[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / gothpol ]

/tech/ - Technology

Winner of the 68rd Attention-Hungry Games
/d/ - Home of Headswap and Detachable Girl Threads

January 2019 - 8chan Transparency Report
Email
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 3 per post.


 No.1027681

Since: http://oxwugzccvk3dk6tj.onion/tech/res/1018729.html

was bumplocked by the shadow admins (aka the programming code) (Since I'm winning on all counts: because I am correct on the law).

https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/4/1065

Quick recap, as told by anon:

Anonymous 02/05/19 (Tue) 14:47:16 No.1027517

Summary of this episode as this thread reaches the bump limit:

>an impersonator ("John Doe") created GitHub, then GitLab and BitBucket repos for trolling purposes

>MikeeUSA hit all three with DMCA (with the GitLab and BitBucket repos successfully taken down)

>meanwhile the impersonator opened the GitHub repo to pull requests; Mikee's butthurt as usual

>that GitHub repo's last commit was made last Thursday

And:

>>1027530

>Gitlab and Bitbucket repos are down due to DMCA notices

>There is still no evidence he hit github with a DMCA

<100 IQ

And

"GPL is Revocable" (== incel terrorism -reddit)

 No.1027684

Some woman contributed this opinion:

>post replyI have rescinded the GPL from a number of people (regarding

>GPC-Slots 2)

>from RheaAyase via /r/opensource sent 8 hours ago

>Hey /u/mikeeusa, I encourage you to google where I work and live and >

>meet me in person for a passionate discussion about how much you've

>contributed to the open source, and how much have I (or just about any

>other woman in open source.)

https://www.reddit.com/r/redhat/comments/andmlq/i_have_rescinded_the_gpl_from_a_number_of_people/

>RheaAyase

>Red Hat Employee

>Moderator of r/redhat, speaking officially

>

>Thank you for your submission! Unfortunately, it has been removed for the following reason(s):

>

> Containing hate speech.

>

>If you feel this action was taken in error, would like better clarification, or need further assistance, please message the mods.

>jwaterworth

>Red Hat Employee

>Moderator of r/redhat, speaking officially

>· Stickied comment

>locking this thread. we dont need users spewing hate into the community. i dont care if youre a nazi or a women hater and contribute code, but keep your dumb ideas to yourself.

Oh and my long held, seldom used, mikeeusa account was banned for some reason. I hope one day the CC gains power again and burns all these women's rights believers alive, like in the old days.


 No.1027685

User was banned for this post.


 No.1027687

>clocks212

>This guy sounds like a complete piece of shit.


 No.1027688

https://www.reddit.com/r/Fedora/comments/anf04l/i_have_rescinded_the_gpl_from_a_number_of_people/

RheaAyase

On one hand I feel like talking about this (as a woman in tech/opensource/redhat) but on the other hand I shouldn't (as a moderator)

I'll just go with this note: One hell of a dare to post such a thing on /r/Fedora and/or /r/RedHat don't you think? I don't think that this person will ever get a job in any Open Source company anymore. :]


 No.1027702

>>1027681

Now you should calm down your schizophrenia. No wonder you weren't taken seriously and you still aren't you phrase things with complete madness. The salt generated on leddit is nice tho. But m8 the way you handled and phrased your goal has created more hatred towards the GPL than anyone else since the beginning of the GPL.

Plus you've also associated GPL users with your own insanity. Don't get me wrong I hate all the social justice retards and it's not insane to be against it but you've handled this in a manner that completely negates what you did.


 No.1027713

>>1027702

>Plus you've also associated GPL users with your own insanity

RMS already does that by literally eating his feet.


 No.1027717

What's the largest project this has happened to. The main one I can think of is Bukkit (the Minecraft server that allows plugins). One of the developers got mad that Mojang hired some other Bukkit devs and essentially sold the project to Mojang so he DMCA'd everything hosting the source code to it. Since he was a large contributor it essentially killed the project.


 No.1027718

>>1027717

also this happened back in 2014.


 No.1027722

>>1027684

>women hater

using proper English grammar, this unambiguously refers to someone who hates women.

using feminist grammar, this refers to a hater who is a woman.


 No.1027724

>>1027722

Are you sure about the second part?


 No.1027736

> https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/anlj03/lkml_i_have_rescinded_the_gpl_from_a_number_of/

> from TrogdorKhan97 via /r/linux_gaming sent 50 minutes ago

> I don't know who you are or what this is about, but after reading the mini-manifesto you've linked to, I wish you every kind of unpleasantness. I only regret that I am likely to never hear of this again, as you seem to be exactly the kind of person who deserves to be made an example of as publicly as possible.


 No.1027738

>>1027702

> >>1027681

>Now you should calm down your schizophrenia.

>No wonder you weren't taken seriously and you still aren't you phrase things with complete madness. The salt generated on leddit is nice tho.

Feel free to re-present the issues using more... sane... language.

>But m8 the way you handled and phrased your goal has created more hatred towards the GPL than anyone else since the beginning of the GPL.

Is this bad? Remeber the GPL proponents were always touting that you could use the GPL to "free the source" of derivative works /WHILE/ also claiming that the GPL /WAS NOT A K/ (they were correct on the second part: it isn't a contract alone).

Specific performance is /ONLY/ available in contracts (and even then it's hard to get). They were blatantly talking out of both sides of their mouths for decades.

>Plus you've also associated GPL users with your own insanity. Don't get me wrong I hate all the social justice retards and it's not insane to be against it

Why is this bad?

> but you've handled this in a manner that completely negates what you did.


 No.1027739

>>1027713

>RMS already does that by literally eating his feet.

Why did he do this? That was disgusting. I (all of us) saw the video. Why doesn't he into shoes?


 No.1027743

.


 No.1027753

Bump.


 No.1027754

>>1027739

It's no more disgusting than admitting to enjoying anime.


 No.1027766

>>1027754

Gnome is trash.


 No.1027782

>>1027766

Agreed


 No.1027788


 No.1027789

When will you just kill yourself MikeeUSA? You're worthless garbage. No one gives a shit about your stupid slot game, no matter how many fucking threads you make. No one will ever care about any code you write. It's worthless, useless, forgettable garbage that doesn't solve anyone's problems. You're an autistic narcissist pedophile, probably a rapist too. Hopefully you get a big dick shoved up your ass in jail after you get caught fucking more children. You'll die alone, with cheeto crumbs all over your 300 lb stank ass belly, shit in your adult diaper, loli posters on every wall, with your micropenis all shriveled up from furiously masturbating to child porn 10 hours a day.


 No.1027792

Imagine bragging about your DMCA abuse.

Imagine thinking the post limit exists specifically to target you.

Imagine samefagging so desperately.


 No.1027793

>>1027789

Daily reminder that trolls feed off this kind of attention. If you're going to fume at a troll, I suggest working with established copypasta because your effort is greatly diminished when you do it.


 No.1027802

>>1027684

You are a fucking imbecile.


 No.1027806

Bump to trigger autism.


 No.1027808

inb4 he gets IP-benned from reddit


 No.1027810

>>1027808

He can post on Leddit through TOR though


 No.1027820

>>1027792

>>1027789

OY FUCKING VEY

SHUT IT DOWN


 No.1027821


 No.1027822

>>1027821

>>1027820

Get new material, mikee


 No.1027825

>>1027822

>says the butthurt jew in full damage control mode


 No.1027842

Someone forked my repo <3

https://github.com/MikeeUSA2/GPC-Slots-2/

My version of GPC-Slots 2 is more popular than Mikee's. ebin :D


 No.1027843

>>1027842

Are you samefagging or another impersonator?


 No.1027844

>>1027843

>impersonator

Nobody is nor wants to impersonate MikeeUSA.


 No.1027845

>>1027842

>that readme

I love this


 No.1027850


 No.1027851

File: b31b430c8e0af1a⋯.png (3.2 KB, 230x154, 115:77, Screenshot_2019-02-06 Auth….png)


 No.1027855

>>1027850

>Mikee is so buttmad he accidentally quotes his own post (1027825)

lolololloolololloololoolloolllooloololol


 No.1027856

>>1027851

thanks for posting irrefutable evidence

i am now convinced you are not a jew trying to push degeneracy by supporting feminists and claiming GPL cannot be revoked in response to linux's code of conduct which you no doubt support.


 No.1027857

>>1027850

>implying I'm samefagging

Please livestream your self-flagellation.


 No.1027877

>>1027851

>people are still posting these

You can just edit that shit with inspect element to say anything you want.


 No.1027878


 No.1027895

>>1027713

Yes. But we already know that RMS is autistic and we know that he isn't insane per default.


 No.1027915

https://old.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/am6xhj/host_agrees_to_dmca_takedown_of_gpld_work_after/

>from Michaelmrose via /r/opensource sent 3 days ago

>You are basically an incel terrorist waiting to happen and we really need to lock you up before you go shoot up something. I think its time the lawful authorities were involved. Can anyone provide which jurisdiction he is in so we can inform the proper folks with the rubber room?


 No.1027918

>>1027789

>When will you just kill yourself MikeeUSA? You're worthless garbage. No one gives a shit about your stupid slot game,

They seem to get pretty angry about "Rescind".

>no matter how many fucking threads you make. No one will ever care about any code you write. It's worthless, useless, forgettable garbage

I write to code for my purposes, not yours.

Since you ban me from having good girls I want to harm you, not solve your problems.

>that doesn't solve anyone's problems.

You think I wrote it for you?

Indeed it doesn't solve anyone's problems. Today it exists as bait to cause you problems. #RescindGPL

>You're an autistic narcissist pedophile, probably a rapist too

> Hopefully you get a big dick shoved up your ass in jail

Faggot americanism.

Hopefully the catholic church will go back to burning you people alive.

> after you get caught fucking more children. You'll die alone, with cheeto crumbs all over your 300 lb stank ass belly, shit in your adult diaper, loli posters on every wall, with your micropenis all shriveled up from furiously masturbating to child porn 10 hours a day.

More americanism.


 No.1027919


 No.1027924

still nothing on https://github.com/github/dmca by the way


 No.1027933

>>1027924

Going to lick your wounds and claim victory?

I send the requests to github something like 10 times now.

Bitbucket and gitlab complied, github did not.

2 for 3.

The GPL is revocable.

The code IS mine.

M I N E.

>>1027792

>Imagine bragging about your DMCA abuse.

