/swc/ - shittywebcomics

I like how most of these people had no problem with SWC going after people like Willis and Dobson, but Kate Leth was somehow going too far. Even though she spouted most of the same shit they did, and SWC ragged on the others as much as on her.

Gee, I wonder what made Kate different from the others?

>>1442

Are you white knighting? Here's a quick test! Would this be creepy if a MAN said it? Is it creepy when a WOMAN says it?

By the way I just happened to read this post while I was looking for dumb Noelle tweets, what a total coincidence that she said something that perfectly fits the point I wanted to make only 11 hours ago, except she *always* says something like this because she's a fucking weirdo.

I did a fair amount of the Noelle bashing submissions on SWC and she deserved every one of them. She's a shitty artist. She's a shitty writer. There's no reason for her to have a job as either of these things, and yet she gets them because she's a twee little girl with boobs. Probably her employers are saying the same things. "Well she's annoying and dumb, but she's not *that* bad… let's give her a few jobs and see what happens!"

I don't think SWC was any nicer to Jeph Jacques or Aaron Diaz. But don't Noelle and Kate deserve more criticism? Aren't they the ones with the comics jobs, and the comics panels, and the constant promotion from everyone who wants us to read girl comics?

Would they have those jobs if they weren't women? Why isn't Aaron Diaz writing for Marvel? His comic is a total fucking mess but he's more qualified than Kate or Noelle to write some D-list Marvel title. At least he has something to say. I bet he's never even been considered, *despite* the fact that he's actually a decent artist too.

Because he's not a woman.

Women are wonderful effect, look it up.

>>1442

When you say that we were too hard on noelle stevenson or kate leth, you're essentially saying that we're too hard on people who defend this sort of mindset.

You're saying we were too hard on a brainwashing political ideology that teaches women to treat men as disposable, while laughing at the fact that the majority of suicides and homeless are men, and simultaneously demands women drag their feet crying victim all the time and behaving as if they have no privilege or agency as the whole of society has been bending over backwards for decades to hand them both on a silver platter.

When told that joining men in civilization involves being able to protect and defend yourself, women throw their ability for self defense to the floor like an angry baby throwing their bottle on the floor, and whine and scream and cry that they should not ever have to defend themselves, and therefore no one else should be be permitted the capability of defending themselves either. Feminists actually demand a tyranny of the the physically strong. They literally say they want that. They wish to be subjugated as they also demand to be handed agency and respect. Just look at kate leth's opinions on the right to defend your life from a murderer: she's against it. She is against a human's right to self defense. Yet she also will demand that fully paid health care is a human right. So you have a right to go to the hospital "for free" but not a right to protect yourself from that hospital trip if some larger psychopath wants to beat you into a coma. Feminism literally doesn't understand its own desires. It is an objectively incorrect ideology. I have just proven feminism, as a concept, wrong. You just saw it right there. SWC was full of proof just like this on a daily basis. Not all of you were smart enough to comprehend it, and it's quite obvious that some of you still aren't smart enough.

You are enabling an entire generation of deluded psychopaths. You can go ahead and make all the excuses you want for them. We'll be fighting for the essential human rights that you seem fine with throwing away.

MORE GLOWING REVIEWS!

http://www.projectafterforums.com/lofiversion/index.php/t3489-800.html

>In their defense, they can still effectively critique bad webcomics when they try and/or feel like it, but they're quite content being a fifth-rate South Park, because, in their minds, actual attempts at critique/humor/political analysis/etc. is for fags.

Now we know where Yaoi Huntress Earth got her theory above from..

http://shreddedmooseproject.blogspot.com/2014/11/side-note-shitty-webcomics-are-still.html

>But they aren’t insane in any glorious, fascinating way. Oh no, their brand of crazy is entirely predictable. They’re like a machine that’s programmed to spit out the same pre-programmed “men’s rights” bullshit whatever button you push.

http://dickjarvisblogblog.tumblr.com/post/59435494856/hey-shitty-webcomics

>I think you know where this is going. I wanna say 'It’s not you, it’s me’ but honestly? I was expecting somebody a little less… anonymous. Not that there’s anything wrong with that!! Lots of artists like anonymous trolls, they’re easy little cowards.

Now you see how you were on the wrong side of history? DO YOU SEE?

Then there's this, which is just crazytalk:

http://www.webcomicpolice.com/2015/02/entities-and-nonentities.html

>Shitty Webcomics isn't mainly about webcomics, but it's the most important review blog since it loudly endorses being an entity. It could be described as "hateful," "misogynistic," and "stupid," especially by one of the feminists or "social justice warriors" the blog often criticizes, but it's significant that it has an identity people can form opinions about. In comparison, the clearest descriptions you could come up with for a nonentity are "irrelevant," "lazy," and "uninteresting," and this makes their posts entirely redundant. Shitty Webcomics is also commendable for attacking people who base their identities on the groups they belong to, which is another form of being a nonentity. I respect anyone who expresses a bold opinion and can firmly back up what they have to say, and I agree with Shitty Webcomics that the Internet should be regarded as a haven for free speech and open discussion. What nonentities are doing is practicing a form of self-censorship, and it reflects a pessimistic attitude about reviewers' abilities to express negativity in a responsible way.

>>1442

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/11905639/Teenager-falsely-accused-of-rape-commits-suicide.html

When you say someone is too hard on kate leth or noelle stevenson, you're saying someone is too hard on people who are responsible for THIS happening.

An innocent human being committed suicide because feminists teach girls that this attention seeking attention whore shit is harmless or even possibly "beneficial" because it attacks some mythical "patriarchy" (which doesn't actually exist) and is against those who are privileged.

Privilege is the new racial inferiority, those with privilege deserve to be tortured to death.

And you support it when you say that these quirky cute feminist girls don't deserve to be attacked too hard. You help cause suicides and false imprisonment and destroyed lives when you white knight for a feminist and enable her destructive psychopathic behavior.

>>1468

>>1469

A handful of stereotypically projecting SJWs (SE's law in effect), and one mentally ill jealous tranny. With enemies like this, who needs friends? They make us look better just by disagreeing with us. Also ironic reference of South Park considering that Team America's legitimately risky morally correct stance of "terrorists should be fought instead of hollywood faggots capitulating to them" was actually accused of being "nihilistic" by roger "jawless corpse" ebert. 8)

http://bigbosswithoutborders.tumblr.com/post/115640946827/i-know-were-all-ic-but-you-dont-actually

http://whoopsrobots.tumblr.com/post/90636442816/shittywebcomics-why-isnt-there-more-art-of

http://thirteenfunbreaker.tumblr.com/post/128003309692/oh-enough-of-this-retarded-we-want-to-get-rid-of

http://captaind38.tumblr.com/post/94447619896/shittywebcomics-swc-recieving-anon-hate-gif

us vs our enemies