[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/tech/ - Technology

Catalog

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 3 per post.


File: 1459141248711.jpg (65.87 KB, 958x599, 958:599, web-browsers.jpg)

 No.552107

I'm sick of you faggots always crying like

>muh webkit

>muh botnet

>muh sjwzilla

1. Firefox is worst web browser on nix systems. I dont even have to mention all its shitty forks & clones.

>this year-10, this year

>fork firefox

>change its name

>WE CREATED A NEW BROWSER CALLED DICKMOONKEY ITS BETTER THAN ALL BROWSERS OUT THERE PLEASE USE IT

>dev team constantly add patches to their shitty browser to work with new or updated firefox extensions

All those fuckers which are using firefox forks should kill themselves.

2. Chromium is botnet. Well debotnet it. Its a fucking free software

https://github.com/gcarq/inox-patchset

I'm not a fan of chromium but we all have to admit

- v8 is best js engine. I was developing a project creating 10M svg objects, well firefox couldn't handle it.

- blink is best rendering engine.

3. luakit is awesome, even has extensions like adblock etc.

4. opera should be examined, to make sure it doesn't have any botnet.

Well for me right now;

Opera > Inox > Firefox > luakit

But have to stick with firefox because of extensions.

 No.552109

Cool patch set.


 No.552148

use lynx, links, w3m


 No.552174

>>552107

>Firefox is the worst web browser

>not vanilla konqueror

Konqueror is pretty decent if you set it up, but out of the box it sucks ass. Worst browser by far. Still a good file manager though. At least Firefox is usable and doesn't use up as much RAM as Chrome*.


 No.552190

Nigger, Opera is shit. Jump to Vivaldi like the rest of us.


 No.552198

>>552190

vivaldi is not a real browser

>>>/tech/549558


 No.552239

File: 1459154852180.png (154.69 KB, 376x428, 94:107, michael bolton still upset.png)

>webkit


 No.552247

> getting everything wrong and proud of it


 No.552345

>opera

>good

lel


 No.552769

>>552107

this thread again ?

>- v8 is best js engine. I was developing a project creating 10M svg objects, well firefox couldn't handle it.

>- blink is best rendering engine.

shilling this much

>opera should be examined

lets do it them

>what is operas licence ?

it Proprietary

>is it a botnet ?

yes

>why is it a botnet ?

because it Proprietary

the end

want a libre/free webrowser that isn't trying to put shit on your computer use gnu icecat


 No.552810

File: 1459210918730.png (342.17 KB, 394x394, 1:1, shamefurdispray.png)

>>552190

>>552345

B-but I use Opera.


 No.552815

>>552769

>because it Proprietary

>the end

People aren't going to take you seriously if you argue like this. I don't like Opera, but if I did, there would be no chance of this convincing me. You might as well just post "because I say so".


 No.552824

>>552769

>Because it is proprietary

Seriously, this bullshit again? Even if it was Open source when was the last time you actually audited a open source browser software, or even implemented your own features in it.

The only people that benefits in most cases are major cock suckers that forks the browser to shit and then next thing you know, they publish it under the banner of better browser than the original.

Take your head out of the sand kid and stop seeing botnets everywhere.>>552769


 No.552846

File: 1459214119616.png (924.59 KB, 1024x1024, 1:1, worst browser in history.png)

daily reminder


 No.552853

>>552107

>luakit

>using abandonware as your web browser

ishygddt luakit is deprecated. use qutebrowser


 No.552856

>>552815

>because it Proprietary

>the end

>People aren't going to take you seriously if you argue like this

Do you even know where you are?

>>552824

>"it's ok to trust a product that doesn't let you open it to check if it's spying on you or if it has security issues"

>"you can't look inside this browser but i assure you there's no botnet"

>"trust me"

>trying to justify using botnet proprietary browsers

Kill yourself


 No.552864

Despite OP's faggotry, Inox is a fair compromise for the moderate autist looking for speed and compatibility.


 No.553105

>>552856

Yes, I know where I am. And even here, I haven't seen anyone outright agreeing with him. That's saying something.


 No.553123

>>552815

>>552824

>when was the last time you actually audited a open source browser software, or even implemented your own features in it

I'm going to respond to you the same discrediting way you have tried to do.

when was the last time that you cared about others anon ?

