/tg/ - Traditional Games

I'd keep it if it's stuff like /co/ created content. They don't have a good wiki of their own. Maybe have a /co/ and /v/ portal? Like the board-tan pages are the best presentations of the concept I've seen in my chanthropology research.

I'd say with every degree of seperation from /tg/ the subject needs a magnitude more relevance to discussion. Hitler? Always relevant, both by Godwin's law in net culture and being the leading of the wwii bad guys, as well as the maker of modern fascist fashion which pervades 40k. Rebecca Black? I honestly can't think of a connection past "internet famous".

Marvel is wholly /co/ and /v/, they could have a footnote on the tabletop games that include them but there isn't enough overlap or interest.

Dwarf fortress? It is a electronic smorgasbord of simulatory charts and graphs. If you can think it then the mathematical GM will tell you what happens. There is no win condition but FUN.

>>194845

I was with you on the initial purging but it was just so tiresome to constantly deal with the autism and stubborn cuckchan fags on the wiki. Fantasy Female Armor just about took all I had. I just stick to doing some quality of life edits now. Dealing with faggots like Walrus and Furore is not how I want to spend my free time.

>>194382

>>194845

The primary issue with Wikis is that they are only able to be maintained by people with nothing worthwhile to do in their lives.

>>194848

I know what you mean, anon, no hard feelings.

>>194849

I won't disagree. I wouldn't do it myself if I didn't have so much spare time.

>>194851

I wish you good luck in your quest. I still edit occasionally and check in on the wiki a couple of times a week, if the SJW faggotry rears its head again then I will be there to help anon.

Why don't we make our own wiki, free of this shit and licensed under the holy CC BY-SA to ensure that it's truly free content.

>>194938

Spectral is worse in my opinion.

>>194939

At least he keeps his sperging out of user talk pages. If I went to a bluepilled university I could probably call his autism harassment.

>>194382

>>194845

Could you give us some example pages which best show the problem?

>>195029

Also, I would hope it goes without saying that SocJus and any other political shit goes immediately.

>>195030

When has that ever cropped up?

>>195029

Some understanding. The linking to reactions and memes sounds like an ED holdover.

>>195038

>When has that ever cropped up?

You'd be surprised. It was beginning to creep in around the edges, mostly accusations of GW beign racist. We had ourselves a Crusade back in July, it's mostly gone now.

Oh, like whining about most of their human armies containing one national stereotype or another.

>>195056

Pretty much. I believe most instances have been eliminated, but there may be a few lurking in a corner.

I told you that pushing this too hard would bring the autists out of the wood works. These guys have been on the wiki forever and take every one of their shitty irrelevant pages as sacred scripture. Now you aren't going to be able to get anything accomplished without them stalking and reverting you out of spite. Start editing under a different name would be my advice. Your current one is radioactive now.

>>195173

Yeah, I fucked up. I let the faggot provoke me into making some edits that probably shouldn't have been made. I'll lay low for a while, making minor edits, saving bigger things for a backup account I made just for this eventuality. The major offender seems to thick to leave on his own.

Why not just dump 1d4chan, create 1d8chan using the same format, and copy over whatever pages we think are worthwhile?

>>195228

>>194907

>>195225

So, what're some of the names in this rogues gallery of autism and spite?

>>195270

This endeavor is best kept focused towards content, not users. That being said, that courtesy should not be extended towards those who are unable to themselves keep personal attacks out of their work. SpectralTime's a major SJW, along with TheWiseDane. User Triacom is more autistic than malevolent, treating content as a sacred cow that should never be removed, ever.

>>195270

All the users that >>195289 named are cancer but I would like to put in a honorable mention for User A. Walrus who is a communist SJW and really pushy about shoving both of those subjects into unrelated articles. Mention capitalists around him and watch the fireworks go off.

>>195310

A real, modern-day Communist? Goodness.

Do we have a Feminazi to round them out?

Found this, it's a Trigger Warning, what should be done?

>Creepy Warning

>Almost all monsters are rapists and have bizarre views of rape. To put that into context, they don't understand how rape could be wrong, believing that rape is an expression of love and that no harm is done if both parties gain sexual pleasure from it. They don't think that there is anything wrong with a man raping a women either so they plain don't see anything wrong with rape instead of holding a double standard. That said, the rape is usually the highly-idealized "surprise sex you didn't know you wanted" kind rather than the more-realistic "ultimate violation of another being" kind.

There is paedophilia everywhere. And in some cases it's not the "adult in a childs body" kind of thing, some of the monstergirls are depicted as being young both physically and mentally.

Dwarves in particular look practically toddler-like. What's worse, the dwarf men apparently found their new women so hot that they eagerly supported the conversion, and now they're mostly extinct. (Used to be all, but was retconned) They still act like normal dwarves.

Alices are "eternal virgins". After you fuck one, she completely forgets what happened. KC tried to retcon this by revealing that they remember it subconsciously and eventually wander off to "Wonderland" where they get over this part, but seriously. Oh, and they also release a field that will mind rape you so that even if you wouldn't initially tap that ass, eventually, you will. So, no matter your official stance on the topic to begin with, eventually, you're going to snap, rape an innocent little succubus-girl, and then become her obsessive stalker who keeps surprise raping her because she keeps forgetting what sex is after you're done. Fucking hell.

If you think Dwarves or Alices are bad, then the Humpty Egg will really freak you out. Basically, there's a species of magical hyper-horny Harpy called the Jubjub Bird which is so sex mad that if an unmarried (to a monster; human women don't count) man gets too close to an unhatched jubjub bird's egg, the embryonic mamono inside is so horny before she is even born that she will impatiently force herself to hatch right there and then, becoming an egg-based slimegirl that will promptly attack and rape the man who provoked her transformation, since she considers him her husband. Yeah, that's right, you risk being raped by what are essentially magically animated self-aborted fetuses. Jesus crunchy Christ…

The Sabbath (the aforementioned loli-superiority cult) also run official mamono preschools, which they also use as brothels. There, they both happily let the girls fuck anyone who comes to visit and recruit new "members" from the pedophiles who come by.

If a mamano is into that then they'll have a passive effect that causes their husband to stay childlike in appearance.

Mamono daughters sometimes start craving sex at about preschool age. And they'll happily fuck their dads if they can't get anyone else. And most mamono moms will not only let them, they'll help them.

Altough, KC has confirmed that mamono don't rape human children. Though if an unmated mamano adopts an orphaned human child then they'll start a Hikaru Genji plan (raise him to be a spouse later). It should be noted that nothing is said about consensual sex between children since mamono children start getting sexual urges at young ages.

If you're gay, the Monster Lord doesn't want you - getting exposed to "mamono mana" will transform you into either a lusty succubus variant called an Alp (if you were a gay dude) or into a mamono (if you were a lesbian) who craves dick just as much as any other mamono. And while lesbian trysts are at least somewhat supported in-setting, expect penis to show up at some point, one way or another.

"Mamono mana" terraforms the world around monsters into the Monster Lord's vision of heaven. So even if you don't want to get involved, just letting monstergirls fuck their husbandos nearby will eventually poison the land you live on, causing more mamono to literally pop out of nowhere - your freaking pets and livestock may spontaneously transform into beastman-type mamono, and that's just for starters - plus, the very air will slowly mindrape you into supporting the Monster Lord. There are places where these effects are somewhat reduced ("green mamono realms," generally held up as KC's ineffectual attempt to water down the poison in the Kool-Aid to get his critics to drink it), but their exact nature and frequency are not always well-described. Additionally bright green mamono realms are often subtle enough that humans in it don't notice it's monster realm, complete with the corrupting effects.

>Protip: If you think this is creepy, you might not be welcome on 4chan.

>>197904

Remove that idiotic shit.

>eww! evil monsters do nasty things!

>>197904

>Protip: If you think this is creepy, you might not be welcome on 4chan.

This is obviously by a newfag or an outsider. 1d4chan shouldn't be a gateway to chan culture, /tg/ should be a gateway to 1d4chan.

I'm looking through the revision history on the MGE article and as far as I can tell, it fucking started with the "creepy shit" section and devolved from there and there's been some sort of revision and reversion war happening on the article ever since.

And here's how you know it was newfags and the tumblr shitstains who moved into 4chan after the exodus.. The article was made in march 2015.

Hey guys, I own /tg/booru. http://grognard.booru.org

While I don't think there's anything there that needs to be purged, I am having trouble preserving the content on there. The site that provides the service seems stuck on the gelbooru 0.1 software and hasn't upgraded in years. I'm a bit worried that they will inevitably collapse and the entire booru network will die.

Anyone have any ideas for preserving this booru before the inevitable happens and booru.org collapses under its own henkyness?

>>197912

Short of downloading the whole thing and using filesharing network?

No idea.

>>197904

Link to the article? If you haven't already purged this cringy shit, do so.

>>197988

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Monster_Girl_Encyclopedia

I haven't touched it yet by virtue of the fact I went to bed.

>>198005

It occurs to me that some of this info can be spread into the rest of the article as setting information, but completely removed from the "EWW RAPE! A BLOO BLOO BLOO! ;-;!!" context

>>197904

>>197905

>>197908

>>198005

The entire article should be nuked anyway. "Monster Girl Encyclopedia" is nothing but pure magical realm worse than piss whizzards and vampire loli circus brothels.

>>197914

Downloading the whole thing is kind of a crapshoot. I can't do anything from the backend so you'd have to use img board grabbing software to grab and tag everything, but the software I've found doesn't support gelbooru 0.1

>>198057

Then do it, faggot. Nothing's stopping you.