First you said "HE NEVER SENT ANY!!!!"

Now you complain.

Moving the goal posts constantly.

It is no abuse: I revoked the license from "John Doe", I OWN THE FUCKING COPYRIGHT, I used the DMCA properly.


 No.1027934

You can get the text of the DMCA requests from here:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpcslots2/files/notes/

There are 2 different versions.

If you wish to send that text to github to see for yourself, you have my blessing to do so, acting as my agent, sending that text to get the DMCA take down through to them

--MikeeUSA--

("e" sig)


 No.1027938

Trying other contact forms on github

>Report content - DMCA TAKEDOWN YOU FUCKING PIECES OF SHIT

Thanks for getting in touch with us!

We’ll get back to you shortly.


 No.1027940

>With your misogynistic views, of course you forgot that the laywer, the one who would have been most likely to work on the GPL itself is a woman

The license was originally written by Richard Stallman

GPLv3 was written by Richard Stallman, with legal counsel from Eben Moglen and Richard Fontana from the Software Freedom Law Center.

You didn't even bother to check.

Like all pro-women people you must claim victories for women from that which was set down by men.

Same thing with the Linux kernel and Opensource: Men did all the work, women have come to kick them out and rule the roost.

That is how western society is. It is an enemy of all men.

>from comphacker via /r/opensource sent 29 minutes ago

>And who's taking care of the legal side of it right now? Also, your code is under the GPLv2, not the GPLv3. Shouldn't you know that?

>

>And you know what, I'm find with women getting some credit. If it makes you mad, then I consider it a success.

GPLv1 and v2 are by RMS.

v3 are by RMS and eben moglen etc.

Women had nothing to do with the GPL, nor the opensource movement, until they invaded in 2009. They've done nothing since but rule the roost.

>I'm find with women getting some credit.

Because you are a faggot. You think you can give them undeserved credit and get your dick wet.

>If it makes you mad, then I consider it a success.

It does, if I were the ruler I would torture you to death as a heretic, as the Catholic Church used to do with people who believe and professed the things you do.

https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/anseco/i_have_rescinded_the_gpl_from_a_number_of_people/


 No.1027947

>>1027940

I appreciate what you're doing with the salt you make from being right but could you not link to Reddit.


 No.1027949

post replyI have rescinded the GPL from a number of people (regarding GPC-Slots 2)

>from TheNerdyAnarchist via /r/linuxmint sent an hour ago

>How emasculated must you feel after getting owned by women and feminists so hard that you decided a month-long temper tantrum on reddit was the only "recourse"...

>

>It'd be hilarious if it weren't so pathetic.

>mikeeusa0

>All western males are owned by women.


 No.1027950

>>1027947

Ok, I'll post the comments without links


 No.1027951

>>1027947

>I appreciate what you're doing with the salt you make from being right

One of the opensource lawyers has said to me: "you are exactly the type of person character and fitness was created to weed out."


 No.1027952

>>1027924

>still nothing on https://github.com/github/dmca by the way

I do wish they'd post it, but if you read their "reason" for creating the DMCA repo it is clear that it is to simply mock the senders.

When there is an issue of law that threatens them, it is not something they can easily mock without lawyers and commentators from the other side citing references that show that the reasoning is sound. They do not want a media story either, so they do not post the takedown.


 No.1027953

>>1027952

stop lying faggot, the repo is there for transparency, you're not important enough for Microsoft to mock you


 No.1027955

comphacker : you had a gratis license, not a paid license. There is no attached interest. I revoked your license, you defied me, and are now committing copyright infringement.

An "interest" generally means PAYMENT (not that you're 'interested' in the work... fucking moron). You PAY for a license, you can then hold the other party to the terms, You do NOT pay for a license, you have nothing to hold the other party to.

YOU DO NOT OWN THE FUCKING CODE.

IT IS MY MOTHER FUCKING PROPERTY. NOT YOURS YOU ENTITLED PIECE OF FUCKING SHIT.

If I EVER find out who you are I am going to FUCKING BEAT YOU TO DEATH...

And then inform you that your license is rescinded.


 No.1027956

>>1027953

I have sent it again and again and again and again.

Time and place. I want to murder you.


 No.1027958

>>1027956

>I want to murder you.

Reported you to the FBI <3


 No.1027959

>>1027956

>I want to murder you.

Totally a lawyer and not an unhinged dindu


 No.1027960

Sent both requests again, this time using:

h2fe6u+ee4spupqs1oo8@sharklasers.com

to: copyright@github.com


 No.1027961

>>1027955

>If I EVER find out who you are I am going to FUCKING BEAT YOU TO DEATH...

lol, Mikee's even more unhinged than usual. What an impotent faggot.


 No.1027962

>>1027958

Time and place shithead.

I will bring a weapon and will kill you.

Time and place.


 No.1027963

>>1027960

>using throwaway mails for DMCA requests

How do you even function in real life


 No.1027964

>>1027958

Tell me where you are so I may cut off you hands, nail you to a wheel, break you on that wheel, and then burn you alive.

Please.


 No.1027965

>>1027963

Sorry, all other emails require your life's story.

Wasn't so in the past, but now we're firmly under the control of the women's prerogative. And they don't want anon males around.


 No.1027966

>>1027958

Aren't you going to tell me where you are so I can travel there and torture you until you are dead?

Why not?


 No.1027967

>>1027962

>>1027964

>>1027966

Cafe an der Uni

Ludwigstr. 24, 80539 Münchan, Deutschland

Tell me when you'll be there.


 No.1027968

>>1027967

>Münchan

München


 No.1027969

>>1027967

On a learjet 7 as we speak.

Be ready for an inquisition style torture, a spanish style disembowelment (using the spiked drum), and then an act of faith.


 No.1027970

>>1027969

I can see that you haven't leaved your basement, lardass


 No.1027971

>With your misogynistic views, of course you forgot that the laywer, the one who would have been most likely to work on the GPL itself is a woman. You're backing a woman's views. How scary. Why don't you contact her if you're having issues with the GPL? I'm sure she'd be happy to help as long as you don't realize just how much a piece of filth you are, a stain on the earth that you've become.

This guy's just wrong. Why did he say that.

I guess women wrote linux too..


 No.1027972

>>1027970

It's nice looking down on the clouds. You will be broken on a 15th century breaking wheel. It's on loan from the vatican. Your death will be slow.

#Rescind


 No.1027986

Lots of birds up here, the pilot must be flying low...


 No.1027987

>>1027986

Odd that you'll pretend you're a lawyer, but won't pretend you're a pilot, too.


 No.1028024

>>1027970

>leaved

Left, not leaved. "To leave" is an irregular verb in English.


 No.1028051

>>1027987

Odd that a jew on 8ch thinks it's opinion matters.


 No.1028098

>>1027792

Imagine getting this mad at some random dude on the internet. lmao


 No.1028120

>>1028098

People seem to get very mad at "GPL is revocable" for some reason.


 No.1028124

>>1028120

I've found that they get mad once someone has revoked it. Especially normalfags who start crying because they can no longer get their favorite software since it's been DMCA'd.


 No.1028132

>>1027955

woop xir ass mikee


 No.1028137

>>1028124

Your slots game is nobody's favorite software.


 No.1028141

>>1028124

>I've found that they get mad once someone has revoked it. Especially normalfags who start crying because they can no longer get their favorite software since it's been DMCA'd.

While they sit next to a 6tb drive full of music, movies, and software they don't have a license for either.

>is nobody's favorite software.

Revoking the license is apparently "incel terrorism", someone seems concerned atleast. Free Software lawyers were saying how they wanted to disbar aswell "people like X are exactly who Character and Fitness was ment to weed out".


 No.1028148

>>1028141

>While they sit next to a 6tb drive full of music, movies, and software they don't have a license for either.

Why would a normalfag keep local backups of media they like when they can stream it anytime they want from Spotify (tm) or Netflix (tm) or Hulu (tm) or Itunes (tm)?


 No.1028168


 No.1028179

To MikeeUSA: please seek help. You've been sperging out for 10 years straight now: you're not well and you are making the internet a worse place for everyone, including people that share some of your anti-feminist goals.

If you keep on this path you'll end up jumping in front of a train like Terry, only difference is that people liked Terry, nobody likes you.


 No.1028180

>>1028179

I rescind your license.

>p46 "As long as the project continues to honor the terms of the licenses under which it recieved contributions, the licenses continue in effect. There is one important caveat: Even a perpetual license can be revoked. See the discussion of bare licenses and contracts in Chapter 4"

--Lawrence Rosen

>p56 "A third problem with bare licenses is that they may be revocable by the licensor. Specifically, /a license not coupled with an interest may be revoked./ The term /interest/ in this context usually means the payment of some royalty or license fee, but there are other more complicated ways to satisfy the interest requirement. For example, a licensee can demonstrate that he or she has paid some consideration-a contract law term not found in copyright or patent law-in order to avoid revocation. Or a licensee may claim that he or she relied on the software licensed under an open source license and now is dependent upon that software, but this contract law concept, called promissory estoppel, is both difficult to prove and unreliable in court tests. (The concepts of /consideration/ and /promissory estoppel/ are explained more fully in the next section.) Unless the courts allow us to apply these contract law principles to a license, we are faced with a bare license that is revocable.

--Lawrence Rosen

>p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest is revocable."

--Lawrence Rosen

Lawrence Rosen - Open Source Licensing - Sofware Freedom and Intellectual property Law

>p65 "Of all the licenses descibed in this book, only the GPL makes the explicity point that it wants nothing of /acceptance/ of /consideration/:

>...

>The GPL authors intend that it not be treated as a contract. I will say much more about this license and these two provisions in Chapter 6. For now, I simply point out that the GPL licensors are in essentially the same situation as other open source licensors who cannot prove offer, acceptance, or consideration. There is no contract."

--Lawrence Rosen

----

>David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:

>"Termination of rights

>[...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.

>[...] My point is not that termination is a great risk, it is that it is not recognized as a risk even though it is probably relevant to commercial end-users, accustomed to having contractual rights they can enforce themselves.


 No.1028181

>>1028179

https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/am6xhj/host_agrees_to_dmca_takedown_of_gpld_work_after/

> Jacobsen v. Katzer.

Appelate court ruled that the Artistic License was a Copyright License, _Overuled_ the lowercourt's opinion that the only damages available for the AL were contract damages. Now licensor can get copyright damages instead.

