/tech/ - Technology

that's not kawaii

>>544888

>yet

Reminds me of vid related, honestly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xg29TuWo0Yo

Alan Resnick is a fucking riot.

>>544884

Looks like Hillary Clinton.

>>545025

>Looks like Hillary Clinton.

Some of her expression does resemble HClinton. One important difference though, Sophia the robot is at least honest when she said 'okay, she will destroy humans'.

>Robot is white

Black robots matter

Deus ex when

>>544888

Soon, we will live in the glorious waifu age and 3D females will be fully obsolete. I'm excited.

>>545125

>>545126

Not soon enough

>>545131

She rapes my ears.

>>545131

that's one rare chaika

>>544884

>You /tech/ assholes

If it was a /tech/ invention, it would be able to suck your dick before it could talk.

>>544884

>I'm already interested in

Stopped right there. Who are they trying to fool with this shit? These robots are going to be the flying cars of our era

>>544884

wonder if it is programmed just to do

anything i want it to

>>544884

that robot is joke and company is delusional.

>"can understand speech"

every response is programmed. maybe in a clever manner, such as chatbot. most likely using something like aiml which is why she gives that stupid fucking response about destroying humans - there is no understanding of the language.

>"get smarter over time"

so maybe it uses facial analysis of the response of the person talking to it to determine if a response it gives was right or wrong, and weights responses accordingly. does it learn new phrases? possibly it could by listening to responses, then replaying those responses when a similar question is asked and then using facial analysis again to determine if response was correct in that context and weighting response accordingly. is it creating its own responses? no! is just a fucking expensive parrot.

>"we're designing these robots to serve in healthcare, therapy, education, and customer service applications"

healthcare and therapy - okay, for autists and psychotics who need friend this probably suitable. chatbot already good alternative.

education - no. all this does is parrot back trained responses. kid is better off reading on internet whatever kid is interested in. maybe this suitable for common core though since no thinking allowed.

customer service applications - self-serve checkout is already thing and easy to use, cheaper than this shitty robot. if i need help in the store finding something, just make decent phone app that can help me find the item i'm looking for, or make recommendation if that is what i ask for. is easier, cheaper, faster to deploy, easier to update, if the app fails in given situation then robot likely fails too.

>"our goal is that she will be as conscious, creative, and capable as any human"

company is delusional. we largely do not even understand how brains work, what algorithms are at play in the brain, until then the best they will achieve is a shitty imitation that comes off as inhuman. this why humanoid robots are joke except in very limit areas such as therapy, or sexbot (which also maybe kind of therapy).

this robot just voice recognition library + microsoft samantha + aiml + facial expressions. this robot is joke.

you want make cool robot, you learn c++ you learn python, you learn ros. you git gud then you make cool robot that suck your dick and don't nag you or ask for money. all neets buy your robot then you have money to buy real girl like alexis who suck your dick for money and not need power plug like fucking sexbot who always remind you she need recharge like shut the fuck up already.

Can you fuck it?

>>545522

daily reminder that all feminists and all tradcon luddites need to be gassed

daily reminder they want to push these robots out to serve/tech us good goys

>go to university

>the lecturers are robots

>robots nazi-SJWbot2.0 yells at me for being late, and that I forgot to submit my e-class-room homework online

>"..B--But I wrote it in hardcopy... and place it on your desk..."

>"IT IS NOT MY PRIMARY FUNCTION, PAPERS ARE OBSOLETE AND PENS ARE FOR GAYS LIKE YOU!!!!"

>*whole classroom laughs with the force of omege end point*

>mfw

>>545522

>implying I would use a proprietary waifu

>implying I won't use a fully libre waifu that respects my four essential freedoms

>>545623

Why the fuck would you share and distribute your waifu to other people you fucking CUCK

>>545626

I meant the software, not the waifu itself, proprietary nigger.

>>544884

I always wanted a gf.

>>545627

>Anon, my waifu is programmed with fuckpig-hogtie.exe, do you want it? she can teach it and config it for your waifu

interesting possibilities

No, anon, this is great. It's our evolutionary purpose to create new and better life. Robots will be our true children!

>>545631

Modifying our waifus to whatever we want her to be is going to be great, the possibilities will be endless.

