No.539766
>Kloss is an avid coder. In April 2015, she partnered with Flatiron School and Code.org to offer a scholarship named Kode with Karlie for young girls interested in Computer Science and Software Engineering
How does this make you feel, /tech/?
No.539771
No.539773
>glossy screen
what a pile of shit
No.539777
No.539778
>not cmatrix
2/10 wouldn't learn coding from.
No.539779
>her "code" is a Hello World and a terminal full of error messages
>she can't even use cd properly
No.539781
It's really fucking spooky how these cunts go out of their way to applaud vapid girls for the modern equivalent of having a Pokemon cheat site on Angelfire
No.539783
>>539766
>How does this make you feel, /tech/?
Depends on how big her mouth is.
No.539786
>>539773
Ha, that's a New Macbook. That laptop that Apple made for dumb execs that absolutely needs to be as thin as possible, has only USB-C and a 3.5mm jack for connections, runs a core M, and starts at 1300. It's has every piece of the worst stereotypes about apple computers, which sucks because they also make some decently priced high quality machines now. but of course it's what dumb SJWs would pick
No.539790
>>539786
None of those things are bad. Are you trying to convince people to get a Macbook? Stop that immediately.
The New Macbook is bad because the keys have zero travel. Typing on a macbook is as pleasant as typing on a holographic projection of a keyboard. I once went to the store, fully intent on buying a Macbook, and then I tried typing "A quick brown fox" and walked away.
No.539792
>>539766
yeah but if she'd just cat crazy_strings.rb I bet you would be blown away!
No.539793
>>539786
I don't care if it has the best specs in the world or best build quality, glossy screen = into the trash
No.539795
>>539790
> None of those things are bad.
well let's see here
>style over substance
>physically large portable computing device with build quality of toilet paper
>limited connectivity dictated by aesthetics over practicality and a vested interest in pushing yet another cable standard so they can milk another round of $80 dongles out of suckers
>$1300 for basically an intel atom
>arthritis
No.539796
Uuugh. Kill me.
I barely code at all and I would never gloat on how much I know or that I'm a "koder!! :)" And who posts their mistakes? What a moron.
No.539799
>>539766
>How does this make you feel, /tech/?
I have urge to show her how to use Linux and Emacs.
No.539800
File: 1457554270415.png (774.66 KB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Screenshot_2016-03-09-12-0….png)
def concatenate_strings(string1,string2)
"#{string1} #{string2}"
end
concatenate_strings("hello","world ")
#expect (concatenate_strings("hello"," world")), to be("hello world")
Prepare your rarest Pepes, mateys. The normalfag squad just arrived.
No.539801
>>539790
Their other machines have actual key travel (especially the Pro), and are actually decently specced for the price. The $1300 Macbook is a glorified netbook.
No.539803
>>539800
Would Fagioliposting work?
No.539807
>>539766
you're such a pioneer
>>539781
>Pokemon cheat site on Angelfire
Thanks for nostalgia m9
No.539809
>>539800
That doesn't even concatenate the strings. It adds a space. That is, by definition, not concatenation.
No.539814
>>539800
>calls function "concatenate_strings"
>it inserts a space between the given strings
>this is what passes as coding today
No.539815
>>539766
What is she eating? Is that eggwhite and some chicken?
No.539817
>>539815
It looks like a salad with of lettuce, sliced boiled eggs, canned tuna, potatoes, olives, and tomatoes.
No.539823
>>539817
I think those are beets. Because of fucking course they are.
No.539843
So who pays her to do that? Did tech companies form an actual cartel?
No.539851
>>539843
They hire women like that to pretend they're coders and further their "social change" goals. HR pets.
No.539856
>>539800
What language is that? Also why is the string not returned, it does nothing right?
No.539862
>>539856
It's ruby. The string is returned because it's the value of the final expression of the function, which is returned by default.
No.539865
>>539856
It's Ruby, which is a retarded backward language so the function probably works.
Can someone post the wat.webm? I'm on my surveillance device and don't have it here.
No.539868
>>539862
>>539862
Didn't knew that, kinda strange and doesn't make sense to me since I thought you should always tell if you want something returned or not, but if this is how ruby works...
No.539870
>>539851
Hence the instagram positioning of her lunch and brand-soda all with a sublte washed-out color palette applied to the photograph.
No.539883
>>539766
I've stayed away from twatter for a long time. However I am getting the urge to make a fake profile of a "womyncoder" just to see how many people I can string along for the ride.
No.539885
>>539883
You will honestly have a great amount of followers if you do that, could be useful for marketing your product. Just be sure to get some female pics no one has seen.
Also, set up a damn patreon account and they will eat that shit up.
