>>546085
>Old Intel processors have disastrous security flaws even without the *intentional* backdoor features. I forget what the name of the issue is, but everything older than a certain line of the core series has a massive gaping hole.
Are you referring to that one vulnerability where a certain generation of Intel processors that had virtualization enabled could allow a program with ring 0 access to escalate to ring -2? (That was patched, right?)
Or is there more?