Until further notice, I suppose. My IMs are set to e-mail me, so feel free to direct any major concerns to me, but the officers should be capable of handling most things. I'll still be logging in from time to time, just to check in and see how things are going (and to handle the aforementioned major concerns, if any), or if I actually feel like being on SL, so you might still see me here and there, but generally I'm gonna be as scarce as I've been the past few weeks.
The actual impact of this should be nothing at all, since the group has become fairly self-sufficient thus far, after the initial shake-up and a few months afterward. But I figured I should let people know.
Builders
I'm also looking for someone to handle whatever building and redeco the parcel needs from this point onward, because I have neither the interest in nor the knack for it, but I know there are people out there who are much better and more interested in it than I am. While all members are capable of building on the parcel, and all officers are capable of returning objects, at the moment any building projects are roughly comparable to throwing a bunch of Legos in the air and hoping they spontaneously assemble into something cool. Clearly we need a bit of direction here.
As such, I'm looking for a "chief architect" of sorts. Someone to listen to the skybox ideas, get rid of ones that are old and unused (or just in need of something fresh), and build new ones, either from stuff they have or by directing others and crowdsourcing parts (probably a good idea, since between the various /d/eviants, we're bound to have almost anything someone could need in terms of sex furnishings). And maybe to remodel the main house if people get tired of it sometime. If we have a surplus of funds at some point like we did back in December, I'd pass that along to the builder to be used for purchasing things that we can't manage to crowdsource. You would of course have officer powers and be able to return objects, otherwise there'd be no point. And in theory, people ought to listen to you. But that's just in theory.
Anyone who's interested, send a message to myself or one of the officers, or post in here with your name. Or just talk Asami into doing it, because that's what I'd do.
No.6930
>>6919What the /d/onghouse needed was someone to wrangle everything together into a coherent whole. Sure it's great to let people contribute but relying on it to get the place built is a surefire way to make everything look disjointed and incomplete. Not to mention when you were looking for skybox suggestions and I offered and asked how many prims could be afforded, and where to put it, I never got an answer. So of course nothing ever got built.
If y'all want me to copy/paste shit over from the WOK then that's fine and dandy, but that's all it would be, and frankly I'd rather you all just hung out there if that's what you want.
What we really need though is a head moderator, or a way to edit things. There're a bunch of people who get banned but aren't added to the pastebin document, so when they contest the ban nobody knows what they did unless the person that banned them is around. Turning that into a group-editable google doc or something would be best.
No.6931
>>6930>someone to wrangle everything together into a coherent wholeThat's exactly what I'm after with the "chief architect" idea. Originally I'd intended to do it myself, but I am clearly a much better administrator and arbitrator than a builder (like seriously, I have zero enthusiasm for building), and I'm not on at a good time for directing others in their building anyway.
>asked how many prims could be afforded, and where to put it, I never got an answer100% my bad on that. I'm far from infallible. I recall saying to myself that I'd get back to you on that, and then it just never happened because I'm forgetful.
It's a difficult question to answer, since even now I'll come to the parcel and see the available prims fluctuate between 120ish and nearly nothing depending on what random stuff people have rezzed that day. I'm perhaps too soft, because I hesitate to tell people to simply stop building "silly" stuff (which is often the big culprit, since it's frequently sculpts with a zillion pieces, and exactly that much LI), since I don't want people to feel they
can't build things. Especially since sometimes "things" is "whatever random piece of BDSM furniture you need for fucking that robot", which is exactly what the parcel is for. There needs to be a limit, but it's tricky to pin down precisely where it should be.
I actually had a plan that I never got around to implementing, and will look into over the weekend, to stretch a "traffic tracker" prim over each skybox in order to see which ones get used the most, and nuke the least-popular of them every so often (monthly, bi-monthly, whatever) to be replaced with some new suggestion, to keep things fresh. That will probably help with the skyboxes issue.
The other thing that would help is to clean up the clutter and replace high-LI furniture with lower-LI equivalents, but I am awful at furnishing places, so I'd have to leave that to someone else to figure out. Again, "chief architect", etc. I'm not gonna arbitrarily slap you with the title, but you'd definitely be the first person I'd ask if nobody else volunteers, if simply because nobody else has demonstrated any particular talent or interest either.
>There're a bunch of people who get banned but aren't added to the pastebin documentI've told the officers to report bans to me so I can update it, I'm not quite sure why that's not happening. I assumed it was current because I hadn't heard anything despite my request, so I figured there just hadn't been any bans lately. I'll look into something more useful. Making it editable by anyone just opens it to fuckery, though, and I doubt anyone wants to use Googledocs (because muh anonymity/privacy). I know there's other alternatives though, which I'll look into, and I'm open to suggestions as always.
Contested bans really ought to be going through me and nobody else. Otherwise we end up in the situation of "daddy (officer 1) said no, let's go ask mommy (officer 2)", and with as many officers as we have, there would inevitably be someone willing to listen to a particularly good sob story. But that's a different issue entirely, and would be difficult to handle without a properly updated banlist anyway. So, one thing at a time there.
As always, thanks for actually taking the time to clarify your issues. I can't do anything if people don't actually say what they need, I'm not a mind-reader.
No.6933
>>6931That shitty rubber room with no furniture in it is definitely not used
No.6934
>>6933I took a picture there! Once.
>>4270 Aw, can't post it here since it already exists.All jokes aside, is this the fault of the lack of furnishings, or of the room itself? I recall it was made in response to the desire for a "less intimidating BDSM room", as opposed to the common dirty dungeons and such that one sees in sex sims, and even our own basement skybox (of which we actually have two, one below the "apartment" skybox and one standalone; those could probably stand to be consolidated to free up the LI for some more variety in skyboxes). That is, it
can't be used now since there's no furniture, but would it be used at all even if it was furnished?
I do agree that it's definitely just taking up space at the moment though. Gotta either do something with it, or scrap it and use the LI for something else. I'm also somewhat unsure whether the "fitting room" is worth keeping or not; that's a fair few LI too, and I've only ever seen it used a few times while I was around.
I know one of the biggest issues is some high-LI furniture in the main house, but like I said, I'm bad at this whole furniture thing, so I don't know where to find good replacements that still have as many features (or more) but less LI. Gonna work on that, or preferably find someone who's better at decorating than me.
No.6936
>>6934No one is using any of the rooms, the only thing that is used is the main room for hanging out. Everyone goes somewhere else for fucking.
No.6950
No.7058
No.7064
Can we ban erk so he stops bringing his creepy underaged pubbie looking furfag friends to the parcel
No.7065
>>7064Make an official complaint in-world or nobody can do anything. Shouldn't be hard, I don't think he's all that popular around here, outside a few people.
No.7066
>>7064>>7065/this is a diff person;
He's not popular at all, outside his creepy underaged pubby looking furfag friends he brings to the parcel.
Google his username and check out how much drama that guy causes, seriously
No.7067
>>7066I know, I saw the l posts about him earlier, but nobody can act on anonymous thread complaints or that would just enable witch hunts and shit-stirring. Seriously, if people have actual complaints (preferably with evidence of shitty stuff being done by him at /d/), please bring them to an officer.
No.7068
>>7066Wait, they're underage? How do you know? I only saw one once, and I barely got a glimpse of him.