No.539886
>>539885
Don't encourage me anon
No.539888
>>539886
I honestly want to do this myself, I seriously seriously need some money, and I think either making a streaming account with female clothes and voices would get me mad cash from autists, or making some shit like women who code on twitter where I shit out bullshit apps because I'm a strong female.
I don't do it just because it will be a huge waste of time if I get unlucky, also I would have to actually invest a bit in buying women clothes, shaving shit and things like that, I do think you would have a high chance of succeeding if you try it. Look at all these retards giving money to females for being females 'interested' in PCs.
No.539893
>>539800
>>539776
>>539766
Words cannot explain how angry this makes me.
>mfw these subhumans go around telling people they're "coders"
>mfw they think they're sticking it to gamergate retards by doing this
No.539894
What an avid coder, 10/10 on bash usage.
Seriously though, I wouldn't bash her for it, she's at least trying, which is more than what most normies do, maybe she'll install GNU/Linux one day or encourage someone else to, either way, if we just ignore the whole SJW "Look girls can code too!" thing (I mean damn, it's like these people have no knowledge of CS history) then it's a win for us.
No.539895
>>539888
What if, instead of making yet another fake poser "wymyn in code" account, you just made a normal "women in code" account where you didn't do bullshit for lulz like the OP pic?
You could teach good programming around problems that are uniquely female. Like
>can you map and predict your periods?
>can you write a program that will automatically buy fashionable items for you when they reach a certain discount or sale?
>a speech engine that will spit out complaints about that bitch at work.
That way we might actually get more women in tech, which is better for me because it enlarges the dating pool.
No.539897
>>539895
Are you stupid? People don't make these social justice freaks popular for being useful, but for being useless. If you make a female account where you are actually helpful and technical no one will give a shit, you need to look empowered, constantly shit on men and taunt everybody about how you can code, and you click that share button until your finger hurts, and complain that women don't have enough chances.
THIS is what makes it popular, no one gave two shits about actual female programmers that worked on great video games and didn't complain, people only care about the retarded ones.
No.539900
>>539895
I don't want women in tech though
No.539901
>>539894
It's zsh, the unintentional pun was good though
No.539902
No.539917
>>539883
>>539888
No wonder there are so many trannies these days.
No.539918
>>539868
It's how dozens of languages work. Ruby gets it from Perl.
No.539919
>>539917
Well, it does work, it turns neckbeards into empowered tranies with money, and they will die at 30 or so because lol tranies
No.539920
>>539895
you sound like one of those typical beta males. women don't get into tech because they think it is interesting. they do it because there are less females to compete with.
so unless you are the CEO of a tech company they won't talk to you even if they go into 'tech'
No.539940
Alright, I am no longer calling myself a "coder". It is well into normie territory now. Software developer is more accurate anyway.
>>539894
>she's at least trying
Maybe, but considering what she took a photo of, she evidently either doesn't care or doesn't understand.
>>539895
This has been done before and it just makes people bitch more.
No.539955
I would be insulted if I won this scholarship and I was female. This used to make me angry, but now it doesn't. The louder someone is, the less talented they are. The really untalented people cling to what they are instead of what they can do to justify their failures.
No.540026
>>539895
Periods are already predictable.
Fashionable items you first try out in the store, with friends, so you have a second and third opinion.
Source: Me :^)
No.540036
>>539766
>who takes in normal antioxidants nowadays?
>you have to fucking infuse them
>>539865
here you go mate
No.540062
>>540051
Just noticed that. What the fuck
No.540097
No.540108
>>539895
Please no, in every aspect of my life besides tech women around me get shit handed to them, its expected. Fuck that, if you cant learn basic logic without being catered to then please die.
The only bright future I can see is one where we are able to have better traps.
No.540111
>How does this make you feel, /tech/?
Girls are sexy and I like computers.
No.540118
>>540111
Posers aren't sexy.
No.540178
>>539766
she's literally the poor man's taytay
No.540179
and you guys wonder why php/python is popular
No.540180
>>540179
It's ruby you cumdumpster
No.540181
>>540180
same shit but japanese
No.540182
Her instagram is full of keks
This takes the cake though:
https://www.instagram.com/p/9p0FIhkSmn/?taken-by=karliekloss
>dat typing
No.540183
>>540178
She looks cuter than Taytay
No.540204
>>540182
>>dat typing
were00e9r09i09i0e9ir90ww
No.540227
No.540228
>>539955
However in our current world setup the loudest people get the jobs.
No.540246
>>539888
top kek
would fuck some nice looking /tech/ crossdresser
No.540263
>>539868
And this is why we tell faggots like you to begin with SICP.
No.540297
>>540263
>preaches functional programming
>uses windows
???