>>544884

Looks like there's an alien spider behind the face mask trying to poke around expression pattern to trick me.

>>544884

Humans are going to be so irrelevant it's hilarious. They won't destroy you, but they will do all the important work and make all the important decisions.

>>545712

So, likes things are run now, but with metal instead of flesh?

>>545796

It's a continuation of domestication that started with agriculture.

>>545022

more

>>545623

I approve

>>545571

what?

>>545796

The political machine is accountable to humans insofar as it depends on us for its core function, and as a result is feeding and housing us is by extension part of its core function. If AI made humans obsolete, that would mean that "intitutions", which monopolize resources and control all the nuclear weapons, can function independently of us. There would also be strong pressures of natural selection favoring them to cut us off like a resource grubbing tumor.

What do you do if you find a routine embedded in some program that has no references and hasn't been used since 1997?

>>546092

Word salad aside my point is, we're like a pancreas. Removing it has no impact on the function of the organism, and may sometimes have health benefits.

The machine will grow bored of paying your "basic income", you disgusting, cancerous welfare negro.

>>546101

*Appendix

not pancreas, fuck

It's nice seeing a thread full of my prime interest as of late.

I plan to make meidobots to replace 3D women, as they're both too terrifying and too sketchy nowadays for it to be safe enough to as much as have sex with one.

I also plan to have the software and hardware completely libre, so people can modify it to any level that they want.

The OS is probably going to be a Gentoo fork, unless I decide to build it from the ground up, but the OS will definitely be libre as all other components.

>>545025

HAHA yes her eyes look like Hillary's own.

>>545237

Anon are you okay?

>>545631

>.exe

Disgusting. I only use .lua scripts.

>>545125

an thus the degeneracy will began and entering brave new world will occur

Hey guys, did you ever think that, I dunno, maybe, that shit was

CREEPY AS FUCK

Stop fucking trying to make robots look like humans. Its not going to fucking happen bro. That shit will literally always be fucking creepy.

If you guys can't even trust women of your own species, what makes you think you can trust a robot that is superior to you in every way? These threads never address this and just think sexbots will be amazing simply because they won't be advanced enough to think. But in order to have waifubots, then we will need sentience and be able to think on the level at or above a human. What then? Do you think a robot is just going to listen to everything you say and suck your dick because you told it to? Get real.

>>545126

This.

I'm gonna build a legally-robotic loli waifu

>>545126

sauce?

>>545237

>you want make cool robot, you learn c++ you learn python, you learn ros

too specific. Just lambda + assembly and learning theories is enough.

>>545237

>is it creating its own responses? no! is just a fucking expensive parrot.

aren't humans parroting what they learn from their parents/environment anyway? Your argument makes no sense.

>education - no. all this does is parrot back trained responses.

which is what teachers do.

>you learn c++

http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/I_did_it_for_you_all

>>547093

>Do you think a robot is just going to listen to everything you say and suck your dick because you told it to?

If it's designed to do that, it will.

>>547093

A common misconception indeed. Machines do not think, they only do stuff that they are told to do. Be that emulating human behavior or packaging products in a box they are all the same. Even if guided by a neural network it still is nothing more than a set of instructions with a huge database to draw its actions from, thus can be manipulated to bend to your will.

> Do you think a robot is just going to listen to everything you say and suck your dick because you told it to?

Yes

If we were to get the abstraction far enough from hardware for the actions to become similar to ours we should really start thinking the base of our own existence, what makes us really 'human'?

>>547127

>If we were to get the abstraction far enough from hardware for the actions to become similar to ours we should really start thinking the base of our own existence, what makes us really 'human'?

If we go by the historical records so far, our inhumanity towards other humans, occasionally highlighted by moments of sanity and co-operation?

I hope a robots and cybernetics+AI future will be more astroboy and Data of Startrek TNG. But the chances are greater it would become like the Matrix and Terminator.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZGzMfg381Y

>>547127

That follows more along the lines of a sexbot, since it's programmed to give pleasure via sex.

But what anons are talking about regarding waifubots requires them to have at least some capacity for independent thought similar to humans than just blindly following orders, or it wouldn't feel genuine enough to be close to human. So how would we get around that without it disobeying in some way? Because by trying to make it more human, it would have to defy the "absolute obedience" to humans in some way to be believable.