No.7069
>>7066Do what a few of us do: cease donating and using the parcel until shit gets resolved; anonymous complaints or not, people clearly known to be toxic shouldn't be allowed the opportunity to present it in a new environment.
That is why Alex was banned, no? /d/ may as well unban him if we're going to let Erk dink around at /d/. Can we pronounce: double standards?
No.7070
>>7068I don't actually know, I was just regurgitating the same text from a previous poster (>>7064); but it can be inferred through the way they act, which is what I personally saw.
>>7069Good post.
No.7073
>>7069That seems kinda counterproductive, especially if you never make an actual complaint so it can be resolved. If you just sit there silently and pout about it, nothing can be done, so you're just allowing your own problem to perpetuate. I mean, feel free to vote with your feet and your spacedollars, but expecting problems to be solved when you never say anything about them in a way that can be acted upon is just plain self-defeating.
Let me be extremely clear about two things:
Firstly,
I will not take action based on thread complaints, and I've told any officer I've spoken to on the matter about my feelings on that. The reasons for this should be obvious to anyone who's ever spent any amount of time on /slg/, or 4chan in general, or several threads right here on /sl/. Anyone with a personal beef can samefag up a storm of shitposts about someone, and if we acted on anonymous thread complaints, then people could simply get whoever they want banned by spinning a large enough story enough times. Without an in-world complaint, I cannot confirm that there is an actual legitimate complaint being made by one or more people.
Secondly, and related,
all in-world complaints are confidential. I can't speak directly for the officers here, since I'm just me and not them, but ideally we're all on the same page here: if you bring a complaint to me, your name will not be disclosed, at any point and for any reason, unless you want it disclosed (or you and/or your complainee disclose it; that's on you guys). That has always been the case, and will not be changing. Back when enough people were complaining about Ana to merit a ban, I didn't give their names to Ana, despite still being fairly close friends with her when I handed out the ban. I certainly won't be any more forthcoming with that information for someone who I don't even know (like, say, Erk).
Parcel complaints and suggestions, I will freely take from the thread, because anonymity isn't really an issue there. If it's an okay suggestion, then it doesn't matter the source or its authenticity, and if it's a shitty suggestion, then we simply won't take it. Easy as that.
Personal issues like bans are a different matter, however; I have absolutely no interest in immersing myself in SL's various social drama communities, so I'm not going to know who is "clearly known to be toxic", especially since the definition of that varies so wildly. Remember that in many places,
we're "clearly known to be toxic", simply because we're from 4chan. So unlike the parcel/building suggestions, it's impossible to know what's a good suggestion versus a shitty one. That's why it's so important to direct in-world complaints to officers.
>That is why Alex was banned, no?No. Alex was banned for:
>ice karsin : Banned for starting shit. Banned harder for whining about it in the thread for weeks on end.That's from the ban/do-not-promote list, which I've shared with anyone who's asked. I meant to include it in this thread's OP, simply for the sake of complete transparency, but I'm forgetful. So, here, and hopefully I'll remember it next thread.
http://pastebin.com/XxX71XDQThe only person on that list who has been banned for being "clearly known to be toxic" is Nurva, who I and a number of other members and officers have enough experience with that we felt it was worth breaking the usual precedent to prevent issues. While it's possible that Erk is Nurva-tier, none of us have the necessary experience to know that, so we need someone to make some in-world complaints or we're just shooting blind. Acting on things we're unclear on would just be irresponsible, and taking a bunch of anonymous internet complaints as gospel just opens us to reporting bias.
All other bans have their reasons logged. The generic bans at the bottom are for recycled bullshit that just wasn't worth typing over and over and over (usually involving self-replicators, spamming annoying gestures at high volume until they get banned, or some combination of the two). Bans can be appealed, but officers have been instructed to direct all appeals to me, to avoid the problem I mentioned in
>>6931 this post. There have been a few successful appeals thus far, and they've apparently shaped up since then, as I've heard no further complaints about those people.
No.7092
>>7073Counterproductive? Pout about it?
My resolution to the problem was quite simple. There is nothing binding my presence on the parcel, there is nothing lost should I choose to use my own parcel and cordially allow guests to use my parcel provided they don't present toxicity into the ambience. If you consider that counterproductive, I believe you invest far too much value in your own parcel.
You can be proactive and use a little bit of intuition, or you can be at the epitome of being counterproductive and sit there with your admin crew waiting for people to shoot themselves in the foot after you've been served a platter of tertiary sources citing an individuals toxic behaviour well beforehand. I have a solid appreciation for what you're doing Raz, I really do, but unfortunately inaction and lack of foresight is kind of why the 'regulars' are finding other places to 'regular'; and if you're fine with your current system, then all the power to you - but for some, it's just not working the way it is.
No.7093
>>7092Are you honestly saying you don't see the issue with taking anonymous thread posts as gospel, after witnessing what happens when /vg/ lets that affect their decisions? It's really easy: you've already made your complaints here, now say something to one of us on SL about it so we have something to go on. You especially have no excuse if you've made complaints in the thread, since I've explained the process here several times; people who don't read the thread at least have the excuse of ignorance.
Ball's in your court; I lose nothing if the parcel fails to make rent, because I've never used it myself anyway. I do this entirely so everyone else can enjoy themselves, and if people complaining in the thread can't make even a token effort to contact me on SL, then I have no sympathy whatsoever for their plight.
No.7094
>>7092hear hear
>>7093Who has the thread complained about lately that has been banned?
No.7095
>>7094>Who has the thread complained about lately that has been banned?You mean the /vg/ comment? Not lately, but if you've been around a while you've seen Sovot condemning exactly this sort of anonymous-thread-complaint witch hunts. I can go archive-diving to dig up actual incidents where administration decisions came under scrutiny because they seemed driven by anonymous potential-shitposts, but somehow I think I'd be better serving you guys by ironing out this issue instead.
What I'm getting out of this is that people would rather bitch more than take ten seconds to send a message on SL, which just makes me sad. "Hey Raz, I've got some experience with so-and-so, here's my story." That's all it takes. Or even just mention this conversation and the various posts elsewhere about this guy, just so I can confirm there's real people affected by this and not just someone with a grudge stirring shit (because none of us can even pretend that's not a common occurrence on SL, and you damn well know there's some volatile personalities like that in the general 4chan-on-SL crowd, so it is definitely a thing to watch for).
I took the time to read some posts about Erk earlier. You folks can take ten seconds to message me on SL with your concerns. I ask very little, but I do ask that, for the reasons I've spelled out above.
No.7096
>>7095So you're saying there have been no recent instances of witch hunts? Requinn comes to mind as a recent ban due to thread activity.
No.7097
Sorry but it's a fucking joke. I don't know how I'm supposed to take the moderation of the parcel seriously if they see people having autismal breakdowns all the time and not even stepping in. It's insulting that I would even have to go to a mod about something so obvious, which I did by the way and I was told I should avoid them, not two days later they were already saying dumb awkward shit again, what the hell kind of atmosphere are you trying to cultivate there.
No.7099
>>7097I haven't seen anything. Which mod did you go to?
No.7102
>>7101
"Insecure" is not the word I would choose.
No.7104
>>7098
I sure hope you checked that this was okay with him before you posted it.
No.7106
>>7104I sure hope you aren't serious, you little bitch.
No.7115
>>7109
It's worse than that. I mean, that's obviously not even his bedroom, unless he's living on somebody's pull-out couch or his Mom decorated his room.