No.540406
>>540297
>those things are mutually exclusive
He's probably trolling though.
No.540408
>>539888
you've given me an evil eveil idea
my voice is sufficiently feminine. All I'd need is a quality mic and filter my voice an octave or two higher.
it's... time...
(1) pretend to be a woman
(2) wait
(3) when the profit goes down, come out as a tranny
(4) make really good ass code
(5) ???
(6) tell everyone the truth in an emotional exposé about your experience
(7) create a book or 3 (via ghost writer)
(8) ???
(9) profit
>>540246
oh, fuck me anon!
No.540415
>>540408
Pics of you in your thigh-highs?
No.540426
>>539800
Hey, at least she wrote a unit test.
No.540430
>>539766
>>540182
>these pictures
I'm not even mad. That's just pure sexism disguised as feminism. And someone even pays her to put literal garbage on social media.
#this will destroy h8chan and make it unusable for others
square(4)
No.540471
>>540430
how is it sexism?
No.540475
>>540108
>The only bright future I can see is one where we are able to have better traps.
Fuck that. Those faggots that pretend to be women are just as bad. I want the perfect woman, a dog with tits.
No.540476
>>540471
Sex sells. They packaged their message of 'girls can code too' with a tall, lean and blonde model. Guys will like her social media shit just because she's pretty and they want to fuck her. If she was an ugly landwhale she would only get other whales to follow her.
No.540483
>>540476
Wait could all of this be fake? They hired a model to act out some shit? Is this a giant conspiracy?
No.540486
>>540483
Are you retarded? She's some Victoria's Secret model and they're getting neckbeardbux and wiredmagazinesubscriberbux by filming her cocking around on her macbook.
No.540489
>>540041
oh man this movie makes me cry every time
No.540492
>>540486
What kind of retard pays money to watch a bimbo pretend to be smart?
No.540523
No.540535
>>539809
>>539814
A space is also a string.
No.540539
>>540535
Which is why anyone with a brain would concatenate their first string with a space and then call the concatenate function a second time to combine the output of the first call with the second string.
string1 = concatenateStrings(string1, " ");
string2 = concatenateStrings(string1, string2);
No.540541
>>540539
Why would you even write a shit function like this when every language today has its own operator to concat strings?
No.540546
>>539766
>>540182
Who cares? Anyone who has ever talked to a woman knows that they are like this. They exaggerate the things that they do, especially on social media, not because they are being malicious or feminist, but because it makes them seem more interesting and attractive. Even men exhibit this sort of behavior sometimes. Exaggeration is a common part of human social interaction. Even so, it is likely this girl has a genuine interest in technology, albeit at a beginning level.
It is also good to have women be interested in technology because it makes it easier for big fucking nerds like /tech/ users to find girlfriends that share their interests.
Perhaps she should not be showered in praise for basic tasks, but everyone in technology, as the unwashed masses view even basic computer usage as extremely dark magic. I remember when I was in high school, a simple text boot splash on my computer had me swarmed by people wondering if I was a ``hacker''.
No.540548
>>540546
Honest advice. Don't share a hobby with your significant other, it never works out.
No.540549
No.540552
>>540546
Good post anon, you have earned a tip of my fedora!
No.540553
>>540546
I've got an email from Kloss here. Says she wants to reward your gallantry by sleeping with you.
No.540557
>>540546
>because it makes it easier for big fucking nerds like /tech/ users to find girlfriends
These women are looking for men who are a 8/10 or above. They care primarily about how many resources you can give to them and how many resources they can take from you if they marry and divorce you. Secondarily, they care about how hot society thinks you are so they can show you off on facebook.
This bitch is never going to have a conversation with you about sorting algorithms, OS / browser choice or anything /tech/ related. She's a barely sentient parasite using technology as camouflage.
No.540582
>>540546
>/tech/ users to find girlfriends that share their interests.
Has anyone even met any female genuinely interested in /tech/ stuff? Or is it just some myth that people keep telling us so we continue to provide then with free software?
No.540587
No.540592
>>540582
They exist, but they're generally not attractive, and they're rare.
No.540593
>>540546
Never thought I'd have to use this on /tech/ of all places. But, here goes. m'lady
No.540594
>>540582
I've had ex's feign interest, nothing genuine though. At least I doubt it was genuine.
No.540595
>>540582
Yes. One of the best programmers i knew too.
But she didn't care about anything else, so forget about dating her.
And she hated social media with a passion too, so no hapless bragging about being able to write shitty webdev code.
Hell you're basically asking if statistical anomalies exist, yeah they do, but nuance is something one must forget to shitpost about japanese anime.
