c6acaf No.37745
if you care about the state of /ssft/ and wish to have input of the rules of /sstf/ please talk about them here.
not giving any input means you are happy with what's already inplace
RULES HAVE BEEN ADDED PLEASE READ THEM
Post last edited at
711bbc No.37799
We need more mods.
That's it.
c2358d No.37801
>not giving any input means you are happy with what's already inplace
…or perhaps it means that you're afraid the autistic creep pedo admin will get mad at you for disagreeing with him.
c4045d No.37804
>>37801Why would he make a thread about it if he wanted there to be discussion?
Why even start with the insults instead of putting some thought?
c4045d No.37806
>>37804I meant to say putting in your own thoughts on the matter.
c2358d No.37808
>>37804But there is thought in my insults. Often people are scared of speaking out against Spider due to his… tyrannical nature.
da710a No.37810
>>37808in that case, I say less tyranny
c2358d No.37811
c6acaf No.37814
>>37799that's an issue I'm fixing currently
c4045d No.37816
>>37808I corrected myself on what I said.
>>37808Also what you did was called an ad hominen. You attacked someone's character based on them or on rumors about them. Try not to use that when in serious discussion.
>>37808>>37810You guys need to show the public where he's tyrannic. It will also be good as it might show him he made a mistake.
But if he's made a thread for people to have this discussion, I have a feeling he's not as bad as you're making it.
c2358d No.37820
>>37814I wonder what the recruitment process will be. How much do they need to suck your dick?
>>37816Oh fuck off Marcus you cuck.
>You attacked someone's character based on themWhat? What's wrong with that? I don't see a problem with that at all.
>You guys need to show the public where he's tyrannic…and we do and we will. Of course, most people just tend to ignore it. People here tend to be too weak and pathetic to stand up again injustice.
>But if he's made a thread for people to have this discussion, I have a feeling he's not as bad as you're making it.It's likely that he'll just ignore most of the stuff in here because he "disagrees" or some shit.
c4045d No.37822
>>37820>What? What's wrong with that? I don't see a problem with that at all.It's rude in a serious discussion such as this. You're not really attacking their ideals or thoughts on the matter, but attack them personally instead. It's like saying "She doesn't know what's she is talking about, she is a woman."
>…and we do and we will. Of course, most people just tend to ignore it. People here tend to be too weak and pathetic to stand up again injustice.Go ahead. Examples would be great. If you think it's in a specific post, link it. Also explain why you think it's tyrannic.
>It's likely that he'll just ignore most of the stuff in here because he "disagrees" or some shit.Seems like a waist of time to do that then.
c2358d No.37825
>>37822Well, it's attacking his suitability as admin. Usually autistic creep pedos aren't very good people.
>Go ahead. Examples would be great. If you think it's in a specific post, link it. Also explain why you think it's tyrannic.I'm not going to spend my night looking for examples but for starters, several times he has provoked people and then when they've gotten mad or whatever, he's threatened to ban them.
>Seems like a waist of time to do that then.We're talking about a guy who made a digusting webm in which he spreads his asshole. What he does is not always understandable.
Why are you so defensive of him? Either you're trolling or you're very new.
c4045d No.37830
>>37825>Well, it's attacking his suitability as admin. Usually autistic creep pedos aren't very good people.Do you have proof he has autism or is a pedophile? Even then that doesn't mean he's not suitable. It's an understandable pre-judgment, but everyone can make their mistakes. Assuming you have proof on why he's a pedophile.
>I'm not going to spend my night looking for examples but for starters, several times he has provoked people and then when they've gotten mad or whatever, he's threatened to ban them.You don't have to do it tonight, but at some point examples would be good. I can point out one instance with Naz, but that's about it. You're making it sound like he does this all the time.
>We're talking about a guy who made a digusting webm in which he spreads his asshole. What he does is not always understandable.People make sexual videos for others all the time. I'm sure you've done the same. It's not his fault someone else showed it to others. I'm sure he'd prefer it to have stayed private.
Again, you're attacking him on something unrelated.
