No.540818
>NSA is logging literally all internet traffic
>quantum computers will be able to break 99% of traditional encryption within the next few decades
Game over
No.540936
>>540818
they will force backdoors into encryption much sooner than first quantum computers show up anyway
No.541219
>not using quantum resistant crypto
No.541342
>99% of that 99% will be worthless shitposting
>NSA employees will commit suicide sifting through the galaxies of piss being defecated all over the internet
No.541804
>>540818
This is NSA-proof if you carry a lighter.
No.541810
>>541804
>implying you're not being watched by cameras
>implying people can't see you
>implying burnt paper can't be recovered
>implying your handwriting can't be analyzed and fingerprinted
>implying this amount of implications
No.541825
>>541810
>implying you're not being watched by cameras
That’s London.
>implying people can't see you
Not in my basement.
>implying burnt paper can't be recovered
If shredded in small enough pieces, it’s already very difficult to recover. Add some fire and disperse the remains and even the NSA will never bother trying anything.
>implying your handwriting can't be analyzed and fingerprinted
Just use a different writing than your usual one and wear gloves.
No.541830
>>540818
No. Only prime-factorization-based attacks become trivial with quantum computing. Most useful encrypted content isn't using prime-based encryption.
No.541833
>>540818
>All those Jews won't be able to hide from Trump
>muh privacy rights
Literally just going to kick my feet up and have a nice cold one while the Trumpstaffel take out the trash in 2017
No.541858
>>541833
>Trumpstaffel
Have a beer on me m8.
No.541892
>>541830
Elliptic curve based systems are even more vulnerable than prime factorization based ones, but you're mostly right.
No.541911
>>541858
thanks m9. always brotherhood
1P2cAkxyu63Fn63cufyv7CiMBk3CwTx39W
No.542065
>>541804
You could also store all your information on an air-gapped computer, preferably with the hard drive in a faraday cage for the rest of the time.
Although why even fucking bother meng? Until these agencies can use this technology reliably and easily and at small expense the only ones they'd bother to use it on is high-value targets.
Are you a high-value target? I thought not.
No.542126
>>541892
Nice to know. Is this a recent development? Last I heard, shor's was the only crypto-breaking quantum algorithm.
No.542149
>>542065
you sound like those faggots who said we don't need secure crypto and anonymity before the NSA revalations
No.542170
>>541830
>Most useful encrypted content isn't using prime-based encryption.
>Tor
>VPNs
>PGP
>TLS
No.542171
>>542149
You sound like those paranoid people who think the government sneaks into their house at night and fondles their children.
In short: you're just not that important anon.
No.542202
>>541825
Found the autist!
No.542262
>>542171
>implying even random activists, relatives of relatives of important people, anyone not retarded, and anyone who has a nice life that might be blackmailed into something aren't already being targetted
No.542267
>>542262
>Implying the government would spend thousands of dollars in both man hours and maintenance to pull out the quantum computer for Joe Faggot on 8chan
>implying that unless you prepare for am attack by a quantum computer, there are no worthwhile steps to take to secure your data
>implying the only worthwhile step is using a fucking notebook
All these implications anon! Where do you keep them all?!
No.542272
>>542267
different anon so i didn't imply those implications, i dont know anyone who has enough pockets for all that shit. They already have plenty of other ways in thanks to nsa/prism/javascript
taking bets on how deep into dystopia we get before we self ahnihilate or recover.
No.542278
>>541804
Your cellphone can pick up the sound wave of your pencil strokes and can be activated remotely.
>>542065
>Are you a high-value target? I thought not.
How do you know?
Also do you have curtain?
No.542395
>implying my shitposting is worth
>implying i will be alive by 2020
>implying they aren't already able
No.542422
>>540818
Not if you have your quantum computers to encrypt everything.
In the end it comes down to the balance of computing power.
No.542453
>>542170
>what is new technology?
No.542568
>>542170
Exactly, they aren't.
No.542732
We already have quantum uncomputable encryption so we could move to that if necessary.
Quantum Cryptography [32c3]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=424LHQQB2DE
No.543249
>>542732
But who do you think will have quantum computers first, the government and terrorists, or the common people?
No.544050
Just go full Osama and use sneakernets.
NSA isn't going to break down your door to steal your bits. They probably won't gain the capability to mass surveill all mesh networks either.
No.544066
I sure they are already capable. In any case, there is always quantum encryption. Which wouldn't be a bad market to get into if you had the funds.
No.547860
>quantum computers will be able to break 99% of traditional encryption within the next few decades
stop with this quantum computer meme. quantum computing is over hyped. it will indeed be an huge step in computer science, but there are already tons of quantum resistant cryptographic protocols
No.547974
>>540818
>>quantum computers will be able to break 99% of traditional encryption within the next few decades
are you having a giggle m8..... symmetric key block ciphers are not vulnerable, fag.
No.547987
>>547974
>symetric key block ciphers
Are not practical in the slightest
No.548094
How quantum computers work?
No.548110
>>541342
I believe there's already software that's been developed to sift through the raw data in a coherent fashion. I mean, think about it, would you just build something that stores everything en mass without having the proper software to inspect it if you had billions of dollars are your disposal?
>555-COME-ON-NOW.jpg
The decryption will be (and already is to some extent) done in Israel.
No.548120
>>540818
1. Make them store the haystacks and bury your information in noise. 1 byte per megabyte.
2. Buy stock in data-storage.
3. Profit.
No.548136
>>548120
Replying to myself. I actually have a better idea.
Don't make haystacks in space. Make haystacks in time.
Send the data _without_ noise encrypted with a random key-seed that has to be pumped through Argon 2 to decrypt the packet.
https://password-hashing.net/argon2-specs.pdf
Set the threshold high, like 60-seconds per packet. Now, send packets all you want. Any length.
No.548146
>>542171
Actually, I am. You have no idea how important I truly am, but then again I can't blame you for projecting.
No.548178
>>That’s London.
3-4 in every street.
>>You could also store all your information on an air-gapped computer ...
Best comment.
No.548272
>>542568
Banking/payment sites use TLS which is an important. Break that then the level of confidence in online bank is likely to be massively reduced possibly caused by the 24/7 scaremongering, click bait, unimportant shit is news worthy "news" organisations.
No.548279
>>548146
>I am important
Not if you post on 8chains amigo.
No.548295
>>548279
Trump post on /pol/, check your privilege NEETscum
No.548314
No.548325
>I'm not important
Those sounds like words a person with something to hide would say.
No.548349
>>548295
I'm sure he does anon. I'm sure he does.
PS: I bet he doesn't and even if he does it's more to pimp his brand because the residents of /pol/ are retarded