[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]

/tgjim/ - TraditionalGames

I don't know what's up with other tg's moderator fetish but it's ending here.

Catalog

8chan Bitcoin address: 1NpQaXqmCBji6gfX8UgaQEmEstvVY7U32C
The next generation of Infinity is here (discussion) (contribute)
A message to the "victims" of Adelaide and the news publications writing about their "plight"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4
Max filesize is 8 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 1 per post.


File: 1414994813190.png (510 KB, 1064x2654, 532:1327, 1339030182515.png)

 No.412[Reply]

>Homosexuality

• Is a sexual deviancy
• Is related to a lifestyle which is degenerate and unhealthy
• Is dysfunctional in that a man and women are supposed to be attracted to each other not to same gender
• Is repulsive to just about everyone on an instinctual level
• Is recognized as a bad thing even on a subconscious level by faggots and fag-enablers in that they use it as a slur, insult, etc. to attack other people with
• Is promoted by jews and subversives to degenerate a nation
• Should not be tolerated in a WN society
• Should be promoted in enemy nations to undermine them with disease, lowered birthrates, moral degeneration, etc.

>Polygamy


In the case of polygyny:
• Causes increased conflict between males over a limited supply of females
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1414994732062.jpg (90.22 KB, 400x350, 8:7, 1304573871102.jpg)

 No.409[Reply]

Monarchy in a White Nationalist Society / Accept Monarchy White Man!

/new/ do you accept monarchy as the ideal form of governance most in accordance with human (white aryan) nature and the right way to go in founding a white nationalist society?

Advantages of a monarchy:

• A monarch is raised from birth to rule. Their whole lives are dedicated to advancing the interests of their people. They can't just walk out on their kingdom without dire consequences like politicians who get away with trashing a country and then live the rest of their life in relative luxury.
• They can plan ahead longer and pursue long-term strategies that wouldn't happen in a democratic society. Changing the politicians around every 4 or whatever years results in short-term thinking and political instability.
• A monarch's wealth is the wealth and success of their people. If their nation suffers then so do they. A democratically elected politician can not really say that the wealth of the country is theirs.
• A monarch is bred to rule. Only the very best and purest amongst us are to be part of the royal lineage. Politicians are bred to tell nice lies; they are deceivers after popular support, not good governance.
• People naturally prefer a monarchy. They want one leader to just rule over them… this is why the sheep usually re-elect the same person again & again & they accept rule by the jewish elite. People prefer those in their own race and a monarch ruling over his own people is much preferable to a foreigner ruling over them.
• Monarchy is hierarchical and embodies ideals of purity and good breeding; exactly what we want for our race. A royal lineage will often inbreed because they love purity so much. Having leaders that understand the importance of pure bloodlines is important for racial preservation.
• A monarch can take actions necessary to preserve their kingdom that a politician would not be able to out of fear of losing the popular vote. A monarch is a lot more powerful than some ZOG puppet politician.
• A monarch has no reason to pander to victim groups, foreigners, etc. to gain votes. Politicians always are trying to gain "the women's vote, the immigrant vote, etc". A monarch will just remove these troublesome groups.
• If a ruler is defective for some reason the people can rise up and kill them and replace them with someone next up in the line. This means a monarch is accountaPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.410

Any person running for office is:
1) Looking for power.
2) Can't obtain the office without being indebted to groups(electorate and other groups)

People who search for power are either megalomaniacs or idealists(or both), hardly the type of people you want running for office. Megalomaniacs will set the country on the path of ruin for the sake of their vanity or greed, since they won't be around long enough to see the results of their actions they can do this without worry, the common man can't see clear enough to put the blame on the right person anyway. Idealists can be safely ignored in most cases, since they lack the backing to get anything done, and the ones who have sufficient backing must pay this support back with interest and thus are compromised. All elected officials are tainted before their first work day.

