/speakingtree/ - The Right India

>>103

insufferable fgt trying too hard to fit in.

>>91

Pretty fucking retarded in general, the "center" it presupposes and from where it access other positions changes every few years. It's just another normative MCQ garbage that anglos made up to turn politics into stupid personality quiz.

Pics related is what i am talking about, these 2 were taken within a span of a week. This in fact one of the better ones out there.

>>52

Also love what DC did with the designs

>>74

>Upholding Traditional family

>UCC

>Sino-futurism

To our demise not only you uttered the exact platitudes that i expected but went even further, now the "Right" and "Left" is at best an umbrella term serving as a scale to map politics in relation to a normative cultural discourse. The only issue here is that the popular discourse in the era of "Information Bomb" is largely that of sensationalism, obscuring the distinction between culture & white noise, here politics have been reduced to making demands right off that discursive bulletin board, this is why your reply was so predictable. You probably even follow those "Right Wing" fb group that is run by politically oblivious bhagora "libertarian" NRIs. I will even go on to make a guess of you previously been a part of the Skeptic™ community.

Now moving away from guesswork, what you actually are is a rootless neoliberal possessed by the specter of Thatcher, your lip service to "tradition" mimics the lip service paid to """minorities""" by your rootless neoliberal counterparts larping as "LW". You'd have been sucking off singapore and The "Basedxd" Lee kuan yew instead of China, if you were actually aware of em.

In fact, link related and it's crypto antihindu bhima-bhosra is the spokeperson for this "RW" meme you fell hard for, you absolute stupid fgt.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HnyAh7bLdIA

>>87

My point was against these naive & rushed attempts at making "proposals" without even being familiar with the grounds one making such "proposals" from. In fact i will say that "proposals" don't count for shit, rather it's ideological/theological grounding is what gives it's meaning and telos, failure to do so will only result in failure to move beyond the socio-political paradigm we find ourselves in.

And in here your simplistic defense/endorsement of these said "proposals" fall apart, to start off with UCC, my point was rather about your contradiction of upholding "Traditional family" while endorsing an act that seeks to discard and dissolve all traditional codes & orders into the melting pot of the normative liberal constitutionalism. That which befell the katuas only recently have been enforced on us since the 50's, and whatever it's benefits might have been in the realm of "social justice" the overarching factor governing this agenda have been to deem Hinduism & tradition in general, toothless and redundant in every aspects of systemic & civic processes. This is what most gets wrong about any form of secular states, it doesn't imply “equal respect for all religions” and "the separation of church and state" doesn't mean the religious body is free from "statist" despotism(as nothing escapes the Leviathan) ,but is excluded from matters of polity in general.

I will post this link that is a sort of Proto-UCC manual for hindus, this is coming from Ambedkar himself and it's funny how delirious and pathological he was in his hatred. His reference to burke is even more hilarious and stems from a terrible reading of Burkean conservatism.

http://ccnmtl.columbia.edu/projects/mmt/ambedkar/web/section_24.html

>>87

when it comes to economic model, there again u suffers from the aforementioned rush and naivete. Here "successful" as a floating signifier becomes your scale, again lacking a solid ground and forgetting how even the Scandinavian model was being heralded as a "success" few years ago. Now frm a Productionist perspective it certainly seems to be doing pretty good tbh, but i'm not a productionist and see it as a degenerate abomination born out of anglo protestant ethics, made worse by Chinese materialism and Confucianism.

To make matters worse it's increasingly hard to tell whether China is capitalist or socialist, as hitherto understood. However a case could be made for this "socialism with Chinese characteristics" being accelerationist, in that respect all too marxist and strikingly similar to lenin's NEP. Now here most of you while making "proposals" for such model won't actually support the conditions that makes such model possible, from how the PRC is governed,by what and whom. It's also ironical to root for freeing hindu temples from the encroachment of the State while proposing an economy that primarily relies upon a far too centralized and totalitarian state (file related) for whom the civic society always remains at it's disposal. Same holds true for singapore, it's a fucking "global city state" for whom "the world is it's hinterland",Pic Related will tell you enough about the viability of tradition in such a system.

Now if you are rooting for some sort of a Mixed economy, i am with you and so is most of the country. We were always a mixed economy even when that scum of the earth, peter sutherland convinced us into Globalization. Either ways, i like where modi is heading with his recent economy i hope he improves more upon state intervention and effective nationalization.

>>65

India is far too diverse for that. It might work if we can erase 70% of the country or we divide the country into many parts (With the Hindustani aka cow belt nation being the largest and the one in charge) and instill puppet dictator in each of the subsidiary states and a looser confederacy than EU with common currency and easier visa controls to politically unite us while each individual nations follows fascist policy ( Sort of like Hitler's plans for Europe in case he won the war).

>>65

Don't listen to this >>75 absolute dolt, fascism for better or worse was a populist reactionary movement and thus unlike liberalism it never came to power as a result of imperialism or coercion, instead it was a rather organic adhering to the collective "Volkish" spirit/features of the time & place it can into being. In fact this is the main reason behind the diverse and distinct nature of each fascist regimes, from the Italian to Romanian to German and so on.

The thing is i don't believe in absence of such a collective "volkish" populism Fascism can even be realize, that means if the "far too diverse" nature of our country proves an obstacle then it won't even see the light of day to begin with. But if it does(did) then i think we can all agree upon that it would have stemmed from the sort of Hindutva as was envisioned by Savarkar.

Tbh Hitler along with Pinochet was the worst thing that could have happened with fascism, Hitler and his Natsoc drove away and eventually turned bitter not only towards the other fascist regimes but also the Great german revolutionary conservative movement that consisted of men like Carl Schmitt, Junger brothers, Heidegger, Arthur van der bruck, Spengler and so on.