When was the last time that you cared about your own freedom and others freedom

Why don't you want me to use a tool in another way, am I not free of doing what I want ?

Listen anon Free/libre software isn't only about security it's also about developing in a community.

I don't understand your shilling over proprietary software it has bean proven many times that these kind of software doesn’t give a fuck about their users expect when it's to bend them over and impose their leash up their ass.

The advantage of free/libre software is that when the dev team goes full retard you can always study/copy/redistribute it to adjust your specifications for yourself and others.

>Take your head out of the sand kid and stop seeing botnets everywhere.

So you won't mind auditing opera, internet explorer or google chrome to see if there aren't any bad features that goes against the users ? so that you can prove me wrong

oh wait you can't it's proprietary

Sorry to say anon that you don't have real arguments.

Browsers are all the same.

Only the licence really matters.


 No.553125

>>553123

Being proprietary doesn't prove something is a botnet, and being libre doesn't prove something isn't a botnet.

Since phoning home is actually rather easy to detect, it's reasonable to demand real proof.


 No.553140

Looking for a new browser to try out, help me /tech/.


 No.553155

>>553125

>Being proprietary doesn't prove something is a botnet

Intel me

https://libreboot.org/faq/#intelme

amd

https://libreboot.org/faq/#amdpsp

indeed but it is nearly impossible verify it or to correct it

libreboot is one of the very rare exception of that not everyone goes into reverse engineering that kind of system

>and being libre doesn't prove something isn't a botnet

indeed but you can verify it

This is why the trisquel community didn't put chromium in the repository

https://trisquel.info/en/forum/chromium-unconditionally-downloads-binary-blob

The "ahem" bug was fixed but

https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/2015/06/google-chrome-listening-in-to-your-room-shows-the-importance-of-privacy-defense-in-depth/

that is why you can't trust proprietary software it corrupts everything it touches that is why there are projects like libre linux

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux-libre

who deblobs the linux kernel of malicious pieces of software because yes proprietary software must be considered has malicious.

if you want a distro who hasn't got shit in it

https://www.gnu.org/distros/free-distros.html

>>553140

http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/


 No.553165

>>553155

You can't completely verify it, but you can research it. Does Opera send suspicious packages? Have you checked? If not, why not?

You seem to think that being right means you don't need evidence.


 No.553182

>>553165

>Does Opera send suspicious packages? Have you checked? If not, why not?

Why would I ?

I don't use opera

Plus I don't want to because I don't want to aid a software that isn't free/libre software

why ?

because helping them is like supporting proprietary there is no long term good that can come from that.

>You seem to think that being right means you don't need evidence.

never said that

But the evidences are everywhere you just cannot trust non free/libre software

another example (now in routers) is the TCP/32764 backdoor that was corrected but them reactivated

https://thehackernews.com/2014/04/router-manufacturers-secretly-added-tcp.html

here's the guy who discovered it

https://twitter.com/elvanderb

also list of hardware touched by it

https://wikidevi.com/wiki/TCP-32764

The community isn't going to play cat and mouse eternally , there is no point auditing software when you don't have the source code in the end it doesn’t benefit the community aka:everyone

here's another bad software that abused users

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_BMG_copy_protection_rootkit_scandal

I don't say that we don't need evidence I say that we already have to much of them.

again look at this thread

https://8ch.net/tech/res/550920.html


 No.553188

>All those fuckers which are using firefox forks should kill themselves.

Your reason for disregarding Icecat is?

Answer: You can't/never tried compiling it because you use windows.

.

>- blink is best rendering engine.

What are you smoking? Chrome couldn't even render a roundcube(or was it icecube?) interface properly last time I used it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_%28CSS%29

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_layout_engines_%28HTML5%29

>4. opera should be examined, to make sure it doesn't have any botnet.

Sure, let's find the source first.


 No.553271

>>553182

>Why would I ?

So you can maybe actually convince someone to stop using it. Incoherent rants won't do that.

And how the fuck does gathering evidence that a program is bad count as aiding it?


 No.553308

>>553271

At this point anon I don't know if you're mentally hill or if you're a troll.

>And how the fuck does gathering evidence that a program is bad count as aiding it?

-If you help a proprietary software you also help them having power over the users.

Do you understand that ?

With proprietary software it's not the users who have control of it, it's the owners, the company.

why would you want a company or even someone to subject other people ?