>>198070

Except for the people who want to keep the article intact.

>>198081

Make a coherent argument, and allow your fellow 8/tg/uys to pitch in with support to offer a more unified front.

>>198086

If his argument is "monsters girls are dumb!" then he's not going to win anyone over.

We're better off trying to salvage the page, rather than destroying it.

>>198094

And we salvage it by rewriting it to include the necessary information.

What's more, that fans of the work tend to see the profiles as guidelines more than an absolute canon. We look at it for the gorgeous art, not the whack-ass writing.

>>198094

Monster Girls are magical realm as fuck. They're dumb by default.

>>198248

I support this discourse, and the salt that it would produce.

>>198292

Seconded. I know jack shit about monster girls or anything related to them, so I would ask MGEfag to perform the edit.

>>198292

>>198248

>>198301

Should we tag in >>>/monster/ to give us a hand?

>>198304

I'm not sure if any help is needed. If >>198248 is to be believed, all that needs to happen is some selective purging. And if everything ends up being decided by committee, we aren't going to get shit done.

>>198305

Needed, perhaps not. However, this is their field, so they might want to help.

They may provide useful information, at least.

>>198349

What information exactly? Like why Kenkou Cross decided that Centaurs have two vaginas instead of one? (Note: This was apparently a comprmise.)

>>198357

Are you done jerking off to how much you hate monster girls?

>>198375

Not him but there is some matter of principal.

Why keep this and delete that. Etc.

Frankly I think that's the silent majority.

>>198376

I say it doesn't really concern us. monster girls are /monster/s autism and its up to them to change it.

The only thing we should do is point out its there, and let them determine what's factually incorrect. Leave it up to them and they will turn the page into a full catalog of everything monster girl.

>>198377

Bingo.

>>198375

What jerking off to how much I hate monster girls? There isn't a lot of useful information they could provide that isn't already available already. In at least two wikis, and most of it is changes KC has made as a response to people's reactions to his work.

>>198377

That's ignoring the fact 1d4chan is /tg/ so it is fa/tg/uy business to deal with and leaving it and letting it sit there goes against the number one rule of dealing with the SJW cancer which is why this whole operation with cleaning up 1d4chan started.

Tripfagging here guys. Been a /tg/ lurker for a bit and I've got some free time. Let's fix up this fucking wiki. Just made an account and am getting ready to do some hard rewrites. Already removed the "Creepy Warning." Shit was gay.

>>198248

I hear ya. If someone can go ahead and give me some places to start researching so I can go ahead and rape this article, it'd be much appreciated. That being said, it's ultimately my job to find this shit out.

I'll be skimming through the wiki and rereading this thread. If we can just continue with finding cringe-worthy or SJW trash and posting the articles here, I might be able to provide some muscle to the purging of this wiki.

>>198401

>What jerking off to how much I hate monster girls?

Post >>198357 .

That posts isn't really contributing anything now, is it? Its just someone trying to make an pot shot at Monster Girls, we should leave those kinds of stunts out of here before we start shitflinging too much.

So as I said,

Are you done jerking off to how much you hate monster girls?

>>198433

Irrelevant. Let's get to it, not point fingers.

>>198414

Nice work; glad to see another soldier in the field and not just endless plotting/complaining on this thread.

We managed to get most of the SJW shit in our last purge, though I still see things from time to time. Right now, I've been prioritizing more general cleanup; deleting/pruning articles that are shit for reasons in addition to SocJus bullshit.

>>198433

That joke is a pot shot at Kenkou Cross himself, faggot.

There are two different Centaur profiles of MGE one is the original, and another version with revisions, one of these revisions is specifically going out of it's way to say a Centaur has two vaginas and it doesn't matter which one to give birth.

The reason for this is because of pointless heated debates of Centaur anatomy, like Mermaid anatomy arguments. Someone asked KC himself and he was baffled and confused when he looked further into this and thought to himself that this would be a good compromise.

So like I said; What jerking off to how much I hate monster girls?

And to your point of Monster Girls specifically, that's a different entry and the entry to MGE is about MGE and Kenkou Cross specifically.

Here is the Monster Grill article

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Monstergirls

>>198447

You're really stubborn, aren't you?

I'm not talking about the 1d4chan articles, I'm just tired of redditors making random replies like >>198357 in attempts of scoring an "epic BTFO" against things they don't like.

Either way you don't seem to be interested in stopping your behavior since you just dodged into talking about the 1d4chan articles, even though none of them mention anything about Centaurs or Mermaids.

With that being said.

>What jerking off to how much I hate monster girls?

You just derailed your post into talking about how much Kenkou Cross and his Centaur/Mermaid are bad. Are you fucking blind?

>>198461

No, your blind to what you hate, whatever that is.

My posts relate specifically to the article itself, beyond the whole Centaur joke because you clearly didn't get it.

I specifically am making digs at Kenkou Cross himself, how this relates to Monster Girls as a whole outside the Monster Girl Encyclopedia out of a myriad of works is beyond me. The reason why the Centaur being given two vaginas instead of just saying one way or another is a weak attempt to appease autism, whether that makes Monster Girls bad or not is irrelevant.

And I didn't say Mermaids are bad either, I take it your not familiar with the arguments over Mermaid anatomy. These same arguments are made over the Centaur and it's all pure autism nothing that speaks of the quality of monster grills in itself. It's not mentioned in the article but I know that's why he did it because I was there when a lot of this monster girl stuff was concentrated in the more popular place to talk about this stuff (which Kenkou Cross scorned out of butthurt).

>>198468

Okay, I get it now. I need to use more precise wording when talking with you.

Here's my question again, lets hope it gets through you:

Are you done jerking off to how much you hate Monster Girl Encyclopedia and Kenkou Cross?

Contrary to what you believe, your posts don't actually contribute anything to the https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Monster_Girl_Encyclopedia page on 1d4chan because there's nothing relating to the article itself.

Do you understand me now?

>>198469

Again what jerking off?

You keep seeing hate that isn't there, I don't hate MGE and making jokes at people's expense and faggotry is not hatred or jerking off to that hate that you believe I have.

As far as your whole "contributing" demand thing goes you can go fuck yourself with that stick up your ass, I brought the link and the trigger warning up and my posts are about discussing the article. My joke is about Kenkou Cross and the change he made, but since this is for now a discussion about the article it relates to the article.

>>198440

Alright. I'm still doing research about extreme furfaggotry, but I'll make sure to do some general cleanup when it's shit I understand. Thank you for your work Anon.

>>198490

This. These two MG arguing faggots are adding nothing to the task at hand. Shut up, get shit done or get out.

I'm also gonna make some Declaration of Content that will need to be reread and probably changed by everybody, but will be a good starting point to reaffirm what will be tolerated on the wiki: fa/tg/uy related shit.

From the Codex: Transformers talk page:

>I think there should be a subcategory of the transformers codex that incorporates the counter culture commonly seen amongst the non-cisgender. I propose that this subcategory be called the "transgender." they are constantly changing sub classes tip keep from conforming to societies standards. As far as rules go I believe that Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner should definitely be out HQ. I'd like to see this to completion! Please contact me at left2shoothq@gmail.com

It's time to roll out.

>>198500

That sounds more like a troll than an actual SJW.

>>198501

It's certainly possible, but with the sheer amount of idiocy I've seen over the years it's hard to be sure. Once he replies, it should be easier to be sure.

>>198501

Poe's law anon, Poe's law.

Okay, here is the first write-up of the Declaration of Content:

"We, the fa/tg/uys, with the intent of designing a suitable wiki to archive significant parts of our culture and to serve as a convergence point for much of our own collected community content, have made this declaration. From this point onward, 1d4chan shall be used as a place merely for /tg/ users and people familiar with our style. No longer shall we allow shit and agendas to place itself alongside our OC. Our duty to this wiki is to preserve its unique style of commentary and purpose, while simultaneously adding to it. It is with this responsibility that we save this haven for homebrews, writefaggotry, and insight on tabletop gaming from the muddied hands of SJWs, /b/tards, and etc."

Yeah, it needs a lot of work, but I'd also like to propose another thing to go along with it: == The Scale of /tg/ Relation. == Basically, a very simple numerical scale where the lower you go, the less related to /tg/ it is.

>5: Actual tabletop games and supplements to those games. Articles on these are a given as they are the foundation for /tg/ culture and discussion. Ex. 40k, D&D, Dominion

>4: Creators, Canon Fluff, and Companies. Things that relate directly to the games themselves, including lore, the publishers, or the people who create the games. Ex. Matt Ward, The EMPRAH, WoTC

>3: /tg/ Creations. Homebrew, writefaggotry, and memes that come directly from the board itself. Very important in documenting a lot of our own additions to games and just games we've made. Arguably a more fitting 4, but I'll leave it right here. Still deserving of articles. Ex. Old Man Henderson, Time Wizards, All Homebrew pages

>2: Things like videogames, books, and supplementary products that relate to the above three. This is also for general stuff /tg/ likes. This is where you put stuff that can be talked about, but not necessarily should. Still makes for good articles. Ex. Transformers

>1: Topics that involve other boards and other sites. You can also put just about any hamfisted attempt at pushing a social, political, or any kind of agenda through tabletop games. Making articles on these? You really shouldn't. Ex. ?

0: Things that have absolutely nothing to do with tabletop games or the people who play them. Ex. 9/11.

Tell me what you think.