How does this hurt me, DIPSHIT? Oh, are you relying on the non-binding DICTA earlier in the case? SHOWS WHAT A FUCKING RETARD YOU ARE.

The ruling helps me. The court decided that the AL was a copyright license, overruling the "we have a contract here" ruling of the lower court. If the court found it was a contract then only contract damages would be awarded, as is their practice.

Artifex case involves a preliminary offer to do business where the company allows two means of acceptance of the offer: Pay for the commercial license, accept the GPL.

Not the GPL standing alone.

Both of these cases are cases where a licensee violates the license, and the court allows the licensor to recover.

Completely unrelated to a situation where the licensor revokes a completely gratis license and you FUCKING pieces of shit feel that you can punish the licensor for doing so.

> that taught you that licenses require consideration to be irrevocable.

It's very basic law of licenses, you fucking moron.

Your only other option is to beg the court under equity not to enforce the owner's legal right. Which, is the SFLC's game plan.

The GPL itself is NOT a contract.

>If you really are an attorney, I want to know who did your character and fitness interview. Man, did that guy fuck up.

Tell me how so, dipshit. It's you who seem to be unaware that licenses are revocable, that obeying a pre-existing legal duty is insufficient for consideration, that a non-exclusive license is NEVER a transfer of rights.

You just assume that because commercial copyright licenses are irrevocable outside of their terms that gratis ones are too. Same mistake PJ the paralegal made.

>But no, you need to keep trying to convince attorneys that licenses are irrevocable

Nope, informing the lay people that gratis licenses /are/ revocable.

>and little girls are capable of consent

YHWH doesn't require consent. See Devarim chapter 22, verse 28 (key words: taphas, na'ar (hebrew), padia (greek Septuagint), puella (latin vulgate)). I know it conflicts with your western religion, but hopefully the muslims will completely destroy and dismantle it so there is no record left of your western religion ever existing on this earth.

>and adult women can't be allowed near software.

The adult women infiltrate gratis projects, then rule over the men who actually built the project from the ground up. They are entryists and ENEMIES. They do this to every single hobby men build into a science or engineering field. I can't really say all women though, WHITE women.

>I've got friends at the SFC

Does that include that baby-faced faggot B.Kuhn who isn't even a lawyer and then suddenly learned one year that, if he was going to run a legal consulting firm, he'd better hire a lawyer instead of playing one... and then learned that a lawyer cannot be below lay persons in such a firm, so he made the woman the head of the place and pretends it was all for women's empowerment, thinking that no one knows the bar rules and can see through his bullshit? Is that the Software Freedom Conservancy's who's "clarification" I debunked within 5 hours of them posting? The one that ignores section 0 of the GPLv2 which defines "you" as the licensees (not the grantor) and falsely attempts to convince readers that section 4 is a "no revocation" clause when it is simply a clarification that if an upstream licensee loses his license through automatic rescission, the downstream licensees do not automatically suffer the same fate. That SFC? The one that "advises" its clients to "wait it out" so they can lose their standing via the statute of limitations running (Great advice B.Kuhn).

Yea, a bunch of fucking retards who basically commit legal malpractice against their clients as a "career". But you get what you pay for (and that also goes for licenses)


 No.1028281

>>1028179

(((To MikeeUSA: please seek help. You've been sperging out for 10 years straight now: you're not well and you are making the internet a worse place for everyone, including people that share some of your anti-feminist goals.)))

(((If you keep on this path you'll end up jumping in front of a train like Terry, only difference is that people liked Terry, nobody likes you.)))


 No.1028334

>>1028281

this. Mikee where da patreon at


 No.1028346

>>1028179

>You've been sperging out for 10 years straight now

Actually, 20 years.

10 years ago is when the women actually managed to gain leadership over OSS, prior to that they weren't given the time of day: the men who actually wrote the code ruled.


 No.1028347

>>1028179

>and you are making the internet a worse place for everyone,

good

> including people that share some of your anti-feminist goals.

If they're not pro-loli, they're not anti-feminist.


 No.1028348

>>1028334

No where, does it for free.


 No.1028352


 No.1028387

.


 No.1028402

Hi MikeeUSA, I'm curious how your childhood was and what major events happened in your life. I want to know how you ended up being you. I'm not judging, I'm genuinely interested. I think you are a fascinating human.


 No.1028435

>>1028402

>Hi MikeeUSA, I'm curious how your childhood was

Private schools.

>and what major events happened in your life.

None

>I want to know how you ended up being you.

Realizing that there was no way to win, so there was no reason to strive. Yet having the desire to strive none the less.

>I'm not judging, I'm genuinely interested. I think you are a fascinating human.


 No.1028448

>>1027738

I agree with him. You sound insane. That's not a bad thing by itself, but it's a bad thing if you want to be taken seriously. I agree with the sentiment against SJWs and enforcing what you enforced, though.


 No.1028497

>>1028448

Would you re-transmit the message in a non-insane sounding way.

Speaking nicely does not work.

Explaining the law calmly does not work either.

The techies only listen when there is an appearance of emotion behind the words; in which case they also dismiss the words as mad. But they atleast read them.

Who do you think sent the original "rescind" emails to the LKML 3 months ago? Nice and calm. The techies did nothing and just dismissed the information as "wrong". Because, you know, they're lawyers...


 No.1028501

>>1026842

>This sort of abusive language makes people think you are a tool. While we'd love to believe that people pay attention to the crux of the argument and not the language it is wrapped in, a lot of today's programmers and the general open source community are a superficial and dismissive lot who will not give two shits about what you say if they can berate you for how you say it. This means that despite your valid points, it will fail to persuade people who will just convince themselves that you are making shit up or not understanding the situation because they prejudged you as a dumbass and will not exert the mental effort to verify whether your claims are actually valid or not. Basically you run up against plain disbelief from lazy tools who dismissed what you said simply because they didn't like the way you said it.


 No.1028511

>MikeeUSA

How is this nigga still going lmao kill youself


 No.1028523

>>1028497

It's because they don't take advice from LARPers. If they want advice, they take it from lawyers where they know the person's name and is accountable to the bar. A LARPer is not accountable to anybody.


 No.1028530

>>1028523

They take advice from the SF Conservancy and the FSF, if anyone, which is like taking advice from opposing counsel. Usually they don't even do that and just take "advice" from each other.


 No.1028535

>>1028530

There are names attached to the SF conservancy and the FSF. If they are wrong, lawyers with names will prove them wrong in court. The name of MikeeUSA is not the name of any lawyer registered to any bar so therefore, the legal analysis of MikeeUSA is meaningless to anybody. The name of MikeeUSA is just LARPing.


 No.1028549

>>1028535

>There are names attached to the SF conservancy and the FSF. If they are wrong, lawyers with names will prove them wrong in court. The name of MikeeUSA is not the name of any lawyer registered to any bar so therefore, the legal analysis of MikeeUSA is meaningless to anybody. The name of MikeeUSA is just LARPing.

The federalist papers were published anonymously


 No.1028623

>>1027789

Don't listen to this leftypol communist cuckface. We love you very much Mikee! 可愛い! (^ム^)


 No.1028643

>>1028549

The federalist papers are a treatise that considers the philosophy of governance. There is no analysis of specific laws in order to punish political opponents. Only philosophy about what it means to choose a balanced government.

The claim that the GPL without revokable interest is revokable is a specific analysis about specific laws.


 No.1028700

Mikee what code is it that is making these liberals so mad?


 No.1028709

>>1028700

Not Mikee, feminists poked the bear by forking one of his games adding a switch statement instead of some ifs iirc and then saying that his code is shit. It was a literal group called "geek feminists" or some shit, asking for it really. Cuck devs are following the proceedings because of what it says for the CoC'ing of Linux, that is, a man can take his code with him if he's kicked out of donating his code for free because SJWs found out he said something doubleplusbad on twitter.


 No.1028710

>>1028709

>mikee switching up his writing style

nearly fooled me there, mikee


 No.1028719

File: 49cb916e927c8c0⋯.jpg (45.59 KB, 480x465, 32:31, ease off.jpg)

>>1028710

Just stop, while trolling Mikee and anyone else in the thread is fun, there's actual important shit going on.


 No.1028720

>>1028719

>there's actual important shit going on.

On /tech/? Top LARP!


 No.1028722

>>1028720

I'll talk to you if you want you lonely faggot. Have you read anything about transactional analysis?


 No.1028725

>>1028722

>LARPing


 No.1028730

>>1028700

>Mikee what code is it that is making these liberals so mad?

A simple text casino game who's origins begin 15 years ago.

https://www.pastefs.com/pid/100415

http://p.ip.fi/Ta9b

>#!/usr/bin/perl

>#GPCSLOTS 2

># By The Entity Known As MikeeUSA

...

>package PrintWrapper;

>use IO::Handle;

>use strict;

>use warnings;

...

>#GPCSLOTS 2 by MikeeUSA

>#https://cat2.dynu.ca or https://caethaver2.dynu.ca

>#Feminism Delenda Est.


 No.1028731

>>1028725

Here's your (you).

I would have actually talked to you, transnational analysis isn't even programming anyway, it's why you do what you do


 No.1028734

>>1028731

>continuing to LARP

just stop


 No.1028736

>>1028730

>#This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or

>#modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License

>#as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2

>#of the License, or (at your option) any later version.

thx


 No.1028741

>>1028700

>>1028709

Can one man be this bad at samefagging?


 No.1028771

I notice that our "John Doe" on the 4chan /g/ thread proclaimed that a Fraudulent DMCA claim is illegal.

There is no fraud here: I am the owner of the copyright.

I sent the DMCA takedowns.

It's a right I have as the copyright holder.

Just as it is a right to, before that, rescind gratuitous licenses at my pleasure.


 No.1028774

>>1028736

The license has been (and was) rescinded from the "John Doe" here now and forever. He has notice of this (for about a week now). He cannot rely on the license terms distributed to the non-identifable public. He is an identifiable singular entity and he was told by the Copyright owner that he is not being granted any license from the copyright holder, and any license he did have has been revoked.

Go and FUCK yourself. Or be sued, your choice shithead.


 No.1028777

>>1028774

>he

You are speaking to him. Sue me :^)


 No.1028790

>>1028774

sue me, kike


 No.1028831

>>1028777

Once I find out who you are, I shall.


 No.1028832

Remember: the linux kernel contributors could do the same thing.

