Why not /pol/?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks) Hide country (this board displays your country when you post if this is unchecked)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4 Max filesize is 8 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 5 per post.

File: 1439971792858.png (3.63 KB, 502x86, 251:43, you must upload an image.png)

Why not /pol/? Anonymous 08/19/15 (Wed) 08:09:52 No.371

Why do you use a board dedicated to a particular political orientation when you can use the general politics board?

Anonymous 08/19/15 (Wed) 10:31:30 No.372

Because /pol/ is not for political discussion. They are for discussing politically incorrect theories and ideas, as the name suggests. Our board is to discuss specifically the ideologies associated with the Third Position. Not news stories, not conspiracy theories, but ideology.

Anonymous 08/19/15 (Wed) 13:10:32 No.374

This type of cancer is being posted everywhere

I saw it on /leftypol/

And he showed up on /atheism/ asking why not use a general religion board

Sage and hide

Anonymous 08/19/15 (Wed) 16:07:23 No.376

/pol/ doesn't allow freedom of speech, even strasserism, national bolshevism while allowed seem to be toeing the line of what is allowed, and if you even bring up socialism you're basically asking for a ban

/leftypol/ was mostly populated at first by communists who were banned from /pol/ but now they're becoming an anarchist torture chamber with mods to reflect it

Anonymous 08/20/15 (Thu) 10:24:31 No.389

File: 1440066271839-0.jpg (31.57 KB, 458x418, 229:209, 1437702578545.jpg)

File: 1440066271839-1.jpg (179.52 KB, 500x532, 125:133, 1392769578641.jpg)

>Implying /pol/ allows discussion of any national-socialism other than the Hitler brand which is socialism in name only.

>Implying we won't just end being shouted down as being good goyim for daring to advocate worker's control of the means of production.

>Implying /pol/ isn't overly obsessed about identity politics instead of focusing on economic issues (which actually matter).

>Implying /pol/ isn't a cancerous place filled with classcucks.

>>>/gulag/

Anonymous 08/20/15 (Thu) 18:26:50 No.390

>>389

>Implying /pol/ isn't overly obsessed about identity politics instead of focusing on economic issues (which actually matter).

Hey man, let's not turn into /leftypol/ in our critique of /pol/. Identity politics and economic issues both matter, and the struggle is incoherent when unable to view the problem from both angles.

Anonymous 08/20/15 (Thu) 19:38:10 No.394

>>390

I agree with this, however I wouldn't even call our side "identity politics". Our side is merely a logical reaction to the cultural degradation of our society and attack on our race and nation.

Anonymous 08/21/15 (Fri) 18:00:40 No.410

File: 1440180040941.jpg (14.31 KB, 198x255, 66:85, 1439651087005.jpg)

>>390

That's why I said 'overly obsessed'.

I agree that identity politics (in my case religion and race) do matter but /pol/ has gone too far since that's all they talk about.

It doesn't help that most of them are complete classcucks when it comes to economic issues and would rather willingly help porky than advocate for a system that is in the best interest of the working class and by extension /pol/acks themselves.

I'm saying this as a former /leftypol/ user who got fed up with the whole thing since it's filled with anarkiddies and /marx/ is basically dead at this point.

Anonymous 10/21/15 (Wed) 21:17:27 No.542

here's a better alternative to /pol/ that aims to be unbiased in it's moderation: >>>/politics/