Evasion vs Confrontation

Retpoŝtadreso
Komento *
Dosiero	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Evasion vs Confrontation Carl von Clausewitz 05/05/15 (mar) 19:30:40 dd14f5 No.207

It is laughable how bad people are at grasping basic strategy.

They always rise in opposition to something, but the can't be arsed to promote their own values.

This leaves them in a vulnerable, reactionary position, where they're always reacting, rather than acting.

They always have to create opposition to movements that are much more advanced, because they had a massive head start. People on the right really need to learn strategy. This is pathetic.

Carl von Clausewitz 06/21/15 (dim) 02:10:18 d5597d No.211

I should write an article detailing why it is impossible to win the republican nomination, unless you have the funds to run multiple candidates at once.

The dropout & endorsement game mechanics make it virtually impossible for a non-zog candidate to win the republcian nomination, because the rethuglicans can always run someone with a similar platform who cuts into your poll numbers and that person can then drop out and endorse the zog candidate. Take Fred Thompson. His only mission was to suck McCain's dick and to shit on Huckabee and Romney (not that they're any better) He made a ridiculously low number of traditional campaign stops and he had "rallies" where there were more Ron Paul supporters protesting him outside, than bussed in rent-a-crowd supporters inside. During the debates he spent his precious time bashing Huckabee and Romney instead of promoting himself, what any real candiate would've done. The game is rigged from start to finish.