In a democracy checks and balances primarily apply to the government, this essentially places all real power outside of the elected government. The media, other corporations, government departments and labor unions have officials who have power comparable to any senator, but they aren't elected, and they are more secure in their position than any elected official, this basically results in elected officials being dependent on favors by these unelected officials. Elected officials can't really do a damn thing, since if they don't comply they'll lose their power, and they will be replaced by someone who is more compliant. To reduce the power of these organizations requires time, and time is not something an elected official has, so they will either lose their power or comply. In a democracy those with power supposedly are more accountable, this simply is only the case if you believe that the ones with power are the ones sitting on the chair, only a fool would believe such a thing. The chair has the power, not the person sitting on it, the people with the real power are the ones who determine who gets to sit on the damn thing. Supposedly it is the people, but I like to think that people on here know better.

Take the media for example. The people who run the media aren't elected by the people, and it must have limited restrictions in a democracy. What can the media do?
1) Trade favorable coverage in return for having political parties and individuals change their positions on various issues.
2) Has dirt on everybody through their huge net of informants.
3) Determines what gets shown to the people, and Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.411

And so on. What can an elected figure do against these groups? Maybe a collection of elected officials can fight one group, but this is bound to end up strengthening several others.

Checks and balances are implemented in a democracy to prevent any elected official or group of officials from getting so much power that they can destroy democracy, how their power in practice is limited is through a few groups of unelected actors being too powerful for elected officials to act autonomously. The people hardly get into the picture. How this kind of beats the point of democracy should be obvious.

Hereditary forms of government simply are superior, not because they are particularly good, but because forms of government based around elections are shittier simply because they give power to people with a short planning horizon, and that these people must act radically against their own interest for the government to work. To believe in democracy you must basically believe that there are people out there who know how to run a country, who will use this knowledge for the benefit of the country, that these people are electable, that these people are allowed to do what they believe is right and that these people agree on how a country should be run and don't constantly undo the work of each other. All these conditions are required for a functional democracy, how this is a bit idealistic should be obvious. Monarchs may be self-interested, but their self-interest gets tempered by the fact that they are planning on being in power for the long haul. Simply looting and pillaging their country makes no sense. A well fed cow makes more milk than a starved one, why would a monarch impoverish his people when a wealthy people makes him wealthier? Buildings and machinery standing on his land basically belong to him, even though he may not hold the deed, so it would be in the interest of the monarch if his people can create a lot of wealth. A monarch has the luxury of being able to weaken groups over time. In a monarchy important media officials will have to look up to the ruler for favor, not the other way around like in a democracy. As long as the monarch doesn't attack too many groups at once or moves too fast he should be fine. Monarchy simply requires fewer favorable conditions to be functional, a monarch basically only needs to be able to appoint people and to evaluate them and their policies. He is born and bred to do just this.



File: 1414994692247.jpg (21.21 KB, 396x281, 396:281, 1315177027847.jpg)

 No.408[Reply]

I want to bring back prohibition in the form of:

Nobody is allowed to profit off of alcohol.

All importing of alcoholic beverages would be stopped.

Commercial-scale beer, wine, etc. producers are shut down.

Nobody can buy alcoholic beverages anymore.

They would still be allowed to produce it at home on a small scale or whatever but they would not be able to sell it to anyone or benefit from it economically.

Those who really want to drink wouldn't be stopped from doing so at all, they just have to produce it themselves, or have someone willing to produce it and give it to them free.

Those who get drunk will be punished with beatings repeat offenders will receive increasingly severe punishment.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1414994591096.jpeg (117.38 KB, 444x600, 37:50, 644542-mother-shipton-pro….jpeg)

 No.403[Reply]

MOTHER SHIPTON'S PROPHECIES

This rare collection of Mother Shipton's Prophecies was sent to us by a Nexus reader who told us that , 30 years ago, she painstakingly transcribed them and managed to smuggle them out of the Mitchell library, Sydney, now the State Library of New south Wales.

The originals were kept in a locked room, along with many other volumns of prophetic writings deemed unsuitable for viewing by the general public.