No.7119
>>7097You should send me a message about what was going on and what mod was neglecting their duties, because this is the sort of shit I'll chew people out for. (I would prefer to keep it out of thread posts simply because it's kind of a dick move to call someone out like that publicly.) I can't babysit the parcel 24/7, and even when I'm on SL I don't want to have to spend all of it sitting around making sure nobody's doing anything retarded, so I have to rely on the officers to keep an eye out and be responsive to issues. If there's an officer witnessing something that's obviously dumb shit and shouldn't be happening, and they're not doing anything, then I need to have some conversations with some people.
No.7222
>>7097I'd agree, if it didn't make me chuckle every time one of these fuckers hit enter.
No.7223
>>7069Ice is revolting, even brought a parcel in the opposite sim to setup a fort across from the donghouse. What a complete and utter creeper.
No.7242
help erk keeps bringing more shitty pubbie furries to the parcel
No.7248
>>7245Hasn't that guy been a member for a while? Or he was in old /d/ or one of the /vg/ groups or something.
No.7249
>>7248more like erks yiff buddy for a while
more like boneyar/d/ 2.0
No.7251
>>7249Gonna solve your own problems or just whine about it here?
No.7252
>>7251Gonna solve your own problems or just whine about it here?
No.7253
>>7252Enjoy your Erkbuddies, then.
No.7254
>>5977Not new but have not been on it much but know the basics.
I went to that giantess town a few times when it was active...That was mostly what I meant by 'not been on it much'.
Am bad at life SIMs because no friends to play them with to feel the need to PLAY SL.
Name on SL; ASXZ
No.7264
>>7073Making complaints confidential worst idea
"in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to be confronted with the witnesses against him."
There's a reason this exists
No.7265
No.7268
No.7272
>>7223Raz stop being butthurt about your shit sim
No.7273
>>7264This doesn't even deserve a response because of the absurdity of attempting to apply US criminal law to completely irrelevant situations, but I'm just dumb enough to give it a brief one: nobody's got the balls to attach a name to their complaint to begin with, even just to direct it to one of the officers privately, so why on earth would they be any more likely to do so if their name would be made public as a result?
Or I could make sweeping administrative decisions based on anonymous thread posts. I'm sure someone somewhere thinks that's a good idea.
>>7272I dunno why anyone would think I cared enough to shitpost about him when his rent runs out tomorrow, and I scarcely ever visit the /d/onghouse to be bothered by it. This may be someone else's popufur catfight, but it sure isn't mine.
No.7274
>>7223I dunno, I thought it was pretty funny myself.
No.7299
Nice going you killed the parcel
No.7304
>>7299>shitposting on two boards because you couldn't get your response on oneHere, have a bone.
No.7309
No.7331
>>7273>Or I could make sweeping administrative decisions based on anonymous thread posts. I'm sure someone somewhere thinks that's a good idea.Are you saying you don't want to reduce the group down to just a circlejerk of powertripping mods and their sycophants as everyone is targeted for trolling in turn, occasionally by people not even in the group?
What's wrong with you?
There's no precedent for something like that happening in other 4chan groups on SL, none whatsoever... No.7332
>>7249more like Erk's alt
No.7339
This thread is fucking hilarious.
Nerds complaining about other nerds becasue most likely they don't like eachothers fetishes.
Please keep the drama going! It's fun for me as an outsider to watch! :D
No.7381
No.7385
>>7381Are you getting angry at me too now for not taking sides? Im sorry did I trigger you?
No.7387
>>7381>>7385What's a Nina and why should I care?
No.7405
>>7098
/d/ was supposed to be for lewd and lewd hangout. by posting this, you're saying "look at me i'm so much better than someone who was using this place for what it was designed for XD"
go jerk off at GYC
No.7406
>>7405I'm not sure talking about RL stuff is quite the same as pixelfucking, though.
No.7407
>>7406It's not.
Bringing RL into it completely ruins pixelfucking.
I can't even suspension of disbelief hard enough to take him seriously after seeing that shit.
No.7408
>>7407Especially on SL, since a lot of people on SL are really big on the RL/SL separation, especially when it comes to sex. If they wanted to know about someone's RL masturbation, they'd get on Omegle or Kik or wherever, I'd think.
No.7416
>>7408Seriously. I don't want to hear that you are trying to shove a dragondildo in your neckbeard ass, nor do I want to hear that your gf is blowing you. I dont want to see pictures of said acts either. Dragging your RL into the game of pretend that is SL rp is like shouting "hey guys this isn't real!" during a theatre play.
You are not hotter than fantasy, so stop trying to wedge your shitty RL into the game. No one cares. You are not important.
No.7417
>>7416This.
This.
A thousand times, this.
>mfw partners that are really good at RP ruin everything by posting pictures of their landwhale body and talk about how aroused they are It's not because they're fat and physically unattractive. It's because now that image is the only thing that comes to mind when I see or attempt to RP with them. No.7418
Those are valid points. I suppose I hadn't considered the fact that not everybody is comfortable/wants to discuss RL sexuality so in depth. And publicly posting a picture like that is a bit much - even for a 'safe' place.
No.7420
>>7418I think there's also the fact that such IRL images are being posted PUBLICALLY, in group chat/local chat rather than sharing via IMs. I know I personally did some IRL stuff for /d/ members, but the links were shared via IM, so those who didn't want to see would not be bothered.
No.7425
>>7417
>It's not because they're fat and physically unattractive, it's because they're fat and physically unattractive. No.7426
>>7416>>7407>>7408>>7417really? in my many years of fucking people the worst i get asked is if I came rl. which sometimes i answer sometimes I dont depending on how comfortable/lewd i feel with them
the best is when i am escorting, they ask that, and i lie and say yes, and then they tip me more No.7427
>>7426Ssen why are you such a slut?
No.7428
File: 1427514449127.png (Spoiler Image, 20.95 KB, 782x796, 391:398, ssen snake slut.png)
>>7427because my name starts with S
and so does snake
and so does slut
pic related
No.7432
>>7428It all makes sense now.
No.7435
>>7425I don't judge them personally for it, it just ruins the fantasy of textfucking.
No.7450
>>7426
>where are you>how old are youIf i'm in my LL avatar, every fucking time.
No.7456
>>7450ah! okay i have had that asked to me, but rarely and even more rare if i just met them. Hell I'll ask that if i have known them for a while!
No.7458
>>7450>hey have you ever done this IRL>ha ha wanna hear about my neighbors who have ;) No.7495
hello this is qaus for a public service announcement
/d/ is much more fun when people do things that aren't standing around
like right now people are messing with my collar
this is fun
do more of this sort of thing
thank you for your time xoxo
No.7522
>>7495Not to be a giant wet blanket but 98% of the time I don't want to touch anything at /d/ so I just sit around until something does come along
Protip: it doesnt
No.7525
>>7522How does one fix this? Can't just ban the furries/kemonos, but having more non-furry/kemonos around would be nice.
No.7558
>>7525The secret to fixing this is to provide good alternatives.
The problem is not a lot of people like using standard LL faces due to how bad it can look in lighting and how poses mess up the face.
Not to mention many mesh alternatives are pretty hard to use or content makers for them don't provide easy ways to work with them.
Utilizator's stuff is very simple to pick up so that's why kemonos and animes show up pretty often.
