/svidya/ - Strictly Vidya Games

I'll allow it for now, but try to keep the meta contained in the meta thread please.

Okay I guess the meta thread is full so keep it in here.

>>18555 (checked)

already on it

>>18547

Or you could just stay here and chat about video games. It's pretty comfy anon.

Anyone here want to link to the archives in the sticky?

Don't have access to my proxxy shit.

>>18549

So Mark says to keep meta in the sticky and then you posted meta in the only sticky and he banned you for it? Am I correct on this?

>>18560

Some people were expressing their banter about how Mark refuses to do anything about shitposting.

He then replied with some stupid fucking shit about how he wasn't going to ban furry porn dump the Undertale general.

Some anon asked him to fuck off for changing the story, and he then banned him for "meta posting"

Mark is about as competent as Anthony Burch.

>>18560

He

>made a meta post on the sticky about Kojima

>started deleting posts and banning people for "meta"

>deleted every fucking post, restarting the thread

>"wow you guys stop bringing meta shit to the sticky"

>bans everyone who complains

Mark is just a /b/tard from 2011 during one of the worst years of /bwithvideogames/ and he just happened to get lucky snagging /v/ on 8ch. It's high time people realized it already.

>>18559

Only caught one of the links before he deleted the post.

https://archive.is/C83Lx

>>18566

https://archive.is/UuhtG

I have this

Just so all you guys know I like this board already.

We'll bring it back.

>>18568

Believe it or not that was some /a/non who made those two ads.

>>18569

Yeah, the owner needs to just do one thing about the shitposting rule and then maybe if the Mark Internet Defense Force doesn't show up we're set.

If there are threads up, post pictures there.

Its already looking like those /intl/niggers are trying to milk this, we can't have that

>>18572

Just wanna say I'm working on it. Looks like the old meta thread actually reached post limit so I finally have to get off my ass and compose a new one already.

Do see >>18138 though.

And while I'm in here.

>>18561

Define "shitpost".

You're welcome to articulate how OP is a fag however you please, but trying to shit up a discussion with lazy spam that only promotes others to do the same is just a recipe for board sliding.

When you decide that you have the insight to discern whether or not a thread deserves to be shat up, it empowers other people to do the same. Perhaps you personally are wise enough to do it responsibly, but the inevitable result from that is that other crybabies who aren't so wise end up using the same tactics to kill discussions whenever they have to deal with opinions they can't handle.

>>18576

When I say "shitpost", I mean just sage while telling OP to fuck off or rolling for dubs.

It wouldn't really be much of a "slipery slope" since all it would be for is if OP and other anons cannot react to critcism and starts to damage control and ruin his own thread.

Basically, if someone makes a CoD thread, gets told why CoD is shit, and then starts shouting "FUCKING GAMERGATE WEABOOS", then some red flags need to go off.

>>18567

Here, take this.

https://archive.is/kyOK1

>every thread people post links to the threads

>Mark deletes them instantly

>"I-ITS ONLY THOSE FAGGOTS WANT GENERALS BANNED"

Its amazing how good the goys are being

>>18547

Just moved on over from /v/. I think Mark's finally hit the point of no return.

>>18582

Nice. Welp, I'm done with /v/

Hello /svidya/, I'm anonymous, it's nice to be here.

>>18582

Seriously now?

Jesus christ.

>>18586

>the vibe you should treat posting here like a job and act professional about it

You can have banter at work and also be a complete wiseass IF you are good at it and dont forget the goal

Hell because we are buddies you can safely talk about gassing jews and throwing gypsies into the sea IF it is on topic or just small chit-chat before or after a topical answer

Also where's HW when we need him, his IRC can be that good

>>18582

Well For some reason I was unbanned but i'm going to guess i am going to get banned for even linking to here in that thread.

Whatever.

>>18576

I deleted my post to try and post it in the sticky instead but it's full. You should make a new sticky since the board has a new owner and REALLY needs a new rule sticky.

What I tried to post in the sticky:

">>18448

Yeah you need to make a new sticky. This one is awful and conveys an extremely autistic control freak vibe that would make any sane person do a 180 and leave. This board seems pretty good from looking through the catalog, but the current sticky suggests otherwise. These rules feel like posting here is a professional job."

>>18590

Have a look at >>>/justvideogames/1 for what I have in mind for the rules. I'm kind of afraid of not being strict-control-freak enough though because I don't want to kill what population this board has left. Some users seem dead set on the old no-fun-allowed policies that the previous owner implemented.

>>18589

There has to be more context than that.

>>18591

Eliminating all fun is going to bleed the population, not save it. There would be plenty of chances to get people here with Mark sperging out so much lately, but that sticky will scare a lot of people away.

I just want a /v/ without the sperglord kike owner, the template threads, and the "I don't like this game so I'm going to spend half an hour spamming it instead of just filtering this thread" which doesn't do anything but generate shitposting from what otherwise would have been a thread that got bumped off the board with zero replies or an actual video game discussion. Calling OP a faggot is fine and all, but when you've got people with a dozen or more posts saying the anon doesn't like this game with 4 smug anime girl images attached to each one, something needs to be done.

The post you linked to looks good enough to just straight up copy paste into our own sticky.

>>18592

What do you mean? The last owner of this board was even more of a sperg than Mark from what I remember.

>>18592

I was initially banned for spam in the second sticky Mark made about Kojima leaving. The ban was removed along with I'm assuming the rest of the bans he made in that thready. I made that post in the screencap to of course test if I could post again and I was banned again.

Seems all the bans have been lifted once again and a new meta sticky is up. Probably a honeypot.

>>18592

I thought you were replying to my post, ignore >>18593

>>18593

>>18591

Actually, I just realized it can all be summed up much nicer: ban anyone who uses sage as a downvote.

>>18598

>filtered the archive links

WEW

LAD

>>18593

>template threads

I have mixed feelings about these. On the one hand they can be annoying to people with thin skin, on the other hand they almost always genuinely do lead to some quality discussion within them. I guess it's a matter of whether or not someone is spamming them.

So what's the argument against IDs? I didn't/don't mind them, being able to keep track of who I'm talking to seems like a nice feature.

>>18603

I feel ashamed to admit it, but I've grown reliant on IDs for that same reason. I can live without them though.

>>18602

And really, a template thread can be something as simple as trying to start up a discussion through a humorous meme. Are we so pretentious that we need to write an original-work-do-not-steal thesis for every OP? Is "Now that the dust has settled (tee hee) let's talk about X game" really so bad?

>>18603

see

>>7088 and >>18220

Basically we've been doing a test run without them for a couple months now. Doesn't seem to have been the sort of angry reaction that I was expecting so maybe it's fine if it stays this way now. I sure hope it can.

>>18607

Thanks, BO. Have flags been discussed?

>>18608

I can't even remember at this point. If there was ever an argument against them I must have missed it. Do you want them enabled? I guess the only possible concern is they might invite off-topic nationalist shitflinging.

>>18609

The only optional flag I'd want is :^) to denote sarcasm. Country flags I make me disappointed in my fellow countrymen's shitposting, so I'm not arguing for those.

>>18609

I thought he was talking about video game themed flags.

The only way I get along on /v/ is by ignoring Mark completely, if he makes it so that I can do that then I'm moving to another board. I would be already gone if one had some decent population.

Mark still gettin BTFO

>>>/v/6598473

I gave up on /v/ a few weeks back when Mark said something along the lines of /b/ garbage always having a place there. And no, I didn't screencap it and 8archive had just gone down. Fuck me.