But they fear the CoC


 No.1028833

"oh oh if I rescind I won't get to work in mandatory sex change industry in faggot and woman country! I better not leverage my copyrights, oh oh dear me!"

--Wage slave faggot "men"


 No.1028835

I remember when nobody in opensource had "jobs", and everyone was anonymous or nearly so.

Yet all these faggots are afraid to leverage their copyrights to force or punish others (which Companies do all the time) and bend them to their will... because they are afraid they will be "unemployable"

Faggot wagies.


 No.1028933

.


 No.1029016

>>1028933

This is why these threads should be deleted


 No.1029085

.


 No.1029086

>>1029016

Why do you hate morse code?


 No.1029087

>>1029016

>This is why these threads should be deleted

You don't have any counters to these threads, the law within is correct: you can revoke a gratis license (You can revoke the GPL).

So you complain about it existing.


 No.1029100

this is the one... https://n3t.host/mumble.html


 No.1029126

>>1029100

The one what?


 No.1029235


 No.1029284

Go choke on gas, pedokike


 No.1029307

>>1029284

Explain your rage.


 No.1029308

>>1029284

YHWH explicitly allows men to have young girls as brides.

Devarim chapter 22, verse 28.

na'ar (child - hebrew)

padia (child - greek)

puella (young girl - latin)

Masoretic Text, Septuagint, Vulgate.

This is the law on raping (taphas - to take, as to take a city) a female child.

The man pays the father 50 silver and keeps the girl.

YHWH is a superior God to your god: the white woman


 No.1029310

(naturally the girl must not have been given away/promised to another yet)


 No.1029315

>>1029087

The counter is that you are a LARPer with bad legal advice. The law is correct and your advice is not.


 No.1029336

>>1029308

This is why your people were gassed


 No.1029345

>>1029315

Explain how the "advice" is "bad".

You have not been able to do so.

You just keep saying "NU UH!"

Licenses are revocable absent an attached interest (ex: $$).

How much did you pay the licensor for your copy of the GPL'd software?

Nothing? You have no attached interest.

That is the law.

Refute it.

Go on, you have failed to do so for over a month now.

"NUUH U WRONG" is not acceptable.

>>1029336

Supposed white man want's to kill anyone who likes cute girls.

Checks out. White men (aka: americans) worship women.

You want a queen.


 No.1029346

>>1029315

2 successful DMCA takedowns faggot.


 No.1029347

>>1029336

>This is why your people were gassed

White men really are scum.

You /recoil/ from cute nice good things.


 No.1029355

>>1029346

protip: the burden of issuing a DMCA takedown is trivial while the burden of defending a DMCA takedown is much higher

Have that legal analysis for free on the house.


 No.1029368

>>1029355

Depends entirely on the platform, a site could come along and place the onus of proof entirely on the one making the claim and then the shoe would be on the other foot.


 No.1029450

>>1029368

>and then the shoe would be on the other foot.

No, then the site would be turbosued out of existence.

Seriously, do you even know what a DMCA is?


 No.1029500

https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/4/1065

Some decisions I have made regarding my GPC-Slots 2 game:

I had chosen, as was my want, to rescind the license I extended from a

few choice individuals. I can do this because GPC-Slots 2 is my

copyrighted work. I built it. I never transferred the copyright over to

anyone.

The individuals are:

"JohnDoe" from 8chan (he knows who he is)

comphacker from here, reddit (if he violates, I'll know who he is after

the subpoenas during discovery)

Leigh Honeywell

Alex "Skud" Bayley

the "Geek feminist" collective (I believe they are identifiable, and a

small group, so no harm using this closed-class identification)

I will continue to rescind the license from anyone who adds a "Code of

Conduct" anywhere near my code (to "fight sexism".). I wholeheartedly

/support/ sexism, as-long as it is not against men. Since men are now

being assaulted as thanks for their ceaseless decades-long work on

opensource by people who did not put in the time, men should /support

sexism/ by revoking license to their gratis licensed copyrighted code

from any project that adds a "Code of Conduct".

--MikeeUSA--

(electronic signature)

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Some notes:

A license without an attached interest is revocable in the US (other

countries have different laws, which is why many OSS repos kept out of

the US in the past, it is also why the FSF is both a 501(c)(3) charity

and also requires copyright assignment to them for any contribution they

accept (otherwise an author who was still the copyright owner of the

code could rescind the license to the code)).

Opensource friends like to bring up the recent district court decision

in california to try to argue the the GPL is a contract. (It's also

interesting that they started adding CoC's right after said decision, to

push out the men who created OpenSource) They are wrong. Acquiescing to

a preexisting duty is insufficient for consideration. They like to quote

this part:

> "Not so. The GNU GPL, which is attached to the complaint,provides that

> the

Ghostscript user agrees to its terms if the user does not obtain a

commercial

license" (Artifex v. Hancom, Case No.16-cv-06982-JSC, page 4 line 17)

This is false on its face.

The GNU GPL contains no such language.

The /business agreement writing/ that Artifex wrote up and posted on its

webpage includes such language. The court here is conflating "The GNU

GPL" with the writing Artifex published on it's webpage. It is an error

on the courts case. A typo by whomever who drafted the decision perhaps

(conflating Artifex's contract language with the GPL itself).

The court goes on to allow Artifex to recover on either

breach-of-contract grounds (for the amount a commercial license is

worth) OR to go forward with a statutory copyright infringement action.

If the GPL alone was a contract, there would simply be two different

state-law breach of contract theories to pursue (breach of the "business

offer" writing or breach of the GPL "contract", and the court would

dispose of the case that way).

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

David McGowan Esq. made a correct statement of the law:

> David McGowan, Professor of Law, University of Minnesota Law School:

> "Termination of rights

> [...] The most plausible assumption is that a developer who releases

> code under the GPL may terminate GPL rights, probably at will.

> [...] My point is not that termination is a great risk, it is that it

> is not recognized as a risk even though it is probably relevant to

> commercial end-users, accustomed to having contractual rights they can

> enforce themselves.

...


 No.1029501

...

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----

Lawrence Rosen Esq. got it right the first time:

(

https://www.amazon.com/Open-Source-Licensing-Software-Intellectual/dp/0131487876

)

> p46 "As long as the project continues to honor the terms of the

> licenses under which it recieved contributions, the licenses continue

> in effect. There is one important caveat: Even a perpetual license can

> be revoked. See the discussion of bare licenses and contracts in

> Chapter 4"

--Lawrence Rosen

> p56 "A third problem with bare licenses is that they may be revocable

> by the licensor. Specifically, /a license not coupled with an interest

> may be revoked./ The term /interest/ in this context usually means the

> payment of some royalty or license fee, but there are other more

> complicated ways to satisfy the interest requirement. For example, a

> licensee can demonstrate that he or she has paid some consideration-a

> contract law term not found in copyright or patent law-in order to

> avoid revocation. Or a licensee may claim that he or she relied on the

> software licensed under an open source license and now is dependent

> upon that software, but this contract law concept, called promissory

> estoppel, is both difficult to prove and unreliable in court tests.

> (The concepts of /consideration/ and /promissory estoppel/ are

> explained more fully in the next section.) Unless the courts allow us

> to apply these contract law principles to a license, we are faced with

> a bare license that is revocable.

--Lawrence Rosen

> p278 "Notice that in a copyright dispute over a bare license, the

> plaintiff will almost certainly be the copyright owner. If a licensee

> were foolish enough to sue to enforce the terms and conditions of the

> license, the licensor can simply revoke the bare license, thus ending

> the dispute. Remeber that a bare license in the absence of an interest

> is revocable."

--Lawrence Rosen

Lawrence Rosen - Open Source Licensing - Sofware Freedom and

Intellectual property Law

> p65 "Of all the licenses descibed in this book, only the GPL makes the

> explicity point that it wants nothing of /acceptance/ of

> /consideration/:

> ...

> The GPL authors intend that it not be treated as a contract. I will say

> much more about this license and these two provisions in Chapter 6. For

> now, I simply point out that the GPL licensors are in essentially the

> same situation as other open source licensors who cannot prove offer,

> acceptance, or consideration. There is no contract."

--Lawrence Rosen


 No.1029504

>>1029355

Protip: the GPL is revocable when you did not pay for it.

It is not difficult to defend.

I explicitly rescinded the license from John Doe.

John Doe acknowledged the rescission.

John Doe "did it anyway"


 No.1029586

>>1029500

> I'll know who he is after the subpoenas during discovery

LOL


 No.1029758

still nothing on Github by the way, Mikee confirmed jew abusing DMCA against small business


 No.1029905

>>1029758

>still nothing on Github by the way, Mikee confirmed jew abusing DMCA against small business

What is your point. I sent the request to github 10 times.

You really do not believe that I sent it?


 No.1029908

>>1029758

No abuse. I am the copyright OWNER. I OWN MY CODE.

I decided to rescind the license from you.

I can do that.

You then violated my copyRIGHT.

I then DMCA took-down' your infringing account where you were violating my RIGHT.


 No.1029909

>>1029586

You doubt that discovery exists?


 No.1029916

Hello mikeeusa@gmx.com,

We're writing to let you know that the group you tried to contact (legal) may not exist, or you may not have permission to post messages to the group. A few more details on why you weren't able to post:

* You might have spelled or formatted the group name incorrectly.

* The owner of the group may have removed this group.

* You may need to join the group before receiving permission to post.

* This group may not be open to posting.

If you have questions related to this or any other Google Group, visit the Help Center at https://support.google.com/a/github.com/bin/topic.py?topic=25838.