Most furry avatars are also easy to work with so that's why furries are common.
No.7591
>>7558There are plenty of easy to use alternatives, at this point it's just people having shit taste.
No.7597
>>7591
>Stop liking what I don't likeIf you don't like kemonos don't fuck kemonos and don't for a second pull that line of "but everyone at /d/ong is a kemono" because there are plenty of other cool avatars.
No.7608
would use default head more in /d/onghouse but the lighting setup and region's windlight settings are fucking completely atrocious
No.7609
>>7597This.
And also, that image really looks like they derendered everything BUT the base head. Sure it's gonna look like shit then. Whatever fantastic body or head you use would look like shit too with everything derendered.
No.7615
>>7597I've gotta contest that point. I wont name names because i dont wanna be mean, but a fair sized chunk of the people i see idling around /d/ look like hot garbage, and not many of those are kemeno's
Everyone has their own kinks and "just muh style" so there's no fixing that though, best option to bring more fuckable people to /d/ is just to bring more people to /d/ period.
The random yiff house vibe it has now is not very condusive to this. It always feels like i'm trespassing into someone's private homestead.
there should still be a hangout area, but it shouldnt be the arrival point. ssen mentioned hotspring and i think that's a good first step. At least, it always seemed to work in HH.
No.7618
>>7615I don't know, the place seems to be pretty approachable to me. I'm not a big fan of the SUPER LONG HANGOUT ROOM though. It makes everything feel super sparse.
>>7558>>7597No, some Animes and most Kemono's take zero imagination to make look good. Which is fine, not everyone is a genius character designer. It's cheap, easy, well known, just like iPhones.
That said, I'll take original fresh designs (even if they look like Hot Garbage) or whatever over Kemono #435348. If people want to be boring, that's fine by me, but there's nothing to set you apart visually from all the other ones. It's the SL equivilant to dressing in black hoodies.
No.7619
>>7597Also, don't go "Stop liking what I don't like" when people call out Kemonos for their lack of variety and imagination.
Naruto can exist, but it will always be seen as a shitty pleb tier anime. That's the price of having something so easy and accessible. What you don't spend monetarily or time investment wise, you lose in social capital.
No.7620
>>7618Not to insult you opinion or reply to your post with only a few words, (
even though I am ) but I tend to fuck people based on themselves and how they act, not their avis. Though I can see how some people are into the whole immersion thing where they have to fuck X with Y to get their rocks off and that is fine. But if I like someone and they happen to be a kemono then I'm fucking a kemono.
>>7619
>Naruto can exist, but it will always be seen as a shitty pleb tier anime.I mean that's your opinion and you're entitled to it but that doesn't make it true or false.
No.7621
>>7615>best option to bring more fuckable people to /d/ is just to bring more people to /d/ period.yeah lets just throw a bunch of random shitters in there
No.7622
>>7621If you throw enough shit at the wall, some of it will stick.
No.7623
>>7618I should be clear, i dont mean the people, i mean the architecture itself. You spawn on a big open platform with no decoration whatsoever and this randomly decorated prefab building in the distance. If i used simhopper to get here, i would assume it was somebody's private sandbox. We can do better dammit.
>>7621the place is already full of random shitters. At this exact second i' posting it looks okay but a lot of the time its indistinguishable from some 3rd rate yiff sim.
No.7626
No.7627
>>7623>We can do better dammit.We so can't. Well, more plainly, I can't. I am really, really bad at decorating. I have never been unclear on that point. Better to know your faults and admit them while trying to do the best you can, than to pretend you're actually good at it when you're not. I've asked for people to help building, but the only person who's said anything on the note is Asami, who just said he'd copy-paste from WOK. If that's the case, then we might as well just hang out there instead.
This is exactly why I've been trying to find a chief builder. We just have a much smaller talent pool to draw upon than /vg/, so it's tough to find someone.
No.7628
>>7627For some reason the /d/onghouse makes my viewer run like shit if I look out towards the couches in the main hangout room.
No.7629
>>7628I've tried to figure that out before, but I always come up empty. Used to think it was the projector lights, but disabling those didn't help last time, so it's probably just a preponderance of inefficient high-poly furniture or something, or some crazy texture bug. In any case, we're probably going to be scrapping the current design anyway. The hot springs suggestion started a while ago, and it's a good one, I just haven't personally had the inspiration to actually do it. Was just talking with Ssen last night about it again.
I'm entirely at fault for the state of the current design. It was a much better idea in my head, but the idea demanded a lot more cohesion in decor (I don't own enough decor to do that, so I had to depend on whatever other people had) and a lot more work on making the textures better than plain boring beige plaster walls. As I have neither the talent nor the desire to decorate, this was a roundly terrible idea.
This is all contingent on what happens in the next two weeks. I've been having to foot unpleasant amounts of the rent by myself for nearly a year, with rare exceptions (like December), and since we've made only 15% of March's rent in donations, I'm tempted to simply let it go, and work out an arrangement with Asami's place instead, because that means a guarantee of an interested and talented decorator (certainly more so than me).
If we decide to keep the Gale Winds parcel, then there will definitely be a redesign in the works. The current house "sort of" works, but not well, and not nearly as well as it should, but I haven't had the energy lately to give enough of a fuck to fix it. With enough people talking about the hot springs idea (or any other, for that matter), and a new leader in charge who's not horribly burned out, we may be able to put together a team to make that happen.
No.7630
>>7627Its not a matter of decorating perse, its straight up sim design.
That being said, i'd love to be in charge of something like that. I've got a pretty clear idea of a potential sim as this sort of dimly lit neon nightmare gay bathhouse/Amsterdam red light district. Make it look a lot seedier and clausterphobic at the entrance, but not in the cliche urban grime way that every other sim does.
like, basically this song personified as a building
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rbdGvTpMwg No.7631
>>7629Suppose since I was name dropped I should chime in!
As Raz said, I'm looking into probably this:
https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/AMM-Design-Building-Azuchi-Onsen-House-35x-29m-japanese-Public-Bath/4147058 for the new place, but i am also completely open to ideas.
I'm also going to post a notice later tonight about my plans on being the new leader and then maybe tomorrow or the day after a little questionnaire on how people currently feel about /d/ and stuff around it
No.7632
>>7631My only problem with /d/ right now is the slowdown.
You should find a place with that inworld to show off to everyone what it would be like, just in case No.7633
>>7630thats also not a bad idea! just a place where people will feel more of a want to lewd. Hell if anyone wants to suggest anything they would like to see the main club house be, i'll turn it into a straw poll or something
No.7634
>>7630>i'd love to be in charge of something like thatWELL YOU SHOULDA FUCKING SAID SO, NERD.
I'll get at you about this later, we might be able to hammer out some cheesy Japanese '80s bathhouse-and-redlight-district kind of idea between all this, and make it all a bit more coherent.
No.7636
No.7639
>>7634was gonna, but you were all doom and/or gloom so i didnt think there was much point. didnt know ssnakes were gonna save the day.
>>7631that's okay for a prefab but yeah, prims r bad. I'd rather see if we can put something together ourselves and just leave clubhouse how it is for right now.
No.7641
>>7632man fuck there is no where in world that has it, this is dumb. Oh well, the other idea i have had for a while is a lewd berlesque club.
https://marketplace.secondlife.com/p/Burlesque-Club/4484112 eye'd this fucked for a long while.
