JJ abrams can't film action scenes> no shot lasts for more than 1 secondIs he Michael Bay's pupil?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1449535550941.gif (702.85 KB, 448x218, 224:109, 1449534444138.gif)

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 00:45:50 No.8658

JJ abrams can't film action scenes

> no shot lasts for more than 1 second

Is he Michael Bay's pupil?

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 01:12:20 No.8659

the more time you have to focus on it, the more you see how fucking retarded it looks

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 03:27:14 No.8662

>>8659

this

michael bay can actually direct competent action scenes that have continuity to them, abrams fills the scenes with lens flare to make you forget.

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 12:46:15 No.8680

File: 1449578775990.jpg (29.95 KB, 422x681, 422:681, 9364EAFE-5B50-4BCA-8092-EF….JPG)

>what is cutting a scene down for a trailer

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 23:14:30 No.8687

I thought I was going mental for hating the new Star Trek and the editing in it. No one else seemed to have a problem with no camera shot lasting longer than five seconds. But it's legitimately annoying and does nothing to help the film.

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 23:18:20 No.8688

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>8687

Here's a good example of what I mean.

>no shot lasting longer than five seconds

>digital zoom

>lens flares

>weightless tracking shots

Stormtrooper 12/08/15 (Tue) 23:35:13 No.8689

>>8687

> I thought I was going mental for hating the new Star Trek and the editing in it.

Same

The movie got something like 95% on Rotten Tomatoes, even with the awful editing and camera placement