>>18616

with jews you lose :^(

>>18619

I'm shit at design, so >>18618 is all I can provide that's of reasonable quality.

>>18617

>>18618

You could have just ripped off the one from /v/.

>>18619

/fighters/ has a sticky for to post their OC banners and flags, you could make a temporary thread for that.

Though I don't really think they're important, they can sort of work like IDs without it being thread-permanent.

Just something to think about.

>>18623

I figured if the board's going to be different from /v/, stealing flags isn't a great starting point. Sticky is a good idea though.

So, its time we make a montage of this to redpill anons.

Anyone got all the links for it?

>>18621

Are they enabled yet?

>>18625

Mark's digging himself pretty deep in the sticky currently

>>18626

That was my reply, not BO

>>18621

Hes trying to change the topic of the thread.

Fucking hell.

Wait so when you delete a board flag it also kills all the posts that used it?

>>>/v/6599271

TOP KOK

GUYS GET THE FUCK IN THE THREAD HES DOING IT AGAIN

>>18635

Guess so.

Also, what do you think of generals?

THE FIRE RISES ONCE AGAIN

>>18638

I'm not a fan of the retarded term "general thread" and think they often run counter to natural spontaneous anonymous discussion. But as long as they don't clutter up the board it shouldn't be a problem.

Holy shit how did Mark even get a cult like this

>>18641

Brought them in from plebit himself, probably.

>>18641

Same as any e-celeb gets their cult.

>>18640

I like generals because they tend to have the best quality. Unless you go to meme generals like Undertale which are just pure cancer.

>>18641

He's a Jew, that shit comes naturally.

>>18644

Agreed. When it's game discussion and not an excuse for a thread full of shitposting. My main difficulty with /v/ is that metaposting is punished, while constant OT shitposting or general threadshitting is fine. The dubs rule only makes the problem worse.

>>18647

>everyone who disagrees with Mark is X boogeyman

He pulls the same shit to be fair.

>>18647

Except most of those people who are defending his ass are using the same excuses, its obvious its his fucking group of fags.

>>18650

The majority of them have a single post in the thread too, it's clear it just some random faggots instead of people who are actually concerned.

>>18641

Remember when he attracted Reddit guys from /r/Gaming in their crisis?

Hard to put down your "savior", especially when being a plebbitor

/pol/ was right once again

>>18648

Yes, because doing the same thing won't just stir shit up.

Come on anons.

I really wouldn't mind an alternative to /v/ but pulling this shit won't net anons.

Doesn't it cross your mind that people have different opinions? I highly doubt Mark has called the JIDF.

It's like calling everyone with a different opinion an SJW.

>>18647

Any time someone comes out to defend him they just say "Oh, it's just shitposters sperging out", "Oh, it's just /ints/-l/"

You can't criticize him for being the huge fucking autistic faggot he is, and for how little he does to help the board improve in any way, self moderation has been countless times proven to be ineffective, as seen by the constant "drama" as he likes to call it. Yet he refuses to change model, dismisses any kind of suggestion and proceeds to close meta threads without having come to ANY conclusion.

No matter what your standing is with the complaints people are making over generals/niggerspeak are, this man is not qualified for the role he's been provided out of nothing but sheer badluck.

>>18652

Actually I don't think he did, when that shit was happening he made a sticky telling them to go to Voat.co or halfchan and not to stay on /v/. By far the only worthwhile things he's done in my opinion.

>>18654

>different opinion

Except its literally the same shit every post.

>>18657

and the other side is mentioning literally the same shit every post. There's cancer on both sides, anon.

/svidya/ is going to be /v/'s new boogeyman. Calling it now.

>>18656

Oh, but you remember that when he did that it was because of all the fallout shit he got in the previous thread he also deleted

This is not his first time doing that, he literally invited them then told them to switch to Voat after HW made the statement about Voat being more friendly for them

>>18659

It already was for a time, before /vvv/ also showed it's ugly head.

>>18659

You mean mark and his cliques new boogeyman?

>>18659

I remember in the early days /sv/ was already used by people scared of "rulecuckery"

It's still used by some but very rarely

>>18659

I'll be very disappointed if that happens.

>>18658

Because one side is giving evidence, and telling people to fucking look it up

and the other is just spamming MARK YES

>>18666 (czeched)

Yes, but to scream "IT'S THE MIDF, ONLY THE MIDF" as the thread goes on doesn't credit our own argument at all. Continue presenting evidence, and stop sperging at everyone who disagrees.

>>18659

in b4 self-fulfilling prophecy

>>18667

Who else would it be?

Who else would look at all this shit and think "yeah this is perfectly fine?"

>>18670

Get to it, jeez!

>>18671

Redditors and retards, which are high in supply on /v/.

>>18670

Alright, let's make an oath not to abandon the board again.

>>18673

>Redditors and retards

So Marks clique?

>>18671

Do you seriously believe Mark, as autistic as he is, has a defense force he can just call up when he's being shat on? No. Retards and the generally uninformed (along with some that are actually biased towards Mark) will defend him. Screaming about some boogyman clique just makes us look retarded.

>>18679

DARK MESSIAH OF MIGHT & MAGIC

>>18671

You understimate the masses, even after the m00tlecaust there will be comformity

>>18670

People are too scared of discussing vidya

We should make several hub threads that fuel userbase activity (but not really generals), that being i dont know, i was thinking of doing a collector's thread for recommendations and possible hypothetical trading now that the Bus has passed to history as a myth

There's obvious problems to that so i was just thinking of doing a small chit-chat one, i dont know, last time i made a thread was on /sp/ back in 2011

>>18680

Just about all the current activity is in this thread though.

>>18683

I had an idea for a while, basically a game of the week thread. Every week we pick a game to talk about and play, obvious multiplayer and easy to acquire through piracy/volafile/etc

>>18685

I'm definitely interested, we can have it stickied and posted on time easily as well since the owner isn't a fag

>>18679

>DmC, the combat was simple and comfy. Story was shit and far too edgy and pretty much worse in every way than a typical DMC game.

>I really enjoyed the the KF1 combat, and the bugs that became part of it (crouching/jumping hunting shotgun, etc). Nothing groundbreaking or innovative there, though.

>Mostly stuff involving exploration, Antichamber was a fun little ride

>Nope. Some jokes are best delivered that way, and I've never been a "muh immersion" type of gamer.

>>18679

Its no where near a favorite, but I pirated Far Cry 4 and enjoyed

MGS3

Ice

I don't take it seriously.

>>18674

I'm in again

Its just that waiting for a reply gets tough

I was one that though quality discussion would attract people, and seriously, we did have a blast for 2 weeks, but that wasn't enough

I will stay here, even as a crossposter, but what if it goes 2PP again?

>>18685

Sounds good, but once a week seems a little advanced, why not once every 10 days or more (due to multiplayer), also space for planning the next one

>>18686

>Sticking piracy

Not so much that the BO is a fag but that sounds hazardous for him, maybe just let it free, i mean i dont think it will get bumped out around these parts

>>18692

I want to work on making some OC to get people to fuck off to here.

We won't last if we don't separate anons from the Mark clique.

>>18693

Whatever works man

>>18685

This is the sort of thing I wanted to get out of the Retro Game Gauntlet Plus (people to actual talk about game mechanics) but sadly interest petered out and then Trebek disappeared.

>>18694

I'm just afraid that shilling /svidya/ will only make things worse for us.

>>18698

Was gonna do it on /v/ but mark permabanned me for disagreeing with him

Well i'm burnt out for the night so I'm gonna sleepbthis shit off.