>>198513

I think it's good.

>>198513

>>1: Topics that involve other boards

You're right about other boards being in this category, but I think it should be noted that something of an exception has been made for board-tans and similar content, as there isn't any other place to archive it.

Aside from that, I think it's good. Maybe throw something in there about "quality content."

>>198514

>>198516

Thanks, guys. I definitely think you're right that it might require an addendum for board-tans and such content like minecraft shit. For quality, it can probably be easily added in to the Declaration right before OC and do the trick.

The whole idea of the scale is just to affirm that if it's below a three, it probably doesn't belong or should be very scarce. That being said, that was hopefully pretty obvious.

>>198519

Not a bad idea at all, anon. I'll paste the version with quality before OC and the changing of the formatting to suit the wiki and start spreading it.

>>198521

>>198521

Okay, here's the copy and pastable version: http://pastebin.com/92qGqEwr

If that's good enough for everyone, start spreading it onto talk pages of users you know are attempting to better the wiki. I'll start looking myself. Godspeed, you glorious bastards.

>>198523

I meant the actual user page, not the talk page, but that works too.

>>198606

>Adeptus Evangelion

It's homebrew so it'd stay.

>Chapter Master

It's related to a tabletop wargame so it'd stay

Other two would be relevant with homebrew too, which does exist.

>>198606

>>198620

In other words, methinks you need to settle down. Put down the whip, he's doing what we want.

>>198626

>we

He's not doing what I want, which is to purge actual SJW taint and leave it at that. Purging the SJW taint was accomplished, now I'd like this tripfag to fuck off with trying to change things that don't need to be changed.

>>198700

I'm inclined to agree with you.

We don't need hotpocketeers to purify the wiki of not-strictly-/tg/-related content. That's not the point. Extra content doesn't hurt us or the wiki.

SJW, identity politics, feminism, trigger warnings, or idiots editing articles to note how icky they are; those are things that need to be excised.

>>198714

>>198700

I'll have to agree with you both as well. As faggoty as I may be, I still acknowledge that we just want the site to be what /tg wants it to be. If the Declaration doesn't work, we can just change it, ignore it, remove it, whatever. I wasn't trying to make it entirely non-/tg/, but I was trying to word it in a way that reaffirmed its /tg/-centric nature. Obviously, I got ahead of myself after blindly spreading it around after somebody suggested it. I'll go out of may way to remove it, replace it, etc.

What we need is something we agree upon. I wasn't trying to make a final draft there, so criticism like this is not only valid, but appreciated. Should we just remove these two things and focus entirely on just containing cancerous users and their edits?

>>198728

1. Drop the trip.

2. Don't assume. The more you pigeonhole topics the more you'll find isn't "/tg/". This is the dark path tread by ye olde nazimod.

3. For fucks sake yes focus on the cancer, the whole point of this is refurbishing the wiki, pulling out the weeds. It's not a hedge that has to be perfectly filled in with content and without anything reaching out.

>>198746

/tg/ is very au naturale when it comes to it's scope of topics. The conversation goes where it goes and we're just along for the ride most of the time.

>>198746

I wonder, would you be as aggravated if he weren't a tripfag?

>otherwise, agree with your points

>>198757

I would be a little less hostile, yes.

The great accomplishment of chans, equality by ego assassination.

Heads up, there's talk about deleting the Transformative Thought Initiative page we made in the aftermath of the Great Exodus. Not sure how much it means to us these days, but thought y'all ought to know.

>>199014

Oh, and link:

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Transformative_Thought_Initiative

>>199015

Doesn't look like a substantive article. I'd be in favor of deleting it.

>>199015

Got to agree with forgefather there, it's pretty barebones. I remember the threads, sad to see it ended how it did.

>>199015

If it's too barebones, why not fluff it out?

Maybe we should put a setting history or something.

I made a thread for it, just to gauge interest.

>>195454

Can't we just get rid of any overly political bullshit from the games? I don't want right wing crybabies sucking Hitler's cock all over 1d4chan any more than I want to see SJW retards calling everything racist and sexist. I just wanna play my games of pretend without X cards on one side and burning crosses on the other.

thanks for the backup vince.

/monster/ appreciates it.

>>199096

As much as I'd like to say yes, no no you cannot.

Those sorts of "No Politics" policies never work because only "moderates" will actually follow such a ruling then the fanatics (in this case SJWs and Commies) will drown all reason out through noise and not shutting up even if they're banned while at the same time going for positions of power then shutting down the opposition entirely.

Politics are a fact of life.

>>199209

>SJWs and Commies

Well I guess /pol/acks and the likes too.

In any case I don't get this argument, as long as the whole thing is moderated by moderates who are dedicated enough, this rule will be followed. Considering injection of politics might shit up the whole wiki greatly, both the community and the content, I support the no politics policy.

>>199214

>Well I guess /pol/acks and the likes too.

The names we've got on the ones making the SJW changes are more or less on the left.

>the whole thing is moderated by moderates

Until you grow tired of the same old routine arguments and then over time stop arguing and give up over time, then the only thing people hear is the extremists.

If both sides have extremists going at it they cancel eachother out and concentrate on eachother, if only one side has them then they'll attack the moderates instead.

And people who are "moderate" and dedicated enough to argue with fanatics are fanatics or are one or two steps away from being fanatics.

>>199214

This is the big problem of this decade, left vs right is no longer a thing. It's all up vs down now. Forced inclusion vs enforced exclusion.

We're not fighting politics, we're fighting philosophies.

>>198620

>>Adeptus Evangelion

>

>It's homebrew so it'd stay.

This! It doesn't matter if something is based off anime or something else not /tg/ if the page is about a /tg/ homebrew to play said thing in tabletop form.

>>199209

>Politics are a fact of life.

And tabletop games try and ignore life as much as possible. It can work on 1d4chan (and a few other places) because "no politics" usually falls rather soundly under "not /tg/-related." There are some grey areas, such as the Communism article, but you can usually avoid political drama in that case by doing no more than describing what Commies believe, without commenting on how stupid they are for doing so.

>>199209

>Those sorts of "No Politics" policies never work because only "moderates" will actually follow such a ruling then the fanatics (in this case SJWs and Commies) will drown all reason out through noise and not shutting up even if they're banned while at the same time going for positions of power then shutting down the opposition entirely.

They do work. Just kick them out. We're here to play tabletop games, not read political theories. Real world politics has no place here whether it's from the left or the right. Extremists from either side suck ass. And I'm not a fan of right wing quacks and their brand of tyranny any more than I'm a fan of SJWs and their brand of tyranny. Both of them need to get the fuck out.

>Politics are a fact of life.

And we're playing tabletop games, not life.

>>199266

And what this guy said. It's that simple. Don't try to weasel your right wing bullshit in here just because the main focus is on the growing radical left and SJW faggots. We don't want tabletop games to be the center of this faggot war like video games was.

>>199280

This is actually a really good point, partially because cultural marxists and their ilk don't necessarily see their politics as politics. It's a way of life to them. It's an ideology that they cling to with such dedication that it affects their perception of reality, and drives them insane from cognitive dissonance and anxiety in the process.

At the end of the day, if I had to choose between some offensive Moonman racewar jokes and being told to check my privilege by some tumblr twat, I'll take Moonman in a heartbeat.

>>199430

>cultural marxists and their ilk don't necessarily see their politics as politics

Bingo. How many times have you seen them define their views as, "common decency," "not being a shitty person," or something like that?

>>199280

That only happens if your moderator is a total cuck. When we say we're keeping out politics, we mean it. We edit out any Marxist or Fascist or what ever non-/tg/ shit, and if the person keeps pushing it we get them banned.

>>199483

>we

You.

The Admins did not side with the SJWs so far but that doesn't mean going around "removing politics" will stand with every article. Especially when your only referring to two specific kinds of political ideologies/systems when you say that, ye olde systems and other systems are also "politics" as well as games which specifically defer to or otherwise involve politics whether that be world building involving settings or just outright parody and satire on the whole thing.

Keeping extreme ideological diatribe out is the only way to go, and both sections of commies and nazis should be parodied equally or not at all.

>>199487

So that's his name.

Harold, wojack, pepi, ben garrison, anon, tyrone, wade davis, john cena, gaben, and stallman. We've got quite a pantheon developing.

>>198248

While the rest sounds fucking terrible, how exactly is the creator of magical real stuff being into magical real stuff and inserting it further in his magical realm stuff relevant?

No, really, I'm kind of curious, not being sarcastic. Is he managing to ruin his magical realm by doing it too hard, or what?

I hope this isn't just about standard dislike of one of my fetishes, anon.

>>199487

Yeah they're pretty bad at doing what they preach. I'd be tempted to say it's because they hate all white people but they're even more vile and hateful toward anyone that is part of their supposed 'opressed groups' but refuse to obey them. Then they are categoru traitor for refusing to be thankful to their white middle/upper class hipster masters.

No SJW, *YOU* are the bigots. And then John was a zombie.

>>199512

To be honest, I'm not entirely sure if that's the man's actual name, or if it's just name that was slapped on by some anon somewhere and ended up sticking.

>>199512

we need a geneology and drawfags.

>>199564

Jesus Christ, that's some /sp/ tier autism.

>>199572

You left out the part where the forum allowed some jackass to write about hiroshima and nagasaki on the guy's birthday card. Then said forum let the jackasses spam pictures of old men with decaptitated monster girl heads photoshopped on pikes everywhere. Said forum also tried to do their own monster girl thing that is the most generic fucking thing ever.