>So you can maybe actually convince someone to stop using it. Incoherent rants won't do that.

>implying the arguments stated weren't enough or out of context


 No.553317

I won't criticize anything else but:

>Opera gets bought out by chinks in billion dollar deal

>Both chans get shilled to use CHROpera and leave anything else

>specially "new opera" Vivaldi users are the worst heretics around now

Hmm I wonder who is behind this

Oy Vey!


 No.553319

File: 1459272202404.jpg (75.59 KB, 300x898, 150:449, 1459208928628-v.jpg)

OP, are you that faggot from the last thread who was assblassted about seamonkey?

Because that's real fuckin stupid.


 No.553329

File: 1459273253970.gif (Spoiler Image, 2 MB, 395x350, 79:70, 1459092370918-b.gif)

>>552107

This 100%. I just disable Mozilla's bullshit. Not very hard to do either. Don't tell these arch fags this.

Good job op, I'm proud of you today. Now come here and let me congratulate on your quality post.


 No.553333

>>553308

You haven't explained how gathering evidence helps the program. You've just repeated it.

And you've only given arguments for something being possible, when proving it should be simple. Not proving it when you should be able to prove it makes it look like there is no proof at all.


 No.553339

>>552174

Konqueror still outperforms firefox in a lot of places. Firefox has had 40 releases since the last major Konqueror update and it's still playing catch-up for basic things like scrolling a fucking static webpage at 60fps.


 No.553348

File: 1459274446262.jpg (25.99 KB, 640x432, 40:27, 879168491.jpg)

>>553333

>And you've only given arguments for something being possible

>shilling this much still and always

I have given proof (links and not only me)

You haven't given any proof of what you have stated

Stop the bullshit anon


 No.553542

>>553348

What am I shilling for? I've said at least once that I dislike Opera.

Why can't you give any proof that Opera is malicious, instead of proof that Opera might be malicious?


 No.553906

>caring about botnet

I want the kikes to know that I hate them


 No.553934

>>553105

> not openly agreeing is the same as disagreeing

Nice bait


 No.553938

>>553542

Not him, but i think youre talking about different things. The anon youre arguing with gets his opinion from a more fundamrntal level, the fact that opera isnt fully open source, thus not worth examening.

To restate: why put effort in devaluing a browser while it already devalued itself by not being fully open source libre free and what not

Not saying i agree with this, but you dont seem to get that


 No.553942

>>553938

I get that, but he's not just calling it proprietary, he's calling it a botnet.

It's fine to recommend against it because it's proprietary, but if you also make the claim that it's bad for your privacy, you should back that up.


 No.553949

>>553942

But anon, all proprietary things are immediately botnet! I heard it from people on the internet, so you know it's true.


 No.553953

File: 1459335959553.jpg (144 KB, 1186x1000, 593:500, 1458281167507.jpg)


 No.553956

>>553949

OP you still assmad?

KEK

I'll give you my open source code of a virus script then you'd trust and execute it just because it's open source? No?

Now I'll give you a closed source executable virus and you won't use it? Now Imma label it Google © and you'll run the code even if it rapes you. You suck proprietary dick.

Free software is very different.

Look at android's google playstore, almost every app there are botnet excluding every free software mirrored from f-droid or git releases.

Free software respects its users, proprietary is shit. A software should do what it is meant to do and not violate the manifest and takeover the user's system (e.g botnet)

Last I checked a popular PVP sidescroller proprietary software/game on android was even tracking its user's movements (gyro/accel), records audio and many more.

Analytics, bigdata and trend marketing 101. Go back when you a l33t, macfag.


 No.553959

>>553956

>OP you still assmad?

I'm not OP! Take that back! I only run the finest of open source software and never check it's source code!


 No.559570

File: 1459993043811.webm (1.57 MB, 854x480, 427:240, Even the memers.webm)

>>552239

>>552247

>>552345

>hurr durr socjuszilla lbgtfox isn't bad browser goy muh buttnetttt

>>552769

>everything needs to be open source and readable so I can never actually read the code or do anything with it beyond (((social signaling))) to autists

>>552856

>"it's ok to trust a product that doesn't let you open it to check if it's spying on you or if it has security issues"

>"you can't look inside this browser but i assure you there's no botnet"

>"trust me"

>"it's ok to trust a vehicle that doesn't let you open every single part to check if it's breaking on you or if it has stability issues"

>"you can't look inside every part of this vehicle but i assure you there's no performance loss"

>"trust me"

This is how you sound. Better not trust that monitor you're looking at, can you disassemble every single part, audit every single molecule to make sure it's not secretly beaming pictures of your fat ugly body to 4chan?

