[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / dempart / doomer / fa / milkchan / now / quests / tahlia ]

/tech/ - Technology

Winner of the 68rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - Home of Headswap and Detachable Girl Threads

January 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 3 per post.


File: 34acecf0a4c9c76⋯.png (50.31 KB, 171x170, 171:170, LibreSSL_logo.png)

 No.1027331

Been using linux since hardy, used various forms of it from suse to arch for different applications but now thanks to pledge+chromium it has replaced arch on even my laptop and my private server has run it since I first heard of it. My question is has anyone tried it in a workstation setting?

 No.1027333

"it" being openbsd, because I'm braindead and an idiot.


 No.1027341

>>1027331

Tried to use it on a laptop. got frustrated with the supposed extensive documentation and yet the lack of how to do supposedly simple things like connecting to the internet and setting up XFCE.

Not my cup of tea.


 No.1027342

>>1027341

IIRC, It wasn't so much trying to set up the internet, it was that the instructions for the program were too few to account for the fuckups. Either way I don't use it anymore so I'm not bothering further.


 No.1027357

>>1027341

If you cannot "connect OpenBSD to the internet," it's highly likely that you are retarded. At the very least, you shouldn't be here.


 No.1027362

>>1027357

Most people here are literal children dude. That includes you. He is right at home here at that skill level.


 No.1027372

>>1027362

A white nine year could accomplish that you worthless pajeet. If you weren't a subhuman niggerfaggot you'd know that was true upon reflection of your own past.


 No.1027373

>>1027357

OpenBSD's documentation is light on step-by-step instructions, and instead assumes the reader understands basic concepts behind what he is trying to accomplish. That's too much for today's youth.


 No.1027374

>>1027373

True. Today's youth literally die when someone opens a jar of peanut butter in their vicinity. Perfect niggercattle slaves. Generation Zion.


 No.1027431

File: 9b7e87da4f5169b⋯.png (144.88 KB, 605x800, 121:160, absoluteopenbsd2efinal.png)

>>1027373

RTFM and get this companion piece. It's even a good read when taking a long shit.


 No.1027438

>>1027341 I have used Linux more than 10 years. Not only OpenBSD but also FreeBSD doesn't support recent hardwares. If you want to use BSD, you'd better use very old hardwares.

So I use Linux today also.


 No.1027439


 No.1027459

>>1027431

I remember reading that as a kid, I probably owe a lot of my systems knowledge to it. It's easy to laugh at newfags, but we were all there once, just most of us forget how we even learned in the first place. At some point I must have learned the basic shell commands, but I don't recall when.


 No.1027511

>>1027439

I just realized that that meme have same meaning as "samefag".


 No.1027514

>>1027459

I remember how I was reading that in the kindergarden while everyone else couldn't do anything more useful than playing with toys. I wish more people would be smart like me.


 No.1027515

>>1027511

It doesn't.


 No.1027519

Every time I tried one of the *BSDs (yes, any of them) it was nice but something about the hardware I used wasn't supported, sometimes with the statement that it probably will never be supported.

also yeah, all the *BSDs claim great documentation but in fact in my experience it was often pretty spotty. If you don't use garbage programs without manpages in linux, linux is at least as good if not better in the documentation department.


 No.1027520

>>1027357

There was a time when I didn't know what BIOS was for and why would need to use it to reinstall Windows on my computer. I wanted to learn things despite everything was really strange and confusing back then but here I am, I can set up a Linux system from scratch without breaking a sweat now. People shouldn't be blamed for being ignorant, but rather not accepting their ignorance and always being eager to learn more.


 No.1027522

>>1027515

Explain.


 No.1027524

>>1027522

Nobody on /tech/ knows how anything works. So if you have faggots claiming that they are BSD pros you know that they are only LARPing as such.


 No.1027526

>>1027524

Oh, now I get it.


 No.1027604

>>1027520

Anon, the whole point is on imageboards you have this constant influx of people wanting to be spoon fed. The appropriate response is lurk more. You have anons coming on here every day asking the same. damn. thing. over and over and over again. It gets pretty old. Therefore, the people who do lurk here get fed up with it. If only newfags would spend time lurking to find the answers for themselves, rather than wanting to be spoon fed, they'd actually learn. Doing research is learning. Asking to be spoonfed is mind control.

Let's have a for instance. The openBSD documentation. So you want to install openBSD, eh? You've read x and y about it and realize it may be superior. But here's the problem, the documentation isn't step-by-step. Here's what you do: look up the things you don't know. It's a learning process. It takes time. Literally Google (duckduckgo) it.


 No.1027672

>>1027524

Nearly all of /tech/ are post-doctoral students in computer science role playing as ironic retards. Of course, some bona fide retards like you aren't in on the joke, and naively think to make this your home.