KC is annoying with his fetishes but that forum has got to be the biggest joke Ive seen

>>199564

>everything related to monster girls turns men into living sperm faucets and women into cock-vacuums, even the plebbest of pleb-tier species like the Holstaurus

Shit, I love me some corruption, but jesus christ, if you build a setting, rather than a "orc rapes elf" oneshot, leave that to the higher-end magical beings, for fucks sake. Similar shit should probably go for TF.

Jesus fucking Christ, I now see where you coming from. He actually found a way to magical realm his magical realm.

>>199638

Yup. He also created a setting where, when you look at things from a rational perspective, the

>pictures of old men with decaptitated monster girl heads photoshopped on pikes everywhere

that >>199623 mentioned represent the only rational solution to enable humanity's survival. It's where the idea that MGE is grimdark comes from, people look at the corruption bullshit without KC's fetish goggles and the whole setting looks like a nightmare.

>>199814

More or less expunged where it was found, though some borderline articles are actively defended.

It was/is refurbishing, not a war.

>>199821

Yeah, pretty much. Just establish the facts, and ignore any appeals to emotion.

>>199812

The first entires that came out were little more grounded and in some were darker, he white washed it out now but the most notorious among them is the Mantango which was originally a fungus that adapted around requiring sex to spread. It didn't sound pleasant as either a girl or guy. Whole villages would be wiped out in rapid speed.

>>199886

That's listed as a letter to the admin.

>>199879

To this day, no one likes or wants the Matango.

>>199969

1. [citation needed]

2. Assuming that the statement referred to in 1 is in fact true, just because people like HowAboutNo went full /baphomet/ doesn't mean he and his gang weren't correct in their judgement of the setting or that KC isn't a shitter-shattered faggot. Ad hominem attacks and logical red herrings do not refute arguments. I'd have to see more of the argument for myself to make a definitive judgment, but considering prior evidence and my own observations on how easily-butthurt faggots tend to react when they encounter meaningless death threats on the Internet, I'm more inclined to believe that KC is in the wrong in this instance.

>>199982

they already had a repeat offense with the guy with all those death threats on his birthday card.

This is the reason he disregards the western fanbase and tells them to go with their headcannons.

>>200001

Didn't say that the trolls were in the right simply because KC was in the wrong. KC may be a faggot whose writing skills are mediocre at best, but the whole "repeated death threats" thing isn't exactly kosher either.

>>>/monster/113098

>implying I'm an MGUfag

>implying you aren't derailing this thread too

>implying it's possible to truly derail /tg/ threads

>implying I'm "mad at kc" and doing this as some form of revenge

wew lad

MGU's an interesting case, really. The whole place was just so incredibly polarized. On the one hand you had autistic waifufaggots ignoring or glossing over the setting's flaws and claiming the resulting masturbation was "canon" and on the other hand you had the autistic edgelords who recognized the flaws in the setting and went full DEUS VULT in response.

>>200007

The death threat shit can't be validated since its a direct attack and the author can fake it themselves. The card on the other hand was autistic as fuck. This situation reeks but both parties are at fault for not being clear to each other.

Anyways the people who used to be on that forum Moved to Monstergirl Redux, and have to talk to kenkou before translating his pages its.

Its all a byproduct of retard ism, not even the paladins on /monster/ went full retard. They have enough self awareness that they know its a joke.

>>200011

You can easily tell death threats are fake if the "victim" didn't go straight to the police.

>>200409

>I think too many people see this SJW thing as a right vs left debacle. It's really more a cultural authoritarian vs cultural libertarian thing.

Old news, but at least you're repeating a known point instead of spewing shit.

>>200456

>that means conservatives should shut up

If that's what you got from that then you really only read what you wanted to see. I said support of censorship can come from both political sides, and that propositioning that you need to submit to one group lest you fall to the other is a false dichotomy.

And what that anon was saying is to keep the articles on the wiki and the games in general from being too politically charged either way. I'm strictly pro-gun, but shouldn't be the focus of the medium nor should I try to change /tg/ into /k/, like SJWs making everything tumblr. I want to fight tumblr cancer, not become it.

While I do feel that nobody should try to interject their political bullshit where it isn't needed (even if I agree with it), the far right isn't giving us too much trouble and this infighting is unecessary, so let's at least agree to focus on SJWs for now. Deal?

>>200498

Fun. An entire SM chapter of Samuel L. Jackson clones is just too goddamn funny to not keep.

>>200498

No harm in a little humor.

>>200409

>are not anti-SJWs, as they would gladly support censorship so long as it censored what they don't like

You're making the mistake here of assuming SJW refers to the SJW's methods. It doesn't. It refers to their beliefs.

A lot of their methods are fine (and some aren't), just being used for the wrong causes.

Their agenda is against things that a lot of us are: straight, white, male, cisgender, non-Islamic, etc. Therefore no matter what methods they use they will be the bad guys because they've made themselves our enemies. The methods are not why we condemn them. The fact that they've set themselves against us is.

>>200489

>If that's what you got from that then you really only read what you wanted to see.

>that propositioning that you need to submit to one group lest you fall to the other is a false dichotomy.

When the fuck did I ever say 1d4chan needs to become part of the greater /pol/ish empire? Why do you keep responding in a manner that ignores the content of other people's posts and always twists the subject back to your talking points?

That anon was saying that politics should be expunged from 1d4chan because it hurts his feelings to be reminded there's a world outside his basement, which if taken at face value is pathetic. However since people lie on the internet for the stupidest reasons let alone where their ambitions are involved that looks a lot like one of the pig-shit standard SJW rear-guard action. A phony compromise to remove all politics from a space to quiet things down on the riled front so that behind the scenes SJWs can bend their efforts to subversion of the website's administration and as >>199280 says once they have power politics is everything that disagrees with them and gets banned. Hell you've already got that guy up there and let's be honest here I'd bet you a shekel that's you talking about getting people banned for posting doubleunplusgood views, great job being anti-censorship.

>>200545

Their methods are a reflection of their views, and vice-versa. And believe me, they give zero fucks about minorities that don't agree with them, I'd even argue they hate them more than the whole straight white boogeyman.

>>200561

I have a feeling that this whole argument is based off of a misunderstanding of each others viewpoints. So let me see if I can establish a better understanding of your viewpoint, and hopefully you can better understand mine.

In regards to that image, let me ask. What is our politics (other than anti-SJW of course)? Are we liberals, conservatives, libertarians, nat soc? Understand there are a lot of different viewpoints on /tg/ and this site in general, and when you say "our politics", you're being vague.

And this extends to our topic. If you wish for us to be political, fine. But what position should we take and to what degree should that reflect on the articles on 1d4chan? There's really only a few thing all users can seem to agree on (i.e. SJWs are cancer).

>getting people banned for posting certain viewpoints

This thread is a bit of a clusterfuck, so if he suggested something like that, then fuck him.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Titan_Legion_Creation_Tables Behold the fruits of our autism.

This is the first of several generator tables which /tg/ had neglected to upload and archive over the years. Because of how hap-hazard fa/tg/uy archiving is, there are enormous gaps where things are forgotten, not written for, or just not submitted. Thus, old content sometimes needs looking over to see what's missing, and should be noted for completion. These are not necessarily the same thing as stubs, but are of the same problem.

>>201804

Good on you. Getting some quality content is what's truly important, not the stable-mucking we're doing.

>>201832

>>201832

Thank you.

Though I fear that a formatting mistake I made might cause me (and others) some problems. Is there any way you know of to auto-format the tables so that slightly less time is consumed making them?

http://darkreign.org/sites/default/files/PlanetGenerator.pdf

https://www.scribd.com/doc/146712617/93851918-Warhammer-40k-Planet-Generator-V2

http://www.4shared.com/office/ChYv34s6/Dark_Heresy_Planet_Generator_v.html Same thing, just in case Dark Reign fails us.

http://www.darkreign.org/downloads/11-05-2013/xenos-generator

https://community.fantasyflightgames.com/topic/96604-xenos-empire-generator/ Might need some tweaking

https://community.fantasyflightgames.com/topic/100927-criminal-faction-generator-table/ Might also need some.

http://www.heresy-online.net/forums/showthread.php?t=116455

Necron Dynasty Generator (yes, it is different in some key ways from the Army generator, but it might be used to augment/complete it, if not as a second set of tables)

http://www.darkreign.org/downloads/11-05-2013/expanded-star-system-generator

http://www.darkreign.org/downloads/25-11-2013/40k-roleplay-emperors-tarot-supplement

These are all generators, creation tables, and further content which I'd thought of bringing over. I would ask for assistance in that matter (yes yes, you're the personal army of none, but this is within the bounds, is it not?). I've also got it into my head to type out the Cult Generator from DH 2nd Ed's Enemies Within, as I have the book in paper and binding.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Generators Just found this by accident. Last updated October of 2013. Doesn't look complete or that big, does it?

We have an opportunity here, ladies and gentlemen. Shall we use it?

>>201838

Can't help you with formatting, I'm afraid. I've usually resorted to copy/pasting an existing matrix that's more or less the shape I want and editing the values until I get the desired effect. As for adding in more tabled, I don't see why not. You'll need to find someone with an actual keyboard to help, though, I'm stuck with touchscreen shit for the weekend. Someone should make a stop at the Imperial Cult guy's thread and see if he wants his things on 1d4chan as well.

>>201847

He is me, and yes he does. Also, I'd appreciate another idea or two in there to get the ball rolling again (seem to have hit a dry spot).