You guys better not have bailed this place for Mark's dick like a beaten wife when I wake up. I want to see some quality discussion when I wake up.

>>18679

>WHAT IS YOUR FAVORITE VIDEO GAME THAT YOU HAVE A HARD TIME OBJECTIVELY DEFENDING IN QUALITY EVEN THOUGH YOU REALLY ENJOYED IT?

My guiltiest pleasure is Take On Mars. For me, it was a great way to relax, to figure out how to get from site to site efficiently with as many science stops as possible, to feel the challenges of navigating a rover on Mars, and to fiddle around with the semi-programmable command system with the rovers to see just how shit of a real NASA technician I could be.

In reality it's a fucking snoozefest for most people and the learning curve, especially with the very tight early-game economy, is near-insurmountable. It's really obtuse sometimes and it's tedious at best with no real goals other than "go explore shit on Mars and maybe draw dicks"

>WHAT GAME DO YOU THINK HAS THE BEST TYPE OF COMBAT SYSTEM, OR WAYS TO INTERACT WITH THE ENEMY IF IT'S NOT VIOLENT?

Combat system? In terms of action games, definitely a toss-up between the combat system in Majora's Mask or Windwaker.

In terms of strategy games of any type? Hearts of Iron 3, especially since it's pretty moddable. I love having a tooltip detailing a particular unit's combat bonuses in understandable and clear-to-read sense, instead of War in the East's absolutely autistic system.

>WHAT ARE YOUR FAVORITE KINDS OF PUZZLES IN A VIDEO GAME?

I honestly don't even know. Perhaps the puzzles that aren't presented as puzzles outright?

>DOES BREAKING THE FOURTH WALL IN A GAME MAKE YOU IDENTIFY WITH IT MORE AS THE PLAYER OR DOES IT PREVENT YOU FROM TAKING IT SERIOUSLY ANYMORE?

As long as it isn't cringeworthy or "MAN THAT DECISION WAS STUPID, HEY YOU EVER WONDER IF SOMETHING IS CONTROLLING US?"

>>18700

Doing ads and recruiting helped 8c/v/ back in September, those were tough lads, but in the end it killed us because they kept doing it way until December (the newfag winter)

If we really want to recruit then we must know what kind of people we want, obviously guys who can discuss but where do we get those and what advantages can we give here other than being a quality place with tough no non-sense mods (or at least that was back in the day when the founders were /pol/ vets)

And i know some of you dont like them but i have the feeling the original /pol/-/v/ crossposters from the early days can be way easy to grab

Just my 2 useless cents on the matter

>>18717

Easy

No newfags

and no Markfags.

How we get them, make a chart showing the entire events fold out. That way, the smart ones will move, and the retards will continue to rot in their own hell.

>>18722

>no newfags

That attitude will only ensure the slow death of your community.

You shouldn't turn away new people as a matter of principle. What you should be doing is trying to mold new users into the kind of posters you actually want to interact with. If they refuse to comply, then you tell them to fuck off. The phrase "lurk more" has always been apt.

>>18717

Fuck recruiting, let people find their own way, like most of use

>>18722

Maybe its just me but I also think spoonfeeding especially if its shit that can easily be found can lead to desegregation

>>18726

Maybe he meant newfags as in 12yo mememasters, for that we already have ourselves and the mods to ban the excess of it

Newfags as in since 2012 posters then it would be tough, everyone was a newfag once, but we had education, the mandatory one year browsing /b/ (after going or seeing old forums) and then going to another board

Completely agree with molding new users in the ways but they should not be so new, this i mean with lads derailing threads because someone posted goatse or forgetting to stay on topic

>>18729

>let people find their own way

Just like 9 months ago? i dont like the concept itself but it needs to be done, obviously not in a large scale but we need at least 10 new users, we are maybe 8 to 15 here, we are going to be running in an endless labyrinth talking to each other to the point we will recognize each other

Quality content makes them stay but it doesn't attract them in the first place

>TPP might pass

>Trump might win

>WWIII is a possibility

>/v/ crumbles

Just fucking end it

>>18732

I'll be honest, I have never actually used Imageboards in my entire life until last year when the GG thing went down. It was posted all over the place I came from so I got curious and found my way here and I guess I stuck around for some reason.

>>18739

Is it possible to just switch BOs? How was it possible, that this place got new moderator(owner) and /vp/'s?

Mark doesn't deserve to own it

>>18741

Mark is pretty buddy buddy with Hotwheels, unfortunately.

>>18741

When a board owner doesn't show up for X amount of time someone else can try to grab it through the e-mail process.

>>18742

Can we somehow take this to court? This shit is unfair

>>18740

>For some reason

Well, but the thing i never understand is how some users, newfag as they can be, adapt so well

This place is kinda clean compared to the old days but still we are very liberal in the use of slangs and derogatory words, along with strong ideologies for the mainstream and lewd/gore images, like a sailor pub.

That's the thing i meant to mandatory runs in harsh and erratic places, newfags generally can't stand it or they end up crazy

What's your opinion on that transition? where you already initiated on that or you just don gave a fuck? i ask this because it can shape the way we can attract people in a hypothetical, far out improvable but still possible idea to grab outsiders

>>18741

You can mail HW and explain your reasons for the coup, then he would judge the move

Markike is an old buddy from Jew York in the crisis days so him removing the BO status is very improvable, he would slap his shit and grab his balls but kick him is not gonna happen soon

This place i don't remember how it switched BO but i think the old one just settled down and let another take in, i might be wrong thou

>>18745

My guess/opinion is that we should let him run loose, playing the coup game seems that it can bite us in the future, HW is not going to be forever and one of the guys in line is no other than The Jew

>>18746

The original owner/founder disappeared along with their volunteers and then the board became up for grabs and an anon got it. Then that owner disappeared after about a few weeks and it became up for grabs again and then the new owner stepped up and took over.

So the sticky is over, now, how do we get people to join?

We don't want to make the same mistakes the other boards made.

our focus should not be gaining people, but spreading the truth about Mark.

>>18746

>whats your opinion on that transition?

I dont really even know If i have an opinion on it. Ever since I came here its been kind of a blur. I'm numb to gore, i made it past the panda, I've fapped to many fetishes i didnt think i've ever had, and experienced how anonymity can make discussion flourish (in the right environment). and I only just turned 18 last week

Its really not as bad as people make it out to be, or I'm just really thick skinned.

>>18754

>crossboarding Markfags

Sorry for caring about /v/, didn't like 7 people call you out for that stupid logic?

>>18756

>everyone who disagrees with me is a markfag

>everyone who disagrees with me is /intl/

You really are a special kind of stupid.

>>18757

>There's no need for a holy crusade against Mark, which happens to make /svidya/ look like shit.

It's why every board in the past has failed to dethrone /v/.

>>18757

We don't want to advertise against Mark, what we are doing is calling out Marks bullshit.

They have like 50 options to go to, chances are they would go to this one.

besides, it would funny watching /svidya/ be a scapegoat

>>18759

The people who called me out for being >(72) was Mark and some other Markfag.

You do the math nigger.

>>18757

Well, half of the recent discussion is how will this place move

You know, ACTUAL discussion

Also roasting a jew is always fun

>>18762

>besides, it would funny watching /svidya/ be a scapegoat

What you're doing is sabotaging the chances of /svidya/ and other boards to be a decent alternative.

If you can't see that, you are delusional.

>>18765

Do you have any idea how a scapegoat works.

A scapegoat is formed when people only think someone is responsible, with hardly any proof. Half of the board is sick of that kike's management anyway.