No.540826
>>540582
I did. She was attractive and also far beyond any of you. She turned out to be a sociopath. To be fair, she did warn me about this at the beginning of the relationship but I just figured it was a self-confidence issue or some bad past relationships and everything would work out fine. Nope. Beware: women in tech that are really good are either men or insane.
No.540832
>>540593
>fedoras defend women now
you clearly do not belong
>>>/reddit/
No.540834
>>540553
>If you disagree with my opinion it's because you want to get laid
No.540864
>>540552
>>540553
>>540557
>>540587
>>540593
All this defeatism... I stay hopeful that there is a autistic programmer wife for me. Mostly because I have no other interests. People think I'm asocial or have anxiety. In reality my interests are too narrow. I talk with my friends for 12h+ about Linux, FOSS, software, patents, protocols, hardware etc..
I would rather stay single forever rather than marry some desperate 30yo normalfag woman who thinks I will provide for her and she can divorce me when she gets bored with me.
No.540883
>>540864
>virgin thinks having the a partner with the same interest will make an ideal relationship
No.540884
>>540883
Why is having same interests as your partner bad idea?
No.540886
>>540883
>virgin
ad hominem
>thinks having the a partner with the same interest will make an ideal relationship
Depends what you want out of relationship. Why do we post on chans and care about software freedom, clearly posting pics on Facebook, following celebrities on twitter and socializing in bars is what works, right? That's what works for most people. /s
No.540896
>>540826
>she was also far beyond any of you
>I just figured it was ... some bad past relationships
White knight harder, cuck.
Any story about a woman who (does thing) or (is characteristic) better than any man is the tippest toppest white knight cuckold horseshit.
No.540903
No.540905
>>540896
There is woman who is better at giving birth than any man.
Is that " tippest toppest white knight cuckold horseshit."?
No.540914
>>540905
way to miss the point fedora kiddo
No.540919
>>540896
>Any story about a woman who (does thing) or (is characteristic) better than any man is the tippest toppest white knight cuckold horseshit.
She wasn't "better than any man" (I was better), but she'd smoke every one of you here on /tech/, no contest. You have no idea what kind of skill gap we're talking about, here.
No.540927
>>540919
>lying on an anonymous image board
No.540938
>>540927
The more I'd tell you about her the less you'd believe.
No.540953
No.540957
>>540919
what level was she?
No.540977
>>540582
I managed to get my girlfriend to learn Lua, but it's Lua. We'll see about something better later.
No.540979
>>540919
I know 95% of tech are retarded asshats who think they are the shit for installing crap like Arch. But some of us actually aren't so please respect us.
No.540994
>>540886
> ad hominem
“Virgin” is a polite form of address and a peaceful acknowledgment of a sad fact here, you triggered normalfag.
Get back to your forum with respectful posters, teenage-brained drama queen.
No.541029
>>540994
>fallacies are just bantz, you dip!
No.541101
>>540979
You're awfully defensive. I've not even mentioned anything about what she did so the only one who can compare her vs /tech/ posters is me, yet you're sure that I'm wrong that there is a /massive/ skill gap?
No.541102
>>539776
Holy shit, no wonder his game looks like garbage. John Flynt doesn't know the first thing about C++
No.541108
>>541101
You should confirm that you are yourself able to determine that. Anyway, without any proof, everything you said is nil.
No.541109
>>541108
You'd not believe why I can't give you any info that could identify her even more than you already don't believe what I'm saying about her.
No.541110
>>541109
A page with some code, or just explain what kind of thing.
For some faggots, "she did a website with node.js" is some accomplishment. If you say "she did a compliant C compiler " or "she wrote a simple video codec" would sound already a little better.
No.541111
No.541113
>>541110
She was a demoscene coder back before 3D acceleration was a (common) thing but after writing your own OS for them was almost mandatory (this was around 1994). It's how I met her - I used to do VGA register demos and met her through those circles on fidonet. The knowledge it took back then was encyclopedic, I'm not sure how to describe that to you. But suffice to say no one on /tech/'s "echo in assembly" thread even knowing how they should /approach/ that problem let alone how to solve it is a good sign there's at least a slight gap.
No.541114
>>541113
sounds legit
no wonder she left your faggoty ass
No.541116
>>541113
If that's true, then cool. Still an aberration. Also m8, that's not because nobody talks about competent things here that nobody's competent. You need to be more than one to talk about things.
No.541117
>>541113
OS-writing demoscene grill? Why would she stick with a ledditor? Everything makes sense now.
No.541118
>>541116
Yeah, no argument at all she was an exception. I've only met two great female coders in my life, one was her (she was very crazy) and one was a kernel developer at Sun during the SunOS days.
No.541120
>>541118
It's understandable that you'd be hung up over it forever, lurking chans and crying about her. You really blew it, anon.