>Why are you so defensive of him? Either you're trolling or you're very new.Why are you so offensive about him?
c2358d No.37840
>>37830>Do you have proof he has autismHis posts lmao
> is a pedophileFucking hell not at the moment. Those chatlogs are years old.
>Even then that doesn't mean he's not suitable. It's an understandable pre-judgment, but everyone can make their mistakes. He makes a lot of mistakes.
>You don't have to do it tonight, but at some point examples would be good.I would rather not waste my time doing that but if I see it happen in the future I will point it out if I remember. Also, another one was when he spent hours trying to upset me when I had already stated that I was incredibly upset due to having an awful week. I begged him to stop and yet he kept carrying on. He told me he was just doing it for his own amusement.
If that's not tyrannical then I don't know what is.
>Why are you so offensive about him?That didn't answer my question but… because he's a horrible manipulative asshole . I'm not just talking shit about him because it's the "cool thing to do", i'm doing it because I honestly think he's a bad person and needs knocking down a peg.
c4045d No.37878
>>37840>His posts lmaoWould probably need to see a doctor's note on this one actually.
>Fucking hell not at the moment. Those chatlogs are years old.I hope it's more than just the Lady incident.
>He makes a lot of mistakes.Let's tell him so he can try to fix them.
>I would rather not waste my time doing that but if I see it happen in the future I will point it out if I remember. Also, another one was when he spent hours trying to upset me when I had already stated that I was incredibly upset due to having an awful week. I begged him to stop and yet he kept carrying on. He told me he was just doing it for his own amusement.
>If that's not tyrannical then I don't know what is.Not really tyrannical because he wasn't threatening you with a ban. Rather I'd just say it's a dick thing to do. He may very well be a complete dick too.
>That didn't answer my question but… because he's a horrible manipulative asshole . I'm not just talking shit about him because it's the "cool thing to do", i'm doing it because I honestly think he's a bad person and needs knocking down a peg.Well I haven't seen any of this manipulation. Asshole, subjective so that could be true. I see you insult his intelligence quite often. I can't see how any idiot could manipulate people.
I've seen his past, and it's creepier there to most people. I don't see it as much anymore. Jokes that seem awkward, but nothing too bad.
c2358d No.37885
>>37878>Would probably need to see a doctor's note on this one actually.Nope, it's quite obvious that he's autistic. I mean hell, have you see what he looks like? You'd have to be autistic to think that's a good look.
>I hope it's more than just the Lady incident.What, trying to have sex with an underage person isn't pedo?
>Let's tell him so he can try to fix them.I do. He doesn't listen.
>Not really tyrannical because he wasn't threatening you with a ban. Rather I'd just say it's a dick thing to do. He may very well be a complete dick too.Yes, but if he wasn't the admin, more people may have spoken out against him and told him to stop. It literally was a terrible week; I even spent hours crying in bed one day because it was all so fucked up. He knew how upset he was and he was actively trying to hurt me even more… for no reason at all, other than amusing himself.
A man that cruel is not a suitable leader.
df38a5 No.37896
>rules
Well if you have any none better be "I am offended wahhhh pls ban"
c4045d No.37897
>>37885>Nope, it's quite obvious that he's autistic. I mean hell, have you see what he looks like? You'd have to be autistic to think that's a good look.I don't autism affects the way somebody looks necessarily. Unless you mean with how they up-keep themselves.
>What, trying to have sex with an underage person isn't pedo?Lady lied to multiple people about his age. Then he would come out and say he's 14 suddenly.
>I do. He doesn't listen. Now is your chance to try again.
>Yes, but if he wasn't the admin, more people may have spoken out against him and told him to stop. It literally was a terrible week; I even spent hours crying in bed one day because it was all so fucked up. He knew how upset he was and he was actively trying to hurt me even more… for no reason at all, other than amusing himself.
>A man that cruel is not a suitable leader.Could be a misunderstanding. You seem to be offended very easily and are very sensitive honestly. Even then, some leaders in the past have been cruel in some ways.
c2358d No.37899
>>37897He's white. He has a ponytail. He's not some handsome viking-esque guy. That's autistic.
>Now is your chance to try again.I've tried a lot. He hates me even when I do nothing wrong and try to give him genuine advice and help.