I'm telling you, we don't advertise our board at all, we just show people why theirs is shit.

>>18769

But why is it so hard?

Shit moderation along with shitposting not being dealt with

>>18736

>the previous alternative /v/s.

Wasn't /svidya/ one of the earlier alternative /v/s here?

>>18769

As much I dont like the idea of bothering with /v/ anymore, I'm going to have to agree with you.

I dont know how we are going to do that when the Meta thread is gone.

>>18659

It's been that for a LONG time now from what I've seen, sadly. A lot of times someone would note a quality drop on /v/, I'd see people around saying stuff like the people here at /svidya/ were the ones causing it to try to get more people to come here. And from what I'd seen, there didn't seem to be any coordinated effort to do anything like that here.

>>18674

I wouldn't say I abandoned it (I usually checked back once or twice a day to see if any threads I'd been interested in had gotten any replies), but once too many people leave, people aren't going to take the time to post as much since they may or may not get a response (or hell, the person they were replying too might not even be around to read it anymore). Nice to see there be such an influx of posts here today though.

>>18750

Personally, I'd prefer to have a board grow on its own since being proactive about getting new people from other boards seems to just cause people to head there to start shit. Not sure if that's much of an option here though. Still, maybe see if some of the other vidya related boards might be willing to toss a link into their headers or whatever? /vr/ might be open to it, especially since they're already in the board header.

>>18752

>Its really not as bad as people make it out to be, or I'm just really thick skinned.

It's a little of both, don't want to sound like an oldfag or an elitist but back in the days things were a little more xtreme and lawless with berserk mods who somewhat shared our ideals and tried to stay on the ground so we wouldnt call them out

The wild west story of W.T. Snacks comes to mind

Also were where u wen GG hapen?

>>18749

>disappeared along with their volunteers

>Then that owner disappeared

Ruh roh, then i dont know the new guy

>>18761

The thing with /sv/ (or at least what this place was supposed to be) is that we are the more strict, hardline place with no fear of mods blasting their hammer. Also casual /pol/ crossposters

That makes it restrictive and not really an equal to /v/, we are just a cousin or something, but that was the idea months ago, i dont know now.

So does increasing our numbers depend solely ONLY on the /v/ user pool?

>>18765

Sooner or later IF /sv/ progresses it will become a boogey or a scapegoat, that's why it will be fun to watch, what will be the reasons for the scare

>>18769

>we just show people why theirs is shit

That's the same thing as advertising, unless you mean advertising as in slapping images with "Come Home Game Man" captions

>>18775

Also were where u wen GG hapen?

Funnyjunk

>>18776

I want them to stop. It makes /svidya/ look bad, and it's no way to bring over new posters.

>>18773

It takes time, maybe post it here a little bit, and then move onto /v/.

>>18776

So then, you got a recommendation on what to do?

Or are you just going to bend over and listen to what Mark tells you, because if you had some intelligence you would be helping us.

>>18773

wait for the next one?

>>18778

It is kinda rude to the anons that were just fine here before us.

>>18775

>That's the same thing as advertising

Not if we don't add /svidya/ to it, just make some infographs to call them out.

>>18775

>Ruh roh, then i dont know the new guy

If you read through the sticky they've been here posting around since the board was made.

>>18782

Again, we aren't doing this for the purpose of getting new users.

If anything, I am doing this for the purpose of educating anons on who their owner is.

If anything, we should focus on ways to keep them AWAY from /svidya/ so that they think more about the evidence and not "what if this person is selling me something"

>>18786

Then stop mentioning /svidya/ when you're bashing Mark. One doesn't need to be intertwined with the other.

Do you think we should spread infomation to other boards like /pol/?

>>18788

You mean those links to this thread?

That was because the evidence as a whole was here, including most of the screenshots and archive links.

I might have been throwing in a "everyones gonna come to /sv/" at some points, but still.

>>18791

/pol/ wouldn't miss a chance to jump on a jew

>>18791

Although /pol/ has its own moderation problems, they don't give two shits about /v/ and would probably do it.

>>18794

The purpose isn't to dethrone /v/ you fucking idiot, its to get people to learn Mark is not a good BO

And the problem is exactly what you said, no one pays attention. That shit will bite them all on the ass.

>>18794

>I'm done with trying to reason with you faggots.

Suit yourself, have fun defending Mark.

Just wait until you get banned once you say something bad about Nintendo.

And I just noticed something about this board, why don't we have IDs?

If don't agree with then, then at least put a little UID counter at the bottom of the thread.

>>18802

We used to have IDs but yeah I would like the UID at the bottom

>>18797

I know exactly what you're feeling. I was one of his biggest defenders too.

https://archive.is/2j8Fl

Up to date archive with all posts and Mark refusing to answer questions.

>>18808

I havent gone back in over a year now.

by the way people seem to imply this all started because of niggerspeak. Right now I don't even care about it. I just want that kike gone

>>18803

>Then fuck off retard

Its like you just took the second part of that sentence and threw in the trash.

Look, what we are trying to do is distance /svidya/ from telling people why Mark is a shit tier BO. Making a "better /v/" wouldn't work because there are so many people attached to /v/ that they would not leave because some other place is less shit.

>and everyone else

You and what army?

And you are acting like I am the only person speaking for us, like I am a leader or some shit. Why are you basing everyone who left because of Marks bullshit on me?

>>18812

Its been built up with useless meta threads that dont get shit done because of the 2 shitposters that whine at the slightest hint that they might not be able to shitpost something.

Then Mark listens to them instead of the 15 anons that say he should change something.

I'm over it

>>18812

i just saw mark being a fag, and was seeing meta shit banned everywhere, so i made a thread like he said i could, got banned for it and am determined to get an answer for it, or rather use this event to raise awareness of his shittiness, since hes never going to respond, being autistic and all.

>>18814

would you at least consider bringing this banning bullshit to his attention next thread?

>>18816

I cant promise it will help but i'll try.

For now i'm going to masturbate and fall asleep.

I think what this place needs is just a solid 100 posters with a decent PPH. I've gotten used to slower boards so I wouldn't mind staying here.

>>18808

>their lack of faith might grow but what else

What else would we need?

If anything, we are trying to replace their faith with passion, to look for a better future.

>if campaigns happen then people will get Spongebob mad and it will ruin the image of a better /v/

Would it really get people mad? We moved here because our free speech was in jeopardy, we want the people who know what true free speech is and who don't defend some fat fucking looser on the internet.

>Wasn't the purpose make /sv/ a good and reliable alternative?

/svidya/ is already a reliable alternative.

We're not even fully trying to get people here, we just want the kike gone.

>>18813

Vendettafags like you have killed every alternative so far. Focusing on Mark doesn't help shit.

It's also the reason why 8ch as a whole has hit a wall, because hotwheels has been focused too much on one upping jewt/g00k and not building a better imageboard community like before. Hopefully that will change with Infinity Next rolling out at the end of the year.

>>18818

Same here. Its pretty comfy. Its probably gonna be faster during daytimes.

>>18814

Anon, you're looking at it wrong.

What Mark did was not based on what the context was it was based on him

>not ignoring shit

>exaggerating shit and making a big deal out of it

>censoring shit and pretending it never happened

He is under this strange idea that because he is a BO with ban/delete powers, he can delete what he puts on the internet.

>>18824

banning me for nothing makes him a bad mod in my book. along with tripfagging and abusing his position to win argumnts.

at this point i dont care who goes to what board, i just want everyone to know how much of a faggot he is.