 No.1027799

>>1027672

Paul, don't give it away to the newb. Damnit.


 No.1027876

File: cf2d1cf387bfca0⋯.png (152.71 KB, 324x299, 324:299, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1027341

>mfw I have no idea how unix systems work but found it easy to connect to the internet and install XFCE

thanks for the validation kiddo


 No.1028127

>>1027438

This is a myth, have you actually used openbsd before?


 No.1028128

>>1027524

Its mostly because the BSD community doesn't mind people being stupid or slow at picking stuff up - mostly they just fucking hate when people don't read the manual and ask stupid questions - so when some "idiot" who is "LARPing" as a BSD user posts to the mailing lists a genuine bug as opposed to his misunderstanding how to read the manual it looks a lot like spoonfeeding an idiot to a linux user. Its a little different in the linux world mainly because of how many varied and unique pieces of tech do exactly the same thing - so bug reporting takes a whole different level of care when taking criticism/comment on code/functions.


 No.1028131

The documentation is actually okay. I wouldn't say better or worse than linux, but it's ok. You have to sit down to read it, for linux you can quickly search your problem online and somebody else probably already solved it, that's the big difference. (If they solved it well or correctly, in many cases- who knows)

With all of them, you get one base system that's put together a certain way and that's it. Not much to confuse there. Coming from gentoo and being used to have not much of the system abstracted away, what I found the most confusing were the little differences. The same commands just behaving *slightly* differently. That's not the fault of anyone, but it takes getting used to.

What kills the *BSDs is the poor hardware support, even for 6+ year old mainstream systems and hardware in some cases. You have to buy the system with *BSD in mind, if you decide to just install it on whatever you have lying around, chances are not everything will work, especially graphics/ wireless or whatever usually needs blobs/inside knowledge of the hardware. Linux has more commercial support. Linux (the kernel) also has generally more stuff for specific usage cases, you don't get a lot of choice with the BSDs there either. If it's needed or not is something case-by-case. The hardware support is truly poor though. Even the things that are supported aren't always supported well and come with a bunch of "ifs" and "buts" and tiny advantages of the hardware like in-hardware video decoding, encryption etc. (yeah yeah it's all botnet I know) are not leveraged, something Linux has gotten really good at compared to 10-15 years ago.

That's the most frustrating thing, else I'd like to use them. Just don't feel like finding the perfect system for it where everything will work. If somebody has some advice there, feel free to mention it. I'm just afraid it'll probably be some oldish system with absolute horrid power/performance ratio that'll still be somewhat slower and worse with the *BSD than with Linux.


 No.1028144

>>1028131

Most of that is wrong or outdated info, but not off by much. fw_update kills your comments on blobs/hardware except for nvidia - which fuck nvidia. All the BSDs have a ports tree and Net/Free both have an entire linux compatibility layer if you *need* a specific debian userland tool or something. And what the fuck are you talking about, OpenBSD formally initated software/hardware vendors handshaking when it came to crypto acceleration. They also have mesa, based in like 4.2 or something, so video decode/encode is only tool limited which learn to use ffmpeg you dolts. Sorry to sound aggressive, but these are some true myths of the BSD world avoiding specifically the actual flaws - like massive over-provisions on OpenBSDs behalf to security axeing performance or FreeBSDs ideological two-facedness when it comes to licenses/NDAs resulting in "best for me, second for thee" tech which while good for securing their in-house servers doesn't do anyone else any good. NetBSD is almost exactly how you described here, but no one actually believes NetBSD is anything more than an experiment or educational tool or some good fun with a dreamcast.


 No.1028150

File: f324d114e50cd32⋯.jpg (814.93 KB, 1171x1600, 1171:1600, turn undead.jpg)

NetBSD is actually perfect, man. I like that it has no incentive for anyone to jump in and start niggering it up. Seen too many things get ruined once they got popular.


 No.1028157

>>1028131

>That's not the fault of anyone

no, it's the fault of GNU.


 No.1028158

I use it on my T42 but I'd rather use something like Gentoo on modern machines.


 No.1028165

>>1027331

>My question is has anyone tried it in a workstation setting?

Absolutely. OpenBSD is an enterprise-level, cloud-capable, webscale OS incorporating blockchain. It's perfect for a workstation setting.


 No.1028188

>>1027331

It works fine as long as it has what you need. If you need niggered out games or wintard software, forget it. If you are already a Freetard then it probably has everything you already use.


 No.1028219

>>1028127 I only installed OpenBSD. But I failed because of its lack of hardware supports. I used PC-BSD and TrueOS though they are actually same.

But anyway, all BSDs I installed and used are not good comparing to Linux.

So I use Linux and Android.


 No.1028265

I was required to use OpenBSD as a workstation/desktop OS on the company I was doing an internship in, around 10 years ago.