>Could be a misunderstanding. You seem to be offended very easily and are very sensitive honestly. Even then, some leaders in the past have been cruel in some ways.No, it wasn't. He was spending HOURS trying to upset me. I told him to stop it and he wouldn't If he was doing something else and it was upsetting me then it would be kind of different, but in this example he was actively trying to cause me to be upset. He wasn't doing it to prove a point or change me or anything, he just wanted some amusement.
>Even then, some leaders in the past have been cruel in some ways.Yeah, and usually not the good ones.
c4045d No.37903
>He's white. He has a ponytail. He's not some handsome viking-esque guy. That's autistic.
Autism doesn't affect the way one looks. Not everyone can be a 10/10.
>I've tried a lot. He hates me even when I do nothing wrong and try to give him genuine advice and help.
Try one last time.
>No, it wasn't. He was spending HOURS trying to upset me. I told him to stop it and he wouldn't If he was doing something else and it was upsetting me then it would be kind of different, but in this example he was actively trying to cause me to be upset. He wasn't doing it to prove a point or change me or anything, he just wanted some amusement.
It seemed pretty amusing to me. I'll note it down as a red flag though. I'd say we'd have a problem if he did it to other people but you.
>Yeah, and usually not the good ones.
Hilter had Germany back on it's feet for a while.
fd68f7 No.37917
>>37745Suggested common sense rules other than the global rules:
No shitposting
No spamming
Porn / lewd images should be spoilered
I find it an issue that this board is considered sfw even though it really isn't. Makes it hard to lurk outside of my home.
c6acaf No.37921
>>37917the board isn't considered sfw and it isn't marked as such under the tags
c6acaf No.37935
so I need something talked about,
drama, is it something which needs to have rules against ? or do we need to keep it as some part of the board?
and if it's allowed, how much of it is accepted?
1ecae5 No.37938
>>37921>>37917We should still ask porn to be spoilered
>>37935I'd rather drama not spill into threads. Let people sort it out in private, nobody gives a shit which e-bf broke your heart
c6acaf No.37942
>>37938>spoiler pornthis is something which I consider a common courtesy but if need I can spoiler shit
>dramawell yes but do I really need to parent people or should it be given a warning then if they keep on with it a banning or what?
c2358d No.37945
>>37903>Autism doesn't affect the way one looks. Not everyone can be a 10/10.Yeah not everyone can be a 10/10, but the choices you make affect how you look, and autism affects the choices you make. No non-autistic white guy is going to thinking a ponytail looks good on him unless he's some super manly viking dude~
>Try one last time.I try a lot and i'll keep on trying but I know it wont work.
>It seemed pretty amusing to me.Yeah a guy spending hours of his time trying to upset a broken man is so amusing. Bullying and harassment is so fun lol!!!1
>I'd say we'd have a problem if he did it to other people but you.It wouldn't surprise me if he hasn't already done so.
>Hilter had Germany back on it's feet for a while.Yeah, but I doubt it was his sadism and cruelty that was fixing the place.
Also, Hitler lost the war and killed himself so… yeah, not that great of a leader after all, you edgy teen.
be6bcb No.37951
Do not commit doxxing of any kind against any user. As well as posting conversations in any way, or posting pictures of others without their consent.
No "shitposting" or shit threads. (Shitposting consists of copypasta/something unconstructive, or threads with unrelated to the board)
These are the only real issue, since it's based on subjectivity.
And I think porn should be allowed unspoilered.
c2358d No.37960
>>37951> or threads with unrelated to the boardBut isn't that kinda subjective too? You could say that you're making those threads to find people with similar interests/opinions or whatever, so then you can add them.
Last I checked, Steam isn't for lewd and yet that still happens a lot here.
67dcea No.37963
Can you remove flags or turn it off by default?
a2c807 No.37967
67dcea No.37968
>>37967I hate my flag, it's an involuntary tripcode. It's on of the reasons don't like posting here.
a2c807 No.37970
>>37968you have an id now though..