I think I've fixed the problem. Now I've fixed all the Minor Xenos tables I'd spread through the Imperial factions.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Sisters_of_Battle_Order_Creation_Tables#Canonical_Orders

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Sisters_of_Battle_Order_Creation_Tables#.2Ftg.2F_Orders

Which reminds me, I found these sections, and they seem to be exclusive to the Sisters' Creation Tables. Methinks we need to spread them throughout those pages, if only to make it clear to folk what they can do/expect from them.

It occurs to me that we might begin the slow healing process of half/tg/ through projects like these. Make them remember past glories, sure, but also bringing forth the notion of competition. A rebirth of creative fervor may follow from there.

>>201850

Patriautism at its finest. I might get back into wiki editing looking at you guys' efforts.

>>201853

It's a pleasure (but never a job).

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Chaos_Space_Marine_Warband_Creation_Tables#Warband_Allies_.26_Enemies Observe. The last table there is my handiwork, with some anons' suggestions. I am going to spread it and variations on it throughout the Creation Tables. No more shall a strong but dinky Communist Empire in the Far Galactic East command a result beyond its reach.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Chaos_Warband_Creation_Tables But then there is a mess like this. Its half-formed shape, while useful for creating the foundations of entities, makes me proud to see the Titan Tables in comparison. It needs things, some obvious (and which I already have in mind), but others less so. What makes a Chaos Warband separate from a Chaos Space Marine Band, even if it also possesses Marines?

I might need to do something in tandem (or stealing bits from) the Cult generator here…

>>201859

>>201850

>>201838

>>201804

Through all of these, I make my argument: OP, may I ask that this thread (and any threads made in its mold), through your consent and the magic of Chrow, be repurposed into a 1d4chan Improvement Projects Thread, holding under its aegis the anti-SOCJUS vigilance you prescribed, the content additions argued for, and the proof-reading of old content for errors and gaps? This is not division. This is collaborating and coordinating our efforts to better the wiki, and therefore bettering all fa/tg/uys, neophytes, or curious normals who seek to use it. When a crisis emerges, we can all better be aware of it and act on it in a short amount of time.

What do you say to this?

>>202061

Well, that was a fun bit of drama only anonymous boards can do.

Time to wait on Chrow now.

One of the reasons I brought up errors is thanks to seeing editors cleaning up the old tale of Grendel, and also the Transformers army codex. I'm also reminded of the /tg/ custom pages, and how riddled with mistakes those tend to be. I distinctly remember a point years ago where I tried to go through the Eyes of Mordred, only to be put off by the scale of it.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Eyes_of_Mordred

>>202078

Thank you, Chrow.

Though, could you also put in what else is on the agenda besides eliminating SJW and political taint?

>>202090

If you want to write up some new OP text for me to slap in there, I'll gladly do so.

>>202095

OP here. If it's not too much trouble, I'd like to update the OP (keeping what's already there) to include tablegen bro's suggestions for rebuilding.

>>202096

"But do not mistake this effort for nothing more than purging, elegan/tg/entlemen. Without SocJus standing in our way, rebuilding may commence. Let us make OC, random tables, and other useful and quality content, and show that we can Get Shit Done."

>>202096

Do you have how you want to write those in set, or should I make suggestions?

>>202101

If you think it could be made better, I'm open to suggestions.

>>202096

You're going to have to be more specific than that. Just tell me what you want me to add to the OP.

>>202104

Currently working on the Cults Tables (may dig up and work in the old cult maker parts, or even make a separate thing for that), but…

I'll take a leaf from >>202098 , if you don't mind:

"One should remember that a Crusade is about claiming and creating as much as if not more than running out the heathen. If running out the SJW and the politico is comparable to clearing the land for Outremer, then what we need to do now is comparable to establishing order and building new infrastructure, healing a kingdom of wounds:

>Writing new content, like setting details, creation tables, generators, and stories

>Uploading forgotten content from the archives and elsewhere for the above, and other informational morsels

>Looking upon the old content of the wiki, the custom organizations, the campaigns, the settings, the codices, the information pages, and yes even the stories. They will need proofreading and editing to eliminate many errors big and small, to say nothing of gaps in the information

>Filling gaps wherever you find them with fresh data, or your own ideas where they could reasonably fit

It is a long work, but fa/tg/uys, neophytes, and curious normals the world over will benefit from your work. This is the rebirth of 1D4chan."

How about that?

>>202107

That's what >>202098 was supposed to be. Just add >>202108's second paragraph, it says what needs to be said.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Heretical_Cult_Creation_Tables

Ladies and Gentlemen, we have (the foundations of) our Cult Generator now.

Descriptions of things are to follow, though the expansion of the last table was my idea.

Hey, gents? On the subject of improving things…

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/List_of_Warhammer_40,000_novels

This list here. It's not just the occasional odd formatting. It's the near-complete lack of information on these titles. Perhaps most importantly, given the whole section on quality variance in the Black Library entry, there's no warning on which books to avoid or recommendations on those which should be read.

I mean, we all know the putrid glories of CS Goto, but he's hardly the only bad-to-mediocre writer in the stable, now is he?

>>200498

It's kind of a joke because Salamanders have always been the only chapter canonically all-black. Or one of the only two, I'm not sure about the Celestial Lions.

The point is people have always made some harmless (by our standards) jokes about this fact and it predate SOCJUS's appearance on the net scene by a long run.

>>203374

Not someone with a history on the page, but you're probably fine deleting the offending content. Could you post an example?

>>203406

>>203411

>>203425

Well it's interesting to us scrub anons.

Like eavesdropping on librarians talking shop.

>>194382

> deleting /pol/

Like an SJW?

OP is always a faggot.

Whatever Homebrew shit we 8niggers have done should go there 2

While cuckchan is the primary shit getter doner as far as /tg/ goes, we've done some stuff

>>203444

Aetern stuff may go in, but recommend doing it once we have the next stage of our map.

>>203443

Like an establishment who caters to neither left nor right.

>>203450

8chan IS /pol/, shitskin

>>203459

It was entirely here, and started as a create-a-setting by building off each others posts.

Smarty me, I actually copied the whole page.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_NP-VjLSHEDgjL_98bshRm1CKAYNe75c9lZl6F8IgE0/edit?usp=sharing

It was way more serious in thread, we went crazy over three nights of jamming our ideas in the doc.

>>203470

Looking back on it, maybe a third of what we did made it in the doc. I weep.

>>203443

>>203452

Is this what false flagging looks like?

>>203483

Nah, just a common troll.

It'd be false flagging if a /pol/ack pretended to be socjus and made a buzz on twitter about the wiki, or a socjus went around /pol/ screaming about how the wiki was compromised and must be filled with red pills.

>>203470

>>203472

Reading. I'm loving this so far. Corrosive god-blood, heh. Makes me think a bit of Princess Mononoke (plus some Pacific Rim). Also nice in that this whole weird, wonderful, hideous world is mostly caused by humanity's fears run out of control. They rose to the occasion, became like gods themselves, but ruined nearly everything in the process.

You should definitely get it into 1D4chan, if nothing else to keep things from happening to it.

I'm wondering if the poor bastards who run/ran the archive can extract any data from that thread. May gently ask Chrow if he can put in a word. About when did you guys run this frenzy of creation? What did you call the thread?

>>203487

Honestly, the worst we'll probably get is corrupted halfchan /tg/ and redditfags jealous/ideologically-enraged over Shoggy visiting us (and occasionally even giving us fresh content).

To put an end to the SJWs can't compromise shillery that's started flaring up again: we're not asking for a compromise. A compromise would be agreeing to some points from either side. We say "fuck you" to both. SJWs aren't going to accept the middle ground? Well, neither are we. Either keep your shit outside, or leave it you can't be separated from it.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Heretical_Cult_Creation_Tables

More expansion done to the tables, planning on yet more. Anything you spot that I missed? Do the results make sense?

>>203892

>expanding the creation tables

thank god

I seriously think /tg/ was starting to run out of OC chapters to roll

>>204675

We also have the Titans Tables up, as you might've noticed.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Monstergirls

someone is still salty about mge

Well, for starters, the big problem is that his setting design attracts an assload of roasting.

It is scarily simple to read the many complaints listed for a certain pile of festering failure and substitute(chakat link) in the demonic race and its leader from this one.

For more details, read the Monster Girl Encyclopedia page.

Forgefather?

Easy on the rhetoric. Whatever this guy's done elsewhere, I don't see that line of rhetoric causing him to back off. Let's keep refuting the nonsense he spouts here.

>>205087

Fair enough. I've been trying to limit it to things he's said in that page (both the colonialism and how evil humans are was included in his rant). I may have gotten a bit provocative, because I've noticed in the past this guy will mischaracterize and attack no matter how neutrally one's arguments are toned.

>>205117

It's funny: Every defense we make for the Imperium, every little bit of humanity we present, every slight mercy and overlooking, and it is still the kind of state every major nation in the world would decry (for one reason or another). And yet unlike the worst of them, they're either stuck with the horrendous practice, or else must do it to survive.

To speak candidly, I've always found that the 41st Millennium speaks to me far more than the gleaming utopias of Star Trek's 24th Century. More "honest," even if it is a cobbled-together mess at the best of times.

>>205172

Well, he's given up, it looks like it worked.

>>205172

The Imperium may be evil, but the values it tries to instill in its populace are good. Compare with this with Chaos, which rewards negative behavior, and while it may not punish you for acting altruistically or even merely nice, it certainly doesn't favor such actions either.