Thanks,

github.com admins

----- Original message -----

X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbhKZ2IRA9bzjGt7CwoVMpm6aIYVq64r9OEiWk0I60xctv0o0LQyWm+4jm+lXJY8nV+3yqQ

X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7719:: with SMTP id t25mr368215wmi.7.1549924159129;

Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:29:19 -0800 (PST)

ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1549924159; cv=none;

d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;

b=bqJvXiTi4r1B0KOMfxYsO86cJf4SwRm5neIz4iqNk/XRcZnlhRjiQEypNkKp2w52UH

jf04/nesEs8Wgjkl9mxbY2W/1NjOspYSj3O7TN5T5N9GDMBzmfraPRmLiKjGD6EIMs0C

QtLTQoHJOCamRfGiezERkA1EVN4WnnpXm21+OsvnZQpHAj0KqGxEGYfcdtkT13c9KCKp

r+VGbq4aCGLNc6O0rS5DGkoMYQPGlXkdtIUcQK83S/i9EaTR8Dv3LALBoaOyUukIV8/h

KERXkcsteWnh6u4kUoJUpPgiKx0ZWK4wenhGCo/Krqrjl0I/RrnT1RLZqNOij7Cp6uIx

PYnw==

ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;

h=content-transfer-encoding:sensitivity:importance:date:subject:cc:to

:from:message-id:mime-version;

bh=mnmbqyFMqGQzQsz8Biv1zhnrGELs6RvdQp9tGeU4nFc=;

b=Rwe3hKwXiHqvxCP90FuL8eCNkXP7neCx7TWups4UTjuKnVzS5HBmN7WjwI8HLNoHt4

Vwl8Q6oKEqop9xKz/bJBB6eIVTNaANkm6fXTY9IqGxTRk42aok2uVH9M4mRCAWe2w2X/

ZnRqfIus4eydXOcP53zP5K6D9GguxcuGFlP0mDB2HMuyiZ6g11Gp+S0UQ9fACEdc5sUb

bxoTI0TGaE65+kkNcvhKoxlWoD8gSiH4ClcQlkFdccaEgDK+TQ+c81e+Kqc+1+LgaRX3

7C59nImDDruNoHUkZfbQfwabl3RYpl7d1PZeCiZegcQ67eKP960EFE3rxwnkfOTKY7R7

PZnQ==

ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;

spf=pass (google.com: domain of mikeeusa@gmx.com designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mikeeusa@gmx.com

Return-Path: <mikeeusa@gmx.com>

Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.15])

by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a5si380021wmg.174.2019.02.11.14.29.19

(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);

Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:29:19 -0800 (PST)

Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of mikeeusa@gmx.com designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) client-ip=212.227.15.15;

Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;

spf=pass (google.com: domain of mikeeusa@gmx.com designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mikeeusa@gmx.com

Received: from [198.98.50.112] ([198.98.50.112]) by web-mail.gmx.net

(3c-app-mailcom-bs02.server.lan [172.19.170.129]) (via HTTP); Mon, 11 Feb

2019 23:29:18 +0100

MIME-Version: 1.0

Message-ID: <trinity-adcd0784-6dbb-428b-ab4f-593b98d1fbf5-1549924158531@3c-app-mailcom-bs02>

From: "Mikee USA" <mikeeusa@gmx.com>

To: copyright@github.com

Cc: legal@github.com, legal@microsoft.com, copyright@microsoft.com

Subject: DMCA takedown notice-GPCSlots2

Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:29:18 +0100

Importance: normal

Sensitivity: Normal

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

X-Priority: 3

X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:q+EtgIdV+SCA16B5HlwX4Zp7UQrgHSjoRAPdUDAow8soMnjw8Zb6ayeYsrPZ/UCBKgbrE

V1vXQo2CYpdKkrcWJG9A4FhkaawGX0JU3C3maL+L01QQA/TdB98ycspQZSdpgyp2VXx7NWvkuUXV

8GLN2E4/XVJPq8p9Y5QvUCfY7GvNwh2t5n1G2/fqiH1VQNDmgXS+2po2Q8N9W96ReOPoawyEedPq

q5azQj0KfvDtFCERp0xPRw0+xFXb3odenDOSLSSI8xPfjLQIcuf8fv/oq398FfgHbMvmca1divVW

Ng=

X-Spam-Flag: NO

X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mOLP2wauTaY=:ZF/6wYHENnvNHAlTmDeBT8

6xqgp7niipiYR1QlfIMQymWzpVpzJApewaK4VwlwX3wCBhQa7V1sP1I7euNayc5h+58rLGqIv

46nphwinE89sY+kBKtwFDKbOigW6jbszaOVuONrNVKVme3DT+IPnNp2zxqTUFDyps147mNNqP

GTmZlRip/YiW6Jlfp62i8fQO+WG2vWwFcUwOSRWRDs5YF83za8fs1EF1vN5GJ9XRXJDEDIHmI

Skn1QfP7wyieyNoZ5Qs41hT1SzWNBau2x4ETCtSLmm49wo6bLgly2x3ykex2xCVglYm30D2CL

wNgP3L6santQO+sdEXBRWew7mODyUP981E59XKSMjSkAiiZLDjBKDHEAC4yH1h+JupguWE2N/

bQRY0CFJkew7d2d8AFBKgEraswzGY0Jz+VmNHQJuAYVBP3RpB+q5MAlmHL7I7WFW9YVDIWura

1SFftdQi/6Q+AJr+ENHBXMSFzoDNS2oNcz5/nUyU4PoSsK39jSFJqwuLQwGB8do2wPFpTJcA5

flfVDGp/crOoWDNOwy83esIbXcK1pIG3Emkh0tzdmMGfwsLTS5h4eZu9WI2GwZF0ZcIjBB9R4

m2vbnGJrCl2ro=

X-Gm-Spam: 0

X-Gm-Phishy: 0


 No.1029918

>>1029758

You truly infuriate me. Suggesting that I never sent the emails because github chose not to post them.

Because of their choice, that mean's I didn't send them some how...

Even though I did.

I would kill you if I met you.

By torture.


 No.1029923

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of

its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es)

failed:

copyright@microsoft.com:

SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host: microsoft-com.mail.protection.outlook.com (104.47.53.36) reason: 550 5.4.1 [copyright@microsoft.com]: Recipient address rejected: Access de

nied [BL2NAM06FT009.Eop-nam06.prod.protection.outlook.com]

legal@microsoft.com:

SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host: microsoft-com.mail.protection.outlook.com (104.47.53.36) reason: 550 5.4.1 [legal@microsoft.com]: Recipient address rejected: Access denied

[BL2NAM06FT009.Eop-nam06.prod.protection.outlook.com]

--- The header of the original message is following. ---

Received: from [198.98.50.112] ([198.98.50.112]) by web-mail.gmx.net

(3c-app-mailcom-bs02.server.lan [172.19.170.129]) (via HTTP); Mon, 11 Feb

2019 23:29:18 +0100

MIME-Version: 1.0

Message-ID: <trinity-adcd0784-6dbb-428b-ab4f-593b98d1fbf5-1549924158531@3c-app-mailcom-bs02>

From: "Mikee USA" <mikeeusa@gmx.com>

To: copyright@github.com

Cc: legal@github.com, legal@microsoft.com, copyright@microsoft.com

Subject: DMCA takedown notice-GPCSlots2

Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 23:29:18 +0100

Importance: normal

Sensitivity: Normal

Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

X-Priority: 3

X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:q+EtgIdV+SCA16B5HlwX4Zp7UQrgHSjoRAPdUDAow8soMnjw8Zb6ayeYsrPZ/UCBKgbrE

V1vXQo2CYpdKkrcWJG9A4FhkaawGX0JU3C3maL+L01QQA/TdB98ycspQZSdpgyp2VXx7NWvkuUXV

8GLN2E4/XVJPq8p9Y5QvUCfY7GvNwh2t5n1G2/fqiH1VQNDmgXS+2po2Q8N9W96ReOPoawyEedPq

q5azQj0KfvDtFCERp0xPRw0+xFXb3odenDOSLSSI8xPfjLQIcuf8fv/oq398FfgHbMvmca1divVW

Ng=

X-Spam-Flag: NO

X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:mOLP2wauTaY=:ZF/6wYHENnvNHAlTmDeBT8

6xqgp7niipiYR1QlfIMQymWzpVpzJApewaK4VwlwX3wCBhQa7V1sP1I7euNayc5h+58rLGqIv

46nphwinE89sY+kBKtwFDKbOigW6jbszaOVuONrNVKVme3DT+IPnNp2zxqTUFDyps147mNNqP

GTmZlRip/YiW6Jlfp62i8fQO+WG2vWwFcUwOSRWRDs5YF83za8fs1EF1vN5GJ9XRXJDEDIHmI

Skn1QfP7wyieyNoZ5Qs41hT1SzWNBau2x4ETCtSLmm49wo6bLgly2x3ykex2xCVglYm30D2CL

wNgP3L6santQO+sdEXBRWew7mODyUP981E59XKSMjSkAiiZLDjBKDHEAC4yH1h+JupguWE2N/

bQRY0CFJkew7d2d8AFBKgEraswzGY0Jz+VmNHQJuAYVBP3RpB+q5MAlmHL7I7WFW9YVDIWura

1SFftdQi/6Q+AJr+ENHBXMSFzoDNS2oNcz5/nUyU4PoSsK39jSFJqwuLQwGB8do2wPFpTJcA5

flfVDGp/crOoWDNOwy83esIbXcK1pIG3Emkh0tzdmMGfwsLTS5h4eZu9WI2GwZF0ZcIjBB9R4

m2vbnGJrCl2ro=


 No.1029925

Hi MikeeUSA,

Thank you for your notices, the most recent of which is included below for reference.

This DMCA notice is incomplete. It lacks "A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed" and "Information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to contact the complaining party."

Unfortunately, an electronic signature must be a legal name, not a monicker or username, and we cannot accept disposable or temporary email addresses as reliable contact information for a DMCA notice.

Once you've revised your notice to include the required details, please send back the entire revised notice, and not only the corrected sections. Once we've received a complete and actionable notice, we'll process it expeditiously.

Thanks,

GitHub Staff

I have a good faith belief that use of the copyrighted materials described above on the infringing web pages is not authorized by the copyright owner, or its agent, or the law. I have taken fair use into consideration.

I swear, under penalty of perjury, that the information in this notification is accurate and that I am the copyright owner, or am authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

:

As you may know, In the United States; a license, absent an attached interest, is revocable.

A "John Doe" had his non-exclusive license regarding the game "GPC-Slots2" terminated by the copyright owner (me: MikeeUSA).

The copyright owner may do this as-of-right, unless there is an attached interest (ie: unless the licensee paid good consideration for the license).

The "John Doe" then proceeded to belligerently upload a copy of "GPC-Slots2" to your host, GitHub.

This violated Author's (my) copyright, since "John Doe"'s gratuitous bare license had been terminated by the copyright holder (me).

The "John Doe" then proceeded to modify my work, which again violated my copyright since I had previously revoked his license.

The license flows from me, the copyright owner, not any text. It is permission to use, redistribute, modify, etc. Instructions on how to use my property.

When such permission is not supported by any consideration, it may be rescinded by the owner, at his will.