>>7639I do like your idea though, it sounds cool
No.7642
>>7641
>465 primsI dont want to shoot down every idea you've got but these are some hella inefficient builds
No.7643
/d/ doesn't have the talent to build anything. You have two options to make thing look good in SL:
a) Buy expensive prefab building and fill with expensive quality props and furniture. Everything must be put together by a single person so the concept doesn't get shat on by others. Said person should have some idea about coherence. You have no such person.
b) Have someone build the area from scratch in a modelling software. You don't have someone like that in your arsenal.
No.7644
>>7643I'm trying to figure out if this is bait to draw someone like that out of the woodwork or just plain shit posting.
No.7645
>>7642oh no, trust me i would gut that fucker like a trout
No.7646
>>7645P R I M S
R
I
M
S
2 0 1 5
0
1
5
No.7647
>>7646>waah waah i want the newest coolest thingi bet you get the newest apple/android product as soon as they have pre-orders dont you?
No.7648
>>7647>I have no idea about lighting and textures No.7649
>>7646its why I am open to ideas, I'm not going to say I know about this shit more than most or something, cause I dont, but really if you want change suggest something and down just whine about it
No.7650
>>7648If it looks cool who cares, this game isn't crisis 5 running on max.
No.7651
>>7647>Newest CoolestTry "Most Efficient"
Want a good framerate? Use mesh builds. Simple as that.
If y'all wanna hang out at the WOK, please do. I have to pay the rent now so any help would be appreciated. It's ~L$22k a month.
No.7652
>>7651People most likely won't hang at wok because people don't already hang at wok. Moving people is hard. Too many places, too little people. You shouldn't waste money on it, as nice as the build may be.
No.7653
File: 1427773507799.jpg (45.48 KB, 437x356, 437:356, ss (2015-01-23 at 04.59.51….jpg)
>>7651>>7652>>7629Then let's just ditch the joint and make the wok the new default locale of the /d/onghouse. Asami is more invested than Raz, Asami has the technical talent to keep it both optimized and nice looking. They're also very impartial and open to insight of the people going there. Raz letting Ssen take over the group was a good step, but the current place doesn't have much going for it other than "People Know To Go Here.". It sounds like the /d/haus was just mostly a burden for Raz anyway.
Have you ever considered just outright selling the /d/onghouse if you didn't want to foot the cost and invest the time into it?
No.7654
>>7653Would be nice. Doubt it will happen.
No.7659
Where can I find the WOK, I need a new sim to find lewd at
No.7668
No.7678
>>7650>If it looks cool who cares, this game isn't crisis 5 running on max.It takes about the same level of hardware to actually run well though.
No.7706
>>7653You can stop plugging Wok any time now, Hirokii
No.7728
No.7729
>>7728Interesting thing to say when I've already been talking to Asami about the idea.
But hey, keep fetishizing me as your villain if you'd like. It's kinda hot.
No.7732
No.7746
>>7729>implying I'm hiroNot everyone who disagrees with you is one person, retard
No.7747
>>7728>>7732>>7746none of these are me lmao
No.7749
No.7750
>>7746What are you even talking about.
No.7760
>>7750Stating that on an anonymous imageboard, multiple people can share the same opinion. That doesn't mean they are the same person
No.7761
>>7760I don't think anyone implied otherwise.
No.7762
>>7761Raz did, when he decided that anyone who dislikes him is Hirokii
No.7764
>>7762I think I'd remember doing that.
Never thought Hirokii fetishized me as his villain, in fact the last conversation we had was pretty cordial. It was just a funny thing to say to a shitposter.
No.7773
>>7764You
you said it right here
Also Hiro is a woman
No.7779
>>7773I was directly addressing that shitposter I responded to, I made no assumptions about their identity. But hey, if that's how you wanna read that post, I can't stop you.
No.7780
Hiro here, Holy shit.
Really you guys, chill out <3
No.7781
haha shit man i know hating people cause they are popular is rediculous, but this is getting just stupid
No.7782
>>7773There's uh, there's no mention of Hiro anywhere in that post. Are you pulling an April Fool's prank?
No.7785
Man I was thinking about joining into this shit, but you guys make it sound toxic as fuck. Jesus christ.
No.7788
>>7785With anonymity comes the shitters. Most people are mostly alright, but having no name attached just lets a certain kind of mindset run rampant and scream while throwing shit at the wall.
No.7790
>>7788you mean like the 4chan/8ch mentality, aka the place the group fucking came from?
Jesus christ you are a fucking child
No.7793
>>7790>I-it's okay if I shitpost because of muh "4chan culture" No.7796
No.7797
>>7790Most of both of those chans do not have that mentality. The loud ones can make it seem that way though.
No.7799
>>7797>>7796>>7793Do you want some cheese with that whine?
No.7801
>>7799Oh man, epic cho'gath joke mate
No.7802
>>7785>toxicFuck off tumblr
No.7804
So like, are there any sims where people actually do sexy roleplay? Seems like everywhere I go it's either afkville, random chat while looking pretty/slutty, or people blurring RL and SL too closely for my comfort.
No.7805
>>7804I never had troubles finding roleplay at the usual meet & fuck places
No.7807
>>7805Eh, maybe it's just the weird fetish places I have trouble finding good rp on
like ABDL and toilet play simsand the Beast Forest is just plain unreliable when it comes to rp. I swear I didn't get any action till I took the initiative and made a monstergirl to rape people with. It's a fucking rape server and nobody wants to rape me.
No.7809
>>7807well it's obvious that with shit fetishes you will only get shit rp
No.7812
>>7807I'd def RP with you regarding the toilet stuff
No.7815
>>7814>>7807Ok, the reason why you don't get rp is because you look ass
No.7816
>>7809Unless you win the lottery or pay.
No.7821
>>7814Will do when I can get in world.
No.7825
>>7814>m3 head on LL body>textures don't match>LL tits>5L$ hairstyleAt least you got the pencil thin drawn on eyebrows right.
No.7835
>>7816>or payIf you're thinking that escort RP is anything but abysmal BR-tier ooo yea fukk me harder shit, I have some bad news...
No.7894
Why is a good body humiliation writing tattoo so hard to find?
No.7898
>>7894Download a handwriting font and make your own
No.7961
>>7835You'd actually be a bit surprised. A while back when I escorted myself, another escort took a liking to me and my style of strip RP (ie, not typing like a retard). We talked a bit, one thing led to another, and I took a shit on her chest.
No.7972
>>7894Because it's a tattoo not a real texturing job stop being lazy and just make what you want
No.7977
No.8003
File: 1428216164773.png (Spoiler Image, 458.02 KB, 1024x708, 256:177, Snapshot_028.png)
Trying to make a sexbot inspired by Kaminitro's robot stuff, and I got a ways to go on it. I guess I should finally bother learning the texture maps for that Aeros Nemo I got.
No.8005
>>8003I think you're looking for this thread
>>45 No.8011
>>8005Ouch man, but point taken.
No.8071
File: 1428459865535.png (Spoiler Image, 1.19 MB, 1600x838, 800:419, Snapshot_123.png)
tfw actual lewds happen in the donghouse and everyone joins in
No.8075
high ceilings must stay, at least 12'
No.8077
>>8075Shit-proportions amazons pls go.
No.8078
>>8071Would have been better without the massive amount of spazzes on mic
No.8080
>>8078I can find it annoying too, but you could just mute mics like i do when I'm not in the mood hear people on mic.