Chaos and the Imperium are both evil, but only one of them rewards you for trying to be good, even if it's futile.

>>205596

I wouldn't call the Imperium evil. Cruel, sure, but evil requires ill intent. For the most part, Imperial tyrrany is necessary to keep the populus from falling to Chaos.

>>194870

of course, Ryulong did eventually get banned from editing gamergate articles.

>>205725

Ryulong was a special case in more ways than one.

did we ever create a page for that grapple build for fighters?

the one that lets you wrestle the tarrasque with like 90% chance of pin

>>205900

Assume that we have not (or if we did, that some faggot forgot to link it correctly to the point where it is lost).

Proceed.

>>205904

Do you have a link to the archive if we even have one anymore

or the screen cap,

>>205906

Not I, sorry to say. But are there any key phrases or sentences you remember?

>>205925

"dragging the tarrasgue into /d/"

>>194382

the wiki still demonizes the imperium of man all the time

>>205926

Nope, no luck.

>>206034

You know, I had a thought. Perhaps we should make a counterpoint article to that one page:

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/How_Imperial_Life_Is_Worse_Than_You_Can_Imagine

>>206038

I think it's better to delete the article outright. It doesn't say anything that hasn't already been said in the wiki a thousand times over. It's little more than a whinefest, and the last thing we need is an arms race of whinging.

>>205926

found it

https://1d4chan.org/index.php?title=Wrassle_Baba&action=edit

>>206048

Hmm. But how do we do that without triggering a whingewar anyway?

>>206098

>clicks page

…Oh.

>>206112

Oh fuck no, Tiji is a clusterfuck. Perhaps like this, http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Calixis_Sector

Footnotes for the less developed factions with more info on the "planets of Aetern" page, and full pages for the more expansive fluff like Carstein.

https://1d4chan.org/index.php?title=Captain_Titus&curid=15686&diff=320126&oldid=314580

Not sure what to think about this edit. It made me smirk a bit, but it's also blatant self-shilling.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Queen_Neferata

This article could use some editing.

>>206535

Don't know shit about Fantasy, unfortunately. I'll make a post in the Fantasy General.

>>206594

Went through, and modified what I could. Some cancer may still remain, but as it's related to fluff I can't in good faith change it any more.

>>206535

You've done a good job from what I can tell. Nice work.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Gnolls

>Problematic

Not sure if satire, or serious.

>>206807

Ironic shitposting is shitposting

synonyms. Troublesome perhaps.

>>206818

I don't know of any archival sites, sorry. How's Aetern coming along? Any way for the ignorant to quickly catch up on it? If not, I'll just trawl through the thread when I get the chance.

>>207031

I'm afraid not yet. Holiday stuff and other things kept me out of article-making.

However, we did get more hammered out in the livebunker chat two nights ago.

As for recaps...

https://archive.is/IpfyS Thread archive.

Within the thread (well, since the thread is still up, you'll be linked there auto), >>187406 and >>189817 are your summaries. Since these summaries, we've accounted for some more worlds and people (most important of which being Cardinal Astral von Hautkopft of Carstein (a fusion of Otto von Bismarck and Cardinal Richelieu) and High Fabricator/Fabricator General Traver Vernandez of Forge Belmond), as well as the local Mechanicus Skitarii.

Each of the factions (save the Space Marines, due to their complicated birth) is linked to in the OP post for ease of access.

>>206112 Thar be our current map.

>>207429

Common low Gothic

Woops.

Anyways, good way to get Squats proper in, or should they be native?

>>206048

>>207429

A newer group of them (in terms of being younger to it than the Chaos Squats) perhaps. Got themselves a Dataslate'o'Scores, eh?

>>207474

There are no "young groups" of squats. They take ancestor worship to the absolute extreme. They'll have a connection and history going back to the dark age of technology like every squat. Perhaps they were of the same guild as the chaos squats, perhaps they're the same as in Tiji, perhaps they've circumnavigated the galaxy these past 10k years.

Begun, this Edit War has.

>>207757

Are you IP 63.245.62.157? If so, you went about it completely the wrong way. Mass blanking a bunch of pages makes you look like a troll or a vandal, more so if you don't provide an adequate reason for doing so.

>>207842

Oh hell no. Voivode1 is me.

I'm just observing what this hothead kicked off.

Mind, it'd be nice if each of those articles could be expanded to take into account /tg/ stuff…

The next round of migration is up, in case it actually happens I'm archiving with Ychan for the next half hour this thread.

>>207863

I think "re-written" would be better. You could probably cut out most of the /his/ content completely, as it's functionally identical to what you would find in a conventional wiki.

For better or for worse, I've opened up the /his/ pages issue again. Made some hacks and slashes to Communism to try and come up with an example of what these pages should look like.

>>208462

I've tried to stick to that, to no avail. Perhaps the scalpel may be more effective than the hammer?

>>208832

Also, with regards to the Oath page, I'd say it can be rewritten to focus on magical (and sometimes technological) parts and effects of oaths in fantasy and sci-fi. The "officials" and busybodies don't appear to mind that.

>>208843

That's how I saw it when newerfag intervened. I wonder if he still lurks here?

>>208844

Call me a purge-happy monodominant, but I've been working under the policy of tagging pages with the potential for quality with the tag as well, and only removing it when and if the page has been modified to suit requirements. Same consensus that was reached for the TTI page, so I'm applying it every where else.

The Walrus has awoken, prepare yourselves.

Is 1d4chan refusing to let anyone in right now for anyone else?

>>210504

Mediawiki had an update recently, try clearing your cache.

>>210506

…Nope.

Halp.

>>209286

You should add a drawing or photo of someone looking bored/depressed or just yawning. Just a suggestion off the top of my head.

>>210611

Clear cookies cache, and Web history. Try accessing the site on a different device (that you've never tried before), or a different browser, or both.

Cleaned up the Sword page, adding lulz instead of blanking (barring the paragraphs that were just whining about muh realisms). If being honest, it's probably better in the long run than a less selective purge.

>>211555

Relax, Mr. Trips. Board is just slow.

>>211555

It's like war. Endless moments of boredom punctuated by days of action. Or at least it feels that way.

>>211835

I prefer war. The enemy near always knows when he has lost.

>>210611

>>210658

You still locked out, anon?

/his/fag pages: Need we set a policy of some sort? Most can be said to be of /tg/ relevance in some way or another, but that doesn't justify carrying on about every little detail. What's the limit?

>>212871

…Fffff, yes. I might get that problem solved by building my PC. That still doesn't answer why neither Safari nor Mozilla let it work, though. It says something about "too many redirects trying to reach (that page)."

Monodominant: Does that make me some weird kind of Amalathian, then?

>>213662

Have you tried mobile? Or a different Wi-Fi network/cellular connection?

I know I'm pretty much talking to myself at this point, but I'm not sure if I can keep doing this. The imbeciles have started ganging up, their arguments only get more cringeworthy with time, and now some fuck is going through my edit history and undoing things out of spite. At the end of the day I'm just one man, against a horde with admin sympathy.

>>214502

My heart goes out to you, but if this is causing you distress, walk away. If these people are the kind I think they are, they will move on in coming months out of borebom or various other reasons.

Be the paladin, nothing they do can make you fall.

>>214502

Take a break to recover. Assuming we're dealing with sjws and not autists, they'll move on like >>214505 said, and then you can move in for the kill.

>>214516

Autists all around, I'm afraid. The SJWs were for the most part scared into hiding during the first crusade.

>>214591

Fuck, that's pretty rough. I guess I'd ask the GG thread on /v/ for advice on how to deal with autists who wiki-edit, assuming you haven't already.

>>214625

It's been done. Let us see what the sages have to say.

>>214691

/v/ and /pol/ here. I will add to >>214701 by saying that this will be a contest of attrition. Copypaste is your friend. It will make changes easier. Make the SJW autists burn out. Usually the editors have their pet projects and topics. Use that to your advantage. Find out who is editing your changes back. Then find out what other topics he hovers over. make meaningful changes to those pages as well. Keep the autistic editors guessing as to which topic of "theirs" you are going to change. This will ultimately force them to make errors. Once this happens, point out those errors to other wiki editors and continue to correct the Autist's article. Burn out on both sides is possible. To avoid burnout, have team members take over while you recharge and recoup the mental and emotional loss you will generate when facing such autism. If you can, turn the article editing into a game: What is the shortest time you can re-edit a wikipedia article?

Good luck I hope this helps you

>>214707

>Make the SJW autists burn out.

SocJus is dead and gone on 1d4chan, my friend. These are generic brand autists now.

>Find out who is editing your changes back

Done, he usually points it out anyways because he's oh-so-righteous

>Then find out what other topics he hovers over

That's invariably the last thing I edited, done.

> This will ultimately force them to make errors. Once this happens, point out those errors to other wiki editors and continue to correct the Autist's article

Would this really help? I've had similar (but not exact) occurrences before, and all it seems to do is result in me and one other faggot arguing over minutae without anything getting done on the articles.

>To avoid burnout, have team members take over while you recharge and recoup the mental and emotional loss you will generate when facing such autism

Nice if there was a team No harm meant to those who have helped, it really is appreciated. We've had hangers-on, but so far the autism has burned everyone else out.

>>214734

>Would this really help?