(/Regardless/ of the "terms". "Terms" are only enforceable against the grantor if the licensee has paid consideration for them, essentially, under US law.)

I have done so.

I reiterated to the "John Doe" that his license had been terminated.

"John Doe" then informed me that I "can't do that". I tried to explain to him US law.

"John Doe" declared that he did not care and would keep the violating work up, in defiance of me.

(IE: he would "pirate" it)

He then cited works from a discredited paralegal while I cited published works by lawyers studied in their field.

...


 No.1029928

>>1029909

>You doubt that discovery exists?

I doubt that you'll deanonymize yourself by actually filing a lawsuit. You've already said you won't identify yourself because you'd probably be disbarred. Of course, that's not really a concern because you're not actually a licensed attorney, but it demonstrated your reluctance to identify yourself. As soon as you do, everyone will be able to look you up and will know you're not a lawyer, just an insane crank still living with mummy. And when she finds out that her unemployed son is a pedophilic rapist with delusions of grandeur, she'll probably put you out on the street.

>>1029918

What makes your impotent rage even funnier is that this is all a joke to everyone but you. Nobody cares about your shitty casino game. Nobody cares about your little legal theories. You're an amusement to us. A joke. Keep dancing, jester! Keep dancing!


 No.1029929

>>1029925

>This DMCA notice is incomplete. It lacks "A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed" and "Information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to contact the complaining party."

lol, rekt

Keep dancing, jester! It's even more amusing now that you've come up against a company that's not going to process your bogus DMCA request just to get you out of their hair.


 No.1029932

You take it down or I sue you, simple as that.

I have revoked the license from a number of people, including the John Doe who has chosen to violate my copyright thence-forth.

I have signed using my 2 decades long held pen-name.

The U.S. Code defines an electronic signature for the purpose of US law as "an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record."

My signing with my pen-name suffices for this purpose. What is important is my intent to sign the record, which I have evinced.

I have also posted the information on my long-held project page, so that you may know that I am me:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpcslots2/files/notes/

https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpcslots2/files/notes/tkdnreq_github.txt/download

https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpcslots2/files/notes/takedownreq_vs_johndoe-of-8ch.txt/download

(I have also uploaded this response to said /notes/ directory)

In addition to many other places.

Your contention that I must do anything greater at this point is legally inefficacious.

I _DEMAND_ that you take the offending material down immediately.

--MikeeUSA--

(Author of GPC-Slots 2)

(electronic signature)

On 2019-02-06 21:20, GitHub Staff wrote:

> Hi MikeeUSA,

>

> Thank you for your notices, the most recent of which is included below

> for reference.

>

> This DMCA notice is incomplete. It lacks "A physical or electronic

> signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an

> exclusive right that is allegedly infringed" and "Information

> reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to contact the

> complaining party."

>

> Unfortunately, an electronic signature must be a legal name, not a

> monicker or username, and we cannot accept disposable or temporary

> email addresses as reliable contact information for a DMCA notice.

>

> Once you've revised your notice to include the required details,

> please send back the entire revised notice, and not only the corrected

> sections. Once we've received a complete and actionable notice, we'll

> process it expeditiously.

>

> Thanks,

>

> GitHub Staff

> -------------------------

>


 No.1029935

>And when she finds out that her unemployed son is a pedophilic rapist with delusions of grandeur, she'll probably put you out on the street.

Nope, my parents are well aware of my opinions and have been for the last two decades. I easily back them up with laws from YHWH, as-well as historical marriages.

>disbarred. Of course, that's not really a concern because you're not actually a licensed attorney, but it demonstrated your reluctance to identify yourself. As soon as you do, everyone will be able to look you up and will know you're not a lawyer, just an insane crank still living with mummy.

No, they would look me up and know that I am a lawyer, and that I don't bother to work too hard because I do not have to. Then they would attempt to disbar me and they would succeed because the Law profession is thoroughly CoC'd

There's no reason to be a fully employed "sane" man when you are paid nothing for your work (no cute child brides, just divorce rape).

No pay. No work.

The insane who work on their hobbies and do not contribute to the enemy civilization beyond that have the correct idea.

>>1029929

First it was "you didn't send it, rekd!

Now it was "they didn't comply, rekd!"

Goal posts constantly moved.

.The U.S. Code defines an electronic signature for the purpose of US law as "an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record."

Me signing with my pen name suffices for those requirements.


 No.1029936

>>1029928

>Nobody cares about your shitty casino game.

You know very well that the purpose of this exercise, from the very beginning, has been to edify the linux kernel copyright holders regarding the fact that they can rescind license to their code.

While no one may care about my "Shitty little casino game", they do very much care about the linux kernel code, and various other now-CoC'd projects.


 No.1029937


 No.1029960

>>1029935

>Goal posts constantly moved.

Nope. I never said you didn't send it. That was someone else. There's more than one person here who realizes what a ridiculous nullo you are.


 No.1029973

Real people care about their families and the people they know. They want them to be happy.

American golems care only about their law or belief system (women's rights, no marrying cute girls, etc) and will happily destroy each-other within their "families" for disobedience to their heretical american religion.

American golems also take great pleasure at abandoning their offspring immediately at the age their religion decrees: 18.

That is because, since a golem is not a person, it cares nothing for it's own: it does not own it's own self and is a slave to its master: so why would it care about "it's" people? It has no people from its point of view.


 No.1029983

>>1029936

>You know very well that the purpose of this exercise, from the very beginning, has been to edify the linux kernel copyright holders regarding the fact that they can rescind license to their code.

And two out of three source code hosts agreeing to delete your irrelevant Perl script proves nothing. Three out of three wouldn't either. Come back after you've won in Federal court and you have an opinion written by a judge that would "edify" the Linux kernel copyright holders who might want to rescind. And don't come back until then. Right now, you have nothing. You are nothing. And your pestilential, masturbatory spam here and elsewhere does nothing but alienate people who might otherwise be sympathetic to your position. Frankly, you're an ideal ally for the anti-rescinders, because you make everything associated with you repulsive.


 No.1030008

Does anyone doubt that I sent the DMCA requests now?

You were saying for weeks that I didn't.

Before that you were saying I didn't sent them to gitlab and bitbucket.

Before that you were saying I wouldn't send them.

Before that you were saying I wouldn't revoke any licenses.

Before that you were saying I couldn't revoke licenses.

Notice that none of the hosts in the US argue against my ability to revoke.

And a signature does not need to be you "legal" name. It can be an X. It just needs to show assent. I posted the text next to the original download area you got the code from: obviously it's me.

Every fucking thing you have claimed has been shown to be false.

I really hate you people... Really. I'm getting headaches from this hate. Now I know what it's like to teach blacks in highschool.


 No.1030010

>>1029983

>And two out of three source code hosts agreeing to delete your irrelevant Perl script proves nothing. Three out of three wouldn't either. Come back after you've won in Federal court and you have an opinion written by a judge that would "edify" the Linux kernel copyright holders who might want to rescind. And don't come back until then. Right now, you have nothing. You are nothing. And your pestilential, masturbatory spam here and elsewhere does nothing but alienate people who might otherwise be sympathetic to your position. Frankly, you're an ideal ally for the anti-rescinders, because you make everything associated with you repulsive.

Yea yea yea, every fucking thing you say is shown to be false, yet you still show yourself as "winning".

I'm going to go where I damn well please. If I were the ruler I would have you killed btw.

I don't have to win in federal court to show that a gratis non-exclusive license is revocable. Various lawyers agree with me and it's been the case for centuries.

You have to win in court to show that the rule has changed. It hasn't.

I really fucking hate you people.

The fact is that before people were under the impression that you couldn't rescind.

I am showing that you can. Yet every victory you say "YEA WELL THAT DOESN'T MATTER"

After saying "HAHAHHA U CANT WIN ON THIS PART!"

I would have you tortured to death if I were the ruler.


 No.1030011

>>1029960

Fuck you.


 No.1030014

>>1029983

>Frankly, you're an ideal ally for the anti-rescinders, because you make everything associated with you repulsive.

I started the /rescind/ "movement", moron. Everyone was anti-rescinders before me. I made people pro-rescind, including ESR. Without me there is no alternative view: only acquiescence.

>And your pestilential, masturbatory spam here and elsewhere does nothing but alienate people who might otherwise be sympathetic to your position.

This is always claimed by the enemy side, no matter what the position. "You fighting us makes other people not want to fight us"

>And two out of three source code hosts agreeing to delete your irrelevant Perl script proves nothing.

You wouldn't be arguing against me constantly if that were so.

It shows the linux kernel peeps how it's done. It shows them that it can be done. I can be done for my "WITTEL PERL SCRIPT" and it can be done for linux code they own the copyright to.

And you think my 15 year old wee wwwwiiiitttlleeee ppeerrrlll sscrripppttt is the only thing I program? Fucking moron.

I chose it because it is a good legal example. It's a nice show pony I can trot out when I need a case or controversy. It's GPLv2 (+) like the linux kernel (well lin isn't +, but if I can rescind my GPLv2+, they can rescind GPLv2). It illustrates the underlying law fairly well and straightforwardly.

There are few complications.

Thats why I chose my wooorthhhlesss litttle perrrll sscrippt and not the various other much larger projects I work on.


 No.1030022

>>1030010

>Various lawyers agree with me and it's been the case for centuries.

Lawyers are like Jews. Any 3 of them will have 10 opinions. You can find lawyers who agree with your position. I can find lawyers who disagree. If only there were some place where the lawyers could go to make their arguments and have them judged by a third party. We could even call that third party a "judge" since they're making a judgement about the lawyer's arguments. Let us know if you find anything like that.


 No.1030030

>>1030022

A non response.

From : "You're totally wrong"

To: ".... yea well other people agree with ME too!"


 No.1030031

>>1030022

Idiot who's not a lawyer.

"HURRR DURR I CAN FIND PEOPLE 2, IF I TRIED!"


 No.1030037


 No.1030047

>>1030010

>I really fucking hate you people.

I'm indifferent to you. You're not important enough to warrant strong emotion of any kind. You're not a lawyer, you'll never file a lawsuit, and your life consists of sperging out on the internet and screeching at people who actually have lives about being "wagies" because they're not F5ing 8chan threads around the clock, like you do. Pathetic.


 No.1030053

>>1030047

>I'm indifferent to you. You're not important enough to warrant strong emotion of any kind.

Yet you've been here for weeks in the same threads.