>>18824

I'm not saying that as a board, we should make our focus taking out the jew. Of coarse we have to care and tend to this board as much as we can.

But we still have to get people to realize how shitty Mark is, keep that away from /svidya/

Please stop raiding /v/

>>18840

>muh /svidya/ boogeymen

It's happening

>>18840

We're not.

Most of those here that are actually raiding /v/ are actually from /v/ in the first place and just using this place to… whatever they're doing.

We are not buying. /v/irgins are buying and selling to themselves.

>>18840

People hating /v/ and wanting to move to a new board isn't a raid, it's the way 8chan is literally supposed to work

Besides this board is shit anyway, we just need a new regular ass /v/

All right anons, cooked up a new meta thread finally in case it wasn't obvious. Please have a look.

>>18831

>>18847

I'm assuming you want us to keep the Mark sperg out related stuff in this thread, and use the meta thread for actual meta related things?

>>18849

It would be preferred if you could keep meta discussion in the meta sticky in the future, but I don't want to mess up the discussion that's already been established in this one.

>>18868

Would you have preferred that this board stayed dead?

>>18868

>meta

It's one thread.

>/bwithvideogames/

Not seeing that shit anywhere.

>>18735

>Trump might win

Why are you listing a good thing alongside bad things?

>4 posts per hour currently

>everyone just came to bitch about mark and then promptly went back to /v/

wew

>>18894

Well it did happen at a certain time of the day. Hasn't been 24 hours yet.

Just keep in mind one thing. Do not cannibalize each other over faggots who think this board is a boogeyman. These people who think this place is some evil big bad board don't deserve any response. Just talk about vidya and have fun. Don't focus too much on the /meta/, focus more on the fun. A small community of anons who enjoy themselves is far better than a massive community filled with retards. 20/30PPH is good enough for me.

That will be my last post on this meta thread, I'll go and have some fun on this board.

>>18895

Whoever that guy is that actually racked up like 70 fucking posts gave us a really bad name and made us all seem like shitposting 12 year olds.

Is it just me or is the 8ch ban list suddenly not allowed to be viewed?

>>18898

Probably just a site thing, doubt it has anything to do with this

>>18894

I'm still here you fucking nigger.

>>18894

I cant exactly post when I'm working on stuff

I'm not really active till evening time usually 7pm-whenever I go to sleep

>>18571

>>18568

Ad guy here, should I keep that one up or do you guys have suggestions for a different screencap/ad links?

https://0x0.st/iuf.png

>>18904

Archived kojimmy thread

Try to work with the picture showing the ban

I have seen many posts deleted for calling out the jew and the janitors

Some real Cuckchannery going on

>>18905

>he defends cuckchan mods

>for free

>>18907

Just got a 3 day ban for posting doubles in a shit thread. Wew.

>>18909

It won't be for that long but you'll get the same ban for pulling that shit here.

>>18911

This place doesn't have nearly as many shit threads though, why would I need to post doubles?

It was an Undertale thread with the majority of posts being porn

>>18909

Good.

>>18917

If the mods actually did their job, nobody would need to post doubles.

>>18630

whew, that's starting to look like /pol/'s ban lists

>>18918

You don't need to at all ever. Retards who use sage as a downvote (yes, that is exactly what dubspam is) do nothing but bait replies in threads that would otherwise die.

>>18609

If the board remains slow-ish and there's one poster from a particular country, flags make that poster an unintentional tripfag.

See: Toothpaste in /sp/

>starts using niggerspeak

>defends undertale threads being pure unfiltered cancer

>smugs all over people complaining about the board sucking

>wonders why people are getting mad and leaving

I hope this board succeeds, I really do. This and >>>/politics/ need to take off and stay semi-busy.

>>18932

We can pray, both /v/ and /pol/ have the problems of being "too big to fail" and name recognition. At least /pol/ is dying out.

So, how are we going to get the news across?

Word has it one of you fucking idiots tired to make a thread on /pol/.

>>18933

/pol/'s growing numbers wise, but the quality's dropped like a rock and the moderation there's awful. I'm not expecting /32/ quality from the place, but the idea of a smaller, higher-quality board is attractive, and I think /politics/ and /svidya/ can fill the niche.

I do agree with the BO that moderating for quality doesn't work. The user base has to buy in. /v/'s doesn't. However, bad moderation can send the users the wrong message. A lot of /pol/ buys into what imkampfy does, but those are the same posters who do nothing but meme and search for happenings that aren't coming. It's better to let the community dictate where the board goes and clean up obvious problems as they arise.

>>18938

>/pol/'s growing numbers wise

not in long term trends, they've been losing members over the last year or so

>The user base has to buy in

Absolutely spot on, if the user base doesn't want quality discussion/posting, then there's nothing moderation can do. Poor moderation however can accelerate the degradation of any given site.

>>18939

http://stats.4ch.net/8chan/displaytable.php?file=pol

There's definitely growth if you look at post count, which is where I think the health of the board is. /v/ has flatlined over the last year.

>>18941

>post count, which is where I think the health of the board is

Thats a point, I was going by UID, but that's fairly easy to spoof up

>>18685

I still like this idea. Maybe make a thread for it already?

anyone looking at the current /v/ meta thread?

>>18904

good one would be a side by side of one showing him to tell people to fuck off for asking for filters, right next to where he filtered the archive links

>>18974

Link it?

One of the guys from /ggrevolt/ is advertising this board on /v/. Expect raids soon.

>>18978

Welcome home

What thread was it?

>>18979

Probably any of Mark's many pet threads

>>18980

you guys leave mark alone

>>18931

>The Jamaican Ass Bro

>The Krygystan No-TV mountain lad

>The Bosnian shithead

>The Macedonian from McDonalds and the Macedonian who is confused for the one from McDonalds

>The U.S. Virgin Islands Virgin

>The Somali Football Pirate

>The South African Dove

Good times /sp/, good times

>>18989

I remember how asshurt that Kyrgyz guy would get if you called him a Mongol and said he was shitposting in a yurt. It was funny because 95% of his posts were shit talking the US, but as soon as you fired back, he'd dump spaghetti all over the thread.

>>18991

I still say he's an idiot for encouraging cancer rather than filtering it

>>18992

Yeah he always got defensive, i remember when he made that thread about his country (without mention of sports) and we just gave him hell with the banter

Overall apart from being a spaghetti dispenser when people gave the bantz he was quite nice and did have some decent opinions

Also he said americans were shit and etc (who DIDN'T say that on /sp/ at one moment?) and that australians were better, minutes later strayas ruined his thread asking him about what he fished on the river or what oracle did he use to know the result of a football game

Strayas have to be the most piss-taking (sometimes literally) social group i have seen on any board, those guys were another thing, no wonder m00t hated them

/v/ has a lot undercover and they dont show their colors unless asked about game prices and Mortal Kombat

Oh and dont forget Israel, there was a point when mods banned them on sight just for the banter

>>18979

it was

ARE YOU A BOY OR A GIRL? the pokemon one

>buying an ad

Strict is the opposite of what /v/ needs. This isn't a real alternative to /v/.

>>18996

>if he filtered cancer he would be filtering half the board

That's what he did in September/October

There was a point in late November that if he banned all the shitposting (that was somewhat considerable), there would've been little backlash

It was until December that newfags outnumbered the old ones, newfags as in people who came late and didn't know how stuff worked before, so they just realized the board was well-managed (it wasn't) and stayed there, then lot of people later came and didnt know anything better so they just settled

Mods helped in the early days, but honestly it was the users who actually TRIED to up their post quality, didnt shitpost AT ALL and made on-spot threads, we were good like the oldfag legends said about 2004-2005 /v/

Also 60 to 100 PPH helped mods a lot, 150 in weekends

>>18998

>real alternative to /v/

Well not really, it's just a niche board for certain tastes (more focus on posts), also the name is legacy, the rules are more lax than before, but there's still rules

>>19000

Nice get and good points.