Yes. Generate in the autist's a sense of chaos. Even the thought of someone changing his ordered world around will create a sense of wariness in his mind. Put your opponent on edge. Even a simple edit change of "then" instead of "to" will generate chaos. Chaos is the autist's enemy. Use it.

>but so far the autism has burned everyone else out.

Regroup and assess your numbers. Formulate a plan of attack among yourselves. With limited numbers burnout must be avoided. Otherwise his autism will win out. Fight smart, not hard.

>>214741

>Generate in the autist's a

Generate in the autist's mind, a

>>214741

>Regroup and assess your numbers. Formulate a plan of attack among yourselves. With limited numbers burnout must be avoided. Otherwise his autism will win out. Fight smart, not hard.

Then, for a single moment, I shall break the pledge of anonymity.

Magnus? Vince? Anonymous IP address that was here since the beginning? If any are still with us, shall we recuperate and plan?

>>214743

If you had user IDs, it would be easier and you wouldn't need to break anonymity. This could even be planned on IRC if you wish.

On an anonymous image board such as this, ask for a roll call of anons.

Arrange a roster for people to lurk the relevant wiki pages for any sign of editor interference. Once organized will enough time zone coverage:

1) Wait for editor to change the article back.

2) If the changes occur, then re-edit the article.

3) Continue lurking pages.

4) Repeat

You may also wish to consider making a new thread with the Op as the central focus. It will get more attention than this "general improvement" thread

>>213707

Right, for some reason, it blanked out on mobile too. Trying one of the uni computers worked, though.

I might have to use these other computers for editing, plus the one I'm building.

>>214734

>We've had hangers-on, but so far the autism has burned everyone else out.

And tech difficulties plus an Ex showing up out of the blue and uni starting back up for me.

Something I've considered while I'm stuck outside the wiki is putting together the Aetern entry in here, then asking one of our roster you don't have to, Forge, but I'd be honored to edit it in. I hope you wouldn't consider such a thing clutter.

>>214743

What particular articles are hotly contested at the moment? We haven't had another "Imperium of Man" pushback since I got shut out, have we?

>>214745

Strictly speaking, the change came about because our purpose here isn't solely searching out and rousting SJWs. For those tired of that particular vigil, we laid out the rest of the tasks available.

>>214918

I wouldn't mind putting up the Aetern article, post it when ready.

>What particular articles are hotly contested at the moment? We haven't had another "Imperium of Man" pushback since I got shut out, have we?

The "Sword" page was the big one. I tried making it more succinct and less of a Wikipedia entry, Triacom got triggered by the deletion and did his usual vandalism accusation. It stopped after I got tired of arguing in circles, though the greater issue of which this is indicative–making rambling, dry, historical articles considerably shorter and a bit less dry–is still simmering in the background. I did a thorough purging of the Imperial Guard page without incident, so it doesn't look like anyone cares about demonizing the Imperium any more.

>>214993

>most important pages to work on

Tough to say. As far as the /his/fag content goes, the most egregious examples that I have seen are the "Sword" and "China" pages. The first is just pure autism, the second autism with a bit of chinaboo thrown in for good measure.

That being said, I'd prefer another opinion (and to see where Carstein-anon stands on this) before continuing.

>>214995

Also, someone's been removing the gangsta jokes in the Salamanders page because "muh edgy 12-year-old raycism." Some is still there, but significantly toned down. Make of that what you will, I personally don't see it as a major issue.

>>214995

>>214996

What an ungrateful cunt am I. Thank you for volunteering, it means all the more knowing you got burned out from this.

>>214995

>>214996

>>214997

Sword and China are wikipedia autism trying to mask themselves as being /tg/ related. They need chopping down to a manageable size and to be tabletop focused. We don't need a laymans biased history lesson. As long as they are bitching about "intersectionality" or whatever SJW buzzword is the new rage on the Salamander page then I'm content to leave it be. Don't worry about it friend. Sorry for leaving you man the wall by yourself for so long. I can only imagine how frustrating that must have been.

>>215002

*aren't bitching

>>215002

Same can be said of anything in the "History" category (which I assume was made almost entirely by a certain Arctic mammal). All the same, best way to go about this is to choke it down one spergtastic bite at a time, and set some precedent by going after the worst ones first. Arbitrarily, I pick Sword.

We'll need a plan of attack of some sort, just diving in with the cleaver didn't work so well the first time. Any thoughts? Hopefully, if this works we'll be able to get it into the heads of some users that more content is not necessarily better.

Retiring to bed now, will check thread in morning.

>>214995

>>214920

>>214993

They've gotten worse? And they've been targeting you personally? What are their arguments these days?

>>214995

>surprised

…Well then. On the /his/articles, only a brief blurb on the historical context, and the rest is given over to their use in fantasy/sci-fi/tabletop settings. Variations may be present for the weapons and personnel-type articles, statted for D&D (as an option; after all, someone might want to use a crow's beak in there).

Don't forget, never rise to personal bait. These people want you to target them so that they can say you're being unreasonable. Always pick apart their arguments, make them look ridiculous. GG playbook, won converts sometimes with argument victories

Another thing I suggest is a "charm offensive." Buttering up admins by taking care of things like stubs, generally making ourselves look passionate and helpful.

Don't lose heart, but ADVANCE, HEAD HELD HIGH

>>215020

>They've gotten worse? And they've been targeting you personally? What are their arguments these days?

That the articles should stay because medieval weapons are occasionally discussed on /tg/. Which makes sense to a point, but that doesn't justify a Wikipedia rendition, and the only effort to make the article /tg/ is a single paragraph at the end, and even that's usually just the author bitching about how fantasy doesn't match up to reality in this one specific way (the argument for this is that petty bitching is actually insightful parody and really funny to some people). There are more arguments after that, but with all the moral posturing and accusation I'm having trouble telling what they actually were. If you want to risk the cringe and see for yourself, check the Sword talk page.

>>215106

I did. You saw me in there, yes? I feel like a camel from all that dry prose. I figured that edit would put the cat among the pigeons (and give us an opening).

By the way, I've restarted work on the Heretical Cult Creation Tables, starting with fleshing out some Cult draws/Alllure. If anyone else has the book to fill in the default examples, that would speed things up. Feel free to add a new table or two, if you think it'll spice things up. Don't be afraid to do that with the Chaos Warband Tables either.

>>215126

Yeah, I checked right after posting. You still want me to post the Aetern stuff, or are you going to do it yourself?

>>215135

I might do that myself, now that I've gotten my PC built.

Tip for battling the Triacom: he likes to equate his vision for an article as the morally correct form. If you can insinuate that an edit he's trying to push "ranges from misleading to outright lying," pretty sure that's a quote from him almost verbatim he'll have a more difficult time trying to reconcile it.

>>215203

And Spectral, if he somehow manages to get involved: He doesn't have great autismal endurance, he's easily riled up, and he has the smallest, tiniest, pinprick of self-awareness. If you keep rebutting him for long enough, he'll either give up, or he'll sperg out completely, realize he made a fool of himself, and retreat check my personal page edit history for evidence.

My experience with the Walrus is that he won't actually defend why he is insisting on his editsbut instead hopes to outlast you with silent revert wars. Force him into defending his biased shit on the discussion page by calling him out on the edit description and watch him crumble due to an utter lack of debate skills.

Triacom's taken the bait. It's clear my method doesn't work, and I've gotten sick of banging my head against this particular wall anyways. Either of you care to sally?

>>215242

Got to work early in the morning. Just hopped on to check the thread before I crash. I will put in my two cents but don't be surprised if they don't jump on me not editing for months and try to dismiss me out of hand. I might need to do some other edits for a week or so so it won't look like I'm jumping in just to help you out. Thoughts?

Thanks a million, Forge, those edits should speed things up nicely.

>>215250

Even if he does check (and I don't think he will) , saying you don't have a right to edit because [reasons] seems like a great way to have a mod come down on your ass; he'll just be digging his own grave.

>>215253

Not a problem.

Is there any way to contact the site admin or the guy who made the 1d4chan wiki?

It seems that every semi-popular and active wiki will inevitably attract some autismal faggots who think they have a divine right to turn the site into their personal safe space. We seem to be dealing with several of those exact kind of individuals; People who don't actually have the expertise, knowledge, or writing ability to help the wiki, but feel entitled to fight for it as their domain and clash with anyone who would challenge their work.

Getting in contact with an owner might allow us to fast track things and just get them booted out, considering they are far more interested in having things their way, rather than having things be good.

>>215303

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikifag

There's also Assistantwikifag, who is a bit more active. You can try if you want, but both of them are leaning towards the more content=better camp, so don't be surprised if nothing comes of it.

>>215304

I do slightly agree that more content does make the wiki better. However there is a point of not making it dry and boring. If you are adding or filling in some stuff and don't have a lot to say about it, then keep it brief.

>>215310

Additionally, if all you have to add to an article is "this is icky" or "this is problematic" or "I think this is stupid and here's a 5,000 word essay why" then you're not fit to edit a wiki.

>>215310

I also agree (to a point). What I was trying to say if that there's ever a dispute about low quality content or pages, they'll err on the side of not deleting anything.

>>215316

I understand your point as well. If it is truly bad I will put it up for deletion myself. Although I am a stickler for not deleting the text before it has at lest been discussed partly on the discussion page.

>>215311

I agree here and out the door that sort of stuff goes

Anyone planning on duking it out over Sword? I understand if no one wants to, but I've been waiting for someone else to make the next move.

>>216081

I think that the sword article should rest for a couple of weeks before people try to take their hands at it again.

Any other articles that need a bit of work?