Mother Shipton reputedly was born Ursula Sontheil in 1488 in Norfolk, England, and died in 1561. She exhibited prophetic and psychic abilities from an early age. At 24 married to Toby Shipton, she eventually became known as Mother Shipton. Many of her visions came true within her own lifetime and in subsequent centuries. These rare verses from Mother Shipton seem to have prophetic indications for our times, but, of course, are open to interpretation.

 No.404

A carriage without horse will go,
disaster fill the world with woe.
In London, Primrose Hill shall be
in center hold a bishops sea.


Around the world men's thoughts will fly,
quick as the twinkling of an eye.
And water shall great wonders do,
How strange, and yet it shall come true.


Through towering hills proud men shall ride,
no horse or ass move by his side.
Beneath the water, men shall walk,
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.405

THESE VERSES WERE ON THE OUTER WRAPPINGS OF THE SCROLLS


I know I go, I know I'm free,
I know that this will come to be,
Secreted this, for this will be
found by later dynasty.


A dairy maid, a bonnie lass,
shall kick this tome as she does pass
And five generations she shall breed
before one male child does learn to read.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.406

THE FOLLOWING VERSES WERE FOUND ON A SCROLL IN ANOTHER JAR


The signs will be there for all to read;
when man shall do most heinous deed
man will ruin kinder lives;
by taking them as to their wives.
And murder foul and brutal deed:
when man will only think of greed.
and man shall walk as if asleep;
he does not look - he may not peep
And iron men the tail shall do;
and iron cart and carriage too.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.407

THE LAST PROPHECY


In nineteen hundred and twenty-six
build houses light of straw and sticks.
For then shall mighty wars be planned
and fire and swords shall sweep the land.


When pictures seem alive with movements free,
when boats like fishes swim beneath the sea.
When men like birds shall scour the sky.
Then half the world, deep drenched in blood shall die.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.



File: 1414993539372.jpg (41.76 KB, 300x510, 10:17, 1347256345834.jpg)

 No.390[Reply]

An ex muslim womyn speaks out

I am a ex-muslim womyn who was formerly married to a muslim man and I want to share my story. This article is INCREDIBLY biased & I found it offensive that such a whitewashed version of islam could be put on a public site. It tells nothing of the MILLIONS of muslim women raped or even murdered in the name of Islam.

I was married at gunpoint when I was 11 years old because a rich 60-year old man from my country decided that I was to become property and not a humyn being. My family was poor then, and my mother needed an operation so my family agreed to it because they were promised money. Of course it is normal in Arab culture to lie and cheat, so we never received the money. We went to court, but before the trial could convene, my husband had my whole family murdered in front of me as I was forced to watch. My baby brother was tied to a Mercedes Benz and dragged through the desert, while my 90-year old grandmother was stabbed. The rest of my family was locked in a barn as a dozen trucks pulled up, and were suffocated to death using diesel exhaust.

After this my “husband” who had kidnapped me and murdered my family for the crime of being poor left the country and we lived for a while in Switzerland as he had some money stashed away in a Swiss bank account. I was raped, drugged and beaten almost every night, and forced to cook dinner. If I didn’t do as my kidnapper and tormenter demanded, he would resort to violence and force me to watch videos of my family being murdered. While we were in Switzerland my husband had a friend a white Swiss man who converted to islam and sometimes he would come and join in the torture. He was an ex-SS man who worked in Auschwitz and had a number of torture implements from the war, and would take joy in torturing me and laugh maniacally as I cried out in pain.