No.541127
>>539801
>Buying a macbook
>not buy the pixel 2015 instead
>mfw
No.541137
>>540582
Yea, one of the top 5 in my CS school is a girl. She's into low level stuff, and she's objectively attractive.
It's just that they are outnumbered 20 to 1 to begin with and the percentage of them who are slackers is the same as men so that's why there are so few of them.
No.541139
>>539776
if (tweet.hasTag("Gamegater") || tweet.seemsNegative())
tweet.block();
No.541141
>>540919
You have the smallest dick on /tech/, no contest.
Go white knight somewhere else, cuck.
No.541142
>>541117
She didn't stick with anyone. She was lying to everyone in her life and I eventually realized she had at least one parallel relationship who was also being lied to. She had lied to her sister who thought she was dating a third person who I don't think she had any contact with, and had lied to her parents about me claiming I was just a friend 2 years into the relationship while also lying to me about how her parents were approving of our relationship. I flew out to meet her parents once and is where everything started to unravel as everyone in her life I talked to had a completely different idea of what was going on and who she was. She could switch emotions like flipping a switch, too. And I don't mean "lol girls be craazy" shit, I mean pathological total lack of empathy - she really was faking all emotion. As things started to come unglued (I found the other guy and we pieced together what had been going on) she must have lied to our collective friends as they stopped talking to me (I assume she said I raped her). Luckily this was the '90s before witch trials were a thing so the only cost to me was everyone I knew. I still don't know how much of what I thought I knew about her was a lie. I do know she was legitimately a beyond excellent coder and Quake player as we did those things together (and I taught her to write demos for Linux with svgalib + mikmod + nasm).
Basically, the reason she was so good and so prolific was that she was so broken she'd just stay inside all day on her computer and try to avoid dealing directly with people since she didn't really know how and it'd always go wrong. She did warn me and I didn't listen. And even when it was obvious I convinced myself I could fix her rather than leave.
>>541120
No, I look back on that as somehow having survived taking a leisurely stroll on the beach on D-Day. I was planning to marry her and was ring shopping and I often think of what a total disaster that would have been.
No.541143
>>541142
You realize you sound like every mangina to ever white knight, right?
"Oh but she was a unicorn she was SO much better than everyone else. See how much better she was than you? See how much better she was than all other women? Oh, but here's one CRITICAL FLAW she had to grant legitimacy to my white knight story."
You don't belong here. Get the fuck out.
No.541145
>>541143
You've been trying so hard, I'll give you this reply for effort.
No.541146
>>541142
>I mean pathological total lack of empathy - she really was faking all emotion.
Anon I'm sorry to tell you this, but that's basically all 3DPD women.
Just kidding I'm not sorry to tell you this at all. You fucking have to learn it someday.
No.541147
>>541145
Yeah, I'm the one making up a bunch of bullshit stories pedelstalizing some random twat who didn't give one molecule of shit about me.
Go write your white knight 'women in tech' fanfics somewhere else.
No.541148
>>541145
are you mad you got emotionally manipulated into revealing the story you said you wouldn't
No.541149
>muh special snowflake woman is totally different than all the other girls
>shes also a stonecold killah
>she could shoot all of you without remorse while writing an os in assembly
sometimes I really want to be 15 again just like you
No.541153
>>541146
I wouldn't say they "fake all emotion" -- that's legitimate sociopath stuff. It's more like they're slaves to their whims. Their emotions are out of control, and often not very valid or representative of anything actually important or meaningful, but they feel like their emotions are more real than ours because they have them more often and quite a bit more loudly.
women love communicating you're just a stupid cave man ;~;
if by communicating you mean verbal and mental diarrhea
No.541154
>>541148
No, I didn't give you any identifying information just like I said, or even tell you the best parts. You'd never believe the best parts in a million years, anyway.
No.541155
>>541146
No, this was serial killer levels of disconnect. It was very different.
No.541156
>>541154
Is "she" actually RMS?
No.541157
>>541155
I bet you 100$ she would have shown some emotions if you had held a gun to her face :^)
No.541158
>>541154
>best parts
The parts where she finally let you flop your penis over the edge of her meat wallet and marinate in her other fucks' cum?
The parts when you lie awake at night thinking about the amount of sweaty cock that got rubbed into your dick via her pay-to-play pussy?
No.541159
>>541154
>random girl who never gave a shit about you
>you feel the need to come to an anonymous image board and tell lies about how she has "1337 skills nobody else has"
>"I can't tell you the best stories about how skilled she was because you wouldn't even believe them!"
10/10 would be trolled again
No.541162
>>541159
why is that so unbelievable? my waifu is a half-vampire. That's much harder for normies to get a grip on.