As always though tell me if stuff gets to obnoxious for you! Can't promise i will instantly do something but its good for me to know what people do and dont enjoy.
No.8084
>>8077>amazon>implying I'm female or futa No.8086
>>8080Yeah I have sound muted on SL most of the time, it's not like there's some amazing music stream at the /d/onghaus you'd be missing out on if you muted. The worse that would happen is missing out on some of the conversation going on, but if you're lewding it's probably not what you're focusing on.
No.8089
>>8084He's just saying you're too fucking tall, man.
No.8158
>>8071I remember that, and that someone was nice enough to let me out of the wall when everyone was done.
No.8173
No.8174
No.8188
>>8173>>8174Remove knifeears?
Remove knifeears.
No.8268
>>8173tumbltard triggercrew
No.8270
>>8268>I didn't want those grapes anyway! No.8271
>>8270>Wanting to be a part of Milkuu's creepy anime ageplay harem No.8275
>>8271none of the avs in that pic are even in my harem, 0/10
No.8276
>>8271How is a chubby Asian mother anime or underage
No.8278
>>8268Isn't it funny how you're always the one getting triggered, and they're always the ones having fun? Gotta wonder sometimes...
No.8285
she cucks little animu boys and kemonos
No.8287
No.8288
No.8315
do we need a new thread for the death of the donghouse?
No.8318
>>8315I'll include it in the next OP for anyone who missed the notice, but no need to make another thread before this one fills.
Besides, the only thing dying is the current build, which became a huge mess anyway and really needed to be taken out behind the shed.
No.8410
>tp to wok for first time
>erk gloom is there
>realize fauvist and ice karsin will also be there eventually
Nice knowing you, /d/. If I wanted to hang out with a bunch of autist furries, I'd go to GYC or IFC. What made /d/ good was the approval process, and the fact it separated actually decent members from the majority of dramamongers and generic riffraff floating around SL.
No.8415
>>8410The shitty people will get themselves banned, but if your whiny baby now-now-now attitude can't handle the group not immediately bending to your whims, you won't be missed anyway.
No.8416
>>8415How the hell did you get that from what I said? Stop projecting.
No.8422
>>8410>implying /d/onghouse was ever not complete riffraff No.8430
No.8439
>>8410What did these three people do exactly?
No.8441
>>8410Your so called approval process wasn't really in place in the first place. Its been on a decline ever since it switched to the cabin due to the growing popularity and shit getting in.
No.8444
>>8441hmmmm it's almost as if donghouse has also been on a decline since then! :^)
No.8445
>>8444>>8422>>8410/d/iscussion thread? More like /d/rama thread. ECHGUCH
No.8455
No.8458
>>8410>>8455erk gloom has been at the donghouse for *months* now. re: the other two, log their behavior and show it to ssen. she's more than happy to listen to you. Ssen's stated several times she won't have any of this anonymous mob justice running the banlist in the parcel.
ps, there hasn't been an approval process for over six months
No.8463
>>8458Erk is just weird, all you need is to Google his name. It's Ice that is a special kind of shit disturber. :(
No.8468
>>8463Jesus christ that artists beware post. No.8469
>>8458This. Ya got a problem im me, simple as that.
No.8473
Not sure about the quantity and selection of admins at the moment. Also the new place is cramped imo.
No.8474
>giving officer positions to people that nobody likes
No.8477
>>8473Was there criteria for admin eligibility? I mean, you don't have to love someone for them to be a good moderator, but they need to actually be capable of moderating.
No.8478
>>8477Nobody ever brought up requirements as far as I recall. I put my name in since I had experience keeping one of the biggest shitholes on the grid in order. Boneyard and it's group chat.
No.8479
Raz - irrelevant
Ssen - too trigger happy, easily butthurt
Trogdor - decent, but has given up
Ayano - decent, but has given up
Ruzha - good, never around
Asami - sensible person
Fjandinn - just why?
Qaus - easily butthurt, easily triggered, bans without warning, whines to admins when he doesn't get his way, full on SJW, emotionally unstable due to hormones
Lumi - irrelevant, but I suppose better than the new pubfur mods.
No.8480
So was there actually an 'election' to select the new officers, or were they handed it on a silver-platter? I would've hoped there'd be more thought put into it, rather than giving it to someone just because they charmed you for a bit.
The only new officer who isn't trigger-happy or temperish is Hirokii. Tzinti has a bad, bad temper when people rub him the wrong way; holds grudges. Qaus is too passive, and gets very easily triggered (I see very many impulse bans down the road). Plus, Qaus hasn't even been around much in the past year. Zippy? Why? Ssen, did you just give out officer to anyone who asked?
I seriously hope these people are reconsidered, there have been longer standing members of /d/ that have a more level-head than any of these people.
No.8481
Well, I think it's time to ask:
Would there be any interest in investing in another /d/ group where there is sort of an approval process before becoming an actual member of the group? Basically the old /d/ sans people like Fauvist, Ice, other spergs and the rest of the banlist.
If there's interest I will open a trial period and see how it goes.
No.8482
>>8480The election process is sucking Ssen's dick.
>>8481>Another /d/ group when all that is really needed is just a place with build off except for builders It is astonishing how many people are still unable to self moderate and need babysitters.
No.8483
>>8482This is getting silly, Ssen doesn't have a dick and is an extreme sub. You become an officer by forcing Ssen to suck your dick.
No.8484
>>8481With the current /d/ having just switched owners, moved land and just having appointed questionable moderators; I'd be in favour of restoring some stability in the form of a clean slate and undoing some of the things that has put this /d/ in a negative light.
>>8482 has a good base for that.
No.8485
>>8483then alex should be an officer
No.8486
>>8480>Zippyidk if zippy would be authoritative at all? wtf
No.8487
>>8480>>8481>>8484Put a name to these posts you guys, otherwise nobody is going to take your complains seriously No.8488
>>8487Why do you feel names are important in this instance? So we can disregard and discredit based on prejudice? These are all reasonable questions.
No.8489
There are simply too many moderators. The ones we already have barely need to do anything as is. I count around 40 unique faces during any given week. That's a 1-2 admin job, tops. Social Darwinism and the light application of self moderation goes a long way.
The quality of company is generally quite good at /d/. I feel we are overcomplicating things.
No.8490
>>8488Names are important because
>>8481 can't get any recruitment going without a name to start with.
> So we can disregard and discredit based on prejudice?>>8482 and
>>8483 is already straight up discrediting Ssen because of their kinks.
Nothing will actually get changed or even done unless the people with valid complaints put their names and proof of who they are to the post.
Otherwise it will just be clumped alongside the anonymous shitposters and people who are just vocal because it's anonymous.
It's also already been stated that anonymous thread complaints will be ignored.
No.8491
>>8479didn't know quas was admin when I met them a few weeks ago, that's funny
>>https://my.secondlife.com/qaussphene/picks/0dd7d575-e81f-21d2-c026-f16f7538d20e>Exceedingly sexual, or exaggerated features/qualities really freak me out. Stuff like massive breasts, genitals, or muscles. And overly effeminate male avatars, though there are exceptions to this. Sergals freak me out too. Oh, unhidden questionable groups too. No.8492
>>8491> I don't like /d/. I should moderate /d/. No.8493
>>8491Perfect candidate for mod on /d/!