67dcea No.37976
>>37970People won't know who I am because of an ID but they'll know who I am because of my flag since no one else is from here.
a2c807 No.37977
>>37976are the flags just to a thread or siteboard?
fd68f7 No.38026
>>37921Nevermind, my brain is fried and remembered an old thread where somebody got banned on halfchan and for some reason I thought it was here.
fd68f7 No.38030
>>37935The drama on this board appears to be both an issue and a driving force on this board.
Banning should be kept as a last resort if a simple warnings don't suffice.
c2358d No.38040
>mfw he thinks an argument = drama
c2358d No.38041
>>38040Seriously though, I think we need to define "shitposting" and "drama" a bit better.
fd68f7 No.38042
>>38041There's no need to define that which has definitions.
>Shitposting: shit nobody cares about or is irrelevant to the purpose of the board.A good example is the GET threads that occurred sometime around the Superbowl. Nobody gives a shit about that here.
>Drama: petty cat fights, disagreements, arguments, and whatnot that hits the fan.Personally I hate some of the drama that I've seen here as it could have been carried out privately and not take up an ENTIRE FUCKING SECTION of a thread. Nonetheless, the drama will persist as it keeps the board alive and provides the occasional laugh and giggle.
944802 No.38045
We have a steam group, right?
Maybe use that and send out announcements, say, a tournament or something, or group games.
944802 No.38046
>>38045I know it has nothing to do with rules, but it will boost up camaderie amongst others.
c2358d No.38048
>>38042Can't you try thinking a bit more?
"shit nobody cares about or is irrelevant to the purpose of the board." is subjective. Often it means "I disagree with you so i'm gonna call you a shitposter".
Yeah, some drama here is bad and should be kept in private, however that doesn't mean everytime someone has an argument, we need to sperg out and call it drama.
>>38045>>38046Lol, it will just turn to shit and bring more drama
>>38046 944802 No.38050
fd68f7 No.38056
>>38050Never hurts to experiment… I should probably figure out how to live stream so we could movie night or something.
dd1e47 No.38060
To have a scheduled night where we play videogames together is a great idea.
944802 No.38064
>>38056We can even have themed nights!
Halloween night with /ssft/!
Kaiju Week! B-Movie Night!
Gay porn! E3!
c2358d No.38076
>>38064>>38056>SFT movie nightvomitinganimegirl.jpg
c6acaf No.38177
>>37951could you help think of how those things should be defined
>>38030that's the consensus I'm getting
>>38060that'll would be nice, maybe even have it a dnd night too
c2358d No.38205
>>38177See, you're ignore me. You may not like me and I may be wrong sometimes, but that doesn't mean you need to ignore everything I say, especially when I'm trying to help the board.
I just think we should at some point, have a proper discussion on what shitposting is, what drama is, and how we should deal with that. etc
c2358d No.38207
c6acaf No.38208
>>38205this
is
the
thread
to
do
it
in
c2358d No.38209
>>38205…and it shouldn't just be "whichever one you agree with". We should all discuss it and try to come to some kind of consensus.
This place should be a democracy, not just a way of you picking and choosing which of our methods you prefer.
c6acaf No.38210
>>38209if no body bothers with talking about it then I'm forced to insert my own methods of handling it.
it's not the way I want it, it ends up just how it is.
c2358d No.38211
>>38208See? You ignore me, and then you get mad at me. You weren't talking like that to anyone else.
I'm just trying to get discussion rolling. I don't like you but that doesn't mean I dont want this place to improve, so really we should try to set aside our differences for now, so that we can work toward a brighter future.
>>38210Well unfortunately many people just can't be bothered to discuss it or are too afraid. But I do know that there are plenty of people here that disagree with some of your methods and rules etc. I just hope they will speak up in time.
c6acaf No.38212
>>38211here's the thing also, this is stuff the /sft/ers need to talk about and come to agreement
I should have as little input as possible with it other then confirming things or giving more detail about stuffs.
c2358d No.38213
>>38212Well I think you should put forth your opinions and ideas and such too, I just don't think you should consider them more important than everyone else's, that's all.