Too bad Mark is too fucking dumb to ever realize how incompetent he is. Such is the problem of fucking morons, they never realize just how dumb they are.

>>19000

well i was a newfag by your definition, and i wasnt an ebin '04 oldfag ( i actually ahvent been to halfchan since like 09, and even then i was a /b/tard) but i still tried very hard to make substantive posts on topics i was knowledgeable about, and tried to ask non-retarded questions on topics i knew nothing about. and what to i get in return? fucking banned without justification and refused an explanation.

and that it what pisses me off more than anything about being banned.

mark has made it very clear in what he wants for the board, and i dont want any part of it. everyone whos still there at this point that has seen whats going on will defend his retardation to the fucking death, or just shitpost any complaints you have to death and get the thread bumplocked to keep it all hush hush. not that i care, im going to be in every meta post that i catch until i get an explanation out of the jew and then i can put that entire shithole out of my mind.

>>18998

Strict but clear is still miles better than something where everything is ambiguous and you randomly get banned for making the wrong post in one of the mod's pet threads while some redditors can dubsbomb anything they don't like all day.

Besides if this is "strict" than the top boards have left the fucking scale.

>>19004

oh and to be clear, marks vision for /v/ is to just make it /b/, except he can delete threads that trigger him.

>>19002

Dumb or naive, maybe he didnt saw or didnt realize how fast the place grew up, because it did

But things like letting Reddit come in and take a seat, only to get slapped by HW and forced him to change his talk to kick them at Voat makes me believe he's just a jew

Malicious and egocentric, in different proportions but there's always 2 of those.

Moot was a piece of shit jew but i have to give him that in the first years i saw his actions (before him being a trip-queen) he actually let people shit all over him and he just told users to throw shit AND make points for him to read and think them later, and some of those he actually managed to pull (minority points he coud manage, he wasn't a good webmaster after all)

I insulted him a lot of times, made banter and even shitposted with shoops, and many people did, not a single time he or any mod banned me nor did i know of someone who was slapped by him without obvious offenses, in those days of course, he later got something inside his head and went berserk and/or didnt care at the end. Mark behaves in one year like moot did after 8 years

>ebin '04 oldfag

I'm not one either but i read countless times how oldfags would talk and explain what made /v/ good once upon a time, and we were very close to be that

You explain your behavior when you came, but you were a minority, in fact not going to Burchan for years made you more aware of your situation as a person who wanted to lurk moar, that's something most people didn't realize, you had to check, see what's going on and then participate (projecting here i might be wrong in your case)

Those days and those exodus (Novemberfags, December Holiday Kids, February Redditors, April-Spring Break dudebros and Summer kids) just brought people who checked threads and shitposted without looking for things, and we for some time did things differently

People disliked non-vidya in webm threads, right now it's a meme but mods did ban or warn people who were posting non-vidya, gachimuchi was allowed because examples posted were almost always vidya themes

Terciary/Nosense threads or what the BO calls it "sneakier attempts at off-topic discussion" were banned in public or shut down immediatly

Seen that banner that says HE (was banned for this post)? first or second time a thread was banned in the early days when HE was an epidemic, later on they just did in hidden

Right now it happens all the time and mods dont give a fuck because they were told to do so justifying /v/'s "culture", we were another culture at some point, he regressed us.

Honestly, you could check 8c/v/, then for memory movements or an outdated bookmark you would return to 4c/v/ for some reason, you would know you were in the wrong place due to the posts, this way before you noted that there was a captcha fill and the image thumbnails were different (like how November cucks made a thread for Mark to change the thumbnail sizes emulating Burchan)

>>19010

remember the unwrittn rule about webm thread OP's? what happened to that?

its just zero interest in enforcing any kind of rule, unless it suits them i guess. even then its usually just a bumplock, which i find humorous at how effective it is at slowing down a thread, because you realize most people are unaware that catalog view exists.

>>19020

shortly after they were banned and brought back, people were reposting the same webms so fast, they were hitting the bumplimit within a few hours and starting another thread the minute it hit 400 posts.

so mark said ( but never put it in the rules for whatever reason) "that the OP must be vidya related, and state that no other webm thread can be created until this one falls off or hits the bumplimit. even with that rule in place, we were having like 4 webm threads a day with the same fucking webms over and over.

they only got good again after bui raided the board and no one had te patience to try and post their shitty webms ~5 times. one thread could last a week, and it was mostly either Oc or webms that wernt posted as much, because everyone stopped posting in them, thinking it was still a pain to do so.

i dont know how they are now, ive been drifting away from /v/ more and more, but they still seem to stay up for awhile at this point.

>>19021

The webm threads are still complete shit, it's mostly not video games and tons of moeblob anime.

>>19046

People have bitched about them for months, and Mark refuses to do anything about it, instead mocking people that are tired of shit like Jojo cluttering up the catalog. It wouldn't be so bad if he wasn't known for throwing around bans so often. It's not even that there are rules he follows arbitrarily, it's that he just makes shit up as he goes along.

>shit on mark quite a few times during this sperg out

>only get my post deleted, no ban

I don't get mark, why'd he only ban some people?

>>19074

He really needs to just quit as board owner of /v/, he's done the exact same shit as moot. Moot made /v/ into /b/ with vidya, mark has done the same.

>>19095

What were you even posting?

>>19098

Basically dumping my Link folder, almost all of it were sfw or questionable. I only uploaded like 11 nsfw, spoilered of course. But that's for the reader to decide from belief

>>19099

>weeklong ban for that

surely you did something more

Either way all Mark is doing is pissing off a lot of people.

/v/ has been going downhill ever since he took the board name and now it's really getting bad

>>19100

Nope, just dumped

I dumped last night, went to sleep, then continued

Also 18 of my posts are still there, last I checked I had over 100 posts

>>19101

Just add it to the growing pile of Mark's incompetence. Not that it matters too much since /v/ is turning into a hugbox, which is unfortunate.

>>19100

mark isnt even around today

>>19105

Yeah he is actually, he made a thread saying he came back and then deleted in when people started shitting on him

>>19106

>>19074

I actually have that thread archived

https://archive.is/3fc8S

>>19106

https://8ch.net/log.php?board=v

oh

>>19109

Just try to talk about video games instead of being a meme-spouting redditor like the majority of Mark's hugbox and you will be fine

>>19107

Does anyone have those pics of when Mark posted someone's post history? I never did get to see that.

>>19109

I'm pretty sure draw threads are fine as long as it's vidya and not just a porn request thread with vidya flavors.

This place isn't meant to be maximum autism like it was with the old owner. Just /v/ without the /b/ shit.

>>19111

>/v/ without the /b/ shit

so, /v/.

>>19110

Nice.

>>19111

Perfect.

>>19114

Draw threads on /v/ have been shit for a long time, the drawfriends all got scared off by avatarfags, tripfags, waifufags, weebs, and other miscellaneous autists spamming their garbage requests

>>19118

Dude what did you expect after GG brought in a bunch of the Reddit crowd?

Redditors need people to worship or else they off themselves, look at literally any subreddit and they have someone they treat as god.

At least /svidya/ exists so I can talk about video games and pretend I am back on 2004-07 /v/.

