/thirdpositionist/ - Third Positionist Politically Incorrect

>>335

What? Serious question

>>336

Don't mind him, we get a lot of shit posters here.

Anyway, could you further elaborate on your question?

>>336

If anyone was a tool of the jews it was the anarchists/SR's who would have either left russia crushed by the whites or a fucking bourgeois democracy

>>333

Wot

nice trips

>>337

Well, we all know of the key Jewish personalities involved with the Bolsheviks. Information on the SR's has been a good deal harder to find, at least for me.

This could be wrong, but the circles I come from frame the Bolshevik hatred for anything outside of their state-party apparatus (as opposed to the SR tolerance for kulaks and independent unions) as stemming from a Hebraic contempt towards Russian goyim, rather than genuine socialist inclination

>>342

Stalin was a russian nationalist, and he hated kikes

That's what started his feud with teotsky, besides, all the bolsheviks were atheists. And in On The Jewish Question, marx heavily implicates that if you destroy jewish identity that you destroy jewry.

>>343

>besides, all the bolsheviks were atheists. And in On The Jewish Question, marx heavily implicates that if you destroy jewish identity that you destroy jewry.

Well sure; Marx was an "atheist Jew" himself. He's not one to write something in the same vein as Culture of Critique by Kevin McDonald.

I myself have wondered whether pro-whites (or whatever term your prefer) should perhaps start saying Hebraic rather than Jew, simply because of how many people make the same "but they were atheists" point.

>>345

Maybe you misunderstood, but if marx is right then he is technically, no longer a jew

Either way i reccomend on the jewish question, it's in the sticky

>>346

Fair enough. In the meantime, I'll rephrase the original question to anyone who may know: were the Socialist Revolutionaries free of (important) Hebrew-descended people?

>>347

Please define "socialist revolutionaries"

Socialism is very beoad, the bolsheviks were socialist

>>348

>Socialism is very beoad, the bolsheviks were socialist

Oh cummon you know precisely who I mean

>>347

I'm unsure of their connection to the jews, if any, they were however pansy social democrats for the most part

The anarchist leadership(in russia, not in ukraine however) on the other hand I know for a fact were comprised almost entirely of jews

>>349

The black army, as far as i know was kike free

I don't know much about the failed 1919 germany revolution, but im givin to understand leadership was mostly jews

>>351

the 1919 German revolution wasn't socialist. The Wiemar Republic was a social democracy.

>>352

So? This revolution was led by figures like rosa luxemberg, and social democracy is capitalist

>>353

That's my point. Social democracy is shit.

>>354

You know the republic was forced on germany in 1918,right?

>>352

>>354

I believe >>353 is referring to the Sparticist Uprising which occurred within the German/November Revolution, which was fully communist in its mission

>>355

That's embarrassing. Did that have something to do with the treaty of Versailles?

>>356

Could you go into further detail?

>>357

Yea, they made them adopt "democracy". I bet it was because all the bickering and inefficiency of democracy makes them easier to exploit.