>>30
>mixed opinions
imo it's kind of a huge mess. I felt alot of cringe while watching it because alot of it felt very awkwardly formulaic but without any substance. I know Dan Harmon does the "story circle" thing which is his adaptation of Joseph Campbell's hero's journey, so alot of eps of Community come across like "Well we followed the story circle so this should all make sense"…When, for me personally, alot of the characters' motivations and actions make no sense at all, not even comedically. However, while alot of it felt like soulless normieshit, you can tell that the actors at least occasionally love what they are doing, and on top of that, here and there the writers hit gold and it will get on a little roll of being top tier funny. If you're a tv/movie nerd, then the references to tv and movies add a little spice and it's a fun/cute touch.
As another anon mentioned it gets really meta. In a way, the metashit is annoying but I feel like it also really drew me in…Because if you ignore the side of the meta-ness that is just Dan Harmon & Co. being weirdly self-depricatingly conceited–or whatever it is they are doing with that–it's also like the show is being extremely open and honest about the fact that their scripts are never done on time, they miss the target alot of the time, their shit is terrible alot of the time, they directly say that it is "inaccessible", and so on…For me, someone who rarely watches present-day sitcoms that air on regular TV and definitely had no TV and watched none of that kind of shit during 2009 when this show began, it's kind of a weird and uncomfortable look into how network TV shows function, like im being forced to look at the guts of the show while also just watching the show itself.
sorry for the rant…i honestly watched this whole thing over the course of like 5 days maybe, and have nobody to talk to about it