[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]

/strat/ - Stratagem | The Art of War

The politically incorrect guide to Warfare & Invasion

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C | Buy Bitcoin easily in the US | Buy Bitcoin anonymously all over the world | Bitcoin FAQ
Retpoŝtadreso
Komento *
Dosiero
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Enmeti
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Pasvorto (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: 1425631571787.jpg (661,82 KB, 2248x1232, 281:154, 1416173573328.jpg)

473137 No.101

We need to bridge the gap between the "alt/far right" and mainstream conservatism.

Be active in comments on mainstream conservative sites and regularly link to alt right sites.

It's already being done to a small degree. Milo linked My Posting Career in a Breitbart article (on Shanley), Ann Coulter writes for Vdare, Vdare has linked to therightstuff.biz. It's all intertwined, and we need to do our best to keep intertwining it. We can make our views mainstream with enough persistence.

I'll make another post with all the links to "ally" sites we should participate in and support.

473137 No.102

File: 1425633372817.jpg (33,4 KB, 380x550, 38:55, StatueHead.jpg)

Here are some sites we want to target (mainstream or almost mainstream sites that we can influence):
http://twitchy.com/
http://www.breitbart.com/
http://rt.com/
http://gotnews.com/
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/

And then our references that we try to inject into the popular consciousness:
>Politics/News
http://takimag.com/
http://zerohedge.com/
http://reason.com/
https://www.youtube.com/user/stefbot
http://www.vdare.com/
http://www.americanthinker.com/


>Philosophy

http://radixjournal.com/
http://www.amerika.org/

>Race/Identity

http://www.tradyouth.org/
http://www.amren.com
https://jaymans.wordpress.com/

>Neoreaction

http://freenortherner.com/
http://unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/
https://radishmag.wordpress.com/

Game/Masculinity
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/
http://returnofkings.com/

>Iron Pill

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCN0-RRaxMgh86eOwndAklxw
https://imgur.com/a/ZDPWi

>Fun/Other

http://therightstuff.biz/
http://mpcdot.com/forums/
https://www.youtube.com/user/milliondollarextreme
http://weev.livejournal.com/

All different flavors of conservatism, but the overall trend is anti PC, unafraid, and subversive. Sites like GotNews that are "almost" mainstream are REALLY ripe for redpilling.

Note that I didn't link the more explicit white nationalist sites. I just feel it would be counterproductive to link things people have a conditioned revulsion toward.

473137 No.103

File: 1425635636554.jpg (229,55 KB, 645x877, 645:877, 1420559216689.jpg)


c32590 No.121

File: 1425679454608.png (385,62 KB, 576x470, 288:235, gaystapo.png)

>AnnCoulter
She may be politically incorrect, but more importantly she's a good goy tranny.

>Her retweet of Mitt "Israel is our greatest ally" Romney:

"President Obama may ignore @netanyahu, but he cannot ignore the truth he spoke. A flimsy Iran deal amounts to presidential malpractice."

473137 No.137

>>121
Her realtalk regarding race/immigration makes her a valuable ally. I don't give 2 shits about Israel. I certainly won't burn bridges because someone wants to support them.

It's important to be "jew aware" and unapologetic about it, but that doesn't mean cutting out anyone who isn't. We would isolate a lot of otherwise valuable allies that way.

For example: Vdare is a very important site in the fight against mass immigration. They keep up to date information, don't sugarcoat anything, and have a wide range of writers. If they adopted your "No Israel supporters" ideology they would be a lot less visible.

It's more important not to stab allies in the back for realtalking about jews than it is to reject jews outright. Solidarity should trump all.

If you're really uncomfortable with it, you don't have to participate in those sites. I linked plenty of "non kosher" sites as well. MPC is especially great.

d9cda9 No.138

>>137
I don't think its wise to attack people with whom you have a lot in common either, but there are millions of twitter users,
why promote Ann Coulter? Surely there are better voices than her.

I like her as a person, but she's a total neo-con, a partisan RNC operative, who has never met a republican war she did not like
and wouldn't hesitate for a minute to sacrifice tens of thousands of americans to fight Israel's wars in the middle east.
She's also very good at pointing out problems, but then when you look at her solutions, it's just the same old RNC sellout nonsense.
Anyway, i just thought that her name stood out, because most of the links and twitter users you posted are excellent.

ddb218 No.192

>>102
Surprised to see reason.com in the second list; thought it should be in the first.

Also, zerohedge seems like extreme conspiratorial stuff to me.

ddb218 No.193

>>101
This may sound like a long shot, but also post in left-liberal sites. The twist is, attack right-wing sites. For example, if someone dissents at all from the hugbox, tell him to "go back to amren".

Some portion of readers are dissatisfied with the hugbox and will be intrigued to hear about opposition. By attacking the opposition, your comment won't get censored.

d47b23 No.200

>>193
That's actually a really good idea. I'll go try it.

5027dd No.205

It's not a long shot at all, Anon. Connections and associations are very important.

When you post a link to a resource, no matter what you say about it, there is at a chance that people might a look at it. If you don't post a link, there's absolutely no chance that people will look at it, which is why all the circle jerk astroturf websites never mention the opposition by name. It's almost comical how they avoid naming names.

it's always "that website", or that "conspiracy guy" or "some people say", "there are those who would say", etc.


5027dd No.206

>>192

Reason is a rather moderate website, compared to so many other radical right-wing websites. It's almost a policy wonk website and the articles deal almost exclusively with libertarian policies, even the news articles contain libertarian commentary.

The emphasis at zerohedge is on edge, not on hedge. They focus a lot on speculation and bleeding edge information that may or may not be accurate, in that sense it is speculative, but i haven't found them to be particularly conspiratorial.




[Reiri][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Forviŝi Afiŝon [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / ] [ b / n / boards ] [ operate / meta ] [ ]