It was fucking terrible, Something like Slackware or Arch would be 10 times easier to setup, find proper tools and software, and get them working. I'd end up spending more time messing around getting the OS in a functional state than actually getting shit done.

Like I say this was a long time ago, maybe it's in a more usable state as a workstation OS nowadays, but I wouldn't count on it.


 No.1028276

>>1028265

10 years ago I worked at a company that provided IBM Thinkpads (they gave me an R51e) to all their contractors and employees. I dual-booted it to OpenbSD, and it ran perfectly, even the wireless was great (it was an atheros-based card btw). Took me only like 5 minutes to install the OS, which is typical for OpenBSD. Then I added a few packages like firefox, vim, and various dev tools, and I was almost never booting into WinXP anymore.


 No.1028287

>>1028265 You're right. BSDs are always sucker than Linux due to lack of developers. They always have driver problems. You always have to use outdated hardwares!


 No.1028288

>>1028287

Windows is the only OS that has reliable hardware support. For the rest you always have to do research before buying.


 No.1028374

I noticed that OpenBSD lacks a port or package for mit-scheme as well as Racket. Are there alternative ways for one to install these programs, or will I ha r to look elsewhere?


 No.1028378

File: 17b5ca4f3a3c511⋯.jpeg (79.22 KB, 1212x798, 202:133, multilingual.jpeg)


 No.1028408

>>1027438

New hardwares are inherently botnet (ME/AMT/uEFI etc.etc.), no wonder OpenBSD doesn't support them


 No.1028437

>>1028408

OpenBSD supports new hardware just fine.


 No.1028451

>>It runs on that specific hardware I have therefore everything that's said about compatibility is invalid

Also apparently *BSD users are really whiny, strike two against these OSes time has forgotten, lol.


 No.1028608

>>1028408

Fun fact: Did you know 99.3% of all strcopys are in driver code of linux?


 No.1028618

>>1028408

>when you redefine botnet rather than admitting a flaw in your OS


 No.1028729

>>1028618

>when you glow in the dark


 No.1028759

>>1028378

I'm thinking about using guile instead just for the sake of using OpenBSD. From what I've read, it's fairly decent, but I would like the opinion of you folks on the language.


 No.1028814

>>1028759

Guile is Scheme. If you like Scheme, you'll like Guile. If you want to connect your Guile programs to your C programs, Guile is specifically designed to help you do that.


 No.1028821

Think I tried FreeBSD on an old dual core laptop and saw it was sluggish as hell. Went back to GNU/Linux.


 No.1028852

>>1028759

guile is meh. chibi-scheme is better and much much easier to integrate with C.


 No.1028963

>>1027341

It's called a retard filter and you were caught by it. OpenBSD isn't like other operating systems, anon. If you can't figure out how to make it go you're not in the target audience. It's that simple.


 No.1028985

All BSDs are suck except macOS and iOS!


 No.1028986

All Linuxes are marvelous including Android!


 No.1028987

If we petitioned OpenBDSM Foundation to use some of their funds for an transparent, documented external audit, would they do it? Or are they too arrogant and proud like Theo to try?

>reminder that OpenBSD got a pwnie for lamest dev response

>reminder that an unofficial one-man audit "easily found" 25 bugs:

https://www.csoonline.com/article/3250653/open-source-tools/is-the-bsd-os-dying-some-security-researchers-think-so.html (they were quickly fixed which is respectable, but one person finding 25 bugs is not. The devs only seem to audit the bits they like)

Yes, they are the top of a shit bunch but that's no excuse to be complacent. If a comprehensive verifiable professional external audit finds little to no errors, they have quality assurance and respect from skeptics. If they do find lots of bugs, it makes their software safer when fixed and shatters unwarranted pride.


 No.1029019

>>1028987

>using pwnie as a standard and the concept of professional software in the same post

Your position is ultimately flawed, openbsd has proven this by simply being more secure than what you are currently using by every verifiable metric - actually improving cybersecurity instead of giving out stupid awards to name and shame and fuel some bias system.


 No.1029150

>>1029019

I'm not saying they aren't the most secure net-enabled modern OS. It's easily possible that they are from their track record. I just doubt they are as secure as they think they are or at least as they advertize they are.

'The most secure OS' is a great start, not an end goal. If one person found 25 bugs in that short amount of time, that is a sign that this 'constant auditing process' still has room for improvement.

Dismiss the jab about the pwnie, sure. That does not invalidate the rest of my argument for an actual professional audit. Auditable does not mean audited.


 No.1029151

>>1028759

Racket is a much better scheme.


 No.1029159

>>1028276

>>1028287

The problem wasn't even hardware support (it was outdated hardware actually, so it had drivers for everything), though I couldn't get the printers to work and had to transfer the files to another machine whenever I wanted to print something.