Also, shitting on people who wear kemono, because that screams professionalism.
[10:40] Qaus (qaussphene): kemono really is a fad avatar just like kani and chinchilla
[10:40] Qaus (qaussphene): "guys i want an avatar that looks like X species"
[10:41] Qaus (qaussphene): "get kemono/chinchilla/kani and get X mod"
[10:41] Qaus (qaussphene): and then it looks really weird
Seriously, how did that guy even get added. He was NEVER at the old house.
No.8494
>>8491Not the best person to be moderating anything with that kind of attitude.
No.8495
>>8490Some people like the anonymity because it prevents lynching. It's also sometimes useful because the complaint, if legitimate, should not be judged soley based on who is making it. I do agree that it's often abused to shit post, but not always. Snide comments about Ssen and her cock addiction are as irrelevant as they are unnecessary.
No.8497
>>8495There is nothing wrong with anonymity but it is constantly abused in the /sl/ board and that's what makes legitimate posts end up getting dismissed entirely.
Putting a name to some serious posts would let it actually allow it to get some attention instead of pushed to the side.
Post ids would also do the trick to at least prevent samefagging.
No.8498
>>8497No arguments there. It's a pity that constructive feedback and genuine issues are pushed aside because of the few folks that can't help being butt holes. Oh well.
No.8500
>>8490I'm not discrediting Ssen, I'm just saying she's exclusively female and submissive. I'm happy she got the role of queen and I'm hoping she can use a skybox or something to build that monstergirl cabaret me and her used to talk about.
No.8501
>>8493lol, isn't he a kani himself?
No.8502
No.8503
>>8501Probably only because it has the best Harpy add ons.
No.8504
>>8501>kani>harpy addonsSomething is wrong with this, I just can't figure out what.
No.8506
>>8504Sorry I thought you were talking about Kemono.
No.8507
To anyone concerned, I sent out a request for admin, those who responded were pretty heavily drilled on what I was looking for, what they wanted from it, and what the needed to be. Those I chose recently all seemed to fit, but that being said I am still new to this and if i see anyone abusing the power or unfit for it will have it taken away.
I'm not just being some dumbass who thinks anyone who is lewd can methodically moderate and pass out a ban if needed.
If Quas, Tzinti, Zippy or Hirokii are at all unfit they will be stripped of being an officer and had anything wrong the did undone
No.8508
>>8507How about you just reverse it now and save yourself a lot of headaches?
They will hand out unjustified bans, going scorched earth, no strikes, because that is all they know.
The place does not need more mods than there were before.
No.8509
No.8510
>>8508Have a feeling one or two of them will, and the others will be more useless and maybe even counter productive than the ones that aren't even around anymore.
No.8511
>>8507It is pretty clear that you really do not know what you are doing if you made a person like Qaus a mod for /d/.
No.8512
>>8508really? you all complain about about people and then don't do anything about, either cause your lazy or to passive to. Wouldn't it rather be easier to have a mod there at almost all times to ban on the spot?
We'll see how it plays out and if they do something stupid you can say you told me so and i am a bad leader or w/e you did with Raz. Or ya know, better yet you can im me about your concerns!
No.8513
>>8508This is a very interesting hypothesis with information already covered on in the post you are directly responding too.
Good job.
No.8514
>>8507You sent out a request for admins and then impulsively added these people. You know how it's easy to tell they were impulsive decisions vs. thought out? Because you kept spamming the fucking notices with every new admin you chose, 20 and 40 minutes apart. You could have at least been a little less obvious about it by introducing them all at once, in one notice.
No.8515
Reminder: Unjustified bans are never permanent and even a group wipe can be undone.
No.8516
>>8515Reminder: Don't worry about getting hit by a car, you can always goto a hospital. No.8517
>>8516this analogy is laughable
No.8518
>>8515Once someone is banned it is much harder to convince someone that it was unjustified because of preconceptions, lack of information and unbanning would be admitting having fucked up.
See also: any unjustified convict who took years to get proven innocent.
More moderators = more bans = more fuck-ups.
No.8519
>>8517Pretty sure the point being made is that prevention is better than cure. Especially when it's so easy to avoid silly bans in the first place.
No.8520
> ban erk gloom and alex! I don't like them!
> UGH, These New Moderators are going to just ban people they don't like and hand out unjustified bans!!!!!
No.8521
>>8512>ban on the spotSee, this is exactly the kind of shit that will ruin the place. As a reasonable moderator you don't ban on the spot. You inform the person who is doing *bad thing* about *bad thing* and ask them to stop. If they don't you inform them that they will get a temp-ban. If they still dont stop then you temp-ban them. If they do it again after temp ban, ban them for a longer time, only THEN should you consider a permanent ban.
If someone is not liked for what they do, others will let them know. This is a much better punishment then bringing out the perma-banhammer and only encouraging vindictive behaviour, like crashing the sim.
No.8522
No.8523
>>8521you are right and this is actually that I should have stated, thats my bad
No.8524
>come back after a few days
>all these new officers
Why
No.8525
>>8523Make a flowchart for the process and give it to your officers, ask them to make logs of the conversation leading up to any ban. That way the process is transparent and solidified.
No.8526
>>8473If we end up needing more space I can work that out.
>>8482WOK has a 6 hour auto return, only admins I appoint will be able to place long-term objects.
>>8518Wrongfully convicted criminals take years to get out because of shitty bureaucracy, not because the system doesn't want to admit they were wrong.
>>8519>>8520Erk, Alex and Fauvist are all welcome to come to the WOK until they fuck up. Anyone with a problem with this can take it up with me. I have not personally born witness to their shit.
>>8521I will deal with anyone found handing out unreasonable bans.
One of the benefits of making my place the new /d/ place is that I can make sure /d/rama doesn't become WOK's drama.
No.8527
>>8526What did Erk, Alex and Fauvist even do?
No.8528
>>8524I don't know, she has completely lost it.
No.8529
>>8527They're special children that only belong in the ball pit.
No.8530
*Puts right hand over heart holding the left in the air*
I will not make any moderator actions on anyone without first fully assessing the situation and making it clear to the problem causing individual that they're being a fart and need to stop being a fart.
If the problem causing individual makes it clear to me that they know they're being a fart either through disregarding warning or direct acknowledgement but still chooses to continue, then and only then will I will make a moderator action.
I will not permanently ban anyone without peer review or knowledge of a person's repeat offense.
I will personally report all bans, kicks, etc. that I make to Ssen for review. (everyone else should too!)
I will not take any moderator actions on people for any personal reason.
I will not interact with /d/ as a group when I feel I am not in a suitable emotional state to be making authoritative choices. In the event that this happens I will bring another moderator's attention to the issue.
If I do not uphold any part of this promise, please call me out publicly without an ounce of conjecture so that everyone may accurately review my practices.
No matter how the wind howls, the mountain will not bow to it.
No.8531
No.8532
>>8531Literally has nothing to do with anything in this context.
No.8533
No.8534
>>8530People like you, who are so desperate for attention and power because they have none irl are truly the worst.
No.8535
>>8530Get this hothead out of here.
No.8537
>>8479>Fjandinn - just why?Why anyone, man? I'm pretty fuckin' neutral about most of this shit.