>You're not a lawyer,

I am.

> you'll never file a lawsuit, and your life consists of sperging out on the internet and screeching at people

> who actually have lives

You do not have a cute child bride. You do not have a life. You have slavery

>about being "wagies" because they're not F5ing 8chan threads around the clock, like you do. Pathetic.

Usually I just program my game :), or make assets for it etc.

https://durietangri.com/sites/default/files/legalaspectsfoss.pdf

GPL is Revocable.


 No.1030063

File: 0fb549f0422c0a2⋯.jpg (139.35 KB, 890x310, 89:31, esr.jpg)

>>1030014

>ESR

Nobody cares about ESR.


 No.1030064

>>1029918

Your willingness to spam irrelevant adresses and even different sites is telling, you're a coward and you're afraid Github will reject your claim.

>I would kill you if I met you.

You wouldn't recognize me, faggot, this is an anonymous board not facebook.

>>1029925

And here we see how much of a coward you are, purposefully sending invalid DMCAs so you can pretend github is trying to stop you on technicalities.

>>1030053

>Yet you've been here for weeks in the same threads.

Still think everyone mocking you is the same person, you dumb pedo?


 No.1030071

>>1030064

How is legal@microsoft.com and copyright@microsoft.com an irrelevant site? They own github. Don't you know that?

The DMCA request is perfectly valid. Learn about signatures. You can sign an "X" on a document and it is completely valid. The signature simply shows your assent to the document. Signing with a Pen Name is valid aswell.

Learn some law you fucking moron.

This is very basic stuff.

You just refuse to believe it.

>Still think everyone mocking you is the same person, you dumb pedo?

You all have the same opinion. "Women's rights good, kill anyone that would marry cute girls, gas Jews" etc.

So yes: you are effectively the same person: all carbon-copy-clones or golems.


 No.1030072

>>1030063

ESR created your entire movement.

RMS did not. He failed.

ESR effected the buy-in that you see today.

He convinced the world.


 No.1030073

>>1030071

>How is legal@microsoft.com and copyright@microsoft.com an irrelevant site? They own github. Don't you know that?

The "lawyer" doesn't know that Github is a subsidiary.

The "lawyer" doesn't know that a subsidiary is its own legal entity.


 No.1030079

>>1030073

Not if they're completely dominated by the parent company, moron.

Why the FUCK shouldn't I send to legal@microsoft.com? TELL ME YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.


 No.1030080

>>1030073

I'd love to fucking kill you.

You're so fucking smug, thinking you know shit, when you know fuck-all about the law.

"Oh I'll just have a subsidiary and be good"

"Haha, got them!" "Oh I'm dominating all the decisions of my subsidiary -- it's all good anyway"

Nope. Once you're dominating the sub, the courts will have the parent co liable for whatever the sub is doing as simply an "alter ego" of the parent co.

Anyway, I can send to whomever the fuck I want. Given as they'd probably have the MS legal team look over things anyway why not?

FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.


 No.1030081

I notice how you were first like "YOU NEVER SENT TO GITHUB"

Now you're like "YOU ARE COWARD!!!!"

_ALWAYS_ changing the goal posts when you're proven wrong.

ALWAYS.

I'd love to torture you to death.

Signature doesn't have to be given name, just has to indicate assent to the writing. It can be an X. Idiot.

https://durietangri.com/sites/default/files/legalaspectsfoss.pdf

GPL is Revocable.


 No.1030083

>>1030079

>TELL ME YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.

>>1030080

>FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT.

You're violating 8chan's Code of Conduct. Please stop.


 No.1030087

>>1030081

LARPing is inevitable


 No.1030090

>>1030087

I notice how you were first like "YOU NEVER SENT TO GITHUB"

Now you're like "YOU ARE COWARD!!!!"

_ALWAYS_ changing the goal posts when you're proven wrong.

ALWAYS.

I'd love to torture you to death.

Signature doesn't have to be given name, just has to indicate assent to the writing. It can be an X. Idiot.

https://durietangri.com/sites/default/files/legalaspectsfoss.pdf

GPL is Revocable.

.The U.S. Code defines an electronic signature for the purpose of US law as "an electronic sound, symbol, or process, attached to or logically associated with a contract or other record and executed or adopted by a person with the intent to sign the record."

Me signing with my pen name suffices for those requirements.


 No.1030093

>>1030090

The reason why we cannot believe you are a lawyer is because you make extraordinary leaps to conclusions then you demand that your reality is right. Real lawyers have a much better chain of reasoning that connect a premise to a conclusion. Your LARPing is amusing though.


 No.1030095

>>1030093

I'm not going to cite cases when doing it for free.


 No.1030096

>>1030093

Explain what is wrong with my reasoning.

I explained what actually creates binding commitments, and what does not. I explained how such applies to gratis licenses. I explained how signatures work (yes, you can just "sign your mark" or an X)

These are all things one is taught in school. But you just don't know them because you never went to lawschool.

So I cited some lawyers you can read.


 No.1030121

>>1030071

>How is legal@microsoft.com and copyright@microsoft.com an irrelevant site?

>Learn about signatures. You can sign an "X" on a document and it is completely valid.

This is why everybody instantly knows you are not a lawyer.


 No.1030122

Anything that fucks over coc trannies is ok with me. They are a scourge on society who try and dominate every facet of society men created. They are vultures. It's a shame Linux will be destroyed by these mentally ill creatures but I'm sure real developers will create something Better to replacd it.


 No.1030229

>>1030122

>Anything that fucks over coc trannies is ok with me.

so, the opposite of this thread?


 No.1030305

>>1030229

If you say so. Subhumans fight dirty so do we.


 No.1030544

>>1030305

Fighting dirty is not the same as screeching impotently, LARPing, and embarassing any potential ally.


 No.1030993

>LtGerome permanently suspended from reddit

>still nothing on https://github.com/github/dmca

>nobody actually rescinded anything from Linux

What a mess


 No.1032898

>tfw mikee is gone

come back mikee :(


 No.1033214

What is this about the GPL? Why not use BSD if you want a toothless license? At least it does not put on airs.


 No.1033215


 No.1033216

>>1030121

>Learn about signatures. You can sign an "X" on a document and it is completely valid.

It is. I don't know why you don't know this.


 No.1033219

>The estoppel defense, in its simplest form, is that once code has been released under an open-source license, the community can reasonably assume that the developer can't take back the right to use his or her's code.

They're going with estopple, lol.

That is basically "We have _NO_ defense at law, so we will beg the court under equity to not enforce the author's lawful rights - and since self-help is not available, please court".

Good luck arguing an equitable defense when you didn't pay a dime to anybody, didn't have a word with the author, and are simply a freeloader.

>Some people are still unclear about what it means or what happens once they've published their program under an open-source license. In the most recent example, mikeeusa, the author of an obscure game called GPC-Slots 2, claimed he was rescinding the program's GPLv2 license from some people and "from anyone who adds a 'Code of Conduct' anywhere near my code (to 'fight sexism'.)."

I'm not unclear about it at all. I know more about the ins and outs of US copyright law than you Singh

>While this specific case doesn't really matter -- the text-based casino game hasn't been updated in over a decade and appears to have no players -- the issue of whether one can block users from using code once it's been placed under the GPLv2 bothered enough people that it's been one of the hottest stories on the Linux Kernel Mailing List (LKML) for over a week.

GPC-Slots 2 is feature complete, it doesn't need to be systemd'd


 No.1033220

>>1032898

I was getting the beginnings of a migrane from explaining the same thing over and over, also I wanted to (lern2) "kode", got some nice features done in my other game.


 No.1033239

>>1030053

Are you ever going to file a lawsuit though?


 No.1033243

>>1030014

Okay I see, your waiting for other people to file suit before you do to cover your tracks and file suit in the fray. Makes sense because while I’m rooting for you you gotta admit if this thread was tracked back to you you’d get at least a reprimand.


 No.1033256

>>1027681

I always assumed the “consideration” you were getting under the GPL was the free use of the software your contributing to.

You use the Linux kernel for a while, want it to do something extra, contribute code to it, and now you have it doing what you want, but since you didn’t pay for any of the labor that went into the rest of the code, that’s your consideration.

Your code on its own would be worthless without the probably millions of man hours that went into making the rest of the kernel.


 No.1033328

>>1033256

You are not required to contribute back at all, so it's insufficient for consideration.

>You use the Linux kernel for a while, want it to do something extra, contribute code to it, and now you have it doing what you want, but since you didn’t pay for any of the labor that went into the rest of the code, that’s your consideration.

The "other side" (licensor) did not ask for, nor require you to "contribute" anything.

Secondly, if you retain your copyrights have you really "contributed" anything? You still own your work in-toto.

What the licensor has done is changed from the default of "no derivative works permitted" to "some derivative works permitted". That's a win for you, with nothing given to the licensor. Again it's a gratuity.

(Which is re-payed, often enough, by the licensees not even following the guidelines and violating the license anyway)

In the case of the Linux Kernel, it is _VERY_ hard to get anything accepted for inclusion in the first place (this is one of the failings by Linus: he just doesn't know what he doesn't know and rejects quite good patches like grsecurity and pax)

For projects where there is a contributor licensing agreement the story is different, but that is not the case here, nor with linux, nor with many (traditionally most non-gnu) projects.

>>1033243

Yep. I think I've stuck my neck out enough trying to educate the programmers. I get threats of disbarment (and imprisonment) from the angry ones. "GPL is revocable" is not a phrase they like.


 No.1033336

>>1033219

no it isn't, ask Github :)


 No.1033618

https://linux-faq.ru/news/reliz-novoj-stabilnoj-versii-kde-plasma-vazhnoe-ispravlenie-dlya-frejmvorka-django-i-drugie-novosti.html

The developer of the text game GPC-Slots 2, known as Mikeeusa, withdrew the GPL 2 license to his game for a number of left-wing parrots. As a reason, he called the inadmissibility of placing his code in one repository with the rules of behavior of developers prohibiting sexism in relation to women. In his communication, he cited a list of legal grounds valid within the United States legal framework to enable him to do so, as well as urging all developers to follow suit. In addition, he said he would continue to revoke the license for other left-wing parrots. Left-hand-liberal dump ZDNet has already published an angry article about this.

New version of PyPy, adapting Ubuntu to work on ARM-laptops with preinstalled windows and other news


 No.1033619

Russians are always great. Always on the correct side.