Mark is going to get fucked on the next Meta thread that he makes though.

>>19119

I've never visited Reddit. I wish the whole site was ignored, but i guess it's a useless struggle.

I will try to get comfy in here, and I hope some more anons sick of Mark's attitude come here too.

>>19121

We will see. I'm just going to remind everyone on /v/ what a faggot he is, he is fucking awful at vidya too and has no reason to be the owner of the largest board on the site dedicated to video games. You ever see the left4dead webms that get posted of him?

>>19121

I hope as well, and I hope we can eventually move on from him and on to better things. This is a vidya board, after all.

Can someone report his Nintendo Network ID, tell Nintendo he's the owner of the /v/ board of 8ch.net

>>19112

>so, /v/.

As in the current /v/ on both 8ch and 4chan? No.

>>19126

No, I'm referring to what /v/ is supposed to be, the video games board.

>>19125

This is a hilarious idea, but that's for /cow/ or /baph/

>>19110

the "cornering" can be pretty awful at times. once saw a "vidya dog thread" that dozens of anons were enjoying, op got banned weeks after it was posted

>>19130

What, it was about dogs in video games, or one of those /b/ tier 'post a picture of your dog' threads?

>>19130

If it was one of those "lol i have a dog and play video games so this is my vidya dog everyone posts dogs lolsorandumb ;PPP" threads, then that is cancer and is part of the problem.

>>19131

it was "post best vidya dogs" and people were posting things like secret of evermore and some side scrolling ninja arcade game and that dog from final fantasy 6

>>19133

you dont know what youre talking about

>>19133

>>19134

im sorry, im retarded. i misread that

>>19132

You know for a fact /ints/ will try to take credit for this board

>>19134

Oh, then that's top-tier hotpocketry.

>>19135

It's okay anon.

I'm fucking done, I've had it

I'd rather help SJWs tear this place to the ground

Burn it all, it doesn't matter anymore

Take it easy /svidya/

>>19138

one more thing before I leave and clear my history of this godforsaken place

keep these, getting rid of these links.

https://archive.is/lQK7l

https://archive.is/bNQF1

https://archive.is/3fc8S

https://archive.is/CCcWp

dont remember what they have so take care

>>19138

>>19140

Where are you going?

>>19138

You ok there anon? Might want to play some vidya and forget about Mark turning /v/ into reddit

whats marks email again? im not waiting until monday to discuss this with him. not that much of a conversation can be had because literal retards and definitely-not-mark's whiteknights will shit it up to the point of unreadability.

>>19144

No idea but it's really not worth trying to speak to him in any serious context, he's an attention whore.

>>19144

No idea but it's really not worth trying to speak to him in any serious context, he's an attention whore.

He sometimes sits on the public /v/ mumble and gets his ass beat in left 4 dead though.

>>19138

Called it right here

>>19136

>>19144

He used to pop in the IRC channel #/v/chat on Rizon, but someone started an argument with him about newfaggotry (e.g., how they weren't but he was) one time and he got mad and never came back.

>>19148

Mark likes to call anyone who disagrees with him a goon, he's such a paranoid little faggot.

>>19150

He got beat so badly in Left 4 Dead 2 that he ragequit. I'll see if I can find the webms someone recorded while playing with him

Also there's a waifu thread up on /v/, lets see how long it takes before Mark bans people trying to derail it, since it's nothing more than an avatarfag hugbox

>>19154

>I know most people couln't deal with /intl/'s shit, hell the /svidya/ guy quit because he was being bombarded with them.

What the hell is he even talking about here?

>>19154

This most recent sperging has provided enough to piss him off for the duration of his existence.

>>19155

Just trying to make everyone that disagrees with him into a goon or /intl/, as usual.

>>19155

Well, the old BO threw a tantrum and quit because of some shitposting drama or whatever. Mark's just using his go-to scapegoat /intl/ like usual.

>>19158

>ctrl+f on /v/ board log

>82 results

wew

>>19159

82 results for Mark, that is.

>>19148

This drama was set off by people in the meta thread on /v/ demanding the Undertale threads and some other stuff be banned.

>>19158

If that happened it must not have taken place either /svidya/ or the old #svidya IRC channel. What I do recall happening is some romance between one of /svidya/'s volunteers and another board owner and they both ended up eloping and deciding to "leave the internet". That was just one of /svidya/'s volunteers though; I can't remember if anything happened to make the board owner and the other remaining volunteer just give up and disappear, but it happened not too long after that.

>>19163

And I'll add that the guy that left the internet was the one planning several events and stuff for /svidya/, so maybe that added to the previous owner's disillusionment when they left.

>>19164

So that's what happened. I haven't been following BO drama too closely over here. Sounds like old BO had a tough life.

>>19162

No, it was people asking for Mark to moderate the Undertale threads, but he sperged out and said that they wanted them banned completely, while claiming they were also goons for not wanting furfag porn generals.

>>18840

How come? We don't like memes, and that's the only thing you have over there.

>>19129

/v/ should just be a head on a stick by now

>>19159

>>19160

So much for that vacation of his.

>>19176

He's going into hotpocketing overdrive now, he's banning so many fucking people for petty shit, a guy just got banned for posting doubles ONCE in the waifu faggot thread, which currently consists of mostly anime and not video games.

here is the two most recent archives with mark in them, feel free to pick them apart for any wrongdoing. the second thread is still going on if anyone wants to archive it when its finished.

https://archive.is/bNQF1

https://archive.is/2zZtp

>>19200

Can you stop constantly trying to make everyone on /v/ hate us? Or whoever the fuck it is doing this if it's not you.

>>19201

There are multiple people posting in this thread, friendo.

>>19203

*nothing but making reasonable posts.

im retarded, and you pissed me off.

>>19203

You're that guy?

So sorry that you had to deal with Mark. I'm gonna see if I can get in contact with any of his hotpockets and have them talk some sense into him.

He should really be removed from board owner, look at how fucking paranoid he is, blaming one of the /v/ mumble users for all that shit.

>>19206

>blaming one of the /v/ mumble users for all that shit.

This happened?

>>19206

He's a jew, over the top paranoid tendencies are only natural

>>19207

Look at the thread, he's blaming a guy names Just L.

>>19206

do whatever you want, im not forum moderation professional, but replacing him isnt going to make the board any better. itll fix the moderation to some degree, sure, but it isnt going to fix the retarded userbase. its pretty much stuck as r/gaming lite at this point. i dont see anything wrong with posting here, slow as it is, and letting the assburgers namedrop the board on /v/ to show how cool they are every once in awhile, potentially drawing a few more users that way. that and advertisements maybe.

but like i said this isnt my area of expertise, so do whatever you gotta do.

honetly this has been the tipping point in me disillusioned with videogame discussion as a whole, and will most likely lead to me not posting much here either.

>>19207

>>>/v/6632781

>>19210

Fixing the moderation is a good first step, look at what happened to the SS13 threads on /v/, the mod team got replaced and they are no longer 100% shitposting.

>>19212

yeah, he started deleting that guys posts to 'prove a point' or something.

Fucking faggot.

>>19212

>>19213

best part is that it doesnt even show up in the board logs as being deleted.

given that he is now deleting logs, ill keep the tab with the thread open, and if anyone sees any replies to a dead post, give me the number and i will cap them tomorrow.

https://archive.is/70JbW

Archived the meta thread, too bad mark deleted half the fucking posts and the 8ch archive is always down

>>19214

That sounds serious enough now, will HW do something related to slapping his shit up?