No.541164
>>540192
Like I said, she looks cuter than Taytay
No.541174
>>541162
Does your half-vampire waifu have skills that are better than any other vampire?
No.541196
god /tech/ really is sad, it's like i'm on /r9k/
No.541211
>>541196
All these sad, fat, virgins refusing to pedestalize brave womyn in tech amirite?
Btw ladies I'm free tonite :^)
No.541216
>>541211
no, just refusing to accept the fact that talented womyn in tech do exist. it's making me a bit scared tbh, since you probably think that way from personal experience
No.541221
>>541216
>no, just refusing to accept the fact that talented womyn in tech do exist
Yes, well, the thing about most people here is that they don't tend to accept something as a "fact" without some kind of proof first. Until proof is provided it's just your opinion.
No.541225
>>541216
No one here is denying the fact that talented women exist.
They become talented through the same ways that men do: combination of natural talent, practice, learning from mistakes, learning from others and collaborating with a team.
When you start making shit up about "the magical wyman who is MORE SKILLED THAN YOU :33333" it reads like very other white knight bullshit thing we see daily in this SJW-ified, feminized, 'women can do no wrong' world.
No.541226
>>541221
The author of Linux's USB stack is female. Could you write something like that, anon?
No.541227
>>541225
>spills spaghetti over a story of a single woman that is better than xim
>it's everyone else who is wrong!
No.541231
You have to understand the mentality of /tech/. People here are posers and the only thing they have to feel better about themselves as they stumble and fail on fizzbuzz is that they are at least better than the women. Thr existence of a woman who is better than them undercuts that. Now they have to face the possibility that they might actually be the worst of the worst and that there are women out there laughing at their shit code just like they laughed at them in high school. It's a scary thought so they lash out.
No.541234
>>541231
/tech/ and the tech field in general can only exist as a meritocracy. We don't give a shit if you're a man, a woman or one of the 58028102 other tumblr genders.
We give a shit that you're capable of writing code. Many women are capable of writing code at a very high level and they garner the respect of most people here and in the tech field in general.
What we're absolutely sick and fucking tired of is "lel you're a sad fat virgin neckbeard for criticizing brave womyn coders" when their code consists of a cout statement that has syntax errors. It's also cute that any criticism of a woman for any reason is met with "lel criticizing women means you were rejected by women because you're a sad fat lonely neckbeard autist virgin".
Fuck off, cunt.
No.541243
>>541234
The thread originally sperged out over was simply a statement that there is a woman that would smoke you at tech, in reply to implying there isn't. Clearly this isn't "We don't give a shit" about gender. This is /tech/ being entirely hung up with gender. You tell me why that is.
No.541246
>>541226
>The author of Linux's USB stack is female.
You mean the USB 3 stack, aka the one where power management doesn't work most of the time
No.541249
>>541246
Power management doesn't work in USB at the hardware level. It's a hopeless mess, especially with modems.
No.541269
>>541243
Like was described above, we're bombarded on a daily basis with 'women are wonderful' and 'women are better than you' and 'criticizing women isn't allowed because it's harassment' SJW shit.
Gee I wonder why people don't enjoy posts about some mystery coder woman who will smoke all of us when it comes to code.
No.541280
>>540546
>It is also good to have women be interested in technology because it makes it easier for big fucking nerds like /tech/ users to find girlfriends that share their interests.
You know, when programming and modern technology determine the reliability of things like fucking aircraft autopiloting systems and automatic food processors, maybe we should value actual competence over getting people's dicks wet.
No.541321
>>541280
Betas will always chase the tail they can never get no matter what you say
No.541371
>>539766
Things like this wouldn't happen if thirsty neckbeards weren't bending over backwards to give her attention.
This is the same reason there's so many girls in online video games that are shitty try hard attention whores.
No.541376
>>541371
>Shitty female behavior is still men's fault.
Those fat virgin neckbeards amirite :^)
No.541378
>>541376
Yeah people exhibit shitty behavior strictly for the sake of it.
Keep upvoting them and praising them in hopes of pussy
No.541431
>>541234
>We don't give a shit if you're a man, a woman or one of the 58028102 other tumblr genders.
I do. Mentally ill people should not be considered as normal as "men and women".
No.541460
>>540582
Um... would my mom count? She basically single-handedly designed and later maintained an automatic electromechanical exchange for a redundancy network for emergency communication in the shipyard in my hometown in the late 70's. She also used to tell me cool stories like how she once won movie tickets on the radio by blocking the line for other contestants.
Maybe it was a specific for eastern block, but according to her there were relatively more women attending EE in her polytechnic back then. In my year there were only a few females, but two of them went on and got PhDs. Also my parents met in a class, so sharing interests in /tech/ stuff is possible.