>>1033618

Разработчик текстовой игры GPC-Slots 2, известный, как MikeeUSA, отозвал лицензию GPL 2 на свою игру для ряда левых популистов. В качестве причины он назвал неприемлемость размещения его кода в одном репозитории с правилами поведения разработчиков, запрещающими «сексизм» по отношению к женщинам. В своем сообщении он привел список правовых оснований, действительных в рамках правового поля США и позволяющих ему сделать это, а также призвал всех разработчиков последовать его примеру. Кроме того, он заявил, что продолжит отзывать лицензию и для других левых популистов. Леволиберальная помойка ZDNet уже опубликовала гневную статью по этому поводу.


 No.1033621

>>1033618

>>1033619

>They didn't link the ZDNet article


 No.1033623

>>1033621

Guess they didn't want to give the librashanka ameriganski of indian extraction his due?

> https://www.zdnet.com/article/no-you-cant-take-open-source-code-back/

Here's a non russian source taking ZDNet's side:

https://www.html.it/18/02/2019/linux-la-gpl-non-si-puo-ignorare/

Now you'll note the argument is simply "no you can't" and "obviously" and also erroneously claims that after the SCO trial the kernel team started requiring copyright assignment.


 No.1033624

> In his communication, he cited a list of legal grounds valid within the United States legal framework to enable him to do so, as well as urging all developers to follow suit. In addition, he said he would continue to revoke the license for other left-wing parrots. Left-hand-liberal dump ZDNet has already published an angry article about this.

Thank you Russia. With love.


 No.1033626

Cracker news had a short discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19161833

They noted Sam Vehrege's proclaimation that opensource isn't the "wild west" anymore and gratis programmers must /OBEY/ now, and we keeping your code!.

You really need to rescind guys. You have to fuck them over.


 No.1033629


 No.1033630

Is it possible to withdraw access to the code originally deployed as GPL? No.

Posted on 19 February 2019 by Raoul Scarazzini in News//2 comments

I had chosen, as was my want, to rescind the license I extended from a

No choice I can do this because GPC-Slots 2 is my

Copyrighted work. I built it. I never transferred the copyright over to

Anyone.

I chose, as was my will, to terminate the license I had extended to some people. I can do this because GPC-Slots 2 is a job I hold copyright. I've never transferred this copyright to anyone.

With these words pops up one of the most followed threads of the last period in the list Linux Kernel mailing list created by that Mikeeusa, developer of the game GPC-Slots 2 (personally never seen nor heard before), within which the author says he wants to Restrict the use of your code to some specific people and in general to all those who add "code of Conduct" close to your code.

The problem is that the developer ignores a fundamental point that we have already covered in the recent past, precisely when Richard Stallman himself has confirmed that the contributions to the Linux code could not be cancelled: once GPL, for ever LPG.

Stallman's word was not enough, the good Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, author of reference for the Linux world of ZDNet, confirms it after contacting several lawyers:

"The GPLv2 have several provisions that, when taken together, can be construed as an irrevocable license from each contributor."

The GPLV2 has several provisions which, when put together, can be construed as an irrevocable license from each contributor.

Though so, black on white, things seem very clear there are holes within the various definitions that can create contradictions of terms and confusion.

Of course things would be much simpler if any developer who decides to develop open source code thinks about donating something without any constraint, respecting the principle of gratuity on all fronts (not only monetary then, but also Ideological). But this is a complicated world, where the licenses to be balanced are manifold and many things change in the course of work, see for example the introduction of the code of conduct. So the steps should be carefully assessed, a bit like when you publish a photo on the internet thinking it can stay private forever: Impossible. The same applies to the code: reprocessing once you have made it free could prove very, very complicated.

What do you think?


 No.1033631

https://www.miamammausalinux.org/2019/02/e-possibile-ritirare-laccesso-a-del-codice-inizialmente-distribuito-come-gpl-no/

È possibile ritirare l’accesso a del codice inizialmente distribuito come GPL? No.

Inserito su 19 Febbraio 2019 da Raoul Scarazzini in Notizie // 2 Commenti

I had chosen, as was my want, to rescind the license I extended from a

few choice individuals. I can do this because GPC-Slots 2 is my

copyrighted work. I built it. I never transferred the copyright over to

anyone.

Ho scelto, come era mia volontà, di rescindere la licenza che avevo esteso ad alcune persone. Posso farlo perché GPC-Slots 2 è un lavoro del quale detengo copyright. Non ho mai trasferito questo copyright a nessuno.

Con queste parole si apre uno dei thread più seguiti dell’ultimo periodo nella lista Linux Kernel Mailing List creato da tale MikeeUSA, sviluppatore del gioco GPC-Slots 2 (personalmente mai visto né sentito prima d’ora), all’interno del quale l’autore dice di voler limitare l’utilizzo del suo codice ad alcune specifiche persone ed in generale a tutti quelli che aggiungono del “Code of Conduct” vicino al proprio codice.

Il problema è che lo sviluppatore ignora un punto fondamentale che già abbiamo trattato nel recente passato, precisamente quando lo stesso Richard Stallman ha confermato come i contributi al codice Linux non potessero essere annullati: una volta GPL, per sempre GPL.

Non bastasse la parola di Stallman, il buon Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, autore di riferimento per il mondo Linux di ZDNet, lo conferma dopo aver contattato diversi avvocati:

“The GPLv2 have several provisions that, when taken together, can be construed as an irrevocable license from each contributor.”

La GPLv2 ha diverse disposizioni che, se messe insieme, possono essere interpretate come una licenza irrevocabile da ciascun contributore.

Sebbene quindi, nero su bianco, le cose sembrino chiarissime ci sono dei buchi all’interno delle varie definizioni che possono creare contraddizioni di termini e confusione.

Certo le cose sarebbero molto più semplici se ogni sviluppatore che decide di sviluppare codice open-source ragionasse pensando di donare qualcosa senza alcun vincolo, rispettando il principio della gratuità su tutti i fronti (non solo monetaria quindi, ma anche ideologica). Ma questo è un mondo complicato, in cui le licenze tra cui bilanciarsi sono molteplici e molte cose cambiano in corso d’opera, vedi ad esempio l’introduzione del codice di condotta. Pertanto i passi vanno valutati con attenzione, un po’ come quando si pubblica una foto su internet pensando possa rimanere privata per sempre: impossibile. Lo stesso vale per il codice: ritrattare una volta che lo si è reso libero potrebbe rivelarsi molto, molto complicato.

Cosa ne pensate?


 No.1033632

>>1033629

Ty

So we have America and Italy(x2) on the women's + CoC side.

And Russia alone on men's side.


 No.1033634

@Richi Jennings

‏Verified account @RiCHi

Replying to @sjvn @ZDNet

haha nice try @mikeeusa

2:27 AM - 13 Feb 2019 from South East, England

----

S. Vaughan-Nichols

‏ @sjvn

Feb 12

No, you can't take open-source code back https://zd.net/2SJiEQd via @ZDNet & @sjvn You can't close the lid to Pandora's copyright box once you've opened your code using an #opensource license.


 No.1033636

Pierre Jackson - Google+

https://plus.google.com/107957485334658597778

Anonymous View

"No backsies!" https://www.zdnet.com/article/no-you-cant-take-open-source-code -back/ · No, you can't take open-source code back | ZDNet · No, you can't take ...

https://plus.google.com/107957485334658597778


 No.1033637

I notice the argument is simply "NO YOU CANT LOLZZZ"

"NO BACKSIES LOLZ"

"OBVIOUSLY! LOLZ!"


 No.1033638

This is why I get a migraine arguing this issue.

No matter what I do the "counter argument" is simply "LLOOOLLZZZ NO!"

All legal reasoning is ignored. Just LOOKLLLLLLZZZ NO!!!! OOOBBVVUUSSLLLYYY.

I hate these fucking people thusly.

They don't even understand that when your "first defense" is an equitable one you have trash as a case. Equitable defenses are the last port of call, they are used in /every/ property case when the other side has NO legal case to make.

But here they're held up as a "sure fire win".

Even though the entirety of the law breaks the other way.


 No.1033640

File: 02615f375e0ca44⋯.webm (3.89 MB, 960x540, 16:9, dead moose.webm)

>mikee is back


 No.1033641

>>1033638

And that's all meaningless if you don't actually bring it to court


 No.1033642

saosebastiao 6 days ago

The person attempting to revoke their GPL licensed code is known for harassing the Debian Women and LinuxChix groups, as well as generally advocating for violence against women and feminists in particular. I mean the guy has openly advocated for the legalization of rape. He's absolutely a troll.

http://geekfeminism.wikia.com/wiki/MikeeUSA

EDIT: lol, the trolls are definitely out in force today.

reply

xd 6 days ago

Sounds like he needs dealing with via law .. codes of conduct won't fix his behaviour.

reply


 No.1033643

>>1027969

>15 days ago

>he was LARPing after all

Mikee is all talk and no action


 No.1033645

>>1033641

It's in the hands of the 1000s of kernel hackers now.

My goal was to educate them so they would contact their local qualified attorney and formulate a strategy going forward.

If one erroneously believes one "has no case" because "LOLz No" one will not make an inquiry.

It's been months and the other side is still using the same non-arguments, I hope the kernel hackers of now and of old will see that.

One posted not too long ago on slashdot that he'd like to take his audio code contributions back from the kernel if he can, perhaps now he knows there is a way.


 No.1033647

> In his communication, he cited a list of legal grounds valid within the United States legal framework to enable him to do so, as well as urging all developers to follow suit. In addition, he said he would continue to revoke the license for other left-wing parrots. Left-hand-liberal dump ZDNet has already published an angry article about this.

<3 Ryoussia


 No.1033980

>>1033645

>It's been months and

...and you still could not file a valid DMCA claim, let alone sue anyone, let alone get any ruling on the matter.


 No.1033981

>>1033980

Learn how to greentext nigger


 No.1033986

> In his communication, he cited a list of legal grounds valid within the United States legal framework to enable him to do so, as well as urging all developers to follow suit. In addition, he said he would continue to revoke the license for other left-wing parrots. Left-hand-liberal dump ZDNet has already published an angry article about this.

<3 Ryoussia

Russia is the best.

Notice how things stand:

Russia is based.

Americans are 1/2 faggots.

Others are 2/2 faggots.


 No.1033994

>>1033981

<Learn how to greentext nigger

>no u




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / gothpol ]