>>8480
>Tzinti has a bad, bad temper when people rub him the wrong way; holds grudges.It's not really a grudge if the person you're upset with hasn't stopped their douchey behavior. I forgive and forget pretty quickly as long as shit stops, but even beyond that I won't just ban somebody for personal reasons. Someone acting like a cunt isn't going to make me ban them, I'm just going to call them a cunt like I usually do.
re:
>there are people who've been here longer>new pubfursI've been here since the first iteration of /d/, dudes.
Put up specific instances of bad shit we've pulled if you're going to start flinging shit. Everything you're saying is either opinion, wrong, or has no demonstrable impact on ability to be a mod.
No.8538
>>8537>I've been here since the first iteration of /d/, dudesSure I believe you
No.8539
>>8526>Alex>welcome to come to the WOKssen count me out of your
not the /d/onghouse, sry but he triggers me vice versa
No.8540
No.8541
No.8542
>>8540read the thread retard
No.8543
Ssen won't buy me presents /d/ is over guys shut it down.
No.8544
No.8545
>>8542All I got is
>Alex didn't get along with Raz>Erk is weird>Fauvist is special No.8546
>>8545Alex and Raz got along fine.
No.8547
>>8545Not just Raz, also where do I sign up for mod, I want to ninja ban people since there's no logs for tracking that.
No.8548
>>8547Just because you don't see the logs doesn't mean they don't exist.
No.8549
>>8548There ain't logs for bans.
No.8550
>>8549Man come on. Don't make me use a trip. That's just rude.
No.8551
>>8550Personally I think moderators should use trips anyways, at least to establish that anything official they have to say is legitimately done by them No.8552
Hello! I am now watching this thread.
>"Social PVP" is terrible and toxic
This is your one and only opportunity to turn this conversation down a more civil route. Thank you for your consideration.
No.8553
>>8550Make a trip, only ever use it for official administrative statements or when you absolutely need your identity verified. Take it off the rest of the time. That way, nothing important is ever misconstrued, and if people wanna believe an otherwise anonymous post with your name at the top is actually you, that gullibility's on them.
No.8554
Get those spit shields ready.
No.8555
>>8552>ToxicMods, everyone
No.8556
>>8552>toxicFuck off tumblr
No.8557
>>8554awww but you didnt cut the best part, where i called you all passive aggressive twats!
No.8558
No.8559
>>8552>"Social PVP"HOLY FUCK, what are you on? No.8560
No.8563
Raz here, Holy shit.
No.8565
oh jesus what's going on
controversy and opinions about who is a good mod or not aside, if your people aren't happy with who they are being governed by, in any context, those people are going to stop coming. and that's bad.
just saying as someone who is genuinely concerned about /d/ degrading into another generic furry pub, but you guys need to sort your shit out immediately before we lose people who the community wants here.
i would really prefer to be lead by capable moderators who have been fairly judged by the administration and not just a slurry of re-hires and people i've barely seen here who have no dedication to the /d/ community.
i respect ssen a lot but this was a bad move on her part. one bad apple doesn't spoil the pie in this particular instance, so i hope this can be reversed.
No.8566
>>8565based on what criteria for "fairly judged"?
more importantly, the people bitching sound like shitheads anyway, so they can fuck right off. anyone who has actually been coming to the house for months has zero issue with the moderators.
No.8568
>>8565People hate change, but change needs to happen. No matter what happens from here on, people are going to be upset. Hell, people were upset at the status quo. The biggest problem isn't that we have new mods, because we need new mods.
Three of the four new mods have been very active in /d/ for months, years in two cases, and people who've been around that long tend to provoke reactions. It wasn't a bad move, it was just a controversial one, but any move Ssen makes would be controversial. The fact that all the bitching has been in this thread and nowhere else is indicative that people aren't bailing because of new management, if they're bailing at all. Basically it's a bunch of shitposting.
No.8569
>>8568The only reason I ever come to /d/ anymore is just to stare at the stupid shit. I doubt anyone is going to abandon ship because they are going to sit there and watch the shit.
Don't assume people make conscious decisions to not go to places. Nobody does that. It's just the place will slip their mind when they no longer get any enjoyment.
No.8570
>>8565Look i get that, really but people are just asusming that i hired on anyone who asked to join.
No, I didnt. People im'd me curious about the position, i told them what i needed from them and how they would react to certain situations. Some I turned down, some decided not to join after that and some we both agreed they would make a good fit.
I have not lead a group before, So if i mess up on something i will be the first to admit it but I also wont accept people behind anons calling my decisions shit if they wont tell me in person
No.8571
>>8569But how will they stop getting the enjoyment? None of these mods seem likely to cause any issues at all. If anything is going to be the cause of that kind of radical change, it's the move, which wasn't going to be stopped, and can't really be reversed.
This isn't a legit argument.
No.8572
>>8571You completely missed the point of that post.
The 'enjoyment' is the dumb shit that keeps going on so yes these mods will provide much enjoyment but it will taper off eventually. Plus its pretty funny to listen to the mods quote the thread and sarcastically say some dumb shit and be like "yeah we showed them".
From talking to a few people the enjoyment most people seem to get anymore is just going there to watch the kemonos be spazzy like its the fucking ape cage at the zoo. The days of /d/onghouse actually being lewd is over.
No.8573
>>8572>Literally videos of people being lewd at /d/ in the lewd thread>Even videosYeah man.
No.8574
>>8573>same 5 people fucking each other again and again that nobody else wants to touch No.8575
>>8572Shitposters are still shitposting in the thread, and I still see people fucking in the house. Nothing has changed, and you're not gonna change anything whining anonymously and giving no solutions. The only concrete complaint made thus far is "Ssen didn't vet the new officers", which wasn't the case, as Ssen said
>>8570 here.
No.8576
>>8574>I didn't want those stupid grapes anyway!Really?
No.8577
>>8576Being defensive about those grapes wont make me want them.
No.8578
>>8574>Moving the goalpost/d/onghouse has lewd going on and people there like to do lewd shit and hang out.
Try asking for it sometime.
No.8580
>>8572>>8574What even is your point? You keep changing your mind with every post. I'm pretty convinced your just le ebin trell taking us all on your wonderful ruse cruise.
No.8581
>>8580See you did miss the point of the post again.
That is literally what im doing.
No.8582
No.8583
>>8581And this is why nobody can take anonymous thread complaints seriously.
No.8602
The garden is cozy.
No.8644
After reading this I've decided there are plenty of better places for me to take my ass too, sorry guys but I'm out. /d/onghouse is kill, WOK is not for me.
No.8652
are you all so shallow that you would let the displacement of landmarks affect your judgement of "the correct place to lewd"?
why would you take your disagreement out upon the admin who decided it was too much drama to handle; isn't that just further arbitrary drama to add to the crockpot?
when i personally joined the /d/ group i thought that the focus of it was to simply enjoy the company of other sexual people. i genuinely hope i haven't been proven wrong; due to my libido, i want to make everyone emotionally fulfilled, while i am though wary of those who take without giving.
No.8733
>>8565I echo this post 110%.
No.8747
>>8733Why? The thing is, the original mods were no more "fairly judged by the community" than our new ones. If people are bailing because of the move, nothing really can be done about that. If people are bailing because of the new mods (without, I might add, waiting to see what may or may not change), they're fickle and are probably looking for an excuse to leave already. /d/ was just as active today as it has been in the past, and most of the people there were regulars. This is overreaction.