No.541465
>>541431
He never said they were men or women. But good code is good code no matter whether it was written by a Tumblrite or a Shitlord.
No.541475
This is of course part of the elites plan to lower wages in programming jobs by introducing women and
P.O.C.. Don't think for one moment they actually care about teaching women how to understand
the internals of software systems. This is not charity.
By the way, why are all these shallow hipster always using Macbooks AND using proprietary OS X?
I see it constantly on open sores convention:
"Here is why Open Source™ will boost efficiency in you organizations software deployment.
Free as in free beer, etc... "
While using a Macbook with OS X and other non-free software.
No.541574
>>541475
>why is everyone doing x?
Because america, land of the retards, home of the good goys
No.541638
No.541743
>>539776
bullshit > /dev/null
No.541745
>>541743
-bash: bullshit: command not found
No.541753
>>541418
This is yet another bullshit marketing stunt, but I don't mind.
After all, at it's core it's just one grill that liked "coding" and wants people to join in on the fun.
Obvioulsly it's a source of both cringe and laughter how somebody can think they know shit about programming after a short bootcamp, and given the screenshots she's about as good as you'd expect, but ultimately? Who cares?
No.541781
>>541418
That puts it in a different light. She's not really trying to be a girl koder!! XD like other cancer, she's a model hired by flatiron to market its program and hadn't attempted code until they hired her, and is being paid to play make believe just like any other marketing spokesmen.
No.541784
>>541745
-sh: 1: bash: not found
No.541793
>>541784
ERROR: undefined identifier at ";"
::/Home/Temp.TXT.Z.0001 sh;;
Except:Compiler:&LexExcept+0x00A6:
PrsStmt+0x090A
No.541824
>>540582
not the kind of women you'd be interested in
the women who are interested in + legitimately skilled in tech most likely come from extremely competitive cultures- see china/east asia in general
these are the kind of people who successfully enter merit-based positions where their position as part of a team is only guaranteed by their ability to yield results for that team, else the product doesn't work and they have no job.
I'm not sure if this is true for software development, but you can rarely find these people in hardware. if your hiring manager is white he might not even be able to tell what gender the applicants are because many of them have foreign names, meaning that if he happens to choose a women, it won't even be because of her gender, just because of her capabilities.
No.541873
>>541781
someone should accuse her of portraying an unrealistic body image of women in tech. And don't get me started on the "cookie expert" line. I can't even...
No.541948
The problem is it's just fake. They hired an actor and didn't bother to look for someone who might actually have an interest in learning. I've seen exactly the same thing, except it was a company offering commercial courses, and it looked legit. They recruited two women with no stem background, first being a student of cultural studies, second having a PhD in psychology and offered them free courses in exchange for vblogging about everything they do. The first one is going through front-end and the second through back-end course. Both of them are currently finishing the prework. They are doing assignments and (depending on the end) learning basics of using linux, git, html, css, javaScript, jQuerry, MySQL, PHP, symfony on their own at home. The prework is supposed to take a month, and is done before the actual 3 month stage of the course begins. The ultimate goal of the course is to get hired somewhere.
I'd give you the links, but unfortunately it's all in polish.
No.541960
>>541948
I'm sure you're not the only Polish person here, so if you have the links ready, you might as well post them.
No.541962
No.541986
>>539766
A girl's only scholarship for CS and SE?
I have no problem with that. Plenty of scholarships for practically every demographic in the book.
Pretending you know how do use a terminal but failing miserably? Yeah, no.
Also, a very round-about Hello World "program".
No.542015
>>541986
Try setting up a scholarship for white cis.men, see how long it takes until you are sued by the SPLC and NAACP.
No.542026
>>542015
>Try setting up a scholarship
Too poor. Need scholarship money to get an education and get the money to set one up.
No.542031
>>542015
>>542026
>scholarships
>not taking a loan and fleeing to Europe after graduation
No.542047
>>539776
I'm still learning about programming, what would her code do and how is it wrong?
No.542053
No.542059
>>539895
>enlarges the dating pool
>he believes more women competing in the same industry might increase his chance of reproduce
Oh Betamax.
No.542060
>>542047
She tried to mimic C++ code, but in C++ =
==
This kind of mistake is considered to be a deadly sin because if (a=b)
No.542063
>>542047
alright so im no teacher (and not much of a programmer) but ill try to sum it up my best:
>besides autistic indenting (yes i know its twitter but still)
>no brackets to surround the if and else statement
starting from the top:
>if(Tweeter=gamergater)
what it is trying to say is that is that if the variable "Tweeter" is equal to "Gamergater" then it would continue into the if statement.