Around this time I realized that I was lesbian as well so I attempted to ask my “husband” for a divorce. Of course since Islamic law does not permit divorce or same-sex relationships this only made the abuse even worse. I managed to escape and lived in the woods for about a month, eating mud and grass, and sometimes even drinking my own blood to stay alive. During that time I was hiding and had to sleep in an outhouse. Eventually my husband found me and he gouged out one of my eyes and amputated one of my feet with a sword for this (afterwards locking me in a dark closet with nails in the door for a weekPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1414993410302.png (507.05 KB, 913x465, 913:465, 1319868201126.png)

 No.387[Reply]

25 Signs American Women Are Being Destroyed

Has the sexual revolution been good for American women? Not at all. In fact, when you look at the facts it becomes clear that the sexual revolution has been an absolute disaster for American women. In the United States today, men have been trained to primarily view women as sex objects, and our culture has become exceedingly promiscuous. As a result, the United States leads the world in teen pregnancy, there are 19 million new STD infections every single year, more than half of all children born to women under the age of 30 are being born out of wedlock and we are witnessing the systematic breakdown of the family unit in America. And yet anyone that tries to teach our young women that they should dress modestly and keep themselves pure for marriage is severely criticized. Well, if all Americans actually did keep themselves pure until marriage, we wouldn’t have nearly the problems with STDs, teen pregnancy and abortion that we do today. The consequences of teaching our young women that they should be “free” to run around and sleep with a whole bunch of different men have been dramatic. The following are 25 signs that American women are being destroyed by the sexual revolution and our promiscuous culture…

 No.388

File: 1414993438222.jpg (110.48 KB, 720x668, 180:167, 1344243794755.jpg)

#1 There are 19 million new STD infections in the United States every single year. Approximately half of them happen to young people in the 15 to 24-year-old age bracket.

#2 It costs the U.S. health care system approximately $17,000,000,000 every single year to treat sexually transmitted diseases.

#3 There were more than 1.4 million cases of chlamydia reported in the United States in 2011. An astounding 33 percent of those cases involved Americans that were younger than 20 years of age.

#4 It is estimated that about one out of every six Americans between the ages of 14 and 49 have genital herpes.

#5 24,000 American women become infertile each year due to undiagnosed STDs.

#6 In the United States today, approximately 47 percent of all high school students have had sex.

#7 Sadly, one out of every four teen girls in the U.S. has at least one sexually transmitted disease.

#8 According to one survey, 24 percent of all U.S. teens that have STDs say that they still have unprotected sex.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

 No.389

File: 1414993460941.png (1.14 MB, 634x1105, 634:1105, 1347088082530.png)

So what can be done about any of this?

Unfortunately, turning our culture around would not be an easy thing. Loose sexuality is glorified on television, in the movies, on our radios and in our magazines. Just about everywhere you turn there are very powerful sexual images. The following is an excerpt from a recent article by Devvy Kidd…

America’s culture has come a long way since the 60s. For decades it has resembled a filthy sewer and shows no signs of returning to decency. Children are being sexualized with markets targeting little girls as young as kindergarten age. Cable television (which includes ABC, CBS, NBC) has become nothing more than a purveyor of soft porn. Sexual imagery is everywhere. The filth used to be confined to porn channels like HBO, Cinemax and others which I have never had in my home. Now, it’s the ‘big three’ (ABC, CBS, NBC) and all the other networks that consistently pump sin and sex into households every night of the week.

Meanwhile, we have raised an entire generation of young males that don’t know how to be men. Our culture has taught them to be extremely hesitant to be husbands and fathers, and instead it has taught them to be sex-obsessed idiots that want to “score” with as many women as possible.

As long as our culture pushes these values, we will continue to suffer the kinds of consequences listed above.

So what do all of you think about these things?

Do you believe that there is any hope for America?

http://www.eutimes.net/2013/01/25-signs-american-women-are-being-destroyed/



File: 1414992985182.jpg (87.76 KB, 650x464, 325:232, 1315177448413.jpg)

 No.384[Reply]

We already have genetic explanations for why blacks are more violent than other races.

For example - At one end of the androgen receptor gene, which is alternatively labeled AR or NR3C4, there are varying amounts of the trinucleotide repeats CAG and GGC. Blacks possess less of these CAG repeats.