I wish more people would discuss these things though, but I mean the intelligence and strength bar here isn't exactly high so I suppose it is to be expected
c2358d No.38250
Also, I just notice this lol
>DISSCUTION
>DISSCUTION
>DISSCUTION
lmao tbh
fd68f7 No.38262
>>38250Took Nonon a while, eh?
c6acaf No.38293
>>38213my idea and opinions are already in place, this is for new ideas and opinions and to criticize what's currently here
c2358d No.38313
>>38262I was more focused on having a discussion, not having a disscution
fd68f7 No.38511
Mods could probably make things seems less "tyrannical".
c2358d No.38537
c6acaf No.38579
>>38537why not talk about the rules and shit like that?
that is what this thread is for even after you derailed it
c2358d No.38598
>>38579Fuck off Spider, I didn't derail anything. Stop fucking trying to ALWAYS start shit.
I was simply asking Panda how he thinks mods could make thing seem less "tyrannical". That is discussion.
c6acaf No.38599
>>38598that has what to do with the rules?
c2358d No.38603
>>38599Mods enforce the rules, so I think it is related to the rules. Besides, Panda is the one that said it, I was just asking him how.
Seriously, stop being a cunt 24/7.
c6acaf No.38604
>>38603so talk about the rules then, how hard is that?
c2358d No.38605
>>38604That's what we're trying to do. The mods enforce the rules so it's still related.
Geez, you're the one that's constantly trying to derail everything with your constant harassment. Just because I don't flirt with you, doesn't mean you need to act mad and be a total creep
c6acaf No.38607
>>38605so are you going to talk about the rules or not?
c2358d No.38618
>>38607That's what we're trying to do. Stop being a cunt.
c6acaf No.38619
>>38618so get to it then, talk about the rules
c2358d No.38626
>>38619What? There's no rush and I don't need to do it RIGHT THIS INSTANT.
Seriously, what is your problem?
c6acaf No.38629
>>38626this isn't a normal /sft/, this is a thread about talking about rules, if you are not going to do that then don't post in this thread
c2358d No.38651
>>38629What the hell are you talking about? I have been trying to talk about rules and how they are enforced etc. It's you that keeps attacking me.
Yes, I know this thread is for talking about the rules. I'm just saying that there's no rush.
c6acaf No.38658
>>38651it's been three days since this thread was made so far there's been little actual talk about the rules and all that but let me tell you what the bulk of this thread is, you being off topic, so yes I'm going to push for people to actually talk about the rules because I think it's important, I want the posters of /ssft/ to decide what rules there should be and how they are enforced but more importantly I want there to be an actual talk about it instead of just one or two people merely using this to slander me because they feel like it'll benefit them.
so talk about the rules or I'll have to consider this offtopic shitposting
c2358d No.38663
>>38658>so far there's been little actual talk about the rulesThere's no rush, give it time.
>let me tell you what the bulk of this thread is, you being off topicThat's bullshit. You're just attacking me. I have been trying to be on topic, it's you that keeps starting shit.
>so talk about the rules or I'll have to consider this offtopic shitpostingOkay right, so you talk shit about me and then I defend myself and you call it offtopic shitposting. That sounds fair.
c6acaf No.38666
>>38663you are still not talking about the rules, more about what shitposting is, what spamming is, who should be volunteers or how the rules are to be enforced.
c2358d No.38734
>>38666>more about what shitposting is, what spamming is, who should be volunteers or how the rules are to be enforcedBut those are fucking related to the rules! Jesus Christ how retarded are you?
c2358d No.38735
>>38734Like, for example… yeah, shitposting is against the rules. However, it would help to get a better definition of "shitposting". Because right now, you're just calling everything you don't like and disagree with "shitposting".
Rule 1 should be that the admin has to not be a asshole bully creep.
c6acaf No.38738
>>38734….. you should think before you type, that's why I said something about them.
>>38735shitposting as it's currently defined as is
>(Shitposting consists of copypasta/something unconstructive, or threads with unrelated to the board)you would know this if you actually read the rules
c2358d No.38752
>>38738>….. you should think before you type, that's why I said something about them.What?
>(Shitposting consists of copypasta/something unconstructive, or threads with unrelated to the board)Yes but even some of that is subjective. What makes something "unconstructive"? What makes a thread "unrelated to the board"?