-- one of the mistakes it made is in programming "=" is the assignment operator (you use this to assign variables not to check conditions). It should have been a condiditonal operator "==" which is what you use to check equality in programming. (Notice it also did this on the else if)
-- Next it used an else if to end the if. but there is no else (I suppose this could be incomplete code but still *cringe*)
-- Also do you see how the parameters inside the if and else if have the same conditions?
this means the code can be condensed into one line
see this >>541139 for just one example, it added a ton of extra code for no reason. I've more of a Network Administrator so I'm sorry if this isn't 100% but the cringe is painfully obvious...
No.542069
>>540118
This. No one likes posers.
No.542106
>>542060
what if I'm not sure 'a' can be made equal to 'b', so I want to check it with an if :<
No.542125
>>542106
In C like languages:
== is the binary operator that gives you the boolean value of whether a is equal to b.
= is the binary operator for assignment (contents of the expression on the right (rvalue) to the expression on the left (lvalue)) and returns the value of the assignment.
So:
if (a == b)
means if a being equal to b is true (What you probably want) and
if (a = b)
means if after assigning b contents to a, the assignment casted to boolean value is true.
Integers, and subsequently pointers, can be casted to boolean values, if they are zero the result is false, true if they are anything else.
So
int a, b;
b = 2;
if (a = b)
The condition inside the if will assign 2 to "a" and then enter the if because 2 is casted to true.
and:
int a, b;
b = 0;
if (a = b)
Would assign 0 to "a" and will not enter the if (or go to the else clause if there is one) because 0 is casted to false.
This is useful with pointers, because more than often you want to check if a pointer is NULL (an invalid pointer), and since pointers are integers the de facto NULL value for pointers is 0.
so:
if (my_pointer)
Is a shorthand for
if (my_pointer != NULL)
Where NULL is defined to be 0.
To recapitulate, this is because in general for integers (and pointers):
if (a != 0)
is the same as
if (a)
If you replace "a" with "(a = b)" you get the explanation I gave you before.
The same implicit boolean casts can be used in other boolean statements like "for" and "while" loops.
Modern compilers will warn you about if(a = b) statements and insist in putting parenthesis around the expression to make sure you really want that like so: if ((a = b))
No.542152
No.542163
No.542167
>>541960
Polak coming through
No.542190
>>542063
> no brackets to surround the if and else statement
That's not an issue. At least, it wouldn't be if the indentation was remotely sane.
>-- Next it used an else if to end the if. but there is no else
obviously fine if whatever follows was meant to be executed regardless of whether the if statements were triggered.
No.542313
>>539766
your picture is wrong
you forgot pwd
No.542331
No.542781
>>540994
>le ad hominem ! !1 111 !! xXddDD
>>>/reddit/
No.542784
>>539776
Well, that explains SJW logic pretty well. "Everyone is the enemy, and every comment is a personal attack on me."
No.542894
>>542784
It's even better, since only mediocre people (=0) are accepted.
No.542897
>>539778
Needs more techno and neon.
No.542899
>>541127
>buying a botnetbox
>fucking ever
2/10 made me reply
No.543202
>>542784
i also made that connection
No.543634
>"coding" in notepad
>"coding" html
>photo of screen
I can't tell who's trolling and who's an idiot anymore, it's all so close together.
No.543659
>>539766
>tfw I used to do this exact thing when I was new
No.543662
>>542015
>someone on 8ch uses guixsd
ugh...
No.543678
>>543634
>Hotlinking to Wikipedia
>Not using css classing and divs
>Not tabbing for readability
Literally first tutorial level html.
No.543776
>>542047
The code would compile and run, but she confused the == with the =. With the former you compare, the latter you assign.
It will always write out the first "Bock." and never even try the second one. Since in the if-statement the variable "Tweeter" is assigned the value of "Gamergater", that will always be true because she assigns it that value right there in the if-statement.
It also looks shit, who the fuck would put the else and the if on different lines?
And why just write "Block."? What's the purpose of that?
No.544047
>>540834
You just admitted that your in it for the pussy tho famalamadingdomg
>It is also good to have women be interested in technology because it makes it easier for big fucking nerds like /tech/ users to find girlfriends that share their interests.
No.544223
>>540919
>She wasn't "better than any man" (I was better), but she'd smoke every one of you here on /tech/, no contest. You have no idea what kind of skill gap we're talking about, here.
Lol there is *always* one of these anecdotal magical unicorn fuckers in these threads and I've never once seen any of them produce the slightest shred of evidence.
Women in tech is the biggest meme
No.544224
>>541137
>Yea, one of the top 5 in my CS school is a girl. She's into low level stuff, and she's objectively attractive.
You must be going to a pretty shitty school anon