>>19216

I don't think HW has involved himself in the site in a long fucking time, but if Mark starts deleting the logs then we have a real fucking problem

>>19216

why would he? Board ownership is pretty much a fiefdom. not that HW woudl interfere with what any of his friends were doing anyway.

>>19217

double check me on this pelase, im prone to being retarded.

heres an archive of the board logs just in case he undeletes them

https://archive.is/vZWrT

>>19218

Wew, you are right.

That's fucking absurd. Isn't it supposed to list all deleted posts?

>>19220

There's absolutely no way Mark will ever step down, he is way too fucking much of an attention whore to ever stop.

He will never realize his mistakes and never give a sincere apology.

>>19220

>just focus on Mark to realize his mistakes and apologize

>implying that hasn't been tried already

>implying it would ever work

I strongly suggest you just not post about things you know next to nothing about. You look like Mark weighing in on damn near anything right now.

>>19220

>all you had to do was STAY on your board

Please don't presume that whatever is happening on /v/ right now is representative of /svidya/ at large. In fact as I understand it, most of the people who have started posting in here weren't even /svidya/ regulars until this happened.

>>19222

Still, spamming threads and racking up to (70) posts a UID is not how to do things.

>>19223

I know, but I am posting it here since people were linking to this as posts advocating a raid.

>>19224

>people were linking to this as posts advocating a raid.

Did they even bother to read the thread? Looks like the /svidya/ boogeyman has already begun.

>>19224

>people were linking to this as posts advocating a raid

Only idiots would actually believe that shit. Idiots that can be safely ignored.

>>19219

its supposed to list any post deletions along with any moderator actions that im aware of. never seen that explicitly said anywhere but that is the idea as i understand it.

>>19220

what you just said was retarded as well, considering we just caught mark deleting board logs. i doubt the majority of posters here has the wherewithal to word that in a way that others understand though

> You are all

kill yourself, ive been nothing but respectful to him since this happened, barring one post that was right after he told me to fuck off for asking for his justification in banning me, which he has yet to do.

>>19224

>racking up to (70) posts a UID is not how to do things.

fuck off, a large post count is not an argument.

> people were linking to this as posts advocating a raid.

kill yourself literally no one has advocated for a raid, and nowhere in that one cap that everyone is spreading around is a raid even mentioned. i will also add that there are zero replies to the post in question,not to mention that is retard easy to false flag on a chan you fucknugget.

>>19227

idiots are the majority of /v/

>I've had people tell me about this particular guy who's been causing trouble for the mumble

Who the hell is he talking about? I went into the mumble like a day ago and told them they must really like kosher dick and insulted them for play assfaggots, that's all.

>>19220

Fuck off.

This is what happens when you dont mass ban new groups of posters misbehaving and also letting Reddit in

Why didn't we stop it

>>19231

because freddit breddit needs the redditors :)))) not that that is what the issue is, the real issue is partly the first thing you said and partly spoonfeeding and not telling newfags to lurk moar.

>>19226

>>19227

I know, I'm just saying, if you are going to spam threads, don't.

Its not a good idea, and would be better just to bring it up on Meta Monday where people would probably be more on your side.

>>19228

I actually made this as a note in case Mark actually did do Weta Wednesday, sorry if I sound like I am generalizing you guys

>>19229

>>19229

/v/ or /pol/ mumble?

Hes trying to blame a user of the /v/ mumble

>>19234

/v/ mumble

>>19229

>they must really like kosher dick

If you think that only people who like Mark use the /v/ mumble you're greatly mistaken. If you think the mumble users are immune to his bullshit you're even more mistaken.

He will sometimes hop into mumble and start banning people just because he's mad. Not because the people he banned actually did anything wrong but because faggots in meta threads will suggest they did, and he'll believe them.

>>19236

Oh I know, I was on it during E3.

>>19235

I dont recall anyone doing that recently, or anyone playing assfaggots

>>19240

No, it sounds like you're generalizing because that's exactly what you're doing.

Stop being a faggot.

>>19241

Whatever you say, just keep what I am telling you in mind

This is the chance you can slap some sense into the fat kike and I don't want you fucking it up.

>>19240

while youre there, make sure to let everyone know that /sp/ is planning raids against /v/, which is clearly happening, as you can see from my screencap.

and if anything, making more meta threads has only provided more ammo against him. for example, if i had not made this meta general today, we wouldnt have caught mark deleting shit just because he can, along with deleting the board logs.

though i wont fault you for thinking that no one is going to provide this information in a non-autistic way.

>>19242

>>19242

Id rather he be slapped out of his board owner position, hes never going to change

>>19242

>slap some sense into the fat kike

You're a gigantic faggot that can't read. A few people have already told you that you can't reason with Mark, especially when he spergs out. It doesn't matter what you show him or what you say to him. People have already tried reasoning with him with screenshots and posting histories, it doesn't fucking work. He's a fucking retard that believes it when some random anon tells him his mumble is full of goons but disbelieves and ignores any evidence someone may have that disproves it.

If you want to insist that he can be reasoned with or shown the error of his ways then you're a dense fucking bastard.

>>19247

exactly. i just spent a good 4ish hours of my life just trying to get him to admit that he had no justification to ban me based on which post he banned me for, with archives and caps for everything, and he just dodged the question until he decided to ignore it and just shitpost instead of having a reasonable discussion.

there isnt any reasoning with him, he always has an excuse for his fuckups, as if that makes up for whatever it is he did. i will enjoy seeing what weasely ass explanation he gives for deleting board logs. my guess is " i only deleted the board logs because /svidya/ would try and use them against me. there up now though you guys, so that makes it all okay, right?"

>>19215

If you still have it open you can save it as html and it will retain all the lost posts. Pretty sure there's a way to archive that too.

i honestly doubt anyone else would make a better /v/ owner. for the most part hes very hands off and isnt trying to steer the board to adopt this or that mindset. he just does some stupid shit once in a while and with the TPP on the horizon i have other shit to worry about

>>19259

Are you from bizzaro-/v/ or is today opposite day?

>>19260

no ive just had good experience with the mods on /v/. reasonable lengths of time to respond to shitposting reports and not caving to autists who simply dont like something and think its their right to shit up a thread

>>19262

Sounds like the complete opposite of reality.

>>19262

Ohh, I get it. You're a funny guy, anon.

>>19268

>>19271

im just telling you my experience. i think its the mods jobs to let anons discuss a vidya they want to discuss even if other anons want an excuse to act like animals

>>19275

Thats the exact opposite of what Mark does. He only cares about his own pet threads, not about the entire board

Hello /svidya./

Thanks for allowing this thread. Every cap is absolutely vital to a case being built by some anons over on /operate/ to hand to Jim about a group of vols who are the worst abusers of their positions on 8chan. Frankly, there's no reason Mark deserves the /v/ board name, as it's expected be a globally reserved name and anons expect to be treated right on /v/. Perhaps /svidya/ should have the /v/ name rather than Mark, who's proven he can't handle the responsibility.

With the help of all you from /v/ and /svidya/ who have suffered censorship and other forms of vol abuse from Mark, we can lay out a case to have his board removed from him, and stop bring attention to other vol abuse on 8chan.

Please be sure to post your experiences dealing with Mark on /operate/. The /operate/ BO won't do anything as he's been found to be covering up vol abuse on /b/, but it's still important to get the message out to the 8chan community.

Don't let Mark cuck you quietly. Be loud about it.

>>19262

>the people who wanted the literal porn dumps are in the wrong

>not the fat kike who defends porn dumps and shit like waifu threads

lol