>>976
BB-8 is cute, R2D2 was never cute, he was always just a shitty Mary Sue.
>>978
Not really. BB-8's design is actually the original design meant for R2D2 as seen here:
>>1002
They just weren't able to make such a thing function in the old movies. Abrams had nothing to do with BB-8, he was just being a thief, stealing stuff and then trying to take the credit for it.
>>1003
Good thing BB-8 didn't end up looking like that though… that design is just some shitty steam Punk crap.
>>1006
>That's probably closer to what McQuarrie envisioned, too.
Doubtful. It looks too much like C3P0. There would be no point in such a robot if it was that much like the other one that was on legs.
rather the idea was probably closer to that "B.O.B" from "The Black Hole" which came out two years after the first Star Wars movie hit the cinemas.
>>7281
>just have r2 fuck shit up as usual
R2 fucking shit up is pretty much the only thing that shitty Mary Sue Scrappy does. In his own way, he is even worse than JarJar. I hope he gets destroyed in the next movie and is never seen again.
>the plot should have been rey coming across r2 and finding luke's saber within him, thus leading to the shit.
The plot about the Light Saber was crap and lazy writing. Finding R2 is a big nono as well since he is always being portrayed as a hero even though he was supposed to be a comic relief. Having Rey find Luke is also shit and should have been scrapped from the story.
>bb-8 is in for no other reason than making a new toy.
Why have any new characters at all? No need since we can just have the same characters do stuff instead… that way we don't have to build any more new toys!!
>>9970
This is the truth.