Fewer CAG repeats causes increased transactivation of the receptor (meaning that the receptor became more activated to increase gene expression), see the research here:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8065934

Cortisol responses are another area that highlight racial differences in behavior. a new study by Way and Taylor has found that the short allele of 5-HTTLPR causes increased cortisol responses to a perceived social threat provided by the Trier Social Stress Test.

http://www.journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/bps/article/PIIS0006322309012724/abstract

Also, a new study by Armbruster et al found that the 7R allele of DRD4 causes lower cortisol responses and that this allele interacted with the long allele of 5-HTTLPR to lower cortisol response to social stress.

http://www.citeulike.org/group/6880/article/6445652
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1414992807486.jpg (62.02 KB, 595x383, 595:383, 1308763617201.jpg)

 No.382[Reply]

The reason we have starving niglets in Africa is because of white interference; it started with the white man's burden and continues on today with white guilt. Whites wanted to civilize the rest of the world and so they tried to develop Africa into a model of white society. Naturally, blacks not being whites, they did not integrate properly. The population increased and tribal life was disrupted. Once independent blacks that fought amongst each other and practiced vodoo became welfare monkeys.

After this great failure to civilize the blacks, the whites pulled out of all their African colonies (except South Africa) giving back everything to the blacks. Even in South Africa, the leadership went to blacks. The result was catastrophic; the congo wars, genocides, etc. worse than the World Wars but confined to the African continent. Whites who were exposed through the media to some of the suffering going on in Africa were once again feeling guilty; so they send foreign aid to the starving.

Starvation; a problem which nature would have corrected in one generation, thus was prolonged indefinitely. Negros became independent on the welfare for their survival & not being responsible enough to stop having children they can't feed, they multiplied. The problem is made worse by the fact they prioritize pregnant women, babies, and young children the most; those who can and often times are actively breeding. This is not all though; the African warlords take everything they want anyways from themselves and redistribute as they see fit.

A bad chief might even keep about 90% of everything for himself and his warriors. Thus foreign AID funds continuous conflict in Africa, and often fails to help even though it was intended for. Villagers are left eating nothing but boiled leaves if that even and when all else fails (they are turned away from the aid camps) they go into the forests alone to die. Thus if you truly care about Africa; leave it to the Africans to solve their own problems.


File: 1414990779023.jpg (63.65 KB, 699x244, 699:244, 1392495938005.jpg)

 No.380[Reply]

Posting on a moderator free board and enjoying true freedom.

Thank you based Jim Profit.

Just know that if you actually ban me at some point I'll fucking expose you forever as a hypocrite.


File: 1414990469711.jpg (203.55 KB, 600x648, 25:27, 1411164388258.jpg)

 No.379[Reply]

You're a fucking crybaby who can't handle things not going your way Jim. You should follow through with your beliefs since you're a mod and kill yourself.


File: 1414875930844.png (426.98 KB, 785x525, 157:105, Rika Nudes.png)

 No.372[Reply]

Here's that picture of Robert Wayne Stiles everyone has been talking about

 No.376

ROBBAAAAAYYYYY



File: 1414946499743.jpg (33.72 KB, 320x427, 320:427, 9792A0A26.jpg)

 No.375[Reply]

this board is crap


>>>/tdm/

 No.378

yours is worse



File: 1414945487001.jpg (73.79 KB, 615x409, 615:409, 1399978419039.jpg)

 No.374[Reply]

Bano?


File: 1414782733516.jpg (129.79 KB, 924x924, 1:1, africa is full of love.jpg)

 No.353[Reply]

I LOVE YOU EBOLA-CHAN!

 No.366

I wanna fuck ebola chan so bad

 No.367

>>366
Me too, bro.

 No.371

love that pic



File: 1414862636628.jpg (15.58 KB, 231x244, 231:244, tips fedora.jpg)

 No.370[Reply]

>Jim Profit claims that moderators are criminal and need to be shot in the head
>Jim Profit is a moderator now
>he refuses to shoot himself in the head
Jim Profit confirmed for hypocrite.


Delete Post [ ]
[]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
| Catalog
[ home / board list / faq / random / create / bans / search / manage / irc ] [ ]