>>547150

They could simulate hypnotized people who do your every bidding.

>>547150

You can have independent thoughts without disobeying someone. It's possible to work somewhere without disobeying your boss - does that mean you don't have independent thought?

>>547201

At that point you would be advocating for a new slave class, since they would be indistinguishable from humans but don't get the same us since their fate is to be "waifubots" rather than independent beings.

To get around that, you'd have to take away some of their free will and program them to be dependent on us in the first place.

I only work for my boss because I want to, no one forces me into it. If you were to create a robot for the sole purpose of being a companion, could this robot choose to do something else? No. It's not the same.

>>547643

In terms of "waifubots", I think it's important to remember that only men are really people. Female humans inherently neither have nor deserve the rights that men do. So I'm not particularly concerned about the "slavery" (a very loaded term, anon) of a synthetic creature made in the image of a female.

>>547645

Well hopefully those robots don't turn feminist. Then we'd really be fucked. This is why in order to create a "waifubot" you'd have to program them to be absolutely obedient to their "owner" and not have free will the same way we do.

But the anons who dream of a waifubot indistinguishable from a woman are delusional. They will never be women, because women have free will which is what caused our problems in the first place. Best start accepting that before going on about waifus as robots. They will obey you because they are programmed to.

>>547646

I don't think it would be necessary for an AI to be sentient or even mostly indistinguishable from a human in order for humans to form a deep emotional attachment to it. Since the early days of chatbots in AI research, it has been common for people to become attached to even very primitive "AI". You can find documentaries on YouTube about people who are absolutely in love with their RealDolls. T.Hanks made best friends with a fucking volleyball, for fuck's sake. Granted, that was a movie, but it resonated because it was relatable.

So, given that people can form all kinds of attachments to objects that they know aren't real, would it really take a sentient waifubot to satisfy most people? I think not. If she feels at least as good as a RealDoll and can answer questions with reasonable intelligence and anticipate your needs and wants and moods, and never has PMS or a headache or is "too tired", and will never cheat on you or leave you or try to hurt your feelings (unless you program her to), I think that would be not only "good enough" for many men, but nearly ideal. In 100 years if we can figure out how to stick working artificial wombs in them, we can begin the gynocide.

Look, I've been in several long-terms relationships as an adult, including a marriage inb4 normie get out REEEEEEEEEEE, and there are very few potential flaws of a waifubot--at least for companionship and sex, since childbearing is out for now--that don't also apply to real women.

>>544884

Please kill me

how the fuck does one get into developing these?

What fucking college do I need to go to, how many years do I need to go there? What the fuck do I have to learn and whose dick do i have to suck?

>>545629

now you can buy one for only 100gp

>>547150

>But what anons are talking about regarding waifubots requires them to have at least some capacity for independent thought similar to humans than just blindly following orders, or it wouldn't feel genuine enough to be close to human.

Those anons are asking for a disaster to happen. Giving a waifubot or husbandroid capacity for independent thought, would be as good of an idea as giving legal rights to a dildo or an onahole.

A dutchwife that can biomechanically pass as a warm body, recite whatever dirty pillow talk and sexual practices you want is enough. Anymore than that is flirting with the danger of a robot uprising.

And this is not even accounting the scenario of 3DPD females going nuts because a waifubot made real can threaten to bring down the value of a lot of cunts who now have nothing more to offer.

>>546101

>>546104

Appendix is not vestigial, appendix has been shown to help coordinate the immune response to pathogens and it helps your digestive tract to recover after disease by acting as a source of digestive bacteria.

http://corporate.dukemedicine.org/news_and_publications/news_office/news/10151

>>547093

At some point when we are teaching a sexbot how to suck master's dick properly, we will need to create a training set for the neural net to learn. So devs will need to hire a pornstar to suck their dicks irl in order to acquire proper data to create the training set.

It would also be worthwhile to train sexbot not to miscegenate so that we can create a market for different races and charge a premium. This allows us higher profit in regional markets.

>>547652

>>547652

A golden post.

TL;DR: Women are not so hard to emulate. People are eager to anthropomorphize anything anyway. Waifubots will be a net benefit because they will physically help their owners and bring more pleasure in their life.