Holy shit this is bad here

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Talk:Damocles_Crusade

>>216614

With the exception of the qing dynasty stuff, which is too long, the majority is pretty concise with being no longer than three paragraphs. While it is sorta dry I will admit it is more concise than a wikipedia article for instance on the subject.

So besides some very minor edits I would say let it stay. It is a decent source to draw setting stuff

>>216645

Must have been changed since I saw it last then. I know one user said he was going to clean it up, must have followed through without my noticing.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Cubes

take a look at this shitty page

Someone's thrown in a few paragraphs of unneeded whining into the Space Marines page, and I can't be arsed to deal with it this late at night. If someone else is willing to put up with it, I'd appreciate that.

>>217915

I tried. But now they're defending even this.

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikifag#Requesting_a_permaban_for_The_Forgefather.

Just fuck my shit up fam. Modronchan is looking more appealing every day.

>>217915

>>218149

Dude it is like a meme from a long time ago.

>>218154

U wot m8? Really?

>>218157

That is basically all Cubes was. It was a somewhat silly name due to how a ton of deadly stuff came in cube form. You have borg cubes for instance or the cubes in archean smashing into each other and having constant fights on them.

>>218159

Somewhat silly Meme*

>>218159

Hmmm. Well, even if that is the case the page makes no explanation, it just has a bunch of pictures of Platonic solids, which makes it look like spam.

>>218149

Fuggit, I'm clocking out. If a group of people wants to work in a pile of shit, who am I to stop them? I'd start 1d8chan, but I no zero HTML knowledge and no way to pay for it at the moment being a full-time student.

>>218149

Looking at edit history, baleeting cubes was the last straw. It appears that you are out of touch and or new to /tg/. That said Triacom outed himself, stating how you "censor". That isn't a word I would use for removing extraneous text.

>>218173

I'm no oldfag, but I wouldn't call myself new. I'm assuming Cubes must be beyond ancient, or unpopular as a meme.

>>218189

It is pretty old, I remember some stuff around the gaming table around 8 years ago. It is pretty old, could be older than that.

>>218173

Honestly you should not delete stuff when you add the delete tag. You should put it up and then make a talk page entry of why you think it should go. One of the problems though is even with a delete tag it will probably still be there for years.

[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdZfTTmF3mQ Long ago, a celestial clock was constructed, a testimony to the very concept of time. Long ago a daemon committed the penultimate sin, and was hounded to a place colder than hell. Long ago and to this day he drags the ill fated to share his prison. Now the clock's gear are welded, melded, sprung and stripped. There are those that wish to fix it for their god, there are those who wish to break it for good, and there are those that wish to command it for their own gain. The most, however, have become so many ticks and tocks. The spring is wound tight, the pressure mounts, and the friction is burning red hot.]

 Where will you stand when the clock strikes midnight?

The Ætern Sector is a part of the [[Imperium of Man]] skirting the edges of the Veiled Regions, and within the bounds of [[Segmentum]] Tempestus. Imperial forces carved it out some three thousand years before the present, but humans have inhabited it for much longer. It is a relatively sparse region of space, only containing a few dozen stars and few planets of mineral wealth; in addition, stellar activity and climates are often colder than average in Ætern, exacerbated by the shadowy phenomena of the Veil (among other factors). The Imperium controls much of the sector, though its reach weakens further into the clouds, and ceases altogether in the region's center. Ætern is divided into four sub-sectors (technically five) surrounding the center, clockwise: Vladimur's Domain, housing the Sector Capital (Carstein), Sothoth Deeps, containing the Adeptus Mechanicus hub (Belmond), Függönyfal, the Veil-choked permanent frontier, and the Bram Highlands, paradoxically containing a seat of Ecclesiarchal control (Himmelwelt) and primary destination for a unique xenos-and-human immigration problem sector-wide. This problem is termed the Pharos Aeterno Effect, an inexplicable lure radiated across the galaxy from the sector's center, the Ænigma Damnatio, a bizarre and impossibly old doppled warp anomaly (composed of the Brass Labyrinthe and the Forever Pit below it). The Pharos draws in the unwanted, the undesirable, and the misfit in their billions every year through infectious dreams, and within Ætern they come to stay. The peoples living within all move to a rhythm of the sector, billions migrating (often in circular fashion) around the sub-sectors. It is their blood, souls, and actions which fuel Ætern, both in mild prosperity and in the coming damnation. The forces of Chaos boil within the center and rampage without, aliens swarm in from all corners of the galaxy, a Daemon-god bellows in its maze, and a great clock counts down to midnight.

Welcome to the work of [[8chan]] /tg/, a custom sector built on a whim from scratch. It is intended to serve as a setting for Fantasy Flight's [[Warhammer 40,000]] roleplaying games, and to an extent also the tabletop wargames. Work started on it back in September of 2015, and has continued on and off since then. As much of the development was not organized, this article will be continuously updated.

>>218253

>cough

Suggestions and critique welcome. I apologize for the namefagging, I wanted to make sure you knew I was back.

>>218256

Is good.

*gears, not gear.

>>218190

>Honestly you should not delete stuff when you add the delete tag. You should put it up and then make a talk page entry of why you think it should go.

I try not to, but my phone auto-highlights the field and I'm usually in too much of a hurry to notice if I'm editing form mobile.

>>218264

You might want to explain that next time, or just see if you can put it in more carefully.

Also, defend yourself calmly.

>>218261

Let's see now, and we were going to organize this the Lexicanum way, yes?

>>218268

>You might want to explain that next time, or just see if you can put it in more carefully.

>Also, defend yourself calmly.

I'm taking a break from editing, perhaps indefinite. Fighting an uphill battle with professional autists over every paragraph just isn't worth it; and calm arguments mean jack shit against a mob that think it has morality on its side.

>>218268

Don't know anymore, Aprior sector setup seems pretty good.

Will make new creation thread tonight.

>>218273

Danke.

Though, I think this: https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Oestalan_Sector

…might be a decent alternative, as it doesn't have the PROGRESS of Aprior.

>>218272

Taking a break is probably a good idea. You sound like you need a recharge and rearm.

>>218279

Huh, I wonder how many /tg/ sectors I haven't heard of. I like our take though, more is implied to be happening at any given moment.

>>218281

Not to mention the stakes are high for just about every involved faction. Plus, we have a central mystery, and others beside it.

Place does have some interesting things, though.

Holy shit forgefather, whats wrong with you? You deleted Necrodermis? No wonder they want you banned, that is completely ridiculous.

>>219187

>forgefather

is that one of ours or one of theirs?

>>219192

Ours.

>>219187

…Please tell me that was an accident.

>>219187

I moved it to the main Necron page, because it was just a couple of sentences, and added a bit more content. I'm taking something an indefinite break from editing, so I wouldn't know if anything has transpired since then.

Huh, redirect wasn't on there for some reason. Either I forgot it or it got dropped somehow. Either way, rest assured deletion was not my intent.

show my post hotwheels

Posts showing up on one screen but not the other. Posting from different ip to test.

>>221858

History should give some option, otherwise copy-pasta it back in?

>>221858

Going to the page history tab lets you view previous versions of a page. Select the one to which you want to revert, then edit and save it.

Ohhh dammit…

https://1d4chan.org/index.php?title=Category:Templates&action=edit&redlink=1

You know how you couldn't access all those organization and character templates in one place, how you couldn't even find them with the search function? Yeah, well, my attempt to make that easier backfired. Can something be done with the concept, or will we just have to hunt through the categories for them?

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Category:Warhammer_40,000/homebrew

Also, what do we do with this?

>>222251

I'm not sure what you mean.

>>222249

If you search for "Template:XX," you can find them.

>>222253

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Category:/tg/_40,000

Compare it with this page. What I'm seeing is redundancy.

>Template

Huh. It works now. That's screwy, nothing showed up until I added ":"

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Creature_Feature_Creation_Table_for_/tg

https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Grey_Knight_Brotherhood_Creation_Table

Well well well, didn't see these before. The latter came just today.

Gentlemen, I think we've helped rekindle something here.

>>222294

That's nice to hear, at least

Hey anons

I was one the furry page, and noticed this

>Antipathy toward furries on /tg/ and 4chan in general already runs high and is rooted partly in the idea of human superiority and cultural conservatism,

I'm not sure what's going on but there seems to be someone editing this stuff, not sure if it's cause for autism alarm and wanted to get your consensus.

Also again i noticed this on /tg/'s page and it seems to have been changed from in gist, furfags got furry Friday and tried to take over Wednesday and /tg/ eventually came out of that struggle

>>228532

> idea of human superiority and cultural conservatism

What

the

fuck

I think we all know why, but to restate common lore, furfags were bronies before bronies. We here might hate them because humanity stronk, but halfchan's gripe was because they literally could not stop yiffing. /b/tards have no concept of paladins, they have boners or anti-boners.

The word conservatism has no place outside of /pol/, it implies politics were involved in the mindset of the anons involved. It wasn't.

>>228532

I say edit that shit, that can't beg the question more if it was on Jeopardy.

>>228541

>>228537

>>228532

alright I did two edits on it, one removed that whole chunk and the other was a small grammar change, make sure no autist or butthurt feminazi changes it bak

>>228543

I'll try to keep an eye on it anon.

<sarcasm>Oooooooh! You "cleaned" a shitty wiki of SJW lies! How.. how… how… </sarcasm>

How sad. And pathetic. But I guess that's the path that suits you.

>>228673

>*raises paw*