>>552853

>deprecated because I say so

>>>/suicide/

>>553123

>I can't provide an answer to a question so I'm going to move goalposts and meme just like RMS taught me to

Kill yourself.


 No.565985

I've used SRWare Iron as secondary browser for many years now, and since Palemoon can't post on 8ch anymore (browser sent no HTTP referer post failed) I need a new browser. Is there any difference between Inox and iron?


 No.566004

File: 1460667141498.png (1.24 MB, 2878x1680, 1439:840, opera.png)

>>552810

Real opera?


 No.566047

>>552107

>Still advocating Chrom*

>When the UI doesn't allow for any modification

>When tabs shrink instead of span, making using the browser with more than 10 tabs impossible

>When customization is a pain in the cunt because Google clamps down on it as much as possible

>When addons aren't nearly as robust as they are on Firefox

>Chrom*

Firefox and friends are islands of garbage in an ocean of diarrhea, which in turn is located on the shitheap Planet Webdev. The island is pure garbage, and you're stuck on a shitty planet, but at least you're on dry ground instead of wading in faeces.

I just reinstalled on this computer so I don't have any reaction images, but pretend there's an incredulous chinese cartoon face attached.


 No.566052

File: 1460672755930.jpg (832.81 KB, 1920x1200, 8:5, circle-outlines-on-grungy-….jpg)

>shitty Firefox fork

>Pale Moon is a Firefox fork

OK I kind-of agree, but if we talk comparative shittiness it still beats the pants off SJWFox v40+ and Google Botnet.

Git Vimperator on it, then gitgud!


 No.566057

File: 1460673535312.jpg (8.51 KB, 248x233, 248:233, 517[1].jpg)

>>566047

don't forget no vertical tabs and no changing the address bar to anything other than white

here I went and got one for you and I don't even use them


 No.566059

It qutebrowser keeps improving it wins fucking everything


 No.566065

File: 1460673929770.jpg (90.74 KB, 1248x868, 312:217, 1460406730482-v.jpg)

Daily reminder that SeaMonkey is the best browser. It comes with Email and ChatZilla too.


 No.566083

It looks like a lot of the stupid shit in Firefox might be optional at build time. I'm trying to do it through an ebuild but my first attempt didn't seem to do anything.


 No.566221

>>566057

This is creepy because it's Shingi with Asuka's hair, but still kinda nice.


 No.566271

BOTNET


 No.568704


 No.569971

Opera 9 through 12 were great, now Opera is just a re-flavored Chromesickle.


 No.569982

File: 1461008215085.jpg (60.61 KB, 950x609, 950:609, opera12.jpg)

>>552345

It used to be good... ;_;

I still use Opera Mail as my main email client.


 No.572350

Are there any debloated, working FF versions? I've tried so far:

Chromium/forks: unless there's a way to completely replace Omnibox with separate search bar to quickly switch between search engines these are out of the question. It's a shame since it feels more responsive than FF.

Firefox: calls home, needs ton of tweaking to make it stop. Also lots of default bloat like in Chrome.

Palemoon: fails to post on 8chan (referer error) and is broken on many sites (thanks HW).

Waterfox: memory hog, crashes often after some update made in December.


 No.572353

>>572350

Seamonkey or GNU Icecat, though I don't particularly like either myself.


 No.572489

( ˘ ³˘)❤


 No.572490

>>572353

I gave Light (https://sourceforge.net/p/lightfirefox/) a go, so far so good. Only nitpick is that Tile Tabs or other view splitting extensions don't work.


 No.572493

>>572353

I gave Light (https://sourceforge.net/p/lightfirefox/) a go, so far so good. Only nitpick is that Tile Tabs or other view splitting extensions don't work.

site is even more broken now?

Failed to connect to alacrity daemon


 No.572568

>>572350

Seamonkey m8, it's Mozilla but they keep far away from it.

It's not easy for SJWs to wrap their heads around a throbber. :^)


 No.572576

>>572353

both are awful, but at least posting works from seamonkey (if this got though)

>>572493

this was broken after all.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]