>>677>Matter-of-fact descriptions like that, from parties supposed to be neutral, really get me going.Man, I know what you mean. It's a strange thing how spanking is the most thrilling when it's the least overtly sexualized.
Another thing I like along those lines is spanking memories. A bit of a guilty pleasure, but there's something more titillating about spankings that were true punishments. Of course, most of the "true" stories are anything but, but I don't mind as long as they're written like they could be true. Much like those wikipedia entries, real(-sounding) memories are usually rather curt. Choice of words isn't porny. The amount of detail is important: too much makes it seem fake or embellished, none at all doesn't spark the imagination.
>>678Don't even get me fucking started.