Steam isn't for ERP last I checked, but you seem perfectly fine with letting people talk about that. So how is that related to the board?
c6acaf No.38755
>>38752asking questions is fine but how about answering some instead
yes alot of it is subjective, this is why I made this thread so that people have a better grasp of how subjective they would want it.
well when you're trying to have a talk about something under the topic, lets say about what the rules are and someone comes in and says oh I don't know, lots of nothing to do with the subject at hand, then I would consider that unconstructive
this board is about making friendships, that is what this board is about.
so unless it's important like this thread or something like that then it's not related to the board and thus shouldn't be here.
part of how you make friendships is talking about things you like or enjoy, the topic could be anything but the act is still making friends or rather the intent is to make friends, so that's fine.
c2358d No.38772
>>38755>how about answering some instead It's not up to me to answer them, this should be a democracy. I feel we should ask questions, discuss them, and together we should find an answer.
>well when you're trying to have a talk about something under the topic, lets say about what the rules are and someone comes in and says oh I don't know, lots of nothing to do with the subject at hand, then I would consider that unconstructiveExcept the general threads don't really have a particular subject, so "shitposting" is a vague term there. If someone disagrees or has an argument you call that shitposting, but really it isn't. You can't stop people from having different opinions.
>this board is about making friendships, that is what this board is about. Yes but lots of things can be involved in making friendships. Like, would there be anything wrong with me making a thread about… for example, football?
>part of how you make friendships is talking about things you like or enjoy, the topic could be anything but the act is still making friends or rather the intent is to make friends, so that's fine.Well I rarely ever see people making friends in the general threads, and yet those are always being posted.
c6acaf No.38785
>>38772together as in the two of us or together as in the whole of /ssft/?
the generals topic is making friendships I would say but other then that I don't know really but I do know that you'd really like my actions to be as simple as merely having a disagreement with you but you see if it was just me who you had disagreements with and not basically everyone else here then there wouldn't of been an issue with it.
as in playing football together or banter at a bar kinda way? I'd say that would come under that definition
I don't know what you're seeing then as I see lots of friendship making and unfriendships makings happening all the time
c2358d No.38872
>>38785>together as in the two of us or together as in the whole of /ssft/? As in the whole of /ssft/.
>the generals topic is making friendships I would say but other then that I don't know really but I do know that you'd really like my actions to be as simple as merely having a disagreement with you but you see if it was just me who you had disagreements with and not basically everyone else here then there wouldn't of been an issue with it.What the fuck are you talking about now? Christ, can't you into sentence structure?
>as in playing football together or banter at a bar kinda way? I'd say that would come under that definition Erm, I just mean a thread to talk about football. I doubt people are gonna be meeting up irl with people they find on here, just to play some football.
>I don't know what you're seeing then as I see lots of friendship making and unfriendships makings happening all the timeLOL
Most of the times, the generals are full of the same old people. "lots of friendship making" is definitely a huge overstatement, and "unfriendships makings" (?) isn't exactly a good thing
fd68f7 No.39275
Sorry about being awol for a bit.
I find that shitposting has a clear defined term. Not knowing what a shitpost is yourself is a problem on your ennd of the table.
I find that we should have a clause against shitposting, though it shouldn't be that much of a worry since it most issues that occur on this board are arguments, bantering, and drama.
f2458e No.39291
delete the board
c6acaf No.39312
>>39291yes this seems like the best idea ever and I'll do it right now
c6acaf No.39313
fd68f7 No.40181
Seriously though, no shitposting should be a rule.
All those bloody /get/ threads taking up space.
c6acaf No.40209
88e9ef No.40478
>>40209I'll be in my corner then.
a9e576 No.40514
c6acaf No.40690
>>40478don't worry keep trying
a24e66 No.40856
c6acaf No.40908
o.k so is there anything more anyone wants to say?
5e5923 No.56624
Allowing to repost your steam ID?
6bb652 No.56627
>>56624
for what reason? you can post it anywhere else on the board
just once in the id thread
5e5923 No.56634
>>56627
I didn't know this :x
6bb652 No.56636
>>56634
yeah I don't think that part was very clear
d47e8a No.56975