But the problem was mostly software availability, lots of stuff I needed or wanted to use wasn't available for it, or there wasn't prebuilt packages available and you had to compile from source.

And if you need to build something from source and run into dependency problems or broken Makefiles, troubleshooting this shit is already bad enough when you're using a normalfag Linux distro. God help you if it's on OpenBSD.


 No.1029256

Android is the only Linux distribution that gets graphics right, even of all the still pitifully existing *NIX oses even. Prove me wrong. You can't. Checkmate, atheists.


 No.1029297

>>1029256 Android is the most popular Linux distro because it's easy to use. It makes it easy for people to want to become dumber.


 No.1029356

Android just works on minimal hardware, good luck watching a simple HD video on a normal linux/*BSD desktop without choking the CPU out. Or even try getting something like smooth scrolling in a browser. Shit's broken.


 No.1029359

>>1029356

Works for me.


 No.1029476

>>1029359 Android is non-GNU Linux. GNU thinks Linux is same to GNU but they're completely different. Linux is kernel and GNU is third-party softwares.


 No.1030648

Is Ungoogled Chromium buildable in OpenBSD? I unfortunately do not see it in the ports list.


 No.1030679

What BSD would you folks recommend for a general use desktop OS? Security and privacy are very important to me, and while I recognize that OpenBSD advertises itself as the most secure OS out there, I've seen others suggest that this may not be true due to certain practices of the devs. I'm currently leaning towards OpenBSD regardless, but I'd like the honest opinion of you fuckers in order to make a more informed decision.


 No.1030684

When I take a look at the ports list, I see a severe lack of software I regularly use. Is this lack of software an issue in the eyes of you folks? Are there ways around this, such as Linux compatibility?


 No.1030697

>>1030679 Project Trident or GhostBSD


 No.1030922

>try openbsd on a very old laptop (no X)

>screen permanently on, cannot find anything in the documentation or online to have it turn off

>try openbsd on an old desktop

>configure as a router

>system won't stay up for 10 minutes without locking up

>also nano for some reason makes files disappear, using vi instead

Maybe FreeBSD would be better?


 No.1030954

>>1030679

I am an OpenBSD critic but I still think they are the most secure. I am no expert, but they don't have the reputation for no reason. They remove unneeded features and do reasonable checking on often used code. This way they avoid lots of common bugs.

They aren't perfect but they're easily on of the best. What matters more is usage. Airgapped Windows XP is on par with TempleOS for privacy and security, so long as physical proximity is not in your threat model. Part of OpenBSDs security is that its harder to add insecure or non private software (outside of the browser, at least)


 No.1030960

>>1030922

>screen permanently on, cannot find anything in the documentation or online to have it turn off

I had no problem finding the ACPI and APM documentation the last time I had a similar problem running OpenBSD on a Pentium III laptop.


 No.1030971

>>1030960 BSDs work on only very very very old hardwares....


 No.1031077

>>1030954

How would you describe the lack of software for OpenBSD? Does this usually cause problems, or are there ways around it that I don't know of?


 No.1031079

>>1030971

It works on my machine. :^)


 No.1031286

Does Steam work on opanbsd?


 No.1031403

>>1031286

Why even bother using OpenBSD at that point? No amount of security will save you if you purposefully install spyware on your system. Another system would be much more well suited for you, as OpenBSD has a severe lack of software, and will almost certainly be incompatible with any of your games, if not steam itself. You're better off using windows or Ubuntu, since you are already disregarding your privacy.


 No.1031405


 No.1031407

>>1031403 OpenBSD is an inferior OS because it can't run Steam!


 No.1031457

>>1031403

Ah, i see now!. Security through lack of functionality.

take that jews!


 No.1031458

>>1027331

My attention span is too low for that.

If I had any purpose, reason, or a real way to benefit off of making my own Linux Desktop from scratch, I would be dedicated enough to do it.

But not here, not now, not like this...


 No.1031642

>>1027431

>libgen only has 1st ed

>so do the filesharing IRCs I frequent

Spoonfeed a download or I'll make sure something javascript becomes an industry standard.


 No.1031649

>>1031642

https://github.com/rangaeeeee/books-bsd

You can correct the bookmarks and metadata if you want


 No.1031736

>>1028408

UEFI is not a botnet, it is a specification. And it is much better than BIOS in every way.

>>1028987

>OpenBSD bugs

Ok, you found bugs in OpenBSD. But the design of OpenBSD assumes users running software with bugs.

The more important question is: can you actually exploit those bugs? The fact is that OpenBSD is the only operating system which by default shuts down the process or even the entire system if it finds a program misbehaving.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / ausneets / dempart / doomer / fa / milkchan / now / quests / tahlia ]