>>58>Unsigned Infographics or Webcomics would be a good /strat/ to get the word out.>That way the shills have nothing to attack and the drones have to use their own judgement whether it is useful information or not.>Infographic and memes can spread like wildfire on forums, facebook pages, rabbit, etc.I think this avenue is promising, and I think a key element is reminding the audience that an argument stands or falls on its own merits rather than depending on who says it. This maximizes the effect of the anonymous argument and prevents shills from discrediting the argument's source.
For those who care about who is making the argument, I think a good stealth mechanism is, at the top of an infographic, quoting bluepill spokesmen like Neill Degrasse Tyson saying "The great thing about science is that it's true whether you believe it or not." or something along those lines. We really want actual quotations for those, rather than fabrications, to retain audience trust in the rest of the infographic. The idea is to co-opt the reputation of the blue pill while retaining the content of the red pill.
This would have the initial effect of cloaking the infographic in a safe blue-pill shell (because reddit types love people like NDT, or Bill Nye or whoever), softening them up for the actual redpill message, and potentially a deeper long-term impact of severing the audience from the blue pill consensus-herd due to cognitive dissonance.
I think finding excerpts from "safe" popular bluepill celebrities and using them as wrapping on our own messages (so long as they fit the infographic) kills a lot of birds with one stone:
1. Keep audience from reflexively tuning out right away
2. Make audience realize that reality is independent of hugbox consensus
3. Potentially drive a wedge between bluepill spokesmen like NDT and bluepill masses by associating said spokesmen with redpill memes about the wage gap or whatever. Audiences may not be willing to take stuff NDT says at face value anymore until they've done their own research, which is basically a win for us. Just getting people to do their own research and make their own decisions is a win for us, because it will get them in the habit of thinking independently.
Again, note that this tactic is primarily about co-opting the reputation of blue pill spokesmen for our red pill content, not about destroying the reputation of blue pill spokesmen.
It might be useful to scan bluepill subreddits for memes we can co-opt, since they'll already have audience recognition we can exploit.
tl,dr: co-opt bluepill memes as a spoonful of sugar to help the red pill go down. Obviously, if this can't be done without compromising the red pill message, it loses all value as a tactic and should not be employed. YMMV
>>58>We need new memes that have the potential to go viral or are at least attrractive enough to be reposted on other websites.If we're targeting text-only comment sections, the memes we create will obviously need to be text-only, like Heartiste's "Diversity = hunting down the last white person". Appropriately seeded in top comments like
>>54 suggested, these will be what sticks in the reader's mind even if the rest of the comment doesn't.